prestige mp tour

• Members Login
• head prestige mp 2021 racket review

Head Prestige MP 2021 Racket Review

With this updated version of the Prestige MP for 2021, Head has upped the forgiveness and power of their most iconic control focused model. The naming conventions of the Prestige lineup have changed a bit since the previous generation, with the MP now representing the previously named ‘Prestige Tour’. In this case, MP stands for Main Performance rather than Mid Plus (don’t worry we’re just as confused as you)! Whatever they call it, this version of the Prestige promises to be more dialled in and user friendly than previous versions. The improved feel, power and stability over the previous generation make the Head Prestige MP 2021 better suited to an aggressive baseline game style, without losing any of that classic feel or control.

Custom Fittings

Discover your perfect racket and string combo!

Groundstrokes

9 out of 10

Head has added more weight to the Prestige MP and upped the swing weight as a result. The idea here is to give the racket more plow through, helping players to get more power from their ground strokes.

This has the benefit of adding stability to the racket whilst reducing unwanted vibrations that previously lighter versions could sometimes suffer from.

To remedy this, Head has also added a new technology called Auxetic to the throat of the racket. This carbon fibre based material actively responds to the contact you make with the ball and where it is in the string bed.

Whilst the flexibility and plush feel of the Prestige line up has been a characteristic feature of the model, adding a bit more weight and dampening to the racket has taken it to the next level.

You can generate more power with this version of the Prestige, due to the uprated force that gets transferred into your shots. But Head has not lost sight of the Prestige’s main attraction and retained a great deal of control and feel thanks to their technological upgrades.

One thing that should be taken into account is that this is definitely a racket that suits an intermediate to advanced level player. This is the most performance focussed racket in the 2021 Prestige line up and should be given the respect it deserves.

You need to be timing the ball and striking it cleanly to get the most out of this racket. Despite the added power due to the extra weight, it is not the most forgiving racket in the world, so beginners should go for something with a bit more margin for error.

That being said, I really got on well with the Head Prestige MP. The extra swing weight gives the racket a more rounded appeal, making it more suited to a wider audience of modern players.

This may sound a bit counter intuitive given that adding more weight to the racket should make it harder to swing and therefore more difficult to play with.

However, the extra pop that you get from the stick means rather than the Prestige MP mainly appealing to all court players that want that classic feel for when they rush into the net, baseliners will also enjoy the updated racket.

The racket pockets the ball really nicely thanks to its relatively flexible frame and adaptive materials. You can feel the ball lingering on the string bed longer than with a stiffer frame, which gives you that classic Prestige plushness.

The combination of comfort, control and extra weight of shot makes this one of the best performance rackets out there today.

The added weight also makes the racket more accessible to a baseline player that wants to dominate with heavy ground strokes from the baseline but also feels comfortable transitioning to the net.

This type of player would appreciate the added weight and stability of the 2021 Prestige MP, as it allows them to hit heavier compared to previous versions.

Bear in mind though that the extra power you get from the Head Prestige MP is generated from yourself more than it is the racket. The added weight will enhance long, fast swings and give them more power and spin.

But, if you have a slower, more compact swing you’ll most likely think the racket is way too underpowered and unforgiving. This is why the racket is geared towards intermediate to advanced level players that want to improve their game.

Again, the 2021 Prestige MP and I got on really well and this is definitely a racket I would recommend to a player that wants to blend control and feel with stability and sledgehammer-like power. Sure, it takes a bit of getting used to due to the higher swing weight, but once you get dialled in it is an absolute joy to hit groundstrokes with.

8.5 out of 10

Volleys are another area that the Head Prestige MP does a great job of. You can place the ball exactly where you want it thanks to the sense of connection the racket gives you. The dense string pattern also adds to the control of the racket, again helping to dial in the precision.

The added weight does improve the stability of the Prestige MP. When you just want to redirect the ball with authority and get a solid volley past your opponent quickly, the racket feels reassuringly secure.

However, the downside of the higher swing weight is that the racket becomes a little less manoeuvrable than previous versions.

This is not so much of a problem if you are a confident net player that has great volley technique and is happy using the weight of the racket to redirect the ball.

But, if you are less of a strong volleyer that is seeking a bit more forgiveness from your racket and need something a little easier to swing, this version of the Head Prestige probably isn’t for you.

However, I enjoyed the crispness of the racket along with its ability to cushion and punch the ball well in equal measure. The weighty feel in the hand made it feel solid on contact and that gave me a lot more confidence when hitting through my volleys firmly.

On serve, the Head Prestige MP 2021 was a very accurate racket that also had a surprising amount of spin. The added weight gives you a lot more of a solid feel on contact, which is particularly satisfying on first serves.

The 18×19 string pattern also helps generate a fair amount of spin, helping you hit an all round heavier serve.

The Prestige MP’s precision is a real asset on serve. The ease of which I could find my serving targets was pretty impressive.

However, one area that the added weight could cause a problem is with tiring out your arm or shoulder. Even for an advanced player that has previously suffered from arm issues, this could be a bit of an issue when using this racket.

It is not a major drawback of the Prestige MP by any means, but definitely something to take into account. It is well worth testing this racket before going ahead and buying it, especially if you are not used to a racket with this kind of swing weight.

8 out of 10

The control oriented nature of the Head Prestige MP 2021 makes it a solid performer when returning serve.

You can block the ball back accurately in order to nullify a big serving opponent, whilst the spin potential and stability make adding a bit more weight to your shots rewarding.

The Prestige MP doesn’t give you much in the way of easy power when returning, so if you are used to a frame with a more forgiving sweet spot and more pop, this may take some adjustment.

That being said, when you time the ball right and connect well, the ball is sent down the other end of the court with power, precision and spin.

You definitely need to be timing the ball well to make the most of this racket, particularly when returning serve.

