head tour vs pro

• Search forums
• Tennis Equipment

2023 Head Gravity Pro vs Head Gravity Tour

• Thread starter gbp1287
• Start date Aug 19, 2023
• Aug 19, 2023

Since I can't demo the Head Gravity Tour as I'm in the US, I was wondering how this racket compares to the Pro? I LOVE the Pro, great on all shots, but the main thing is it FEELS AMAZING. But unfortunately, it's just a heavier racket that I can't play much with right now. So was trying to see what the Tour is like, especially in terms of feel, compared to the Pro.  

Hall of Fame

I played with the Tour 360+ for a few years. Not the same fee as the Pro, mostly bc of the weight I thought, but still a great feel. Evenly balanced, decent pop for a low flex stick. My issue with it was maneuverability, but that kind of goes for all 100’s for me. No idea how the 360+ tour compares to the new Auxetic.  

SupahMan5000

gbp1287 said: Since I can't demo the Head Gravity Tour as I'm in the US, I was wondering how this racket compares to the Pro? I LOVE the Pro, great on all shots, but the main thing is it FEELS AMAZING. But unfortunately, it's just a heavier racket that I can't play much with right now. So was trying to see what the Tour is like, especially in terms of feel, compared to the Pro. Click to expand...

I own both. They are completely different frames. One is simply not a lighter version of the other. The Tour is based on the same frame as the MP. It is thicker beamed, has a different throat design from the Pro, and well, a completely different beam design in general. The Tour and MP are sort of like a big blade with a thin and flatter yoke design and a more or less D-shaped hoop. The Pro is eliptical all around with flattened edges, like the old Speed's were. The feel is rather different between the two. The Pro feels more solid, not only due to the heft, but it also feels more firm even though it's rated about the same. So it flexes differently. The Pro is also feels foam filled if I recall. I've loaned my one out, so can't say exactly at the moment. ETA - it isn't foam filled, just feels that way. All in all, I would say the Pro carries forth some of it's old Speed genetics whereas the MP and Tour are truly a newer design.  

• Sep 20, 2023

Also, if anyone in Europe wants to trade a Pro for my first gen Tour, lemme know. OK, I got the Pro back. Geziz, this is actually a rather good stick.  

• Sep 26, 2023

if I may borrow this thread ... I fell in love with the Gravity line in the middle of this summer. I always thought I need a firm(er) and heavy(er) racquet until I tried friends Yonex VCore Pro 97 310 which I loved, but at that time lacked power. plus, I had my elbow broken twice in past ten years (last time was 2 years ago) and realised that my elbow does not like heavier racquets. at that time I just thought that my trusty 20 years old racquet is giving me problems, but realised it's heavy racquets (tried some 310+ racquets around me just to confirm it). realised that limit is somewhere around 300/305g unstrung. someone recommended me Head Gravity line, as I am a really hard spin player and it offers good amount of spin and control. so I demoed Gravity Team and MP. honestly, didn't feel much difference between the two and as I was able to get the Gravity S at that time for a very very nice price, I got myself Gravity S. strung with Volkl V-Torque (24/23) and it plays extremely well. great spin, allows me also to play flats (which many of the demoed racquets didn't, either spin or flats) now as I have gotten back into the groove I am also getting a feeling that I am overgrowing Gravity S. and honestly, lacks a bit of a puch against heavier hitters. so I wanted to try Gravity Tour, which is not available for testing in my region, so I said okay - lets try Gravity Pro. to put it short and civil - what a racquet!! omg!! but - yes - elbow doesn't approve. I hoped that as I will play through the summer I will gain strength, which I did, but elbow remains a limiting factor. but still - I love the amount of control it gives me, and still brutal amounts of spin - i.e., if I really exaggerated and went completely for spin and not so much for depth, if the ball landed on service line, my hitting buddy could still receive it normally on the baseline. so quite a kick, I dare say. and strung with "normal" string Signum Pro Hyperion, so ... and that's a 18/20 racquet! so, since I cannot demo the Gravity Tour - how much difference in weight and swingweight there is between the two? I am thinking this way - S and MP are really close together, hardly can tell the difference between the two. if the difference between Tour and Pro is the same, then I am afraid it might still be to heavy ... any inputs maybe?  

Yurifi said: if I may borrow this thread ... I fell in love with the Gravity line in the middle of this summer. I always thought I need a firm(er) and heavy(er) racquet until I tried friends Yonex VCore Pro 97 310 which I loved, but at that time lacked power. plus, I had my elbow broken twice in past ten years (last time was 2 years ago) and realised that my elbow does not like heavier racquets. at that time I just thought that my trusty 20 years old racquet is giving me problems, but realised it's heavy racquets (tried some 310+ racquets around me just to confirm it). realised that limit is somewhere around 300/305g unstrung. someone recommended me Head Gravity line, as I am a really hard spin player and it offers good amount of spin and control. so I demoed Gravity Team and MP. honestly, didn't feel much difference between the two and as I was able to get the Gravity S at that time for a very very nice price, I got myself Gravity S. strung with Volkl V-Torque (24/23) and it plays extremely well. great spin, allows me also to play flats (which many of the demoed racquets didn't, either spin or flats) now as I have gotten back into the groove I am also getting a feeling that I am overgrowing Gravity S. and honestly, lacks a bit of a puch against heavier hitters. so I wanted to try Gravity Tour, which is not available for testing in my region, so I said okay - lets try Gravity Pro. to put it short and civil - what a racquet!! omg!! but - yes - elbow doesn't approve. I hoped that as I will play through the summer I will gain strength, which I did, but elbow remains a limiting factor. but still - I love the amount of control it gives me, and still brutal amounts of spin - i.e., if I really exaggerated and went completely for spin and not so much for depth, if the ball landed on service line, my hitting buddy could still receive it normally on the baseline. so quite a kick, I dare say. and strung with "normal" string Signum Pro Hyperion, so ... and that's a 18/20 racquet! so, since I cannot demo the Gravity Tour - how much difference in weight and swingweight there is between the two? I am thinking this way - S and MP are really close together, hardly can tell the difference between the two. if the difference between Tour and Pro is the same, then I am afraid it might still be to heavy ... any inputs maybe? Click to expand...

WYK said: I own both. They are completely different frames. One is simply not a lighter version of the other. The Tour is based on the same frame as the MP. It is thicker beamed, has a different throat design from the Pro, and well, a completely different beam design in general. The Tour and MP are sort of like a big blade with a thin and flatter yoke design and a more or less D-shaped hoop. The Pro is eliptical all around with flattened edges, like the old Speed's were. The feel is rather different between the two. The Pro feels more solid, not only due to the heft, but it also feels more firm even though it's rated about the same. So it flexes differently. The Pro is also foam filled if I recall. I've loaned my one out, so can't say exactly at the moment. All in all, I would say the Pro carries forth some of it's old Speed genetics whereas the MP and Tour are truly a newer design. Click to expand...

mpournaras said: I mean, the specs are pretty clear. Mine came in 318 strung (the Pro is 335-340). Got it up to 325 for stability and is perfect. It is still a pretty hefty step up from the S in terms of overall mass. I do not think you will find quite as much spin as you would with your S but your overall shot penetration should be better with the Tour. It is a relatively open 18x20 all things considered. I love mine. A word of advice, when you have arm issues you need to play a little less attention to price and a little more attention to what works. I have friends who have chronic arm issues and don't want to spring for new rackets that they have demoed and liked but didn't want to spend on. I know this sounds privileged but just think about it. Click to expand...

the tour is FAR more stable than the MP just wanted to get that out there.  

Professional

• Sep 27, 2023

dr325i said: There is no Foam in the Pro...or any Head racket Click to expand...

HitMoreBHs said: Hopefully never. Foam filling has a limited lifespan, and once it begins to disintegrate, the racquet feel starts to change. I like the fact that my PC600s and PT600s still play and feel as good as ever after more than a quarter century! Great feel comes from the layup and foam filling should never be necessary. Click to expand...

• Sep 28, 2023

Yurifi said: after two days of playing, all I can say is - I love this frame. and I hate this frame. love it - this is easily the best frame I have ever played with. better than my trusty old Wilson Ceramic FP. the playability and feel it offer. goosebumps! even though it is a completely control oriented frame, it has plenty of pop and it really never lets you down, even when you are on your back foot. hate it - because high static weight and swing weight are not suitable for my arm. I said to myself, that I will just try and grind through maybe I will get used to extra heft. well, I did, I played some of my best tennis with this racket. but today when I woke up I was barely able to fully extend/pull together my hand ... I think my two-times-broken-elbow is just not in state to cope with such a racket. so I have to find some middle option, to have a racket around 280-290g, stable and strong enough so I can play against anyone, with Gravity S I can play with almost anyone, but it fails against heavy hitters. or, as I wanted to do with Gravity Pro - just try and grind it against heavy hitters with Gravity S ... in the end, I am crazy enough ... Click to expand...

Hawks9451 said: A stiffer racket at a lower weight than the Gravity would be comparably stable, but would feel completely different. If you're pondering the stiff path, consider the Tecnifibre TF-X1. Incredibly stable and a pleasant, albeit totally different feel from the Gravity. I know women who are 110lbs and use this racket effectively. Really good dampening tech for arm comfort too. It's like a rubber insert that takes the sting out but leaves the sensation of clean, crisp contact. If you want to stay with flexible frames, you'll need a certain amount of weight to make it work. 300g is probably the minimum. I'm not sure what I'd recommend for a light, flexible, stable frame. Not sure it exists as such. Click to expand...

