trek 6500 disc

Cycling made Simple.

Made By Cyclists

Trek 6500 Bike: Comprehensive Review and Pricing

October 24, 2023

‍ Key Takeaways

• The Trek 6500 is a versatile mountain bike, ideal for both beginners and seasoned riders.
• With a durable aluminum frame and high-quality components, it promises longevity and consistent performance.
• While designed for mountain terrains, with some modifications, the Trek 6500 can also serve as a comfortable road bike.

This article may contain affiliate links where we earn a commission from qualifying purchases.

‍ As mountain biking enthusiasts, we know the importance of finding the perfect bike for your needs. That's why we decided to take a look at the Trek 6500.

The Trek 6500 is a versatile mountain bike tailored for both new and seasoned riders. Boasting a durable aluminum frame, it stands out in performance and reliability. It is designed for challenging terrains and performs commendably on roads, making it a top choice among mountain biking enthusiasts.

We've ridden this bike through various terrains and conditions, paying close attention to its frame, suspension, brakes, and components. As we dive into the details in this review, we will discuss everything from the front fork and Shimano Deore derailleurs to the disc brakes and overall ride quality. So, join us as we explore the ins and outs of the Trek 6500 and find out if it's the right choice for you.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

‍ Trek 6500 Bike: An Overview

The Trek 6500 stands as a testament to Trek's dedication to producing high-quality mountain bikes tailored for both beginners and seasoned riders. With its robust frame, responsive handling, and trail-ready components, it easily distinguishes itself from other mountain bikes in its class.

Designed to tackle challenging terrains with ease, the 6500 ensures every off-road adventure is met with unmatched performance and reliability. Whether you're hitting steep inclines or navigating tricky descents, this bike promises an exhilarating and secure ride.

The Trek 6500 is equipped with reliable gears and brakes, ensuring consistent performance regardless of the conditions. For those who demand more from their rides, the 6500 is a worthy contender in the mountain biking arena.

Key Features and Specifications

The Trek 6500 mountain bike is an excellent choice for riders looking for a versatile and reliable bike. Its lightweight aluminum frame offers a smooth and responsive ride on various terrains.

This bike is equipped with a front suspension fork to handle bumps and technical singletrack easily. Its Shimano Deore components provide reliable shifting and braking performance.

Some of the standout features of this mountain bike include:

• Lightweight aluminum frame
• Suspension fork for smooth rides on rough terrain
• Shimano Deore components for reliable shifting and braking
• Suitable for cross-country and trail riding

Riders will also appreciate the durable and lightweight wheels, which offer good traction on various surfaces like gravel and sand. Combined with the comfortable and adjustable seat, this bike is perfect for long rides and exploring new trails.

History and Brand Value

Trek is a well-known and trusted brand in the mountain biking world. They have been producing high-quality bikes for over four decades, and the Trek 6500 is no exception. Despite being over 15 years old, the Trek 6500 remains a good value for mountain bikers.

The history of this bike and its performance on trails have helped build the brand's reputation for producing reliable and enjoyable mountain bikes. Riders who choose the Trek 6500 can be confident in their decision, knowing they are investing in a bike from a reputable company with a long-standing history of excellence.

Detailed Trek 6500 Performance Analysis

Performance and ride quality.

Our experience with the Trek 6500 mountain bike has been nothing short of amazing. The bike's performance on trails is exceptional, tackling technical singletracks and long rides with ease.

Its Shimano Deore components provide a smooth and responsive drivetrain, allowing for efficient pedaling on climbs and flat terrain. The suspension system, consisting of a front fork, offers excellent shock absorption.

This allows the rider to maintain control and confidence when navigating corners, bumps, and hills. Additionally, the bike is equipped with disc brakes, providing reliable stopping power in various riding conditions.

Durability and Longevity

We found the Trek 6500's frame to be incredibly durable, and capable of withstanding rough trails and harsh riding conditions. The wheels and rims also contribute to the bike's longevity.

They have been built to endure the demands of mountain biking. We believe that this bike will last for many years, making it a suitable investment for riders who want a reliable and lasting mountain bike.

Workmanship and Design

The design of the Trek 6500 is both functional and aesthetically pleasing. The top tube is sleek and modern, while the frame's geometry provides excellent handling and maneuverability.

The components, such as the front derailleur and rear derailleur, are of high quality and have been thoughtfully integrated into the overall design. Here are some standout features of the bike:

• Frame: Lightweight and sturdy for optimal performance
• Suspension system: Front fork for improved shock absorption and comfort
• Components: High-quality Shimano Deore parts for optimal functionality
• Wheels: Durable and versatile for various trail conditions

Comfort and User Experience

Riding the Trek 6500 mountain bike has been an enjoyable and fun experience for us. The seat and body positioning make long rides comfortable, and the responsive suspension helps absorb bumps and impacts from rough terrain.

We have found the bike to be suitable for both beginner and advanced riders, as it offers a great balance between performance and comfort. Moreover, the bike's lightweight design and agile handling make it easy to maneuver on different types of trails.

This includes gravel, sand, and technical singletrack. This adaptability, combined with its durable components and frame, makes the Trek 6500 an excellent choice for those looking to invest in a high-quality mountain bike without breaking the bank.

Our Experience Riding The Trek 6500

This section will discuss our experience riding the Trek 6500 mountain bike, focusing on its performance in various situations. We'll cover its descending and climbing abilities, road performance, and braking and handling features.

Descending & Climbing

The Trek 6500 is an excellent choice for mountain biking enthusiasts who love tackling steep climbs and fast descents. With a solid frame and good suspension, the bike easily handles technical singletrack and rugged terrain.

Its front fork provides sufficient shock absorption to keep riders comfortable, helping maintain control and traction on rocky trails.

When it comes to climbing, the Trek 6500's lightweight and responsive drivetrain gives riders an advantage on steep inclines. The smooth-shifting Shimano Deore front derailleur ensures reliable gear changes, allowing us to preserve our energy for tougher sections of the trail.

Road Performance

While primarily designed for off-road terrains, the Trek 6500 performs reasonably well on paved surfaces too. We found that it offers a comfortable ride for longer distances, thanks to its well-balanced frame and sturdy wheels.

Its versatile range of gears can adapt to varying gradients, though it's important to note that the bike's knobby tires are more suitable for trails than for smooth roads.

Braking & Handling

The Trek 6500 bike comes with disc brakes that provide reliable stopping power in various conditions, be it muddy trails or fast descents. We appreciate the bike's strong braking performance, which instilled confidence while navigating technical sections and sharp corners.

In terms of handling, the bike's light and stiff frame responds well to rider input. Its wide handlebars and well-placed controls ensure that maintaining control in tight spots and navigating switchbacks is no trouble at all.

Can I Use My Trek 6500 On The Road?

While the Trek 6500 is primarily designed as a mountain bike, it's versatile enough to handle on-road conditions easily. Its robust frame and durable components ensure a smooth and reliable ride, whether you're navigating city streets or countryside roads.

The wider tires, typical of mountain bikes, provide increased stability and comfort on the pavement, especially over uneven surfaces or potholes. However, it's worth noting that the knobby tread pattern, ideal for off-road traction, might result in slightly more rolling resistance on smooth surfaces compared to pure road bikes.