Whilst the additional weight makes the Prestige MP a little more demanding to swing quickly, it more than makes up for it in additional punch. Time the ball well and you’ll be returning like Novak !

Overall, the Head Prestige MP 2021 is a great control oriented racket that has been tailored to suit the modern game. The addition of a heftier swing weight and better damping technology gives the racket a more baseline friendly set up whilst still retaining the classic Prestige feel.

The reduced manoeuvrability and whippiness that the 2021 model has over previous generations may not be the best of updates for some players.

But, if you are a performance player that needs a racket that will give out what you put in, the Head Prestige MP is a solid choice.

It rewards faster strokes with heavier shots and the control and feel that the racket is famed for makes it a great companion up at the net.

This makes the Head Prestige MP a perfect choice for the aggressive baseliner that likes to finish points off at the net and wants to take their game to the next level!

Is This Racket Right For Your Game? Find Out With a Custom Fitting!

Get the Head Prestige MP 2021 for the Best Price from RacquetGuys!

41 Lessons · $49.00

Doubles Tactics

Supercharge Your Doubles With TheTennisBros.com

10 Lessons · $35.00

The Art of Volleying

Become clinical at the net with our in depth volleying walkthroughs!

35 Lessons · $49.00

Singles Tactics

Outsmart your opponent with superior tactics! Our strategies can be quickly implemented for instant results!

We save you time and money by doing the painful research process for you!

No more frustration in your game, due to your equipment failing you!

Start playing the best tennis of your life and win more matches!

Get Our Free Guide to Supercharging Your Tennis Equipment!

Sign up to receive your Free Guide to Supercharging Your Tennis Equipment , straight to your inbox!

Explore more

Sep 14, 2023 • Boom Head

Head Boom MP Tennis Racket Review

So, you want to know all about the Head Boom MP? From the family of frames endorsed by US sensation Coco Gauff and the classy Italian, Lorenzo Musetti? The celeste and black color frame makes the Boom line stand out, but does its performance match the cosmetic? With an ever…

Aug 31, 2023 • Babolat Dunlop Head Prince Wilson Yonex

Men’s vs Women’s Tennis Rackets: What’s the Difference?

Is there really a difference between men’s and women’s rackets? This is a commonly asked question that doesn’t have a very clear answer. Whilst there aren’t specific rackets that are designed for men or women tennis players, there are some trends in both the men’s and women’s games that make…

• Tennis Rackets
• Shop by Brand
• Junior Rackets
• Used Tennis Rackets
• Sale Rackets
• Racket Help
• Racket Reviews
• Junior Store
• Men's Apparel
• Le Coq Sportif
• NK Foundation
• Original Penguin
• Roland Garros
• Sergio Tacchini
• Tennis Warehouse Europe
• Under Armour
• New Arrivals
• Shop by Type
• Hoodies & Jackets
• Pants & Tights
• Baselayers & Compression
• Men's Socks
• Women's Apparel
• Lucky in Love
• Tanks & Tops
• Long Sleeve Tops
• Women's Socks
• Team Apparel
• Hats & Visors
• Head & Wristbands
• Men's Shoes
• Shop by Surface
• Flips & Slides
• Women's Shoes
• Running Shoes
• Shoe Reviews
• Tennis Balls
• Tennis Bags
• 3 Racket Bags
• 6 Racket Bags
• 8-12 Racket Bags
• Tennis Backpacks
• Strings Sets & Reels
• String Reels
• Multifilament
• Natural Gut
• Synthetic Gut
• WeissCannon
• Stringing Machines
• Tool & Supplies
• Grips & Accessories
• Replacement Grips
• Vibration Dampeners
• Racket accessories
• Other Items
• Recovery & Therapy
• Memorabilia
• Tennis Training
• Miscellaneous
• Clubs / Teams
• Pickleball Paddles
• Balls and Nets
• Reviews Reviews
• Learning Center Learning Center
• >Message Board Message Board
• Podcast Podcast
• Promos Promos
• Gift Cards Gift Cards
• Contact Us Contact Us
• Order Tracking Order Tracking
• Shipping Shipping
• Returns Info Returns Info
• Sizing Charts Sizing Charts
• Warranties Warranties
• Careers Careers
• Account Login
• Mailing List Mailing List

Head Prestige MP 2023 Racket

Select Your Country to View Pricing

Head Tour Team 9R Bag (Black/Orange)

2 rackets plus Head Tour Team 9R Bag (Black/Orange) is 481,70 €.

Savings: 3,00 €

Head softens the feel of the Prestige MP for 2023

Head adds another chapter to the Prestige MP ! Like the previous generation, the Prestige MP combines an 18x19 string pattern with a classic 21.5 mm box beam and a slightly more forgiving 639 cm 2 . It is faster and more forgiving than the Prestige Pro while delivering the iconic control that Prestige purists crave. It also feels wonderfully solid for its weight class, which bodes well for those who want a traditional player's racket without the bulk. For 2023, Head lowers the RA stiffness to give this racket a softer more classic feel. Head has also lowered the swingweight, making it easier for the player to scramble on defence, whip up spin or react quickly at net. The main technology is Auxetic 2 , a uniquely flexible material in the yoke and handle to optimise feel. The MP also benefits from Graphene 360+ (labeled Graphene Inside), which strengthens the frame in key locations to increase power and stability. Ultimately, the Prestige MP is an outstanding option for intermediate and advanced players who want a speedy player's racket with outstanding control and feel.

Specifications

Other items to consider.

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review for this product.

• Skip to primary navigation
• Skip to main content
• Skip to primary sidebar

Tennis Tribe

Tennis Racquet & Gear Reviews, Doubles Lessons & News

Head Prestige Review: Compare All Models of the Prestige Tennis Racquets

Will Boucek · March 10, 2024

When you buy a product through our links below, we may earn money from our affiliate partners to help support the site. However, this does not affect our evaluation or recommendation of each product.  See our list of partners & how we get paid here . You can also learn our process for reviewing tennis gear here .