Yurifi said: there is only one problem. I had stiffer racket, not really lighter, but light - Yonex Ezone 100 300g and as much as I liked the frame it packed a bit too much power and here and there it felt a bit too stiff. so I sold it and got Gravity S (after quite some demo period) ... during the demo period I also played with VCore Pro 280 and really liked it but guess what - I was told it's too light ... maybe I'll try to get some demos like Ezone 98L, VCore 98L and maybe even Gravity MP (if they have Gravity Tour that would be a dream, I think it is on the limit but should be okay because I also tested Ezone 98 305 earlier this year and it was ok) ... Click to expand...

Juggernauts

• Oct 17, 2023

Has anyone had experience with Head Gravity Tour and Prince ATS Textreme 100P ? Both specs are quite similar.  

• Oct 18, 2023

Juggernauts said: Has anyone had experience with Head Gravity Tour and Prince ATS Textreme 100P ? Both specs are quite similar. Click to expand...

Yurifi said: I tried Speed MP and didn't like it. to pingy. tried Radical S, didn't like it, it had a really strange metallic feeling. concluded that since Gravity S and MP are so so similar, it's not worth trying Radical MP as it would be too similar. but have to get it for my hitting partner and will be able to give it a try. waiting for Extreme MP for demo (I am a heavy forehand spin player), when I was picking a racket for my wife I played a little with Boom Team L and actually loved the racket (that was the point when I also started testing Head rackets) but was told that if Ezone is too powerful, Boom MP/Pro would be also too powerful and then didn't go down that road. funfact - if Gravity Pro is the best racquet I have ever played with, then Boom Team L comes in top 3 for sure, it has a great feel, you can feel that frame is stiff, but then again, it's not, so funky. also Boom Team L was racquet which gave me the highest amounts of spin, and it was strung with a normal, round poly string (Volkl V-Star). maybe, because it is a plus lenght frame. Click to expand...

I felt that the tour could get a little launchy at times. The pro doesn’t do that. The mp lacks stability for me at 4.0 The tour is stable The pro is super stable If you want the control of the pro, but lighter, try blade v8 18x20. Twist weight and sweet spot are similar. The blade is 9 grams lighter. I’d put 3 grams in the handle to tail weight. SW 332 vs. 327  

• Oct 29, 2023

^yes, Blade 98 is similar in how it plays to Gravity Pro but in a lighter package.  

• Nov 7, 2023

How would a customized MP compare to a Pro if you get them pretty close in terms of specs? Thanks!  

ttlapointe said: How would a customized MP compare to a Pro if you get them pretty close in terms of specs? Thanks! Click to expand...

Power Player

Bionic poster.

Ryebread said: it's so unstable and the GP is incredibly stable. you really can't. you would have to add 20 grams to the hoop how would the balance work at that point? add 10-15 grams to the butt cap? just get a pro Click to expand...

ttlapointe said: I was thinking more about aiming at an underspecced GPro, like around 325-330 SW. Which I prefer to a 335 SW. I think it's pretty reasonable to bump the SW to the upper 320's and put some weight in the handle to bring the balance closer to the Gpro. Of course the GPro is more stable in stock form. But I struggled a bit with it's high SW (previous generation), on topspin OHBH mostly. Since I can't find the Tour anywhere at the moment, I'm looking to either find a low SW Gpro or tinker a bit with an MP to see how it goes. Click to expand...

Ryebread said: got it good luck!!! I have purchased three GP in the past two weeks 315-316 grams for all three. the tour is completely diff from the pro, just fyi. I would say the tour is like an MP and the MP is like a TEAM. Click to expand...

Yurifi said: interesting … I liked the MP. didn’t feel any difference between S and MP, got the S and slowly modded it and now it’s a 104” MP. but … as I play, I am getting back to my form I started longing for some 18x20 - Pro, as much as I love it, is to heavy, but Tour - does it play more like heavier 18x20 MP? or it’s still something completely different? Click to expand...

Ryebread said: MP for me is a no go I do not like playing with lead MP is not stable enough for me Tour is stable enough Pro is legendary Click to expand...

• Nov 8, 2023

Power Player said: It’s not hard to find a lighter pro. Mine is 296 sw and I just grabbed one from the store. Also you can use a thinner string and it will add only 30 pts or so. Silver 7 tour 1.25 is awesome in this frame. Click to expand...

WYK said: If you put a full bed of HyperG 120 maybe even less SW. Click to expand...

• Nov 26, 2023

dr325i said: A few to consider: - Auxetic 2.0 Prestige MPL. Very soft feel, close to gravity in stiffness, lighter, still good without any modification, great spin and control, box beam - Auxetic 2.0 Boom MP is also a great, improved layup. more powerful than the MPL though. - Gravity Tour, though different from the Gravity Pro, has the familiar plush feel, is lighter, amazing control Click to expand...

• Nov 27, 2023

nov said: Hi, can you compare Speed Pro 2022 Auxetic vs Prestige MPL Auxetic 2.0? Click to expand...

• Dec 19, 2023

I got my tour and modded it to the exact same spec as my pro -310 grams 296 sw 8 pts hl unstrung spec The feel of the tour is a lot softer. It’s plusher, but both frames feel great. I think I prefer the pro as it is more connected to the ball in a way, but then I go hit with the tour and the feel is awesome on contact so I’m glad I have both. For a match I’ll probably always start with the pro because i have more control with it. I can hit a heavier ball probably just due to the confidence I have with the frame. The tour has more free power but I don’t swing as hard so it evens out. Since they are the same spec I can easily use both for now. The tour really has a soft and classic feel so if you are into hunting down pro stocks for feel, this frame may be a better option. It’s a 100 and is easy to mod. There are a good amount of 310 gravity pros out there so that is a great option too. The gravity pro plays best for me when the weight is at least 310 and the sw is close to 330 strung. Not a frame id want weighing 300 or 305, personally. It has mass based power.  

• Apr 3, 2024

so, currently I have both, Gravity Tour and Pro for demo ... two completely different racquets. completely. first of all, Tour has Flex Groove ... or lets rather go like this. Tour is pretty much in line with the rest of the Gravity line. Morph Beam (more square like on the yoke, and sharper edge on the inside of the hoop, round on the outer edge). Flex Grove, as said. the only thing similar are grommet holes which are tighter than on the rest of the Gravity line, but then again, even though it's 18x20, the string pattern is different. if you lay Tour on Pro, strings are not overlapping, which is quite interesting. Pro has same frame shape all around, it's a nice oval shape all around the frame. and it is really really sweet to play with, like I said many times - with Gravity Pro, somehow, something happens and my shots become pacy and speedy, with a loth of depth (but not easy), and even though it's 18x20 pattern, I can still produce loads of spin. I only managed an easy half an hour session with both racquets (also testing the Vcore Pro 100L which I bumped from 280g to 305g of weight and it looks very promising) but hoping I'll be able to play more tomorrow. will keep you updated ...  

wingedeagle

• Apr 4, 2024

Ryebread said: the tour is FAR more stable than the MP just wanted to get that out there. Click to expand...

heavyD said: This is why I wish we got this in North America. I really like the GP but for me it's too heavy for multiple set play and the MP is on the other extreme of being a too light. Click to expand...

Similar threads

• Jun 20, 2020

• Nov 16, 2019
• Apr 27, 2023
• mashatennisbear
• Oct 30, 2023
• Jan 2, 2020

• Members Login
• accessories
• head tour tennis ball review

Head Tour Tennis Ball Review

The Head Tour ball is one of the most popular tennis balls in the amateur and professional game, alike – and for good reason too!

There’s nothing worse in tennis than your equipment letting you down.

This could be from being too lazy to get your racket strung regularly and watching your ball constantly sail out the back of the court, to playing with a racket far too heavy for your game and catching the ball constantly late, and it flying to the right.

Custom Fittings

Discover your perfect racket and string combo!

Another contributing factor to “frustrating tennis” is the ball.

Often the choice of ball is overlooked by club level players and organisations, but failure to recognise the benefits of a certain ball could be hurting you both in terms of performance and your finances.

In this article, we’ll take a look at the Head Tour (taking over from the Head ATP) ball and look into why we believe it should be the primary choice for your game.

10 out of 10

There are certainly a lot of tennis balls out there. But rest assured, over the years, we have literally tried them all!

A tennis ball’s ability to penetrate the court effectively and truly “pop” on serve is something we really appreciate at TheTennisBros.com.

There’s nothing more frustrating than making clean contact with a shot, only to find the ball dribbles off your string bed.

The Head Tour ball contains power in spades.

We feel it’s probably the most powerful ball out there, both before and after being smashed around for a couple of sets.

Tennis balls always lose some of their pop within a number of minutes on the tennis court, but the Head Tour balls remained reasonably steadfast in this aspect all the way up to to the end of the two-hour playtest.

Control is an aspect that we hear a lot of players talking about, whether that be in terms of their tennis racket or string.

The control aspect of a ball is something that isn’t discussed a lot, however.

How much control a tennis ball has will have a direct correlation with how easily it is able to take spin.

Additionally, a balls ability to receive spin potential is linked to the quality of the felt material, but also how well intact it is after a set of tennis or two.

You’re probably thinking I should be putting this information in the durability section, but a lot of these aspects, whether it be power, control or spin, do interconnect.

Due to the premium, professional level felt of the Head Tour Ball (and also, its great durability, which we’ll look at in a moment), its control was very good indeed.

We’ve heard some complaints from some of the more elderly female, lower level club players about these balls being “too bouncy”.