If you're considering using the Trek 6500 predominantly on roads, you might want to invest in hybrid or road-specific tires for a more efficient and faster ride. With minor adjustments, the Trek 6500 can serve as a competent and comfortable on-road companion.

How Long Will The Trek 6500 Last?

Durability and longevity are cornerstones of the Trek brand, and the 6500 is no exception. Constructed with a high-grade aluminum frame, it's built to withstand the rigors of mountain biking, from rocky trails to mud-laden paths.

The bike's components, from the drivetrain to the suspension system, are chosen for their resilience and reliability. The Trek 6500 can serve avid mountain bikers for many years with proper maintenance and regular check-ups.

However, it's important to note that the bike's lifespan can vary based on usage intensity, rider's care, and external conditions. But given its robust construction and the brand's reputation for quality, one can confidently expect the 6500 to be a long-term companion on the trails.

Is The Trek 6500 Worth Buying?

Value for money is a critical factor when considering any mountain bike, and the Trek 6500 shines in this department. It offers a blend of top-notch features, comfort, and performance at a competitive price point.

The bike's design caters to both casual riders and those seeking more intense off-road experiences, making it versatile for various terrains and rider preferences. Its responsive handling, sturdy frame, and reliable components ensure a consistently enjoyable ride.

Moreover, Trek's long-standing reputation in cycling guarantees post-purchase support and easy access to spare parts or upgrades. Other reviews would support this analysis because this dependable mountain bike blends durability and performance.

Why Road Cyclists Are Switching to Gravel Bikes

Why Fitness Enthusiasts Are Switching to Smart Cycling Trainers

Why Competitive Cyclists Are Switching to Aero Road Bikes

Why Eco-Conscious Riders Are Switching to Bamboo Bikes

About THE AUTHOR

Danny Lawson

Mountain biking is more than just a hobby for me - it's a way of life. I love the challenge and excitement that comes with it, and I'm always pushing myself to go faster and ride harder. Some people might think that mountain biking is dangerous, but I see it as the only way to live.

Trending Now

Why City Dwellers Are Switching to Folding Bikes

Why Budget-Conscious Riders Are Switching to Co-op Bike Brands

Why Mountain Bikers Are Switching to Fat Tire Bikes

Why Urban Commuters Are Switching to Electric Bikes

About PedalChef

PedalChef is a blog on all things cycling. We are a group of people who love bikes, and we want to share the joy that comes with the experience. You can read more about us here .

©2024 PedalChef. All rights reserved.

We can be reached at [email protected]

PedalChef.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon. This site also participates in other affiliate programs, and is compensated for referring traffic and business to these companies.

Is The Trek 6500 A Good Mountain Bike? [Review]

Table of Contents

Despite the fact that the Trek 6500 is over 15 years old, it is a good mountain bike.

Since a reader emailed me and asked me to review the Trek 6500 for him, I haven’t ridden this mountain bike and had to find Brendan in Detroit to give him some insight into what it’s like to ride the Trek 6500.

Below, I’ll go over the descending and climbing performance, key features, components, and specs of this mountain bike, as well as how it compares to other mountain bikes.

Welcome to the Best Bike blog, so let’s get started right away.

Trek 6500 Specs

The following ride experience was communicated by Brendan and the blogger, and the blogger completed the corresponding record.

The Trek 6500 setup still appears to be low, but consider that this was an entry-level mountain bike 15 years ago.

Brendan enjoys riding on rough trails, and to give me a more accurate description, he had to ride 15 miles to reach a trail ride where he could quickly descend.

It is possible to descend quickly on the hills of Lindau with a slightly steeper head tube angle, 100mm shock fork, and entry-level 2.2-inch front tire. Because all Trek 6500 configurations are at the low end of the mid-range (some are upgrades needed to get there).

When descending small trails, the 26″ small size tires are very flexible. Even in the corners, the direction is constantly changing. Because the ride is very responsive without the grip of larger tires, some riders prefer the smaller size.

Brendan’s complaint about the Trek 6500 was that it slid sideways when descending on loose ground. When I spoke with him, I told him that it would be better to change the tires to wider tires.

But, because he rarely rides in such terrain, he didn’t think to change the tires. As a result, the Trek 6500 is suitable for hard ground descents, and the steering agility and fork damping on descents are excellent.

Because of the Trek 6500’s 26×2.2″ tires and multiple gears, hardtail mountain bikes have an advantage over softtail mountain bikes when it comes to climbing. Smooth slopes on trails are not difficult to climb, and even rough slopes can be easily climbed with the help of Bontrager tires.

When riding on smooth slopes, 100mm shock forks with knobs can be adjusted to provide appropriate shock travel, ensuring that your efforts are not wasted. When climbing steep hills, the 3*9 gear system, which can be switched to the lowest gear, provides enough uphill traction to climb, but it does not appear to be an easy climb.

So I don’t think the Trek 6500 is a very good fit for mountain biking on steep hill climbs.

But Brendan had a lot of fun speeding up on flat trails and then going for fast climbs, so the Trek 6500 mountain bike is perfect for mountain climbs that are not technically difficult.

General Roads

Many readers may be under the mistaken impression that mountain bikes perform best in mountainous terrain.

Flat or undulating hills, on the other hand, are the most commonly ridden roads on mountain bikes, and are frequently the preferred terrain for riders who don’t want to be constantly on the limit.

Yellow grass trails, winding wilderness trails, and the occasional small rock make for a fun time for mountain bikers traveling with friends, and the Trek 6500 is a favorite on such trails.

The 26″ small tires are small enough to get around large rocks, but the shock fork is also very good at reducing ground impact in rolling terrain. The shock fork is constantly reducing the ground’s impact.

A water bottle holder can be mounted on the frame, allowing you to take your sports drink and ride to new places.

The Trek 6500 has a reserved rear rack and mudguard mount, and it outperforms the average commuter bike on city roads, not only in terms of tire grip, but also in gearing combinations that rival those found on road bikes.

As a result, the Trek 6500 is an excellent choice for general mountain or commuter road performance.

Main Features

Alpha slr aluminum frame.

The Trek 6500’s aluminum frame is lightweight. The Alpha SLR Aluminum frame weighs only 3.6 pounds, which puts it right in the middle of the weight range for aluminum frames.

It is stiff enough to accommodate 26″ tires, and the width can be increased to a maximum of 2.4″. The 2006 Trek 6500 is finished in ruby blue and has a lively appearance. The frame, which can be used for more than ten years, is not only strong but also corrosion-resistant.

Shimano Deore drivetrain

The Shimano Deore drivetrain, which is not considered low-end at the moment, is of very high quality, and the Trek 6500 is equipped with a complete Shimano Deore. The Trek 6500 had a 3X9 drivetrain in 2006, but it has been a 3X10 drivetrain since 2010.

However, the price has risen, and I don’t believe it is particularly cost-effective. 1X drivetrains are popular today, and almost all of them do away with the front derailleur chainstays in an effort to simplify riding and to hell with complicated gear systems.

Riding a 3X drivetrain bike car didn’t feel particularly different to me, but a 1X mountain bike gives you more confidence to ride your best in technical singletrack.

Bontrager Jones ACX Tires

Because these tires are tubed, the tire pressure requirements aren’t excessive.