The Head Prestige is one of the best tennis racquets for control and feel on the market. Below, we’ll review the Head Prestige, including pros, cons, and different models of the racquet. Then, we’ll compare it to other tennis racquets to help you decide if the Prestige is right for you.

Review Summary & Ratings for the Head Prestige

The Head Prestige has been around for a long time and is known for its precise control and feel for advanced-level tennis players.

Head makes Prestige tennis racquets for intermediate to advanced tennis players. Their most recent Prestige model is from 2023.

See our ratings, plus the pros and cons of the Head Prestige below for a quick glance at how it performs compared to other tennis racquets.

Our Ratings for the Head Prestige

• Groundstrokes: 8
• Great advanced-level racquet for control & feel
• Weight helps with power & stability against pace
• Excellent stability on volleys
• Comfortable frame on contact
• Great touch around the net
• Very stable returning against hard servers
• Not great for beginner to intermediate players
• Heavy frame can be difficult to handle

The Different Versions of the Head Prestige Tennis Racquet

The Head Prestige tennis racquet comes in several versions that vary in weight and size. Below is a list of the different Head Prestige racquets on the market today.

• Head Prestige Pro
• Head Prestige Tour
• Head Prestige MP L

We’ll review each version in more detail below.

What’s New with the 2023 Auxetic 2 Prestige?

Head has updated the Prestige line of racquets with the new Auxetic 2 technology, adding extra flexibility and comfort to the famed line. Fans of the Prestige will be happy that they still have a very classic feel that Head is known for. The specs for the Prestige Pro and Prestige Tour racquets are nearly identical to the previous version, but I did feel a little more power compared to the previous version.

• Prestige Pro: Very similar with a little extra power
• Prestige Tour: Also similar with a little extra power
• Prestige MP L: Noticeable increase in power, spin, and maneuverability

The main difference in the 2023 Prestige line is with the Prestige MP L (formerly just the Prestige MP). This racquet has been updated from an 18×19 string pattern to a 16×19 pattern, providing a little extra power and spin. It is also a little bit lighter, dropping in weight to 11.2 ounces. Maneuverability has been slightly improved with a slight sacrifice in stability, but overall the updates make this racquet a little more accessible to those that prefer a lighter racquet that maintains the classic feel.

3 Steps to Find the Perfect Tennis Racquet for Your Game

Free checklist with 27 racquet recommendations

Head Prestige Pro Review

The Pro version is the most control-oriented Prestige racquet. It is one of the best 8 tennis racquets for control .

Head Prestige Pro Racquet Specifications

• Weight: 11.9 oz. strung
• Head Size: 98 square inches
• Length: 27 inches
• Balance: 320 mm
• String Pattern: 18×20

The Prestige Pro has a heavy frame and is best for advanced players only. This added weight helps with both power and stability when hitting against pace. Lower level players will have trouble handling this racquet.

The tight string pattern and classic 98 square inch frame give it excellent feel and control as well. This is makes the Prestige Pro great for players who can generate their own power. It’s also one of the best racquets on the market for volleys and feel shots around the net.

On-Court Performance Review of the Prestige Pro

The Prestige Pro is going to give you a precise feel on all shots so you can place the ball anywhere on the court.

• On groundstrokes, the Prestige Pro will help you generate enough power, but with better control than most modern racquets.
• On volleys, the stability of this racquet will stand out. You will feel in control on both defensive and attacking volleys. It will feel great on half-volleys as well. Because of its weight, it is more difficult to maneuver than some other racquets.
• On returns, the stability will help against powerful first serves. Against second serves, you will be able to step in and hit with controlled power.
• On serves, you won’t be able to create quite as much power. This racquet helps you least in this area, however, you should still find good control with your serve.

Overall, the Head Prestige Pro is a great advanced tennis racquet . I would not recommend it for beginners or lower-level intermediate players.

Other Sellers: Amazon.com

Read our Head Radical Review to find more beginner and intermediate-friendly racquets.

Head Prestige Tour Review

The Prestige Tour tennis racquet is a smaller version of the racquet with a more open string pattern. It’s great for high-level players who want more spin and a smaller frame.

Head Prestige Tour Racquet Specifications

• Weight: 11.7 oz. strung
• Head Size: 95 square inches
• Balance: 325 mm
• String Pattern: 16×19

The head size of the Prestige Tour makes it easier to handle than the Pro version. However, there is a smaller sweet spot on this racquet so I don’t recommend it for people who don’t play frequently.

The open string pattern helps add power and spin potential. Similar to the Pro version, the weight of the Prestige Tour helps with stability.

On-Court Performance Review of the Prestige Tour

The Prestige Tour is a great classic racquet for advanced players.

• On groundstrokes, this racquet is stable and has good spin. You’ll move the ball around the court easily, but this frame isn’t as forgiving as other models.
• On volleys, the Prestige Tour will be easy to handle and stable at the net. Doubles players who like to play from the net will love this racquet.
• On returns, you will be able to control power and spin serves with this racquet, but you may struggle to hit deep in the court.
• On serves, you will find a good combination of power, control, and spin depending on how you string the racquet. A looser tension will help add power.

Head Prestige MP L Review

The Prestige MP L is great for both intermediate and advanced players who want more control in their game.

Head Prestige MP L Racquet Specifications

• Weight: 11.2 oz. strung
• Head Size: 99 square inches

The Head Prestige MP L is for Intermediate & Advanced Skill Levels

The Prestige MP L is a great tennis racquet for high level intermediate and advanced players who want something a bit easier to handle.

The 99 square inch frame gives this racquet a larger sweet spot. The balance point is moved slightly towards the head to add stability as well. Players who swing fast and freely will get the most out of this racquet.

The Prestige MP L is great for intermediate and advanced players who need a more forgiving racquet with good handling and excellent feel plus control.