Personally, we didn’t find this to be anything near an issue and with good footwork and technique, no tennis ball out there will be “too bouncy”.

The Head Tour balls take spin extremely readily. When I use them, myself, I can literally hear the topspin fizzing off the ball!

It’s easy to press back your opponents with them, and when the stars align, you can deliver a fatal, heavy ball or flat winners without parallel.

Of course, your opponent can also hit the same type of shot at you, so be ready!

9 out of 10

Durability is one of the most important factors for club level players who do not want to be paying for brand new tennis balls every single session.

No tennis ball out there is perfectly durable. If it were, the manufacturers would be out of business as everyone could play with the same balls forever and not have to buy any again!

The Head Tour are the best it gets in terms of durability, though. They really do withstand a pounding.

Often, you’ll find you’ll get a good number of hits out of them until they become unplayable.

This is of stark contrast to the Dunlop Fort Balls, which fluff up virtually instantly!

Personally, I find a ball fluffing up during a match to be incredibly infuriating.

The moment this happens, they lose their ability to spin effectively, suddenly sending my topspin serves a foot long, instead of a foot inside the line, where they were landing previously.

When this happens, I feel much more vulnerable out there on the court as I’m fighting with a factor which is beyond my control and sometimes have to make small adjustments in my game to help deal with this.

The game of tennis requires so many small adjustments already, so don’t add in more complication by choosing an inferior tennis ball!

Another Reason Why Choosing The Right Ball Is Important

Failure to choose the right, or even a good quality tennis ball will, quite simply, hurt your bank account.

No tennis balls out there are “really cheap”, and if you choose a lower grade ball, you’ll have to replace them in practice far more often, costing you more money in the long run.

For a club level player, the Head Tour ball will last you many hits and help you cut down on some of those painfully high expenses tennis can bring!

Buy In Bulk

Do you buy your tennis balls can by can? Match by match? Training session by training session?

If you do, you’re missing a trick. I (Tom) never do this as I know I’m basically throwing away money.

The more tennis balls you buy at once from good tennis retailers, the cheaper each ball costs, and the more money you will save.

In England, where we are based, the Head Tour balls tend to average about £1.25 a tennis ball/ £5 for a can of 4.

These numbers don’t sound like they will break the bank, but when you’re buying one, two or even three cans a week for this price, the numbers soon add up.

Instead, it’s far better to bulk buy your balls from reputable online retailers, as you can get the cost per ball MUCH cheaper.

In England, providing I buy enough balls, I can get mine for about £0.80 a ball, which is insanely cheap in comparison! I tend to buy a year’s supply of balls at once to get them for the cheapest price I can.

Of course, the downside lies in the fact that you need a suitable place to store them if you do go for a larger bulk buy.

You’ll also need to make sure that you store the balls in a room with medium temperature and where conditions don’t increase and decrease too dramatically.

In our opinion, here, at TheTennisBros.com the Head Tour tennis ball is THE BEST ball on the market today.

It’s durable, powerful, easy to spin and all of these attributes contribute to maintaining a fair tennis match between opponents.

There’s a reason the pros use this ball, so be sure to give it a try!

Discover The Perfect Racket and String For Your Game With Our Famous Custom Fitting Service!

Get the Head ATP Ball for the Best Price from RacquetGuys!

41 Lessons · $49.00

Doubles Tactics

Supercharge Your Doubles With TheTennisBros.com

10 Lessons · $35.00

The Art of Volleying

Become clinical at the net with our in depth volleying walkthroughs!

35 Lessons · $49.00

Singles Tactics

Outsmart your opponent with superior tactics! Our strategies can be quickly implemented for instant results!

We save you time and money by doing the painful research process for you!

No more frustration in your game, due to your equipment failing you!

Start playing the best tennis of your life and win more matches!

Get Our Free Guide to Supercharging Your Tennis Equipment!

Sign up to receive your Free Guide to Supercharging Your Tennis Equipment , straight to your inbox!

Explore more

Feb 20, 2023 • Balls Penn Balls Wilson Balls

Penn vs Wilson Tennis Balls: What’s Best for Your Game?

Trying to compare Penn and Wilson tennis balls? Choosing the right tennis balls can make a big difference to your game, so we’ve researched all of Penn’s and Wilson’s tennis balls to give you the complete guide of which will suit you best, based on your needs. Here’s our in-depth…

Oct 14, 2021 • Balls Wilson Balls

Wilson US Open Ball Review

The Wilson US Open ball is the one of the most premium level balls on the tennis market today. Although they are such a high class ball, I must admit – I don’t see them as frequently as I expect to at tennis clubs across the country. This isn’t any…

• Skip to primary navigation
• Skip to main content
• Skip to primary sidebar

Tennis Tribe

Tennis Racquet & Gear Reviews, Doubles Lessons & News

Head Prestige Review: Compare All Models of the Prestige Tennis Racquets

Will Boucek · March 10, 2024

When you buy a product through our links below, we may earn money from our affiliate partners to help support the site. However, this does not affect our evaluation or recommendation of each product.  See our list of partners & how we get paid here . You can also learn our process for reviewing tennis gear here .

The Head Prestige is one of the best tennis racquets for control and feel on the market. Below, we’ll review the Head Prestige, including pros, cons, and different models of the racquet. Then, we’ll compare it to other tennis racquets to help you decide if the Prestige is right for you.

Review Summary & Ratings for the Head Prestige

The Head Prestige has been around for a long time and is known for its precise control and feel for advanced-level tennis players.

Head makes Prestige tennis racquets for intermediate to advanced tennis players. Their most recent Prestige model is from 2023.

See our ratings, plus the pros and cons of the Head Prestige below for a quick glance at how it performs compared to other tennis racquets.

Our Ratings for the Head Prestige

• Groundstrokes: 8
• Great advanced-level racquet for control & feel
• Weight helps with power & stability against pace
• Excellent stability on volleys
• Comfortable frame on contact
• Great touch around the net
• Very stable returning against hard servers
• Not great for beginner to intermediate players
• Heavy frame can be difficult to handle

The Different Versions of the Head Prestige Tennis Racquet

The Head Prestige tennis racquet comes in several versions that vary in weight and size. Below is a list of the different Head Prestige racquets on the market today.

• Head Prestige Pro
• Head Prestige Tour
• Head Prestige MP L

We’ll review each version in more detail below.

What’s New with the 2023 Auxetic 2 Prestige?

Head has updated the Prestige line of racquets with the new Auxetic 2 technology, adding extra flexibility and comfort to the famed line. Fans of the Prestige will be happy that they still have a very classic feel that Head is known for. The specs for the Prestige Pro and Prestige Tour racquets are nearly identical to the previous version, but I did feel a little more power compared to the previous version.

• Prestige Pro: Very similar with a little extra power
• Prestige Tour: Also similar with a little extra power
• Prestige MP L: Noticeable increase in power, spin, and maneuverability

The main difference in the 2023 Prestige line is with the Prestige MP L (formerly just the Prestige MP). This racquet has been updated from an 18×19 string pattern to a 16×19 pattern, providing a little extra power and spin. It is also a little bit lighter, dropping in weight to 11.2 ounces. Maneuverability has been slightly improved with a slight sacrifice in stability, but overall the updates make this racquet a little more accessible to those that prefer a lighter racquet that maintains the classic feel.

3 Steps to Find the Perfect Tennis Racquet for Your Game

Free checklist with 27 racquet recommendations

Head Prestige Pro Review

The Pro version is the most control-oriented Prestige racquet. It is one of the best 8 tennis racquets for control .

Head Prestige Pro Racquet Specifications

• Weight: 11.9 oz. strung
• Head Size: 98 square inches
• Length: 27 inches
• Balance: 320 mm
• String Pattern: 18×20

The Prestige Pro has a heavy frame and is best for advanced players only. This added weight helps with both power and stability when hitting against pace. Lower level players will have trouble handling this racquet.

The tight string pattern and classic 98 square inch frame give it excellent feel and control as well. This is makes the Prestige Pro great for players who can generate their own power. It’s also one of the best racquets on the market for volleys and feel shots around the net.

On-Court Performance Review of the Prestige Pro

The Prestige Pro is going to give you a precise feel on all shots so you can place the ball anywhere on the court.

• On groundstrokes, the Prestige Pro will help you generate enough power, but with better control than most modern racquets.
• On volleys, the stability of this racquet will stand out. You will feel in control on both defensive and attacking volleys. It will feel great on half-volleys as well. Because of its weight, it is more difficult to maneuver than some other racquets.
• On returns, the stability will help against powerful first serves. Against second serves, you will be able to step in and hit with controlled power.
• On serves, you won’t be able to create quite as much power. This racquet helps you least in this area, however, you should still find good control with your serve.

Overall, the Head Prestige Pro is a great advanced tennis racquet . I would not recommend it for beginners or lower-level intermediate players.

Other Sellers: Amazon.com

Read our Head Radical Review to find more beginner and intermediate-friendly racquets.

Head Prestige Tour Review

The Prestige Tour tennis racquet is a smaller version of the racquet with a more open string pattern. It’s great for high-level players who want more spin and a smaller frame.

Head Prestige Tour Racquet Specifications

• Weight: 11.7 oz. strung
• Head Size: 95 square inches
• Balance: 325 mm
• String Pattern: 16×19

The head size of the Prestige Tour makes it easier to handle than the Pro version. However, there is a smaller sweet spot on this racquet so I don’t recommend it for people who don’t play frequently.

The open string pattern helps add power and spin potential. Similar to the Pro version, the weight of the Prestige Tour helps with stability.