However, I prefer the 27.5 “pneumatic tires Despite the Trek 6500’s 26*2.2 “Tires greatly aid in steering and technical climbing.

The 27.5″ tires are the middle size between the 29″ tires and fit a wider range of heights, as well as having many advantages for riding speed, including fast climbs. However, the Trek 6500’s tires were already quite good at the time, and the size of the tire button would perform admirably on hard ground and gravel.

Puncture resistance is also fairly good.

The Trek 6500 had two versions of brakes in terms of accessories. One is the brake of alloy pulling line, this kind of rim brake, cheaply built, at that time the braking effect in ordinary terrain and mechanical disc brake is not much different.

At that time, it was not suitable for some fast descending terrain as I mentioned above. The other is the Trek 6500 Disc with mechanical disc brakes, which can be configured for technical singletrack or forest road riding.

Although brake upgrades are not expensive, I still prefer a mountain bike with disc brakes that can be ridden in the mountains with easier stops and no worries about riding.

If you go with the Trek 6500, you can upgrade it with appropriate disc brakes from Amazon. The budget can be as low as $100.

The Manitou Axel Comp 80mm travel shock fork was still available on the Trek 6500 in 2005. The Trek 6500, however, has a 100mm travel fork since 2006. This is what makes it more suitable for trail riding and, according to other reviews, the most affordable trail mountain bike.

That’s because it was improved incrementally each year until it reached the configuration preferred by trail riders in 2006. It’s also not expensive.

The Trek 6500’s fork is excellent on a variety of terrains, but in intense mountain riding, it may appear inadequate because, as mountain biking has evolved, high-end cross-country or speedy mountain bikes have reached 120mm of travel or more.

These days, 100mm travel forks seem a little short. If you’re looking for a beginner mountain bike, a 100mm or 80mm travel fork will suffice.

Bontrager Select seat and handlebars

Trek still uses Bontrager Select seat and handlebar parts in mountain bikes under $2,000 these days, and the parts are strong and durable enough that there’s not much to complain about.

However, I prefer the gel seat for long rides or mountain riding, and it’s beneficial to have less seat impact on the body. If you only plan on riding short distances, the Trek 6500 seat will suffice.

Benefits of the Trek 6500

• Affordable price
• Off-road mountain bike with versatility
• 100mm travel shock fork for entry-level cross-country
• 26*2.2″ tires for agile steering and strong grip
• Sturdy and durable handlebars
• Peace of mind after-sales service, up to 10 years frame warranty

What we don’t like about it

• 26″ tires are slightly outdated at the moment
• Stiff seat, not suitable for long rides
• What is the body weight of the Trek 6500?

The Trek 6500 has a bodyweight of 27.8 lbs.

• What frame sizes does the Trek 6500 come in?

15.5, 17.5, 19.5, 21.5″

• What is the current price range for a trek 6500 for sale?

The Trek 6500 is worth about $95. It also depends on the condition of the bike.

Is The Trek 6000 Mountain Bike Worth Buying? [Trek 6000 Review]

Is The Trek 830 A Good Mountain Bike? [Trek 830 Review]

Compare Tables

Trek roscoe 7 mountain bike vs trek 6500.

It’s a stretch to compare the latest Trek Roscoe 7 mountain bike to the 15-year-old Trek 6500. However, just like a computer upgrade, the new configuration is always far superior to the old one. So, what are the advantages of the Trek Roscoe 7 mountain bike over the Trek 6500?

You get, Alpha Gold aluminum frame, 29×2.60″ Bontrager TLR tires, 1X12 Shimano Deore Drivetrain, 140mm travel RockShox Recon Silver RL fork, Shimano MT200 hydraulic disc.

A good mountain bike is often the starting point for fun riding, and the race-ready Trek Roscoe 7 is less than half the price of a professional race bike, but the slew of accessories will not disappoint. 29-inch tires are more common these days, but they’re 2.6″ wide and have excellent traction even on sand.

Although a Deore accessory alongside the Trek 6500, the 1X12 Shimano Deore Drivetrain has been updated over the last 15 years and its performance is in no way comparable to older versions of gears.

Finally, I must mention its mid-to-high-end RockShox shock fork, which has 140 mm of travel. Dropping down to higher distances on slopes is very difficult to bottom out the fork, and the damping effect will dazzle riders who haven’t tried this fork before.

For those of you who want to compete in races, the Trek Roscoe 7 is a mid-to-high-end mountain bike.

Learn more: Is Trek Roscoe 7 Worth Buying? [Trek Roscoe 7 Review]

Trek Marlin 8 mountain bike VS Trek 6500

It must be rugged and durable, as well as easy to ride in the mountains. The Trek Marlin 8 is a low-cost mountain bike that will not disappoint casual adventure riders. It has an Alpha Silver Aluminium frame, a RockShox Judy Silver fork (100mm travel, 80mm travel on some frame sizes), 29 (XS & S: 27.5×2.4″) tires, and a Shimano MT200 hydraulic disc brake.

With a clean alignment and a slim profile. The rear rack and fender mounting holes remain on the Trek 6500. Every detail is suitable for daily adventures and commuting, thanks to the excellent bodywork and non-redundant features. The Trek Marlin 8 mountain bike outperforms the Trek 6500 on both mountain climbs and descents, balancing budget and performance.

If you prefer the current Trek mountain bikes, the Trek Marlin 8 is an excellent choice.

SANTA CRUZ Nomad Mountain Bike vs Trek 6500

When comparing high-end race bikes, the SANTA CRUZ Nomad Mountain Bike is an existence that does not let boring riding replace your riding life entirely. The SANTA CRUZ Nomad is designed to allow you to ride freely in difficult woodland singletrack or challenging park terrain. It is built in accordance with a professional mountain bike park.

A carbon frame, RockShox Super Deluxe Select+ Rear Shock (170mm Rear Travel), Fox 38 Float Performance (170mm Front Travel), 800mm handlebar width, and SRAM Code R 4-piston hydraulic brake are all included. SANTA CRUZ A slack-out 64-degree head-tube angle, combined with 27.5in wheels, allows you to roll over obstacles without feeling sluggish on a technical trail.

The bike is only 33.16 pounds (15,030g). That’s not a particularly heavy mountain bike. So, if you want to be first in endurance racing in the future, you should consider this wild mountain bike.

Schwinn S29 Mountain Bike VS Trek 6500

When you compare a race mountain bike to the protagonist, it’s like comparing a cheap mountain bike to the protagonist after speeding down a steep hill to the flat. The Schwinn S29 is a good value for money mountain bike with 29″ tires that are suitable for commuting or general mountain riding.

The 60mm travel shock fork is adequate for mountain riding in hilly areas, but it has many limitations when riding on forest roads and single tracks. As a result, this mountain bike is best suited to riders who live in low-altitude areas.

When compared to the Trek 6500, it has the advantage of mechanical disc brakes and is about the same weight. On wet surfaces, the slightly wider tires provide a little more traction. The Schwinn S29 is another good mountain bike that strikes a good balance between price and performance. Consider it for your limited funds.

Tip: Used Schwinn S29s can fetch a good price.