This racquet won’t be great for players who need help with power. For that, I’d recommend reading our Head Extreme Review .

On-Court Performance Review of the Prestige MP L

The Prestige MP L is a well balanced racquet with a slight focus on feel and control.

• On groundstrokes, this racquet is forgiving, stable, and has decent spin potential. You’ll move the ball around the court with ease, but won’t generate a ton of power.
• On volleys, the Prestige MP L is easy to handle with great feel. You’ll have good touch and placement on volleys.
• On returns, this racquet offers a generous sweet spot so you can take big swings. You’ll also be able to defend against hard serves.
• On serves, you won’t find a ton of power, but should feel confident to hit your targets with spin and accuracy.

Stop paying full price for tennis gear! Get deals on shoes, racquets & more up to 70% off .

The Best Alternatives to the Head Prestige

Below are 3 other tennis racquets similar to the Head Prestige that you may want to consider.

• Wilson Pro Staff – Another control-oriented, advanced tennis racquet, the Pro Staff has precise feel in a comfortable frame. It is also the racquet used by Roger Federer. It’s a bit more difficult to swing though.
• Wilson Blade – A widely-used racquet on the pro tour, the Wilson Blade will offer better power and spin than the Prestige. This is a better option for intermediate players or older adults.
• Babolat Pure Strike – The Pure Strike has more power than the Prestige and will have good feel from the baseline. It’s a great option for players who need a little more MPH.

My Experience Playing with the Head Prestige

I have played with several versions of the Prestige over the years because I love the classic feel they provide. I do think this is a good update, as the previous version was low-powered, even compared to most other control racquets. The new version does have a little more power without changing much else.

The Prestige is still one of the best racquets on the market for stability, control, and feel. It excels especially well at the net where control and feel are most important.

A slight increase in power also helped on the return, where this racquet is probably the weakest for me. The update helps handle big serves a little better, but is still not a shining point for this racquet.

This racquet is similar to the Wilson Pro Staff but with a bit more stability.

While I think the Prestige tennis racquet is a very formidable tennis racquet, I do still prefer my customized Yonex Vcore Pro (I have the 97HD version), which plays similarly but with a little more modern feel.

About Will Boucek

Will Boucek is the Founder & CEO of Tennis Tribe. With over two decades of experience playing & coaching tennis, Will now works as a doubles strategy analyst for ATP & WTA tour players and coaches. Will helps tennis players at every level play better doubles through smarter strategy. He also has expertise in tennis racquets & gear, testing the latest products from Wilson, Babolat, Head, Prince, and other tennis brands.

FREE 20-page guide - Learn 3 doubles tactics to force errors and get more easy volleys! Download

Head Prestige MP L Review

With its blend of precision and power, the head prestige mp l is the perfect racket for ambitious players. how does it play find out in this playtest & review..

Since the late 1980s, players have enjoyed Head’s line of Prestige rackets. The Prestige Pro, launched in 1987, had a thinner frame relative to many other rackets on the market. This helped aerodynamics and, combined with smaller head sizes, made the frames famous for their control and precision. Today, big names like Marin Cilic, Aslan Karatsev and Gilles Simon use the Prestige range.

The New Prestige rackets

In the Winter of 2021, Head unveiled a new line of Prestige rackets:

• Prestige Pro
• Prestige Tour
• Prestige MP
• Prestige MP L

The big difference in 2021 is that Head introduced Auxetic material into the frame’s construction. This expands and contracts with the ball’s impact, offering a greater feel. Another change is that Head subtracted the choice of an “S” frame – the lightest of the range with an unstrung weight of 295 g. Now the most lightweight is the MP L, which weighs 300g.

Prestige Cosmetics

The new look of the Prestige is a stark contrast to its immediate predecessor range and calls back to its original roots. In 2019 the racket was decked out in a striking bright red. Here, the pallet is instead subtle and stylish – a matte black base with a rich, glossy burgundy (first seen in the 1987 Pro model) diagonally sweeping the frame, as if the racket had been dipped at an angle. 

This toned-down but professional looking cosmetic better suits the frame’s sophisticated and precise capabilities. Head uses the brighter red colour sparingly but to significant effect, with the logo and company name standing out proud against the relatively darker background.

Along one side of the throat, “Prestige” is spelt out boldly with a red “P” and light-grey accompanying letters.

The bumpers are tapered and cleaner, appearing integrated with the frame itself, and don’t stick out at the end like previous iterations.

Specifications and Setup

The Prestige MP L racket used in this playtest was strung with Head Hawk at 55 lb, giving a strung weight of 317.9 g and a swing weight of 324.8. I measured the strung balance at 330 mm.

First Impressions

With the 2018 Prestige as my regular racket, I was excited to give its updated counterpart a playest. The first thing I noticed was the weight – a 5 g addition to what I was used to. Instantly everything was smoother and more stable.

When I set up my legs for a shot and felt the racket hang for a moment in the air, I noticed the mass gently bearing on my wrist and the additional power, and plough-through it generated. There was little or no resistance on contact. The swing path was like a knife cutting through butter, as I felt the frame deal with the ball with ease.

The ball came off with a satisfying “thud” and travelled with more momentum towards its target. Consistently, the racket possessed this same, smooth comfort.

Aesthetically, I love the matte black and glossy burgundy. In an attempt to become increasingly Federesque, I had tried out the Wilson Pro Staff 97 a couple of years ago but found it unforgiving and difficult to control. Here, the new design of the Prestige gave me a reprieve, with the black background edging me a little closer to Federer’s style.

One thing I appreciated was the factory default grip the racket came with. Since buying my 2018 Prestige frame, I treasured the Head Hydrosorb Pro grip. It was thin enough to feel some edge from the bevels but sufficiently comfortable to hit with for extended periods.

It was the perfect level of tackiness without chaffing my palm. When it was time to replace the grip, I searched high and low for the same version.