On-Court Performance Review of the Prestige Tour

The Prestige Tour is a great classic racquet for advanced players.

• On groundstrokes, this racquet is stable and has good spin. You’ll move the ball around the court easily, but this frame isn’t as forgiving as other models.
• On volleys, the Prestige Tour will be easy to handle and stable at the net. Doubles players who like to play from the net will love this racquet.
• On returns, you will be able to control power and spin serves with this racquet, but you may struggle to hit deep in the court.
• On serves, you will find a good combination of power, control, and spin depending on how you string the racquet. A looser tension will help add power.

Head Prestige MP L Review

The Prestige MP L is great for both intermediate and advanced players who want more control in their game.

Head Prestige MP L Racquet Specifications

• Weight: 11.2 oz. strung
• Head Size: 99 square inches

The Head Prestige MP L is for Intermediate & Advanced Skill Levels

The Prestige MP L is a great tennis racquet for high level intermediate and advanced players who want something a bit easier to handle.

The 99 square inch frame gives this racquet a larger sweet spot. The balance point is moved slightly towards the head to add stability as well. Players who swing fast and freely will get the most out of this racquet.

The Prestige MP L is great for intermediate and advanced players who need a more forgiving racquet with good handling and excellent feel plus control.

This racquet won’t be great for players who need help with power. For that, I’d recommend reading our Head Extreme Review .

On-Court Performance Review of the Prestige MP L

The Prestige MP L is a well balanced racquet with a slight focus on feel and control.

• On groundstrokes, this racquet is forgiving, stable, and has decent spin potential. You’ll move the ball around the court with ease, but won’t generate a ton of power.
• On volleys, the Prestige MP L is easy to handle with great feel. You’ll have good touch and placement on volleys.
• On returns, this racquet offers a generous sweet spot so you can take big swings. You’ll also be able to defend against hard serves.
• On serves, you won’t find a ton of power, but should feel confident to hit your targets with spin and accuracy.

Stop paying full price for tennis gear! Get deals on shoes, racquets & more up to 70% off .

The Best Alternatives to the Head Prestige

Below are 3 other tennis racquets similar to the Head Prestige that you may want to consider.

• Wilson Pro Staff – Another control-oriented, advanced tennis racquet, the Pro Staff has precise feel in a comfortable frame. It is also the racquet used by Roger Federer. It’s a bit more difficult to swing though.
• Wilson Blade – A widely-used racquet on the pro tour, the Wilson Blade will offer better power and spin than the Prestige. This is a better option for intermediate players or older adults.
• Babolat Pure Strike – The Pure Strike has more power than the Prestige and will have good feel from the baseline. It’s a great option for players who need a little more MPH.

My Experience Playing with the Head Prestige

I have played with several versions of the Prestige over the years because I love the classic feel they provide. I do think this is a good update, as the previous version was low-powered, even compared to most other control racquets. The new version does have a little more power without changing much else.

The Prestige is still one of the best racquets on the market for stability, control, and feel. It excels especially well at the net where control and feel are most important.

A slight increase in power also helped on the return, where this racquet is probably the weakest for me. The update helps handle big serves a little better, but is still not a shining point for this racquet.

This racquet is similar to the Wilson Pro Staff but with a bit more stability.

While I think the Prestige tennis racquet is a very formidable tennis racquet, I do still prefer my customized Yonex Vcore Pro (I have the 97HD version), which plays similarly but with a little more modern feel.

About Will Boucek

Will Boucek is the Founder & CEO of Tennis Tribe. With over two decades of experience playing & coaching tennis, Will now works as a doubles strategy analyst for ATP & WTA tour players and coaches. Will helps tennis players at every level play better doubles through smarter strategy. He also has expertise in tennis racquets & gear, testing the latest products from Wilson, Babolat, Head, Prince, and other tennis brands.

FREE 20-page guide - Learn 3 doubles tactics to force errors and get more easy volleys! Download

Advertising

Racquet review: head prestige pro 2023, racquet review: head boom mp 2024, geared up: rafael nadal plays out his illustrious career with babolat and nike, racquet review: dunlop cx 400 tour, nix biosensor takes the guesswork out of hydration, tales from the stringing room: strange requests, racing against the clock and more, babolat commemorates 30 years of the pure drive racquet, asics releases its clay season collection, shoe review: babolat jet tere 2, geared up: emma navarro is rising up the ranks with yonex and fila, what needs work, tester comments, bottom line.

Check out my custom vibration dampener

Head Tennis Racquets Explained

In-depth Buyer’s Guide

We hope you love this article. Just so you know, TennisCompanion may collect a small share of sales from the links on this page to help keep this site running. Learn more .

By Jon Crim TennisCompanion

From the pros to recreational play, Head tennis racquets are some of the most popular worldwide, with the brand offering a wide selection of frames to appeal to a broad range of players.

However, while the depth of their product lines is impressive and one of the company’s strengths, it can also be overwhelming when exploring and comparing models to find a racquet that will work well for your individual needs.

This guide aims to provide clarity by discussing each racquet line, including its pros and cons, so you better understand the performance characteristics that make them unique.

Along with answers to common questions, background info on the brand, recommendations of their racquets by skill level, and my picks for the best Head frames, you’ll have everything you need to narrow your options and select a frame or determine it’s worth exploring other companies, such as Wilson, Babolat , or Yonex .

Article Contents

Click below to jump to a section

Tap below to jump to a section

Racquet Lines

How to choose a racquet, best head racquet, pros using head, men’s vs. women’s, quality control, new to tenniscompanion.

Create a free account and explore my latest videos below

Founded by Howard Head in 1950, the company initially focused on reimagining ski equipment with an innovative construction method he developed, which eventually saw success in the 1960s.

Later, in 1968, at the start of the Open Era , Head began developing metal tennis racquets, not long after the introduction of the first steel frame by Lacoste in 1963.

Since then, Head has expanded to develop products for several racquet sports, including racquetball, squash, padel, and pickleball, and they’ve grown to offer a full suite of top-rated products in tennis, including strings, footwear, apparel, balls, bags, and accessories.

Combined with a strong roster of sponsored athletes such as Novak Djokovic, Coco Gauff, Alexander Zverev, Bianca Andreescu, Andre Rublev, and Sloane Stephens, Head has become one of the most dominant racquet brands in the sport.

Head offers seven different racquet lines or families, each designed to offer unique performance characteristics that will appeal to a specific type of player or style of play.

Within each line, you’ll find several models with similar attributes that vary in their specs, such as weight or head size , giving players more options to find a racquet that best meets their needs.

In this section, I’ll review each family of tennis racquets and what you can expect from them, along with a detailed comparison of the specs that differentiate each frame. At a high level, here’s what you can expect from each line I’ll discuss.

Introduced in 2021, the Boom series of racquets is the latest addition to Head’s lineup, emphasizing power and spin with a large sweetspot and above-average comfort.

With many of the company’s racquets emphasizing control, their team wanted to bring something fresh and approachable to the market that broke typical expectations. They also had US players in mind for its creation, likely to compete with some of the popular models from Babolat and Wilson.

Within the Boom line are four different racquets, each with similar overarching characteristics but slightly modified specs to appeal to a broader range of players.

• Head Boom Team L
• Headd Boom Team
• Head Boom MP
• Head Boom Pro

At the top of the list, you have lighter frames like the Team L (light) and Team, with larger, more forgiving head sizes that are easy to maneuver for beginners and early intermediates.

The Boom MP features a mid-ranged head size of 100 in² (645.2 cm²) and added weight to appeal to intermediate players. Similarly, the Boom Pro tightens the head even further to 98 in² (632.3 cm²) for the heaviest model intended to appeal to stronger intermediate to advanced players.

Ultimately, the Boom line has something in it for everyone, with designs catering to players looking to emphasize power and spin without sacrificing comfort and feel.

Boom Comparison Table

The Instinct and Boom share quite a few similarities, evident in their specs, with the Instinct emphasizing power, spin, and comfort. However, unlike Boom models, available Instinct racquets skew even further toward the beginner market, which is reflected in the pricing, as these are more affordable frames.

Comparing the two, one of the most significant distinguishing factors is feel. I find the Boom models to be more forgiving on off-center shots and deliver better comfort overall.

On the other hand, with the Instinct line, I find their power to be a cut above what you’ll get with the Boom family.

Four models are available within the Instinct line, each providing similar performance characteristics but with tweaked specs to appeal to more players.

• Head Instinct PWR 115
• Head Instinct PWR 110
• Head Instinct Team L
• Head Instinct MP

The top three racquets listed are lightweight, with oversized heads and open 16×19 string patterns. These features make for easy maneuverability and afford players extra margin for error when swinging to hit the ball while also delivering effortless power and access to spin, which is ideal for beginners.

At 11.2oz (318g), the Instinct MP is the heaviest model of the four to help provide intermediate players with added stability, and the racquet also features the smallest head size of the bunch at 100 in² (645.2 cm²) to help reign in power for added precision. The MP also has a spin-friendly 16×19 string pattern like the other models.

Overall, the Instinct line is well-suited for beginners on the hunt for an approachable racquet with performance attributes that set them up for success at a fair price.

Instinct Comparison Table

The Speed series is one of Head’s most popular, backed by the endorsement of Novak Djokovic, one of the most dominant players ever to compete on the ATP tour.

As the name suggests, Head designed Speed racquets to swing fast and help players generate more topspin, as racquet head speed is the most significant factor contributing to spin.