Learn more: Schwinn S29 Mens Mountain Bike Reviews-In-Depth Assessment

Final Verdict (4.5/5)

Even though it lags behind in terms of riding feel and accessory stack, the Trek 6500 is a shining mountain bike when compared to mountain bikes from 15 years ago.

The comparison takes into account that it was originally configured with a significant number of replacement parts over the course of the ride, and that these replacement parts will be gradually upgraded over time. So, in terms of riding experience and component quality, the Trek 6500 is a good mountain bike. We ultimately gave it a rating of (4.5/5).

If you want to see more trek mountain bike reviews, follow us as we’ll bring you more evaluations.

Learn more: Is The Trek 6000 Mountain Bike Worth Buying? [Trek 6000 Review]

Related Videos

Related Posts

[Orbea URRUN 10 20mph Review] – Best Used By People Who Enjoy Riding To Get AFeel For The Mountains!

[schwinn admiral hybrid bicycle review] -is schwinn admiral hybrid bicycle worth buying？.

[Specialized Turbo Como 5.0 Review] – Good Choice?

15 of The Best Mountain Bike Saddles You Can Buy

20 INCH FOLDING BIKE BTWIN 120 Review－Fold up and put in “pocket”

2023 Top 10 Best Fun Kids Bike Bells – Will This Bring Joy To Your Child’s Ride?

27.5 vs 29er Mountain Bikes – The Battle Of The Century

Best 20 inch Bikes For 6-13 Years Old Kids Bikes (With Gears)

Best 27.2 Dropper Post

Best 30.9 Dropper Post In

Best 31.6 Dropper Post

Best Mountain Bike Stems-Better Travel Through The Mountains And Forests

3 thoughts on “is the trek 6500 a good mountain bike [review]”.

I was recommended this web site by my cousin. I’m not sure whether this post is written by him as no one else know such detailed about my problem. You’re amazing! Thanks!

You mentioned flexible front wheel. This is simply a maintenance issue, nothing wrong with the bike. Just have your bike dealer retighten the spokes and that flexible feeling will be gone for good.

Thank you for the reminder.

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

• ALL MOUNTAIN
• ACCESSORIES
• ALL (130 Forums)
• WHEELS & TIRES

Trek 6500 Disc XC Hardtail

• Rear Derailleur
• Front Suspension
• Alpha SLR Aluminum
• Bontrager Ranger alloy rims
• USER REVIEWS

Massive Alpha aluminum tubing, quick handling, good climber for a 26", Deore shifting is tight and disc brakes are super-good.

It's front heavy. It's just plain heavy overall for a 26" hard tail, but that's the price paid for massive amounts of aluminum and (probably) the Manitou shock. The bb is a little low, too, and I catch a lot of roots w/ the pedals if they're not kept flat and level.

I bought my 6500slr disc used from a friend for $100. A screaming' deal, for sure, as all it needed was a little TLC, a tune and a couple of cables. I've put a lot of miles on the bike and it's never failed me. The Deore shifters are crisp and clean after all these years and the Shimano hydraulic brakes are amazing! This bike is my beater and alt. ride to my #1 Cannondale F29 and yet I'll cover 30+ miles on it without trying too hard (I've upgraded the saddle to a Specialized Body Geometry Riva = comfy) as it's just an easy and inviting bike to ride. If I keep it for a while, I'll put it on a slight diet, but as it is it rides great.

Similar Products Used:

Schwinn Moab 3, Raleigh M-40, Mongoose DX 5.3

Real tight frame. Nice colour scheme: blue and silver. Good mix of Shimano components from Deore shifters and front mech, to SLX chainset and XT rear mech. All solid and work in harmony together. Weighs in at around 27lb. But due to great geometry does not feel like it. Accelerates well and climbs well. I ahve had lighter weight weenie bikes and I do prefer this.

Not such a weakness, but the Recon fork can be a little "spingy" but does work well of road. Tyres changed to Maxxis Aspen 2.1.

Overall great bike. Unfortunately not value for money anymore because of rising costs and exchange rates. This was the best i could get for my money, and I bought local so I could give it a good try out. Would buy again if I had to.

Speciaslized Rockhopper Pro Scott Scale 50 Cannondale Trail 2

Excellent Frame, Nice Shock-Rock Shock Tora, Great Brakes-Shimano Disc, Nice Deore Components elsewhere.

Stock saddle is hard as a rock.

Very nice hard tail for under 1K. Components are very worthy and capable on road and off. Where performance and price tag came together for me. Over 1,000 miles at this point and the only wear is the rear tire. While this is a very sweet ride, I've not yet ridden the perfect bike.....so 4 Flamin' Chilis for the Trek 6500.

Klein Pinnacle XT - Rode it for 20 years, it was time for a new bike!

For this price range, I have seen guys find lighter bikes (Made in China Giants). I have been happy with it. Other than replacing the rear brake, I have not had any issues.

The first 1K miles I only upgraded the seat and had a set of street tires. Shortly after 1K I changed my pedals because I started riding a lot more trails, from there I changed my brakes to mechanical because the hydraulic ones started to leak. Then I just started changing everything.

Great bike!

Specialized Hardrock, Road Bike

The bike is light and very efficient.

The brakes on this speceific bike aren't great. I'm taking them to be tuned up to par.

The bike is great for the money. I'm having troubles with the disk brakes that i hope to get fixed but other than that it is great

This bike is relatively light and just feels right when riding. The components are well above average and the RS Tora suspension forks are nice and plush.

The grips are thin and hurt the hands after awhile. The seat is uncomfortable, even when wearing padded shorts. I'll have to look at a new seat at some point. I've had a few flats on the back tire due to glass. Probably due more to bad luck than poor Bontrager Jones XR tires. Time will tell.

Love the bike. I held off on a review until I got in over 100 miles on the new rig. I do most of my riding on the pavement for cardio but try to get to the trails as often as possible. The 6500 performs well on the pavement and trail systems alike. I upgraded to this bike from a Haro Vector and the difference is night and day. I'd highly recommend this bike to anybody looking to get into a mid-range mountain bike.

Haro Vector

I just bought this bike, just took it on it's maiden voyage this morning. I am posting this review because I did it with my last bike and 5 years later it was nice reading my original review and comparing. This morning I rode for about 3 hours on some muddy, nasty trails. First impression of this bike is that it climbs like a billy goat. I put my clip-in pedals on it and other than that it's stock. The front fork is a nice 100mm Rock Shox Tora that really soaks up the bumps. The disc brakes definitely helped today because the trail was muddy, slick, & rutted out from all the rain. I was able to stay in control and descend down the steep inclines without sliding the rear tire.

This was my first ride of this bike, just bought it. I removed the factory pedals immediately and put my clip-in pedals on, so I guess I'd say pedals are a weakness.

Bottom Line, I'm thrilled about this bike. My first ride was this morning, I loved every mile of it and this thing climbs like nobody's business. I can't wait to get back out and put some miles on her. I'm riding again this evening!