The individually available Head Hydrosorb Pro grips were slightly thicker and waxier, similar to the original, but never had the same magic. The thinner default grip on the MP L helped me control the racket and aided manoeuvrability.

Full Head Prestige MP L Review

Groundstrokes

Overall, the weight gave my groundstrokes more length, so even when I hit a comparatively weak shot or was on the defensive, the ball still landed with enough depth on my opponent’s side of the court. I maintained complete control over the shot selection, varying speed, the level of topspin especially, and direction with no issue.

On the forehand side, I found the Prestige MP L very helpful in generating extra topspin. An increase in head size (by five in 2 ), and the classic thin frame, meant the ball leapt over the net and came down with considerably more arc. Especially while playing on the artificial clay, this denied my opponent the chance to build up the rhythm from the baseline, with the high topspin forcing him further back into defence.

I felt my attempt at winners down the line was consolidated with the extra momentum behind the ball, making it harder to track down and return. If I wanted to flatten out the ball, that produced the most explosive shot from the MP L frame, combined with the punchy aggressiveness of Head Hawk . Especially if taken on the rise, a flat groundstroke would be greatly penetrative and almost impossible to return.

If I had time to prepare a decent shot on the backhand side, the frame was superb at delivering a flat backhand drive. It seemed more accessible and comfortable to hit, with a heavier frame doing most of the work.

The only drawback on that wing concerned the backhand slice. On this shot, I found the heavier racket slightly harder to move around, generating a weaker slice and spin in the process. However, this was not a significant disadvantage, as I only found the issue occurring when I was a little slow in my preparation and footwork. 

Initially, there was some sacrifice in precision due to the larger head size. When I aimed for a particular target, at first, I was only able to hit around it, as opposed to exactly where I intended the ball to go. But it did not take long to adjust, and I soon found myself aiming for lines with the same confidence I had before.

When it came to serving, the extra weight helped me hit with more conviction, and again I felt the racket do most of the work for me, hitting through the ball rather than at it. The MP L is very good at a hard, flat serve and also excels at a kick or a slice out-wide.

Here, I found the larger frame size helpful in generating more side and topspin. If I had a mental blip and felt a little nervous on the second serve, the racket’s weight would accentuate the feeling of weakness in my hand, where a few balls found themselves hitting the net.

The racket afforded excellent stability in the forecourt. The frame was very dependable at deflecting fast balls with ease when coming into volley. The racket did not shudder and stutter on impact and made for smooth shots at the net to close out a point. I found drop shots and more delicate touches easy to pull off.

The Auxetic material gave a slight yielding quality to the racket, which felt good to handle. It also offered a real connection in sensing the ball on the strings. Especially during singles, I had mental confidence in the racket when volleying helped me stretch out wide for balls and stopped me from being passed at the net.

Against fast servers , I had to stand a little further back than I ordinarily would to return serve effectively. Standing closer to the baseline, I found the racket slightly slower to manoeuvre with less time to react. A change of returning position quickly solved the problem.

Against slower servers, the MP L was a delight. I set up a deep shot, and from the excessive plough-through, hit a winner off the return of serve. As with volleying, the racket’s stability boosted my mental confidence when returning and encouraged me to unload on the ball.

Who Is This racket For?

The Prestige MP L is geared towards high-level intermediate and advanced players. It is especially suited for players who enjoy hitting acute topspin and flat balls.

The weight will benefit players competing against opponents who similarly hit heavy balls, and therefore need the stability to deal with the increased speeds to avoid being blasted off the court. Despite its power, I was pleasantly surprised by its volleying abilities, and the feel would complement the games of players who like venturing towards the net.

I would be wary recommending this racket to a beginner, as its level of control and precision may be difficult to play with at first, but by no means is it impossible to learn with practice.

Final Thoughts

The MP L is a classy racket to look at. The smoothness of hitting with the frame from the baseline was a joy. The sensation of hitting through the ball with little to no resistance is just magic to feel, and seeing the ball fly off with such weight and momentum was satisfying.

I love the stability that the frame brings for volleys, making it a good racket for doubles and singles.

Though it has some drawbacks surrounding weight on the return of serve, these are easily fixed by tactical adjustments.

Have you tried the new Prestige line from HEAD? Let me know in the comments.

Control - 7.5

Manoeuvrability - 8, stability - 9, comfort - 8, touch/feel - 8, groundstrokes - 9, slice - 6.5, volleys - 8.5, returns - 7.

The classic Prestige range continues into 2021 with added feel, while maintaining a punchy and precise ball-striking experience. Intermediate and advanced players will appreciate the racquet’s competitive features, with an all-court game and the ability to impart deadly amounts of topspin.

Alex Nulliah

Join 12k tennis fans who get our updates.

News, racket reviews, guides and more.

Roger Federer’s SABR

The atp tour is back, related articles.

Yonex Percept 100D Review

Andrey Rublev’s Racket

Yonex Percept 97D Review

Gifts For Tennis Players

Great review!!! Thanks Alex!!!

Djokovic got a medical exemption for the AO. I don’t think the players are going to be happy about that.

Where can you even get this racquet? Loved the 360+ prestige pro and find the upped swing weight in the new tour (old pro) a bit unwieldy. Would love to demo a lighter 16×19 in the prestige line.

Where are you based in the world?

Great racket. Good power, good stability, and quiet good control. I had MP last year but 320 grams was to heavy. Great review!