Beyond spin, this line of racquets seeks to offer moderate power along with excellent feel, ideal for all court performance. Within the Speed line, you’ll find four different racquets:

• Head Speed Team L
• Head Speed Team
• Head Speed MP
• Head Speed Pro

*Please note that an MP L model within this range exists but isn’t readily available for purchase.

Every racquet in the Speed lineup features a 100 in² (645.2 cm²) head size, blending spin, power, and control with an adequate sweet spot to ease off-center hits.

The Team frames are lighter, with thicker beams and more weight toward the head of the racquet for added power. They also feature open 16×19 string patterns for plenty of grip on the ball, translating to added spin. These are excellent options for beginners and early intermediates.

Geared toward intermediate players, the MP is a bit heavier than the Team racquets but also features a thinner 23 mm beam to ease power and reign in control, resulting in a frame that’s also more flexible and easy on the arm.

Finally, at 11.5oz (326g), the Pro model is the heaviest of the bunch to provide maximum stability, combined with a tighter 18×20 string pattern for added control and precision. Spin doesn’t come as easily, but strong intermediate to advanced players will have the strength and technique necessary to generate extra RPMs independently; just ask Djokovic.

Overall, the Speed line of tennis racquets has something in it for everyone, making it an appealing option for a broad range of players, including those seeking extra comfort.

Speed Comparison Table

Players who like the idea of the Speed line of racquets but are looking for a frame that skews more heavily toward the control side of the spectrum should check out the Gravity series.

With their thinner beams and tighter string patterns, these racquets are precision oriented and offer some of the lowest flex or stiffness ratings , perfect for arm-friendly comfort.

The following three racquets make up the Gravity line:

• Gravity Team
• Gravity Pro

*Please note that Tour, MP L, and Team L models within this range exist but aren’t readily available for purchase.

At the top of the list, the Team racquet is the most accessible frame in the lineup, geared toward beginners with a larger 104 in² (671 cm²) head size and a very manageable 10.6oz (301g) weight that ensures the racquet is easy to maneuver for beginners.

However, the Team’s moderate 24 mm beam and tightened-up 16×20 string pattern keep power reined in, making the racquet an interesting option for beginners up through intermediates who appreciate the ease of handling and added margin for error.

For the MP, Head drops the head size to 100 in² (645.2 cm²), thins out the beam by reducing it to 22 mm in thickness for added control, and bumps up the weight by a few grams for added stability, making it an excellent option for intermediate players.

Head then rounds the Gravity line out with the Pro model, which has an even thinner beam, the tightest string pattern of 16×20, and even more weight for stability, making it an attractive option for strong intermediate to advanced players.

Overall, the Gravity line is worth a close look if you’re searching for an approachable control-oriented racquet with plenty of comfort and reliable all-court performance.

Gravity Comparison Table

With many of Head’s frames skewing toward control, the Extreme line of racquets flips the script, delivering explosive power and spin combined with impressive feel for its class.

However, contrary to Head’s marketing, their Extreme models are much less overpowering than they’d lead you to believe. They’re certainly not on par with what you’d find with a racquet like the Babolat Pure Drive, and that’s okay.

Instead, you’ll find a more balanced power-to-control ratio, better feel, and a frame that’s easier on your arm.

The Extreme line has four racquet models catering to all levels, from beginner to advanced.

• Head Extreme Team L
• Head Extreme Team
• Head Extreme MP
• Head Extreme Tour

Similar to other racquet lines from Head, the Team L provides one of the most accessible options geared toward beginners with a larger 105 in² (677.4 cm²) head size, lighter 9.9oz (281g), and open 16×19 string pattern for effortless power, spin, and maneuverability.

Moving down the line, the Team model gets a mid-range 100 in² (645.2 cm²) head size, some extra weight, and a minor adjustment to the beam’s thickness at its throat, resulting in a bit less power but more stability and control, that can work well for beginners or early intermediates who are developing their technique.

Designed squarely for intermediates, the MP combines extra weight balanced toward the handle to provide stability while maintaining an agile swing for maximizing spin.

Lastly, the Tour model has the smallest head size at 98 in² (632.3 cm²), the heaviest weight, and the thinnest beam for maximum precision, control, and stability. However, its 11.3oz (320g) weight isn’t overbearing, making this a reasonable option for intermediate to advanced players who want a fast-swinging stick.

Extreme Comparison Table

Head designed the Radical for Andre Agassi in 1993, and its bumble bee design quickly became a fan favorite, not to mention his stick of choice for his 1994 US Open victory.

Over the years, it has slowly evolved to meet the demands of the modern game, but players can still expect controllable power, excellent spin, and top-notch feel for all court performance.

Within the Radical line, you’ll find four racquets:

• Radical Team
• Radical Pro

*Please note that a Team L model within this range exists but isn’t readily available for purchase.

The Team is the lightest and most maneuverable Radical frame in the lineup, and its moderate 10.4oz (295g) weight, 102 in² (658.1 cm²) head size, and 16×19 string pattern make it a reliable option for strong beginners and early intermediates.

Moving up to the MP provides players extra weight and a thinner beam for added stability and control. Head also equips it with a smaller 98 in² (632.3 cm²) head size and 16×19 string pattern for added precision without forgoing easier access to topspin, an ideal combination for intermediates.

Finally, the Radical Pro is the line’s heaviest frame at 11.7oz / 332g blended with a smaller 98 in² (632.3 cm²) head size and open 16×19 string pattern for optimal control and spin, leaving the experienced player swinging it responsible for generating power.

With a lean toward smaller head sizes, added weight, and flexible frames for comfort, the Radical line skews its performance toward experienced players. However, with the team models, Head leaves room for new entrants who desire an emphasis on control without forgoing user-friendly attributes, such as lighter weight.

Radical Comparison Table

Dating back to 1987, the Prestige is the longest-running series of racquets in Head’s lineup, which emphasizes control and precision combined with excellent feel for experienced players.

Notably, it’s also Head’s least powerful line of racquets, with all frames featuring sub 100 in² (645.2 cm²) head sizes, thinner beams, and heavier weights to emphasize control.

Here are the three racquets you’ll find in the Prestige family:

• Head Prestige MP
• Head Prestige Tour
• Head Prestige Pro

The MP is an attractive option for intermediates, featuring the only 99 in² (638.7 cm²) head size the company offers, combined with a meaty 11.5oz (326g) weight and tighter 18×19 string pattern. The racquet doesn’t skimp on power, but it’s arguably the most demanding of all Head’s MPs with the heaviest weight.

The Tour features a unique mix of attributes relative to Head’s other frames. The head size is the smallest the company offers at 95 in² (613 cm²), requiring accurate targeting, and there’s more weight for added stability. However, to prevent the frame from being too dull, its beam is a half-inch thicker than the MP to give the racquet a bit of extra pop.

Rounding out the lineup, you’ll find the Pro, which weighs in at a hefty 11.9oz (337g), with a 98 in² (632.3 cm²) head size, a tight 18×20 string pattern, and a thin 20 mm beam that will deliver terrific feel, precise targeting, and loads of stability for the advanced player that can comfortably wield it.

Overall, the Prestige line delivers a classic feel combined with a modern construction that will appeal to experienced ball strikers who hit a flatter ball and desire maximum control.

Prestige Comparison Table

• Head Titanium Ti.S6

Although Head’s Titanium line is far from new, its sheer popularity, ease of use, and fantastic price point make it one of the company’s best-selling racquets for beginners.

Rather than offering several models as they do with other lines of their racquets, Head’s Titanium Ti.S6 is one-of-a-kind and designed to appeal to beginners through intermediates.

The racquet is ultra-light at only 8.9oz (252g), has a large oversized 115 in² (741.9 cm²) head, an extended length of 27.75 in (70.5 cm), and an open 16×19 string pattern.

All combined, these attributes make for an incredibly easy-to-maneuver racquet with a large sweet spot, tons of power, and excellent spin, ideal for players learning the game.

On the other hand, the racquet is ultra-stiff with a thick beam to help players generate power, resulting in an RA rating of 75, one of the highest you’ll find on the market. Combined with its lower weight, some players using this racquet will discover it’s not too forgiving and lacks the weight to absorb shock and vibration.

The lack of comfort is usually most prominent for players who begin to advance their skill set with the racquet, resulting in faster swings where off-center hits or shanks can deliver added shock and vibration above and beyond what a beginner might feel.

Of course, that doesn’t make it a poor racquet by any stretch, especially for beginners looking for a lightweight, easy-to-use option because it affords those players plenty of power for depth of shot, spin, and margin for error when swinging. Its downsides are simply good to be aware of, especially for players who have suffered from arm injuries such as tennis elbow.

Overall, the Head Titanium Ti.S6 is worth consideration if you’re new to the game and looking for a quality racquet at an affordable price, helping you develop the fundamentals.

• Ease of use
• Maneuverable

Titanium Ti.S6 Specs

Kids and juniors.

Younger children learning how to play tennis require equipment designed to help make picking up the sport as fun and easy as possible. To that end, Head carries a line of kids’ racquets for juniors with varying sizes that grow with children.

The following table outlines the different size tennis racquets that Head carries for children, along with the appropriate age and height that corresponds with each size.

One of the most significant distinctions between various Head tennis racquets for kids is the material used, which is either aluminum or graphite, the latter you’d find with adult racquets.

Generally, their smaller 19″, 21″, and 23″ racquets are constructed with aluminum for cost savings, weight, and the fact that early on, materials matter less as kids begin learning.

However, some of Head’s 23″, 25″, and 26″ kids’ racquets use graphite for a more stable hitting experience that also preps younger children for the feel of an adult racquet.