Prior to this bike, I had a Diamond Back Response & a Giant Yukon.

almost everything

pedals suck

this bike is really good for the money. handles really well and the fork has taken everything i have thrown at it without a problem. definately change the pedals and the brakes could use an upgrade but they aren't too bad. impressed overall

giant yukon

Sturdy frame, solid stock components, builds confidence on technical stuff, just looks awesome

Since I was transfering from a 15 yr old bike, weaknesses are hard to find. Crappy stock Bontranger tires, weak platform pedals

This bike is a significant upgrade for me, and I think is a good value in it's price range. I compared it to a Speicalized RockHopper, and I felt the Trek had much better balance and fit me better. I have had no mechanical issues, and have taken the bike on some brutal rides down at Gambrill State Park (rocks, logs, rocks, rocks, rocks). This bike is a great bike for the intermediat rider who doesn't have the money or doesn't quite have the experience to invest in a FS or 29er. I love the bike, and would buy it again.

Peformance M304

Comes stock with good components for the price paid. Very comfortable to ride and capable of more advanced/fast mtb'ing. Nice looking, very stiff and sturdy frame (lifetime warranty).

A little on the heavy side. I'm not a racer (yet) and a little heavy myself, so this isn't too much of a problem for me. Stock tires, grips, and saddle leave something to be desired (which is why I upgraded them). Brakes could be more responsive, but do the job.

Like I said before, I am fairly new to this sport but I tend to learn quickly about any hobby/sport I am involved in and am very observant of equipment (being a mechanical engineer). This is an excellent beginner bike and probably a decent hardtail for an intermediate rider. I also considered getting a Rockhopper when I choosing a bike, and this one pulled through due to a step up in components across the board for only a little bit higher cost. I also liked the way it felt to ride marginally better than the Rockhopper. Overall, I feel this was an excellent choice for my first mtb. I am very good about maintenance and haven't had any failures while I am out riding. The thing performs like a champ for what I need it for. I like to go fast on downhill sections, take corners at a decent speed, and hit small jumps and drops here and there. I can't go crazy on it yet due to my limited skill, but I'm improving quickly due to pushing my limits and having an awesome bike to back it up. I am 5' 10" and 210 lbs, a little heavy, but the bike does fine under my weight. The brakes aren't as crisp as I would like them to be, but they certainly slow and stop me just fine. Pretty good for being some of the cheapest hydro's out there. It shifts quickly with Deore derailleurs and I would probably have a to fork out quite a bit of money to see a marked improvement over them. The wheelset is a little heavy but is durable and gets the job done for me. Same thing with the fork, its nice and smooth but a little heavy. In conclusion, awesome starter bike. Make sure it fits you and feels good, then buy it. If it doesn't, check out some of the offerings from other companies in this price range.

None, I am fairly new to mtb'ing.

Get the latest mountain bike reviews, news, race results, and much more by signing up for the MTBR Newsletter

Hot Deals See All Hot Deals >>

• CLASSIFIEDS
• TERMS OF USE
• PRIVACY POLICY
• ADVERTISING

VISIT US AT

© Copyright 2024 VerticalScope Inc. All rights reserved.

• MAGAZINE OFFERS
• BIKE INSURANCE
• Best Products
• Maintenance
• Accessories
• Long-Term Reviews
• BikeRadar Podcast
• First Look Friday
• Bike of the Week
• Tech Features
• Routes and Rides
• Bike Galleries
• BikeRadar Bargains
• Buyer's Guides
• Fitness & Training
• Sizing & Fit
• Mountain Biking UK
• Cycling Plus

Trek 6500 (SG) review

From the eye-searing paintjob to its slender wishbone rear triangle, Trek's 6500 looks every inch a pared-down cross-country racer for the budget conscious rider. But will it also cut it as a trail all-rounder for the rest of us?

From the eye-searing paintjob to its slender wishbone rear triangle, Trek's 6500 looks every inch a pared-down cross-country racer for the budget conscious rider. But can it cut it as a trail all-rounder for the rest of us?

The 6500 has slimmer tube profiles than many of its contemporaries, but the super-stiff, cross-ovalised down tube boasts an impressive girth. Clever tube shaping removes the need for a strengthening gusset up front, while a minimalist chainstay bridge and elegant wishbone give generous mud clearance. And, hinting that it may be more versatile than its racing heritage suggests, there's a set of rack mounts at the rear too.

There's nothing subtle about the 6500's looks - and at first ride there's no subtlety in its manners, either. Despite an averagely roomy cockpit, the inline seatpost forces the rider forward towards the bars into a powerful pedalling position over the bottom bracket. A stack of headset washers move the bars up, transferring some of the rider's weight back towards the centre of the bike. But it's still a slightly nervy-feeling beast.

The payback for all this over-eagerness is a bike that'll do exactly what you tell it to, precisely when you tell it. Generous tyre profiles, lowish weight and that weight-forward ride position translate into instant squirt-and-go in any trail situation you care to throw the 6500's way. The Manitou fork's firm feel suits the bike's overall demeanour, pattering over the bumps in a way that takes the sting out of the worst hits without ever letting the rider feel isolated. Everything we did with this bike - from long, draggy climbs to fast, technical singletrack - put a big grin on our faces. It's light, lively and demands constant rider input, but it's a whole heap of fun.

What, no disc brakes? No, but we're not bothered as, first, the rim brakes work well enough in all but the filthiest of conditions. Second, they save weight over budget disc alternatives. Third, they've left room in the budget for an upgrade to a Deore XT rear mech - giving minor bragging rights. Trek has also specced disc-compatible hubs for a quick and cheap upgrade. Our biggest spec niggle is that inline seatpost, which leaves little scope for fore-and-aft saddle adjustment.

Share this article

• Terms & Conditions
• Subscribe to our magazines
• Manage preferences

• Forum Listing
• Marketplace
• Advanced Search
• Mountain Bike Manufacturer Forums
• Bike Manufacturers

Trek 6500 - disc brake install

• Add to quote

Hello group, I have a 2004 Trek 6500, stock with V-brakes. Recently added a Cane Creek Thud-buster seat post..... Love the bike, it's been great. Practically ride it every night afterwork. Lot's of canal's and horse trails by my house. Some day soon, I plan to hit South Mountain, (in Phoenix). Right now, just trying to build up endurance. I'm considering adding disc brakes. Possibly the Avid Ball Bearing, 160mm. With my Shimano M475 and the Manitou Axel, will this essentially be a "bolt on" without any adapters? Product informations says they'll work with the existing brake levers. Are new cables needed?  

javelina1 said: Hello group, I have a 2004 Trek 6500, stock with V-brakes. Recently added a Cane Creek Thud-buster seat post..... Love the bike, it's been great. Practically ride it every night afterwork. Lot's of canal's and horse trails by my house. Some day soon, I plan to hit South Mountain, (in Phoenix). Right now, just trying to build up endurance. I'm considering adding disc brakes. Possibly the Avid Ball Bearing, 160mm. With my Shimano M475 and the Manitou Axel, will this essentially be a "bolt on" without any adapters? Product informations says they'll work with the existing brake levers. Are new cables needed? Click to expand...

thanx for the book suggestion. I'll check that out. Interesting training philosophy. I'm of the type that thinks you need to fatigue yourself to get the "gain". wow, looks like an interesting read, and a big training shift on my part. regarding the disc brakes..... I'm a gadget freak. Love to tinker. pretty wild to consider disc brakes on bikes now days. Granted, there's a weight gain, but I'm not really a gram counter, (not at this point at least). Also, I was considering gettting new pedals. Looking at either the Shimano M324's or Wellgo WPD-95b's. Either seemed like a good clipless for a beginner like myself. I like the idea of having a platform on the other side of the clip. any thoughts to those? thanx for the info......  