Cheers. I am reviewing the Boom MP at the moment, will post in a few days, interesting frame.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Shop by Brand
• Tennis Racquets
• Junior Racquets
• Vintage Racquets
• Used Racquets
• Pickleball Paddles
• Padel Racquets
• Demo Program
• Trade In Program
• Racquet Matching & Customization
• Articles And Reviews
• Racquet Help
• Racquet Finder
• Racquet Reviews
• Junior Store
• Men's Apparel
• Aceing Autism
• Ace the Moon
• Flow Society
• Le Coq Sportif
• New Balance
• NK Foundation
• Original Penguin
• Sergio Tacchini
• Tennis Warehouse
• Travis Mathew
• Under Armour
• New Arrivals
• Shop by Type
• Short Sleeve
• Long Sleeve
• Compression
• UV Protection
• Men's Socks
• Women's Apparel
• Lucky in Love
• Alabama Girl Hats
• Ame & Lulu
• Bird & Vine
• BlueFish Sport
• Cross Court
• Denise Cronwall
• FP Movement
• Yaffa Sun Protection
• Sports Bras
• Women's Socks
• Boy's Apparel
• Girl's Apparel
• Hats & Visors
• Head & Wristbands
• Team Orders
• Men's Shoes
• Lightweight
• Women's Shoes
• Shoe Reviews
• Tennis Balls
• Tennis Bags
• 3 Pack Bags
• 6 Pack Bags
• 8-12+ Pack Bags
• Duffle Bags
• Bag Accessories
• Court Couture
• Maggie Mather
• Strings Sets & Reels
• String Reels
• Multifilament
• Natural Gut
• Synthetic Gut
• Alpha & RAB
• WeissCannon
• Stringing Machines
• Tools & Supplies
• Grips & Accessories
• Replacement Grips
• Vibration Dampeners
• Head & Lead Tape
• Other Items
• Tennis Towels
• Fitness & Therapy
• Hydration & Nutrition
• Tennis Books & DVDs
• Memorabilia
• Tennis Ball Machines
• Court Equipment
• Gifts & Novelty Items
• School Teams
• League Teams
• Pro Player Gear
• Reviews Reviews
• Learning Center Learning Center
• Mental Game
• Stroke Instruction
• Selecting a Racquet
• How to String a Racquet
• Measuring Grip Size
• Best Tennis Racquets
• Best Tennis Shoes
• Best Tennis Strings
• Tennis Warehouse University
• Message Board Message Board
• Podcast Podcast
• Specials Clearance
• Gift Cards Gift Cards
• Brands Brands
• Contact Contact
• Ordering Ordering
• Tracking Tracking
• Shipping Shipping
• Returns Returns
• International International
• Careers Careers
• Privacy Policy
• Account Login
• Mailing List Mailing List

Head Prestige MP L 2023

We will match or beat any posted overall price advertised in-store or online on in stock items.

Racquet Matching $20 per match. Get up to 3 racquets matched to the nearest specifications of each other. Learn More

Racquet Customization $30 per frame. You provide us with the exact specifications you would like for your racquets. Learn More

Classic Prestige feel meets modern speed 

As the lightest member of the Prestige family, the Prestige MP L brings the incalculable benefit of maneuverability and speed to one of the game's most storied control franchises. At approximately 11.2 ounces strung and boasting a whippy sub-315 swingweight and open 16x19 string pattern, this racquet will give intermediate players the kind of user-friendly hitting experience that breeds confidence. For the more advanced ball striker, the MP L not only makes a great customization option, but it's also no slouch in stock form where it provides a user-friendly entry point into the outstanding control and feel of the Prestige family. The main technology is Auxetic 2 , a uniquely flexible material in the yoke and handle to optimize feel. The MP L also benefits from Graphene 360+ (labeled Graphene Inside), which strengthens the frame in key locations to increase power and stability. Ultimately, this racquet is an outstanding option for those who want a faster, more spin-friendly Prestige without sacrificing the control and feel for which the franchise is known. 

Specifications

Similar racquets.

Other Items to Consider

Customer Reviews

• Search forums
• Tennis Equipment

Your impressions on Head Auxetic Prestige Tour

• Thread starter eb_tennis_247
• Start date May 20, 2022

eb_tennis_247

• May 20, 2022

I tried the demo and I loved it - control, precision, feel, stability, plow through power. It is definitely not a CPI 300, as listed. This thing has power. I did notice a lower launch angle and a slower swing speed on my serve than with my 360+ Radical MP (all expected due to higher swing weight). However, it is a real serve cannon. Also, I am a big/strong guy, so the weight of this racquet is not as much of a problem as that could be for a smaller player. And, frankly, I used to play with a 350+g wooden racket as a child and then with Head Graphite Edge, so this frame is still featherlight when compared to those "bricks". However, I noticed that there are no very many reviews of this frame, and the ones that are there seem to fall into either being total lovefests or into "pass on it" categories (Tennis Spin's Harry/Andrew Gu love it, and so do @TW Staff Michelle/Chris), but many struggle with its weight. So, I was wondering what was your opinion about the frame, if you played with it?  

• May 22, 2022

It doesn't get much press as not many use it because of it's specs.. Many people would be pleasantly surprised by it though if they ever had the chance to try it..  

Professional

• Sep 24, 2022

Anyone demoed it or played with it recently? What is your review? The lack of interest in this frame is pretty surprising to me. Looks like it's headed for discontinuation, just like Prestige Mid. I wish I had a racquet with exact same specs and layup as Prestige Tour, but in 98 head size!  

serveandvolE

Who's calling the Graphite Edge a brick? Blasphemous!  

RF_PRO_STAFF

• Sep 25, 2022

I loved it in all aspects apart from the SW that was too high on mine to swing for me long-term. I'm planning on trying one again with a lower SW. If I can find one with max 330 SW, it might be a real gem for me.  

RF_PRO_STAFF said: I loved it in all aspects apart from the SW that was too high on mine to swing for me long-term. I'm planning on trying one again with a lower SW. If I can find one with max 330 SW, it might be a real gem for me. Click to expand...

I dig the Auxetic Prestige Pro. I haven’t hit with the Auxetic Prestige Tour  

Tranqville said: My current racquets are 337-338 SW, so this is right in my ballpark! What do you thnk about 95 head as compared with 98-s in the market? Click to expand...

vsbabolat said: I dig the Auxetic Prestige Pro. I haven’t hit with the Auxetic Prestige Tour Click to expand...