Ultimately, what matters most is that parents help select the right size for their child’s age and height. Whether you spend more on a graphite option will likely tie to how quickly your child’s skills are developing and your budget.

One of Head’s strengths is the deep lineup of racquets they offer, but this can also be a detriment as players wade through the myriad of options to select a racquet that best fits their needs.

If you find yourself in this position, one of the best places to start is with your skill level, which can help you narrow down an appropriate head size and weight .

In the early stages of learning to play tennis, larger head sizes give beginners a bigger hitting surface and a larger sweet spot, making it easier to swing and hit the ball. Similarly, lighter-weight racquets improve maneuverability, which is helpful when developing fundamental stroke mechanics.

However, as a player’s skills and targeting improve, moving to a racquet with a smaller head helps to improve control as swing speeds increase. Furthermore, more weight enhances stability for returning a ball with added pace from an opponent.

Of course, the specs outlined are approximations, so you’ll find some crossover, but these are excellent guides to use as a jumping-off point when researching your next racquet.

With those in mind, I’ve organized all of Head’s available tennis racquets by skill level to help narrow your options, which you can further evaluate with some extra research.

Beginner (or Rising Junior)

There are several options for beginner racquets from Head spanning all their adult racquet lines. In some ways, this makes selection easier because you can identify a line with performance characteristics that are appealing and run with it.

However, to further simplify, we can separate available racquets into two categories, those with mid-plus (98 – 104 in²) and oversized (105+ in²) heads.

Again, a larger head size will make it easier to generate power and spin while also giving you extra margin for error when swinging to hit the ball. On the other hand, a smaller head size will deliver better control, so you’ll have to choose which is more appealing.

Mid-Plus Heads

• Head Gravity Team L
• Head Radical Team L

Oversized Heads

• Head Speed PWR

One caveat for these racquets is that some new players will find them too light. If you have the strength, you may need to move up to a racquet in the rising intermediate to intermediate range. If you do take this route, I’d encourage you to stick with a racquet that has a minimum of a 100 in² (645.2 cm²) head size.

Furthermore, it’s worth noting that the frames in the mid-plus bucket are also terrific options for kids transitioning to full-sized racquets because they’re lightweight and easy to handle.

Rising Intermediate

As you begin to feel comfortable on a tennis court and start swinging more freely, reducing the head size of your racquet can be beneficial to enhance control. At the same time, a slight increase in weight helps bring added stability when hitting.

Of course, if you start with one of the racquets I’ve bucketed in the beginner category, there’s nothing wrong with continuing to use that racquet through this stage of learning.

Within this group, you’ll find a smaller selection of lightweight tennis racquets with head sizes between (100 in² – 104 in²).

• Head Gravity Team
• Head Boom Team
• Head Radical Team

These racquets also make great options for players who have some limited experience playing tennis or terrific hand-eye coordination they developed in another sport.

Intermediate

At this stage, you’ll have the fundamentals down, your confidence will grow, and you’ll be more consistent with a diverse repertoire of shots you can execute.

Your opponents will be experiencing similar improvements, and the game’s pace will increase. Therefore, moving to a racquet with a smaller head size in the (98 in² – 100 in²) square inch range will be ideal to enhance control and stability.

Like beginners, intermediate players have plenty of options, so I’ve separated them into two categories: those with a lighter weight denoted by the letter “L” and the models with a standard mid-range weight for their class.

Lightweight

• Head Gravity MP L
• Head Speed MP L
• Head Extreme MP L
• Head Prestige MP L

Mid-range Weight

• Head Gravity MP
• Head Radical MP

If you’re curious, the MP attached to these models stands for mid-puls, referring to the head size of these racquets.

I don’t love how Head uses this naming convention because some of their Team and Pro models also have mid-plus head sizes. Nonetheless, it’s what they chose for this range.

Strong Intermediate to Advanced

At higher levels of the sport, players have developed a strong skillset and the ability to consistently and accurately move the ball around the court with pace.

To complement their game, experienced players typically seek racquets with smaller head sizes and tighter string patterns to deliver optimal control, ensuring they can confidently swing through the ball and hit their targets.

They’re also looking for racquets with extra weight, which with proper technique, allows players to generate power and remain stable when fielding strong shots from their opponents.

• Head Gravity Pro
• Head Radical Pro

One of the challenges players will have with this category of racquets is moving to them prematurely. For example, Novak Djokovic endorses the Head Speed Pro, so a player might think they should use that racquet to perform like him.

Unfortunately, that’s not how it usually works out. Instead, these racquets will often be too heavy for players, resulting in fatigue and, at worst, arm injuries.

If you’re new to the game or an intermediate player tempted to buy one of these racquets, proceed cautiously. At the very least, demo the frame before buying it to ensure you can comfortably handle the weight for an extended period.

One of the most frequent questions I get about Head racquets is which is the best as players seek to find the optimal equipment to learn as quickly as possible.

Unfortunately, it’s not cut and dry because what works well for one player isn’t necessarily a good fit for the next, especially when considering experience. In a perfect world, you’re evaluating your skill, style of play, preferences, and any experience with other racquets to decide.

Despite that, I have my favorites, and with experience using every line of Head’s racquets, I’m happy to provide recommendations that are ideally suited for varying skill levels. Check out my guide on the best tennis racquets in the industry for a deeper dive.

When you’re first starting, players usually look for every advantage they can get with a racquet that makes learning easy while offering arm-friendly comfort that ensures longevity.

For many players, the Head Boom Team fits the bill and is my pick for the best Head racquet for beginners because it possesses several user-friendly attributes. Those include a larger 102 in² (658.1 cm²) head size for a large sweet spot and power, an easy-to-maneuver 10.2oz (289g) weight, and an open 16×19 string pattern to make it easier to hit with topspin.

Overall, the racquet is an excellent starting point to build a great foundation for the game.

The Head Speed lineup is one of their most versatile, and the MP model provides players with balanced all-court performance that’s perfect for building upon an intermediate skill set.

To help support a player’s development, the Speed MP features a popular 100 in² (645.2 cm²) head size, manageable yet stable 11.1oz (315g) weight, and spin-friendly 16×19 string pattern.

As a bonus, the racquet also has an RA rating of 62 for arm-friendly comfort and excellent feel.

Although Head has some terrific offerings for advanced players, one of my favorites is the Head Prestige Pro, a reliable option for the player who can comfortably swing it.

From its smaller 98 in² (632.3 cm²) to its thin 20 mm beam, heavy 11.9oz (337g) weight, and tight 18×20 string pattern, the Prestige Pro puts the player in the driver’s seat and is stable enough to handle anything its opponent can throw at it.

At the same time, the frame demands buttoned-up technique, accurate targeting, and adequate strength, so you’ll need to be confident in your skillset to maximize its performance.

Turn on any professional ATP or WTA tournament, and you’re bound to spot a player using a Head racquet.

However, beyond offering the performance that the pros demand, Head sponsors many top players to endorse their frames, which helps influence the sale of their products.

Sometimes younger players start with their racquets and transition to the pros, offering a natural sponsorship opportunity. Other times, Head approaches players to try and bring them into the brand as sponsored athletes with incentives.

Over time, they’ve amassed an impressive list of the game’s most talented players, including Novak Djokovic, Coco Gauff, Andy Murray, Sloane Stephens, and Andrey Rublev. You can find the complete list of the best athletes using their racquets below.

It’s worth mentioning that players often use different frames or customized versions of Head’s racquets, known as pro stock – these are only available to the pros.

Head paints these frames to look like the latest model, but they’re usually not. With companies releasing new generations roughly every 2-3 years, it would be unrealistic to expect top athletes to change the frame they use with each new cycle.

As for the list, I’ll do my best to keep it updated, but periodically things change. If you spot any outdated info, please feel free to comment at the bottom of this article to let me know.

If you’re shopping for a Head racquet, one of the questions that might cross your mind is whether certain lines or models are for men or women . The short answer is no; all Head’s tennis racquets are unisex and equally effective for both genders.

However, Head intentionally offers several models within each line to appeal to varying skill levels, styles of play, and different player builds. For example, a smaller player might be more inclined to opt for a lighter-weight racquet model because it’s easier to handle.

For that reason, it’s common for many women to opt for a lighter-weight racquet, but it’s not a rule. Up and down the entire range of Head racquets, you’ll find men and women using all models, and at higher levels of the game, players on both sides need extra weight to handle pace from their opponents adequately.

At the end of the day, it’s all about finding the right racquet that helps you play your best tennis and have fun on the court.

During your research, you may stumble upon the idea of quality control, which refers to how accurately a manufacturer meets their quoted specs for a tennis racquet.

Weight, which enthusiasts can easily measure, frequently comes under fire. For example, if a brand markets a racquet as 11oz (312g) unstrung, players expect it will be close if not exactly matching that measurement, and it can be frustrating when it doesn’t, especially when buying multiple frames.

Head manufacturers most of their racquets in China, as is common, and generally have a solid track record, consistently producing racquets that closely match specs. However, they’re not perfect, so you shouldn’t be surprised if a racquet you buy from the company isn’t spot on – it’s pretty common and mostly negligible, especially when first learning.

At the game’s highest levels, having all a player’s racquets match exactly is usually more important. Advanced players can tell the difference between a few grams and tend to switch their racquets often throughout a match, so if every frame had a different weight, it could throw them off.

Many players will customize their racquets to compensate for these nuanced spec differences. If it’s a concern, you can search online for racquet-matching services, which many retailers offer for a small fee.