javelina1 said: thanx for the book suggestion. I'll check that out. Interesting training philosophy. I'm of the type that thinks you need to fatigue yourself to get the "gain". wow, looks like an interesting read, and a big training shift on my part. regarding the disc brakes..... I'm a gadget freak. Love to tinker. pretty wild to consider disc brakes on bikes now days. Granted, there's a weight gain, but I'm not really a gram counter, (not at this point at least). Also, I was considering gettting new pedals. Looking at either the Shimano M324's or Wellgo WPD-95b's. Either seemed like a good clipless for a beginner like myself. I like the idea of having a platform on the other side of the clip. any thoughts to those? thanx for the info...... Click to expand...

funboarder1971 said: you do want to fatigue yourself, you just don't want to exhaust yourself. overtraining is much worse than undertraining, and the hrm will tell you exactly what your body is doing. discs do look cool! i'll grant them that... and they stop much better in the rain. i'll still run v-brakes whenever i can, unless i move back to portland or seattle. i'm an eggbeater guy myself. once you get used to clipless, you'll never want to go back to platforms... unless you get into dh/urban/fr. i NEED to be clipped in or my balance goes away. if you're using the bike as a commuter, the platform/clipless pedals are a good thing. Click to expand...

gopriest31 said: Youll need the bracket that Trek sells that bolts onto you left rear dropout- I have on 04 4900 with the same dropout. Its a very simple bolt on install. I dont have the part number but any trek dealer should have it (good ones will have it on the shelf) Everyone has an opinion on disc brakes - modulation & perfomance increase vs weight- Ive ridden both for a while, and I can say I'll never be without disc on the front- I can live with v brake on the rear, as I tend to use more front brake. Modulation and wet performance are an undeniable advantage- As far as weight, there is an increase, no question. The added wheel weight of the rotor is far less significant than if the same weight increase was made to the tire/rim, as the rotor weight is added very close to the axle centerline, so the impact of the added weight is minimal (it has less impact on acceleration of the wheel assembly) Im a recovering gadget-aholic, and couldnt resist the whole disc deal myself- Hayes hydros are my choice, but I hear great things from my buddies about their mechanicals- Mechs are much simpler and make trailside repairs much easier- Good luck whatever you do! Click to expand...

Uh... I thought Trek did away with that add-on bracket for '04? A friends '04 4300 appears to not need the bracket like my '02 did.  

RidgeRunner said: Uh... I thought Trek did away with that add-on bracket for '04? A friends '04 4300 appears to not need the bracket like my '02 did. Click to expand...

javelina1 said: my bad, a typo. my Trek 6500 is a 2005 model.... if it doesn't need the bracket, cool.... Click to expand...

gopriest31 said: Now Im confused... My new 05 Fuel 70 has a bolt on bracket for the rear caliper also.. My 4900 dropout has provisions for the same bolt on...wierd.. Im not totally sure on the year of my 4900 though- I was told it was an 04 by the seller. Good luck- Im curious on the book mentioned also, cause my current spinning regimen seems to help, but isnt enough. Take it ez Click to expand...

book just ordered the book from Amazon for around 13 bucks- thanks for the tip!  

• ?            
• 15.5M posts
• 516.3K members

Top Contributors this Month

• Crosscountry
• Rider Notes

2011 Trek 6500

A 26″ aluminum frame crosscountry bike with high-end components.

For This Bike

View more similar bikes →

A bike with lower gearing will be easier to ride up steep hills, while a higher top end means it will pedal faster down hills.

Similar Bikes

(descending)

Add custom gearing

5'0" – 5'7"

5'5" – 5'11"

5'9" – 6'3"

6'1" – 6'6"

🐐 Estimated

Do you have this bike? Help other riders make a decision about which size will work for them by sharing your own size and fit notes. Report your fit

Last updated June 29 Not listed for 2,487 days

Our people, your freight.

Yedaiah has a proven methodology for engaging customers using a collaborative solution development process to understand business needs., to tailor our solution to specifically deliver the objectives for our customer’s global supply chains., our core values:.

Innovative – Open and creative to customer and employee solutions.

Transparent Communication and Collaboration. We communicate openly.

Don’t fix what isn’t broken, unless it provides a road map to increased productivity.

Shared Goal & Initiative Alignment.We accomplish our goals more efficiently.

Our proactive approach to invoice consolidation and freight analysis reports.

We carry your trust.

With a global network and advanced logistics solutions, our air freight services provide., our clients, and what they say., delivered packages.

We strongly support best practice sharing across our operations around the world.

Countries Covered

As one of the world’s leading supply chain management companies.

Satisfied Clients

Provide best-in-class services across its integrated worldwide network.

Tons of Goods

Sustainability helps us reduce waste and share the benefits with our customers.

What makes us different?

What make us different.

"They have great service, quality products and we trust them. We value a local relationship and the impact it has on our community."      — Jason Manson

“It is a company we can count on. They are responsive, they bring new ideas and they care about the success of our organization. I’d recommend them to any athletic department.”      — Mr. Attkins

“We have a world-class supply chain that demands immediate response.Industriel came to us with creative, cost saving solutions related to inventory management. Last year we identified a 3% savings across one category.”      — Marcos Valtea

"Great job...thank you for getting this to us in an extremely short amount of time.hey also showed me ways to reduce costs in supply chain efficiencies. Industriel are always responsive and I know I can count on them to deliver.”      — Sandra Mitchel

"Dealing with Industriel on a day-to-day basis has proved to be very easy. We make a telephone call, look at the options available, and then let them get on with the job while we concentrate on our business.      — Robert Frost

Değirmendere Mah. Sanayi Cad.8

Sk. No:7 Kuşadası 09400 Aydın

+ (90) 256 340 03 40

[email protected]

Mon - Fri: 9:00 - 18:00 Closed on Weekends

Küçükbakkalköy Mah. Fevzipaşa Cad.

Bozkır Sok. No:1 ,K:3 D:15 Ataşehir 34750 Istanbul

+ (90) 216 900 28 62

+(90) 216 576 47 90

[email protected]

2, Stroitelny Lane, Elektrostal , Moscow

+7 (499) 390 35 04

128 City Road , London EC1V 2NX

+44 20 4577 1271

[email protected]

Mon - Fri: 9:30 - 17:00 Closed on Weekends

26 Seaman Ave Hempstead 11550 New York

+1 646 980 28 04

[email protected]

Humberto 1 985,Piso 2,Ofic 222

Constitucion Capital Federal CP 1103

Buenos Aires

+54 11 52 371 371

[email protected]

Mon - Fri: 9:00 - 17:30 Closed on Weekends

Subscribe to our newsletter:

Moskva-Class Cruisers

Separate design teams often attempt to meet a set of ship specifications with completely different, although equally valid, strategies. To fulfill the requirements issued in April 2169 for the successor (NX-223) to the Daedalus class, which was introduced at the end of the Romulan War, Prosser & Ankopitch proposed a ship with an extremely large, spherical command hull attached to a nearly vestigial engineering hull. The proposal from the Mikoyan-Tupolev-Dassault Bureau used a long narrow command hull with a minimal frontal silhouette counterbalanced by an equally long engineering hull.