@RF_PRO_STAFF I noticed you play with modified Pure Strike VS. Have you tried Pure Strike Tour and if so, how would you compare to Prestige Tour? I was choosing between these two racquets but could not get the demo of the Tour, so went with the PST.  

Tranqville said: @RF_PRO_STAFF I noticed you play with modified Pure Strike VS. Have you tried Pure Strike Tour and if so, how would you compare to Prestige Tour? I was choosing between these two racquets but could not get the demo of the Tour, so went with the PST. Click to expand...

• Sep 26, 2022

I enjoyed it overall, however, my demo was literally 6 grams(!) underspec-so I wasn't sure it was 'valid' test period to pass honest judgement. Great feel coming from VCPHD user although the sweet spot felt slightly challenging and quite underpowered IMHO.  

• Sep 27, 2022

It is too heavy for me for long matches but it feels sweet. Very underpowered and string sensitive.  

TennisHound

I’ve hit with it briefly. I had some putaways that were “Holy Cow” moments, especially high forehands. I’m not sure if I prefer it over the CX Tour 16x19, but it’s has more power, whereas the CX requires weight up top. This was the only Prestige I liked better than the 360+.  

FourOutOfFive

• May 7, 2023

I’m really interested in this Prestige, an on-spec one with a 335-338 SW and a leather grip sounds right in my wheelhouse. Can anyone comment on this frame’s weight distribution? I’ve noticed that I play a lot better with racquets that are weighted more towards the upper hoop/12 o’clock position. I’m not really a fan of other 315g frames like the GPro and 22 Ezone Tour that have most of their weight in the throat/lower hoop region. If this Prestige Tour is weighted similarly to those frames I’ll probably pass. Thanks!  

• May 15, 2023

The weight is pretty evenly distributed. It feels very solid, balanced. I don’t get any sense of upper hoop weight. It plays like an iron bar - firm, stable, solid, powerful.  

Mine came in at 324 strung, and the swing weight hasn't bothered me at all (maybe the SW is under spec too). It felt a little stiffer than expected on my first hit, but has gotten much softer as the strings have lost some tension. I'm still debating which multi to put in it next. Mantis comfort synthetic played fine, but I feel like I can get more performance out of a different multi. Anyone else used a multi in theirs?  

I’ve used Triax which is hybrid-like. Very good experience overall. Specs on the Prestige Tour vary wildly. It is pity because the frame has a “quality” look but their SWs can vary by at least 5 points.  

eb_tennis_247 said: I’ve used Triax which is hybrid-like. Very good experience overall. Specs on the Prestige Tour vary wildly. It is pity because the frame has a “quality” look but their SWs can vary by at least 5 points. Click to expand...

Hall of Fame

FourOutOfFive said: I’m really interested in this Prestige, an on-spec one with a 335-338 SW and a leather grip sounds right in my wheelhouse. Can anyone comment on this frame’s weight distribution? I’ve noticed that I play a lot better with racquets that are weighted more towards the upper hoop/12 o’clock position. I’m not really a fan of other 315g frames like the GPro and 22 Ezone Tour that have most of their weight in the throat/lower hoop region. If this Prestige Tour is weighted similarly to those frames I’ll probably pass. Thanks! Click to expand...

• May 16, 2023

Will be playing with the 2021 Auxetic Pro for the first time tomorrow, my first 18x20. Strung up with RPM blast orange 1.30 mains and KB super smash orange 1.28 cross @ 43/43. Will be using lower gauge next time 1.20-1.25. Will bring it by local shop to get weighed as well. Curious what string setups/tension folks are using?  

• May 21, 2023

B dog said: Will be playing with the 2021 Auxetic Pro for the first time tomorrow, my first 18x20. Strung up with RPM blast orange 1.30 mains and KB super smash orange 1.28 cross @ 43/43. Will be using lower gauge next time 1.20-1.25. Will bring it by local shop to get weighed as well. Curious what string setups/tension folks are using? Click to expand...

My Auxetic Pro (98in) came in on spec at 11.9oz strung. I don’t think I can play with a Tour (95in), head size too small for my intermediate skills. I don’t mean to post about the Pro on a “Tour subject thread”. But there is almost no review / comments about the Pro. I do feel that 12oz. is my max weight for sure.  

• May 22, 2023

TheBlackburnMorb said: Mine came in at 324 strung, and the swing weight hasn't bothered me at all (maybe the SW is under spec too). It felt a little stiffer than expected on my first hit, but has gotten much softer as the strings have lost some tension. I'm still debating which multi to put in it next. Mantis comfort synthetic played fine, but I feel like I can get more performance out of a different multi. Anyone else used a multi in theirs? Click to expand...

• May 23, 2023

HitMoreBHs said: That’s about 7g under spec, which is a lot. Did you check the buttcap trapdoor to see if it’s the usual weighted version that is installed? That said, if the racquet works great for you, then congratulations for falling on the right side of the QC lottery! Click to expand...

• May 25, 2023

Just played a league match with my Prestige tour with Volkl Classic synthetic gut 17 at 55lbs. The racket / string combo feels amazing. Soft and spinny. I'm already considering buying another tour.  

• May 26, 2023
• May 27, 2023

The only thing that keeps me from playing with this excellent frame full-time is a lower spin potential/swing speed than my current main racquet (Radical MP). Otherwise, this thing is a weapon. I cannot think of a better racquet for flat hitters.  