Hopefully, the information I’ve shared in this guide helps you narrow down a handful of racquets of interest. However, to make a final decision, one of the best pieces of advice I can give is to demo the racquets you’re interested in before purchasing.

Although there’s a lot you can glean by researching specifications and learning about the type of performance you can expect from a racquet, nothing beats hitting with a racquet to gain a sense of its feel to ensure it’s a good fit for your needs.

Often, what you see on paper doesn’t materialize as you’d expect when hitting with a racquet, especially regarding weight, so it pays to try a few before spending your hard heard money.

I’d recommend demoing at least two for the best results so you have some base for comparison. The cost is usually nominal, and many retailers will apply most, if not all, of what you spent on the demos toward your purchase.

Unfortunately, demo programs aren’t available globally, so you may be unable to try a racquet before buying. If so, I encourage you to borrow a racquet with a similar weight and balance from a friend or family member to see how it feels before deciding while relying on your research to make an informed choice.

Tennis racquets aren’t cheap, so when you buy one, you hope it will last you for years. Although rare, there are some cases when frames have defects, so it’s nice to know if you have some protection when buying a new one.

In the case of Head, most of their racquets have a limited one-year warranty covering defective materials or workmanship as long as you can provide proof of purchase.

Visit their warranty guidelines page and follow their outlined steps to confirm you qualify and start a claim. When in doubt, reach out to them to get some feedback. Also, keep in mind that policies can change, so check their website for the latest information.

I haven’t had any issues despite heavily using nearly all of their racquets I own and review. Other than minor cosmetic blemishes such as scrapes, they hold up well. Over time, you may need to do some maintenance, such as replacing grips and bumper guards, but if you stay on top of it, your racquet should last for years.

Home > Gear > Racquets > Head

Play Better Tennis

Improve your game alongside our community of tennis players

Discussion Boards Join the conversation with other members of the community.

5 Point Friday Read our weekly recap of the 5 most interesting things we dig up in tennis.

In-depth Resources Learn with comprehensive resources to help you improve your game.

JavaScript seems to be disabled in your browser. For the best experience on our site, be sure to turn on Javascript in your browser.

Choose your location

• Austria Deutsch
• Belgium Français
• Bulgaria English
• Croatia English
• Cyprus English
• Czech Republic Čeština
• Denmark English
• Estonia English
• Finland English
• France Français
• Germany Deutsch
• Greece English
• Hungary English
• Ireland English
• Italy Italiano
• Latvia English
• Liechtenstein Deutsch
• Lithuania English
• Luxembourg Français
• Malta English
• Monaco Français
• Netherlands Nederlands
• Norway English
• Poland Polski
• Portugal English
• Romania English
• Slovakia English
• Slovenia English
• Spain Spanish
• Sweden English
• Switzerland Deutsch | Français | Italiano
• United Kingdom English

North America

• Canada English | Français
• United States English

Rest of the world

• Australia English
• Japan Japanese

HEAD Prestige TOUR Tennis Racquet

Description.

The updated PRESTIGE TOUR TENNIS RACQUET, with the innovative new Auxetic construction, allows the technical tour player to compete with modern precision.

Product Information

Stringing instructions.

Technologies

Auxetic Auxetic constructions show a unique deformation compared to non-Auxetic constructions. Due to their internal properties, Auxetic constructions widen when a “pull” force is applied and contract when squeezed. The bigger the applied force, the bigger the Auxetic reaction.

Elongated Shaft Elongated shaft for classic flex and feel appreciated on Tour since 1987

Box Beam The box beam cross-section stabilizes the frame for maximum control.

Full Cap Full cap for signature impact feel and unmistakable sound.

HEAD Pro Tour 2.0 Racquet Review

A while back I gave my first impressions about this long-awaited frame. Now it is time for the complete HEAD Pro Tour 2.0 Racquet Review.

The HEAD Pro Tour 2.0 is the comeback of a classic. It has the same design as the original , but a stiffer layup. It also lacks Twaron, a material that the hardcore Pro Tour 630/280 fans claim to be the magic ingredient. Despite the lack of it, the racquet plays plush and controlled – very close to the original. Perhaps the most hardcore PT630/280 fans will detect a slightly different feel, but in my opinion, it is very, very slight. I would say that you get a bit more control with the original (the string bed is more dead) and you get more power and a livelier feel from the Pro Tour 2.0.  Considering how much the Pro Tour 630 costs on the used market, this one is the obvious choice if you want to see for yourself what all the fuzz is about.

In short: more than 25 years later, this is still a great racquet. Is it easy to use? No. Do I (and many other players of various levels) play their best tennis with it? No.

The reality is, the sweet spot is small (the racquet is 95 sq inches), the spin potential is decent, but not comparable to most 98-100 sq inch racquets, but the touch, feel and control are divine. If you want to play tennis for fun (without competitive juices flowing) and just enjoy a nice feeling racquet – the HEAD Pro Tour 2.0 is a great choice, but if you have plans to compete, there should be racquets that will give you a bit more for free. At least in terms of power, spin, and forgiveness.

HEAD Pro Tour 2.0 Racquet Review – Specs

The two string setups I used made the specs differ a bit. I do prefer a hybrid setup in this racquet, but even with a full bed of poly, it’s not harsh.

As you can see, the gauge and material of the string can impact swing weight quite a bit. This is good to know.

The other HEAD Pro Tour 2.0 specs are:

Head size: 95 sq inches Beam: 20 mm Weight: 340g strung (depending on string) Stiffness: 65 (says TW, I can’t measure it) Balance: 6 pts HL or 32 cm String pattern: 18×20 How does it play?

This racquet is all about control and feel. If that are the key components you’re looking for – it is a must-try. Still, there are things to consider. The swing weight is pretty high, so you need to be an advanced player to get the racquet moving. And when you do, the sweet spot is still pretty small, so you need to have quick feet and eyes. This racquet is simply a stick for more advanced players. It is beyond my wheelhouse to use effectively in matches unless I’m on my game.

If I would compare to other racquets in the same category, I think it offers a bit better control than the Prestige MP, but that the new MP is more forgiving. The sweet spot size is similar to a Prince Phantom 93P. Pretty generous for its head size, but since the head size is small, it doesn’t compare well against most 98 sq inch racquets and above.

This racquet is plusher than the Dunlop Srixon CX 200 Tour 18×20. The Dunlop offers a bit more free power and a slightly larger sweet spot,  but the HEAD feels nicer.

Who is it for?

This racquet is very versatile in the hands of the right player. You feel very connected to it and you know exactly where the ball will go. It doesn’t give you a huge serve or groundstroke – but it gives you exactly what you put in . If you’re Tommy Haas or Andy Murray , that’s great. For most of us, we need a little more help.

Still, this HEAD Pro Tour 2.0 version is easier to use than the original. You get a bit more free power, the swing weight is lower and the string bed is livelier for more spin. I think they did a good job of getting it more player-friendly and ready for a modern game without killing that vintage buttery feel.

You need to be an advanced player to benefit from this racquet. That cannot be said enough. If you are, it’s still great. The classic returns and it’s still a classic.

You can buy this frame from Tennis Warehouse . The Tennisnerd video review of this frame will be published tomorrow evening at 8 pm CET.

Have you tried the new HEAD Pro Tour 2.0? What do you feel about it?

Jonas Eriksson

Jonas has been known as "tennis nerd" mainly for his obsessing about racquets and gear. Plays this beautiful sport almost every day.

Wilson Ultra 100 V3 Racquet Review

Djokovic’s covid-19 infection didn’t change his title odds, you may also like, why use heavier racquets, new prince phantom racquets, atp houston string tensions, tecnifibre tf-x1 v2, wilson blade 98 16/19 v9 review, the babolat pure drive celebrates 30 years, babolat pure strike 100 16/20 review, head boom pro 2024 review, head boom 2024, dunlop cx 200 review, 13 comments.

Great point about the difference in string weights. The overall specs are virtually identical to the Dunlop M-Fil 200 18×20 from 2005, inluding the beam width and shape. The M-Fil had tungsten and silicone in the mix, plays solid and not totally unwieldy. I find using these rackets is all about timing. On a good day you feel like a hero, on a bad day you’re shanking all over the place!

I’ve played with both and I feel like it’s something about the 280. Have it strung with straight Polly and weighs 375 grams but swings like a 305 racquet. Just ordered my 2.0 to put it in my racquet mix. Thanks as always for the unbiased review!

-a tennis nerd named Lucas

That’s a heavy spec! But a great frame. Enjoy!

Ok I pulled out my Blade 93 18 x 20 and added tungsten putty in the but cap as well as lead tap at 12, 3 and 9 oclock. Current specs are 377g, 8 pts HL almost identical to the original Head 280. Any thoughts on why is still doesn’t swing like the magic made in Austria?

– A Tennis Nerd Names Lucas

“Is it easy to use? No.” YES IT IS ! If you’re used to playing with racquets like Wilson Pro Staff Classic 6.1 or Wilson Pro Staff 85 you feel right at home with the HEAD Pro Tour 2.0. Trust me. I first got two of these sticks and I loved them so much I got myself a third one. 95 in² is not that small even though most may have gotten used to 100 these days. Don’t worry. 95, 98 and 100 in² are pretty close in real life. Current racquets in my bag include Prince Textreme Tour 100 (310), Yonex Vcore 98 (305) and my trusted HEAD Pro Tour 2.0s. I love the Vcore 98 and the Prince, but I keep reaching for the Pro Tour 2.0. It simply gives me the most predictable, reliable and stable response, and this is with the factory string no less! Although I must say the Yonex Vcore 98 Galaxy Black 305 is right up there as well, with the excellent Prince Textreme Tour 100 (310) in 3rd place.