The engineers at Tezuka-Republic decided that the division of ship's functions between a command/crew hull and an engineering hull was arbitrary and unnecessarily restricted design options. Therefore, rather than gathering all the specified facilities in a single hull, their design TR-223A spread them across two hulls, as in Daedalus , and segregated the SSWR-IV-C warp core to a "bustle" at the extreme aft end of the secondary hull. This bustle could be separated easily and quickly from the rest of the engineering hull in the event of a warp core breach. The now-unpowered warp nacelles would then be shed. In this way, the demands of safety would be met without warp dynamics being degraded either by an excessively large frontal silhouette or by longitudinal warp field imbalance.

Although the Ship Specifications Review Board praised Tezuka-Republic for its creative solution to the problem of admittedly contradictory requirements for extreme safety and improved warp performance, they were forced to disqualify design TR-223A for not precisely meeting contract specifications. Therefore, in October 2171, construction contract NX-223 for Starfleet's new cruiser was awarded to Prosser & Ankopitch for what would become the Wasp class .

However, almost no one was happy with the new Wasp ships. Even before the contract was awarded, voices within Starfleet and within industry had strongly criticized the specifications of April 2169. These critics charged that they would lead to a mediocre, albeit safe, fighting ship. Two separate classes were needed, not a single class that was neither a proper explorer nor a proper warship. When Wasp was finally launched in 2173, her performance during precommisioning trials clearly showed that the critics had been correct. Although the performance problems were related in part to the continuing unavailability of the more powerful Tezuka-Republic Hiryu ("Flying Dragon") mark III warp nacelles, Wasp was obviously not the ship Starfleet had hoped for.

In a second attempt to obtain a reliable and capable warship, new specifications (NX-374) were issued in September 2175, little more than a year after USS  Wasp had entered service. Adding to this sense of urgency were intelligence reports suggesting that the Romulans had either developed or otherwise acquired matter/antimatter (M/AM) reactors. This time the specifications put less emphasis upon safety. The original requirement for completely separate command and engineering hulls was eliminated; instead, any hull configuration was allowed as long as the warp core could be quickly separated from the rest of the ship. Furthermore, requirements for speed, acceleration, and maneuverability both under impulse power and under warp power were increased, as were performance levels for target acquisition, tracking, and servicing.

These new specifications were a clear, albeit belated, admission that the critics had been correct all along: one class could not be expected to serve as both an explorer and a main battleship. In fact, starship technology was not considered sufficiently mature for a single ship to adequately fulfill both mission profiles until 2245, when the Constitution -class heavy cruiser was launched. (The controversy continues even today in the wake of the problems of the Galaxy -class explorer.)

Luckily, the designers and engineers at Tezuka-Republic had not been idle since their disappointing loss of the Wasp contract in 2171. Instead, they had spent their time refining design TR-223A so that their new entry (TR-374A) was markedly superior to what had been submitted 5 years earlier. In particular, the new SSWR-V warp reactor allowed the bustle to be made smaller, lighter, and even more easily separable. Therefore, it was hardly surprising when in November 2176 Tezuka-Republic was awarded the production contract over designs from Shimata-Dominquez, Prosser & Ankopitch, Mikoyan-Tupolev Dassault, Monarch R&U, and Thornycroft/Ebisu for what was to become the Moskva class.

However, engineering prowess may not have been the only factor in Tezuka-Republic's winning of the contract. There were accusations that the delay in delivery of the Hiryu warp engines was an attempt by Tezuka-Republic to prevent Wasp from reaching her designed performance levels. While no conclusive incriminating evidence has come to light, the delivery of the long-awaited engines shortly before the scheduled launch of Moskva in December 2177 is certainly suspicious. Tezuka-Republic maintains that if their submission of 2169 had been selected, its performance would also have not have met design specifications without the Hiryu engines. However, critics charge that TR-223A was not as reliant as Wasp on the type of engine used. Furthermore, once the Wasp contract was awarded, and even after Wasp was launched, Tezuka-Republic certainly made no efforts to accelerate delivery of Hiryu.

These controversies were soon rendered moot as the new Moskva class was recognized as a significant advance in starship design. The most important new feature was Moskva's discoid primary hull. Earlier designs had chosen a spherical primary hull for reasons of economy. Simple geometric relationships dictate that a spherical hull has the smallest surface area for a given volume. Therefore, construction costs are lower and shields are more efficient. Furthermore, institutional inertia had led nearly all exploratory cruisers originating until that time from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the United States Astronautics Agency, the United Earth Space Probe Agency, and its successor organizations to have spherical hulls.

The designers of USS  Moskva employed a biconvex disc for several reasons. Their initial motive was to increase hull volume while minimizing both frontal and lateral silhouettes. A warship with large frontal and lateral silhouettes would be at a greater disadvantage in most tactical situations than would be a ship with an increased superior silhouette. However, the discoid hull allowed the traditional radial layout of command hulls to be retained.

More important than these tactical advantages were functional advantages. As was shown with the Wasp class, warp field geometry would have been awkward if a spherical hull with its relatively large frontal area had been used. The discoid hull was also found to channel warp field flow across its upper surface towards the bussard ram scoops of the warp nacelles. This channeling effect improved field efficiency at all power levels and speeds. As the understanding of warp field mechanics was refined, the trend towards saucer-shaped primary hulls would be intensified in later Starfleet vessels.

In most respects, the Moskva class continued design and engineering trends established in the Comet and Daedalus classes introduced at the end of the Romulan War. As in these classes, ship functions were clearly divided between a command/crew hull and an engineering/propulsion hull. The bridge was returned to its customary position atop the command hull and the shuttlecraft bay was again placed in the secondary hull. The fusion reactor was centered along the longitudinal axis of the ship, and impulse thrust ports exited immediately in front of the warp bustle detachment seam.

Weaponry was the then-standard mix of fusion-warhead missiles and lasers. New to this class was an early type of ultraphased pulse laser cannon, two of which were mounted in the chin of the primary hull. Although the on-target energy output of this new weapon approached that of early phasers, its power requirement was higher and its range was substantially less. However, subsequent refinements lead to steady improvement and, ultimately, to the development of true phasers in 2202. Although Moskva -class ships were the first to be fitted with phasers in 2204, lasers were still carried by the Moskva class and later classes until the 2220s. Finally, warp capability was supplied by the long-awaited Hiryu mark III drive units.

The first ship of the new class, USS  Moskva (NCC-374), entered service with Starfleet in April 2179. An additional 30 ships (NCC-375 to NCC-404) joined the fleet through 2183. Moskva -class ships gained immediate popularity with officers and crews. First, total laser firepower was increased some 75% over that in the preceding Wasp class. Second, because the ship's mass was more equally distributed along the longitudinal axis than in the Wasp class, Moskva was significantly more maneuverable at both sublight and warp speeds. Finally, the more warp-dynamic design allowed greater cruising and maximum speeds.