Currently playing with a DB26 but often feel the wider hoop shape (& wider beam) on the one-handed backhand is a little awkward but do-able. Just feel like I’m slapping the ball around like Ljubicic, with only slightly more hair, but less accuracy. I used to play with fine control results from classic Wilson midsizes, then Liquidmetal radicals, but just got QUITE BORED as it seemed low powered and sort of mushy- Since I needed to upgrade for supplies/grommets purposes anyhow, I think I should get back to a thinner beam, slimmer hoop shape, and stiffer layup.. Would you think this Pro Tour 2.0 a resonable choice to have some power & stiffness while having a nice slim beam OR does it still seem soft and low powered similar to liquidmetal?? I mostly play just for fun and am overly thrilled by STAN THE MAN, maybe finally spending a boat load on a yonex vcore 330 97 or stiff pro staff would be better? Or just stick to my slightly wider headed DB26 for a while?? The money is annoying & I’m not playing consistant enough to demo, since I don’t get out too often w/ my vaccince-less friends (american) :(

ANY thoughts or comparison would be greatly appreciated- guess maybe I am becoming a tennis nerd afterall.

That is not the best of your reviews. Fist of all head size is very close to 98 sqin (630 cm2) – not 95. It is a mystery where these rumors come from. I have the old PT 630 (made in Austria) and the PT 2.0. Both have the same head size, the 2.0 is lighter and a touch stiffer, but nothing to worry about. The new one is preferable because it is a bit more forgiving than the old one without sacrificing stability (don’t believe the Twaron myth!). Feels definitely better than most of the 98 in2 competition out there. I guess reviewing a racquet while believing its head size is 95 in2 gives the impression it might have a small sweet spot ;-)

Where did you get the idea that the head size is 98 sq inches? HEAD used to measure the outside of the frame and called what other manufacturers said was 95 sq inches 98 sq inches. The HEAD Pro Tour 630 is 95 sq inches as well.

Head pro tour is considered one of the holy grails in tennis. If ur serious about this kind of rackets then u also gotta try Volkl PowerBridge 10 mid. Its just MAGIC.

Hello TennisNerd, how would you compare this racquet with a leaded up Head Microgel Radical MP?

Heavier, a bit more power.

Great to find this. I bought a head Pro tour from eBay for about 12 bucks plus shipping. I don’t know anything about the racket. I’m a Wilson guy by history. I bought it because it was listed at 26.75 in and I want to try a shorter racket. Very excited to read about all this and the comments too. Great value of your posts and videos, Jonas. I appreciate you for the service that you provide all of us.

Leave a Comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• The Tennisnerd Guide to Gear
• Recommended Racquets
• Recommended Strings
• Recommended Bags
• Racquet Consultation
• Racquet Reviews
• The best tennis racquets for spin and control
• Racquets and strings for beginners and lower-level intermediates
• Arm Friendly Tennis Racquets
• The Best Spin Racquets
• The Best Racquets for Intermediate Players?
• The Best Advanced Player Racquets
• The Best Power Racquets
• Pro Stock Racquets
• Pro Player String Tensions
• String Reviews
• Stringing machines
• Arm-friendly Strings
• Top Ten Tennis Strings Right Now
• The lowest string tension on tour?
• What is the difference between multifilament and poly strings?
• My Top 3 Spin Strings
• My Top 3 Control Strings
• Tennis balls
• Shoe Reviews
• Tennis Tools
• Podcasts and Interviews
• Tennis coaching with Intuitive Tennis
• Travel Blog
• Buying Tennis Tickets
• Tennis Academies in Europe
• Betting Blog
• Madrid Open Betting
• Best Tennis Betting Sites
• How to Bet on Tennis
• Live Betting Tennis
• Tennis Betting Odds Explained
• Betting Tips and Strategies
• Promotions and Bonuses
• ATP Masters 1000
• Betting Predictions
• ATP Rankings
• WTA Rankings
• Pickleball Blog
• Accessories
• College Tennis
• Contributors
• What People Say
• Advertising
• Tennis Friends
• In the Press

Please wait while you are redirected to the right page...

RBC Heritage: Final round suspended due to darkness, Monday finish underway at Harbour Town

Change Text Size

Updated: Monday, April 22, 8 a.m. ET: The final round of the RBC Heritage resumed at 8 a.m. ET.

Scheffler, chasing his fourth PGA TOUR win in five starts, authored a signature moment in the waning twilight Sunday, recovering from a hooked 4-iron second shot on the par-4 15th with a sorcerous wedge to 11 feet that he converted for an unlikely par to maintain a five-stroke lead over Wyndham Clark, Patrick Cantlay, J.T. Poston and Sahith Theegala.

Scheffler, chasing his fourth PGA TOUR win in five starts, stood 20 under for the tournament as the final round was suspended due to darkness at 7:45 p.m. Sunday, with nine players yet to complete the final round on Hilton Head Island, South Carolina.

This will be the second unscheduled Monday finish on the PGA TOUR this season and first since the Cognizant Classic in The Palm Beaches, won by Austin Eckroat. The AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am, won by Wyndham Clark, was shortened to 54 holes after play was unable to be contested on Sunday and Monday.

Sunday’s play at Harbour Town was initially suspended at 4:28 p.m. due to lightning in the area. The final pairing of Scheffler and Sepp Straka had completed 11 holes at the time. Players were removed from the course, with the delay ultimately lasting 2 hours and 32 minutes before play resumed at 7 p.m.

Scottie Scheffler's masterful par save at RBC Heritage

Updated: Sunday, April 21, 7 p.m. ET: The final round of the RBC Heritage resumes at 7 p.m. ET.

Updated: Sunday, April 21, 6:30 p.m. ET: The final round of the RBC Heritage will resume at 7 p.m. ET.

Updated: Sunday, April 21, 5:40 p.m. ET: The final round of the RBC Heritage will not resume at 6 p.m. ET.

Updated: Sunday, April 21, 5:28 p.m. ET: The final round of the RBC Heritage is scheduled to resume at 6 p.m. ET.

Updated: Sunday, April 21, 4:28 p.m. ET: The RBC Heritage’s final round has been suspended due to lightning in the area, with the final groups playing the back nine Sunday at Harbour Town Golf Links.

Play was suspended at 4:28 p.m. local time, with leader Scottie Scheffler playing the 12th hole. Players were taken off the course at the time of suspension.

Scheffler began the final round at 16 under, one stroke clear of Sepp Straka, and the world No. 1 turned in 3-under 33 with a chip-in eagle at the par-5 second, a two-putt birdie at the par-5 fifth and seven pars. Scheffler stood 19 under, four strokes clear of the field at the time of delay. Seven players stood 15 under.

“We were hoping to play through this; we felt like we had another 25 minutes left of this heavy rain and were then going to get a break on the back end,” said Mark Dusbabek, the PGA TOUR’s senior director lead TV Rules & Video Analyst, on the CBS broadcast. “We had lightning unfortunately pop up 4 miles away; just suddenly caught us in, so we had to stop play for this. We’re going to see how things go here and make a decision.

"The course was not unplayable. It wasn't because of the rain. It was just because the lightning popped up."

The final round of the RBC Heritage is poised to deliver fans a fantastic finish, but that might not come without a little bit of weather late in the day.

After the first three rounds of tournament golf at Harbour Town Golf Links were accompanied by sunshine and temperatures ranging from the upper 70s into the mid-80s, Sunday could bring golfers a different challenge to navigate as the tournament comes to a close.

According to the forecast, a cold front will be slowly moving southward into the Hilton Head Island area on Sunday, increasing the chances for showers and a few thunderstorms as play gets into the early to mid-afternoon hours and continuing into the evening hours. Storms could produce gusty winds and heavy rainfall. Otherwise, Sunday morning will remain dry with temperatures warming into the mid to upper 70s before falling into the 60s late in the day. Light wind Sunday morning will increase out of the north 10-15 gusting to 20-25 mph late in the day.

The final pairing of the day, Scottie Scheffler and Sepp Straka, are set to tee off at 1:55 p.m. ET. Scheffler holds a one-stroke lead at 16-under.

Head Extreme Tour

We will match or beat any posted overall price advertised in-store or online on in stock items.

Racquet Matching $20 per match. Get up to 3 racquets matched to the nearest specifications of each other. Learn More

Racquet Customization $30 per frame. You provide us with the exact specifications you would like for your racquets. Learn More

Surgical, spin-friendly and uniquely fast, the Extreme Tour gets updated with Auxetic technology for 2022

Introducing the Extreme Tour 2022! With this update, Head delivers a uniquely fast and spin-friendly weapon to intermediate and advanced players. Featuring the smallest head size in the Extreme family (98in²), this model packs a tad more control than the Extreme MP. Although too underpowered for those who require the mass-based pop of a traditional player's racquet the Tour is perfect for those who crave easy acceleration from the baseline and lightning quick reactions at net . For 2022 the product team at Head adds an Auxetic construction to the yoke which optimizes the feel and response according to impact force. Additional technologies include Spin Grommets which enable greater string movement for enhanced snapback. Like the previous generations, this racquet benefits from Graphene 360+ , giving it extra stability and power.  Ultimately, this is a great option for aggressive players looking for a speedy and spin-friendly weapon.

Specifications

Similar racquets.

Other Items to Consider

Customer Reviews