The Moskva class had an outstanding safety record. No ships were lost because of mechanical failures. However, an incident occurred aboard USS  Johannesburg in 2186 when a faulty nacelle flow monitor falsely indicated a runaway positive feedback power loop within the plasma flow governor. Believing that a catastrophic warp core explosion was imminent, Chief Engineer Roberta Bocharnikov ordered the warp nacelles and warp bustle to be separated. Although unnecessary, these maneuvers were successful in causing the separated warp core to initiate its automatic shut-down routine. The warp core, nacelles, and the rest of the ship were towed to Starbase 13, where they were successfully re-mated. Despite her supreme embarrassment, Bocharnikov oversaw the reassembly and relaunching of Johannesburg and retained her position as chief engineer.

Although most ships of the Moskva class had left front-line service by 2215, some continued to serve as auxiliaries and training vessels until the 2240s. After retirement from active duty, Moskva -class ships were used as testbeds for many emerging technologies owing to the similarities of their layouts to those of succeeding classes. USS  Moskva was the site of the first successful ship-to-surface transport of a Human being in 2206, and USS  Gato was the first ship to fire photon torpedoes in 2214. In addition, Taurus -class tugs, which entered service in 2182, and Sanford -class repair tenders, which entered service in 2185, were derived from the Moskva class and used the same primary hull and warp drive assembly.

The Moskva -class cruiser USS  Aurora (NCC-377), a participant of the Battle of Eohippus IV, is on display at the Starfleet Museum.

Standard displacement: 67,750 t

Crew complement: 160 (27 officers + 133 crew) Weapons: 8 Type VI laser turrets (8 × 1 mounts), 2 Type VII laser cannons (fixed mounts), 2 missile launchers with 36 Spartak missiles Embarked craft: 4 medium cargo/personnel shuttlecraft, 2 light personnel shuttlecraft, 5 fighter/scouts Warp drive: SSWR-V-A spherical cavity M/AM reactor with 2 Hiryu III nacelles Velocity: wf 4.0, cruise; wf 5.0, supercruise; wf 5.2, maximum Units commissioned: 31

• Rocky Mountain
• Specialized
• YT Industries
• Allied Cycle Works
• Black Market
• DALLINGRIDGE
• Diamondback
• Early Rider
• EVO Bicycles
• Growler Bikes
• Guerrilla Gravity
• iGO Electric
• Intense 951
• Juiced Bikes
• View all brands
• Production Privee
• Rad Power Bikes
• Rambo Bikes
• Riese & Müller
• Soul Fast E Bikes
• Spark Cycleworks
• State Bicycle Co.
• Structure Cycleworks
• Surface 604
• Van Nicholas
• Vintage Electric
• We Are One Composites

• Cross Country

• All Mountain

• AUS $ NZD $ USD $ CAD $ GBP £ EUR €

Size / 15.5", 17.5", 19.5", 21.5"

At a glance

Where to buy.

Specifications

• Frame Alpha SLR Aluminum
• Wheels Shimano M475 disc hubs; WTB Speed Disc rims
• Wheel Size 26"
• Tires Bontrager ACX, 26x2.2", 52/54
• Crank Bontrager Sport 42/32/22
• Front Derailleur Shimano Alivio
• Rear Derailleur Shimano Deore
• Shifters Shimano Alivio
• Brakeset Hayes Sole XC, hydraulic disc
• Handlebar Bontrager Crowbar Sport
• Saddle Bontrager Select
• Seatpost Bontrager Sport
• Stem Bontrager Sport, 10 degree
• Headset Aheadset, semi-cartridge, sealed

Q: Where to buy a 2005 Trek 6500?

The 2005 Trek 6500 may be purchased directly from Trek .

Q: What size wheels does the 2005 Trek 6500 have?

The 2005 Trek 6500 has 26" wheels.

Q: What size 2005 Trek 6500 should I get?

No comments on this bike yet. Why not be the first?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Want more MTB in your mailbox?

The latest on mountain bikes delivered straight to your mailbox.

More Bikes in Range View All

Trek 6500 Disc

More cross country bikes view all.

Trek Cake 3 Disc

Moots Mountaineer Shimano XT

- YBB micro-suspension soft tail design- External cable routing with internal dropper post routing- Optional rack eyelets- Photos show alternate build

Yeti SB115 T3

Deals view all, view all deals, recent posts view all.

Blackburn Honest Digital Pressure Gauge Review

It's 2020 people. The squeeze and bounce test doesn't cut it anymore (and this is…

Comparing Mountain Bikes

Mountain Bikes are complicated machines. They have parts from hundreds of different manufacturers, come in…

Undomestic Mountain Bikes: Here’s what we know

Update March 2020: Undomestic has announced that they are manufacturing frames "at this moment" and…

Send Feedback

Have a suggestion? Looking for a bike that's not on MTB Database? Or perhaps you've spotted an error?

We'd love to hear from you. Let us know with the form below.

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience possible. Learn more.

About MTB Database

Explore, search and compare thousands of the world’s best mountain bikes here on Mountain Bike Database.

Compare prices, components, suspension, reviews, images and more on current and past MTB’s. You can even share reviews, comments and questions on mountain bikes. View and compare a huge selection of bikes from brands such as Trek , Specialized , Giant , Santa Cruz , Norco and more .

We strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information for mountain bikes on MTB Database. If you’ve spotted any issues, please let us know . We also include helpful tools, such as our frame size calculator, to assist you in choosing the right mountain bike. Bear in mind that these tools serve as a guide and simply provide a general indication. Refer to information provided by your bike manufacturer for the most applicable information for your bike.

Bikes By Brand

Bikes by year, bikes by riding style, bikes by wheel size, popular bikes.

• 2022 Specialized Epic EVO Comp
• 2022 Trek Marlin 6
• 2022 Specialized Enduro Comp
• 2022 Specialized S-Works Epic EVO
• 2022 Specialized Epic EVO Expert
• 2022 Giant Fathom 29 1
• 2022 Trek Marlin 7

Latest Bikes

• 2023 Commencal SUPREME DH V5 SIGNATURE 70'S
• 2023 Orange Phase 29 Factory
• 2022 Commencal META SX V4 TEAM Frame
• 2023 Commencal SUPREME DH V5 SIGNATURE LTD
• 2023 Commencal META SX V4 - Frame
• 2023 Riese & Müller Swing4 vario
• 2023 Riese & Müller Swing4 silent

An archive of Star Trek News

Star Trek Into Darkness Moscow Premiere

• Cast & Crew
• Star Trek Into Darkness

Yesterday was the Moscow premiere of Star Trek into Darkness and in attendance were J.J. Abrams, Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto , and Alice Eve .

It was a rainy day in Moscow, but that didn’t deter the stars or the fans waiting to see them.

Click on thumbnails for larger-sized photos from the event.

About The Author

T'Bonz

See author's posts

More Stories

Cruz Supports Rapp’s SAG-AFTRA Candidacy

• Star Trek: Discovery

Jones: Creating Your Own Family

Burton Hosts Jeopardy! This Week

You may have missed.

Several S&S Trek Books On Sale For $1 This Month

• Star Trek: Lower Decks

Another Classic Trek Actor On Lower Decks This Week

Classic Trek Games Now On GOG

• Star Trek: Prodigy

Star Trek: Prodigy Opening Credits Released

The Moscow Sessions Complete (3 disc set)