• May 28, 2023

babar said: I just played a 4.5 Line 1 singles match with the new Head Auxetic Prestige Tour. I was expecting to get waxed off the court, but this frame allowed me to play with controlled aggression and put up a good fight. I didn't win the match, but I played well and much of that was the supreme confidence I had after the warm-up that whatever I was going to hit, would go where I wanted it to go. Also, I didn't think I would be able to play the whole match with it due to shoulder issues, but I only got tired in my last service game and dropped a few serves short in the box. Overall, I really liked how it hit and the confidence it gave to hit out on my shots. We'll see how my shoulder feels in the morning though. . . I've been playing with a Yonex EZONE 100 and Wilson Clash lately to get more power and depth and make tennis easier, but now I am intrigued if this frame or maybe a slightly more user friendly version of this would be helpful to me. Maybe a Prince Phantom 97P or a Wilson Pro Staff v13 or v14? Click to expand...

bnjkn said: I'm interested in this racquet but the high swing weight is scaring me away. I have a Pro Staff RF97 v10 that has addictive power but maneuverability sucks and I really don't want another Thor's hammer. I'm also thinking that maybe a whippier regular Pro Staff would be closer to ideal for me. Click to expand...

• May 29, 2023

TheBlackburnMorb said: I think you'll find it more manoeuvrable than the RF97. The lower static weight and the small head size will help too Click to expand...

• Jun 8, 2023

On my second demo of this. As long as nothing radically changes on the next version (I know the specs in terms of weight balance etc are the magazine specs are the same) this one will likely be what I'm switching to. Can't find any flaw with this racket so far aside from the feel not being what I would want in a prestige. It feels like auxetic which I like the playability of, but not the feel for a a prestige (in this particular racket, I like it in the speeds). Will be interesting to see what they go for with new tech...  

Yamin said: On my second demo of this. As long as nothing radically changes on the next version (I know the specs in terms of weight balance etc are the magazine specs are the same) this one will likely be what I'm switching to. Can't find any flaw with this racket so far. Will be interesting to see what they go for with new tech... Click to expand...

TheBlackburnMorb said: I wouldn't be surprised if they discontinued the 95 square inch model. Click to expand...

Yamin said: They're not. Click to expand...

@Yamin — what is your play style / level? I ask because I am trying to understand what seems to be the typical best player style match to this frame and who likes this frame the best. I noticed that in reviews, it seems to be mostly flat hitters and older players (vs. Pure Aero/Head Extreme “kids”).  

eb_tennis_247 said: @Yamin — what is your play style / level? I ask because I am trying to understand what seems to be the typical best player style match to this frame and who likes this frame the best. I noticed that in reviews, it seems to be mostly flat hitters and older players (vs. Pure Aero/Head Extreme “kids”). Click to expand...

TheBlackburnMorb said: I hit with a lot of spin on my forehand and a pretty flat two handed back hand. This racket is super spin friendly. I wouldn't say it's just for flat hitters. Click to expand...

• Jun 12, 2023

Recently got a 360+ pro, loved it immediatel, plays like my old 6.1 team but with good plow through, power and great spin. Played great with multi/poly hybrid, kind of stiff with full poly. The only thing It felt little unstable, mostly on serve returns. For anyone that used the previous and the Auxetic version, does the new one with the higher swing weight feel more stable or it also needs some extra weight on the sides? TIA  

• Jun 13, 2023

Doulke said: For anyone that used the previous and the Auxetic version, does the new one with the higher swing weight feel more stable or it also needs some extra weight on the sides? TIA Click to expand...

eb_tennis_247 said: Stable like a rock. That was the biggest “upgrade” over 360+, beside the Auxetic material. Click to expand...

• Nov 3, 2023

Some advanced reviewers say Prestige Tour Aux 1.0 (2021) is difficult, others say it's accessible. Would it possibly work for a 4.0 with modern mechanics and a preference for 315-320g racquets who is comfortable with 340-ish SW? How important is the smaller head size?  

Tranqville said: Some advanced reviewers say Prestige Tour Aux 1.0 (2021) is difficult, others say it's accessible. Would it possibly work for a 4.0 with modern mechanics and a preference for 315-320g racquets who is comfortable with 340-ish SW? How important is the smaller head size? Click to expand...

I have a Prestige Tour that is under spec, 335 SW and it plays great.  

If 340 SW is in your wheelhouse, I’d say the Prestige Tour Aux 1.0 is a potential keeper. It has rock solid stability and a good sized sweetspot for a 95 (compared with eg: CX200 Tour, Prince Tour 95 and even a PS97). The 16x19 string pattern is relatively open off the 8 centre mains and with modern swing mechanics, one can hit a really heavy ball with this stick. It is also a great serving racquet with generous power on flat serves and easy spin on kicks and slices. Traditionalists might say the string pattern is too open, but I think HEAD has got the balance just right in keeping with the way the game has evolved where topspin has become such a major factor. I’m amongst the minority in preferring the 360+ Prestige Pro, but that is simply down to feel (less muted, more throat and tip flex). Set up to the same specs, they perform the same for me in terms of control, power, spin, launch angle and stability to the extent that I’ve been able to switch between the 360+ PPro and PTour Aux 1.0 mid match with no issues.  

Just started playing with this racquet, and I'm loving it. I've used the Pro Tour 2.0 for a few years and loved it but needed a little more power and spin potential. Prestige Tour 2021 absolutely delivers on that with more power, more spin, same control, even more stability (how is that even possible?), with just a slightly more muted feel. I wasn't a fan of the more muted (compared to Pro Tour 2.0) feel the first time I used it, but I've come to learn that there's plenty of feedback when you swing and hit freely; it just feels a little dead when going for soft finesse shots.  

• Nov 4, 2023

Never hit this racket, never played a Head in my life (aside from a few minutes of hitting), but just based on the specs I really want to try one. The combo of a 95 sq in head and a heavier, stiffer frame seems to be a unique combo these days. Someone above described it as an iron bar, which sounds perfect. I think the original Wilson Ultra/Ultra 2 Standard are the greatest rackets ever made, and that's basically how I always described them. I read that the new version of this frame is more flexible, so I'm hoping I can find a deal on a used one somewhere.  

Similar threads

• Sep 16, 2022
• May 18, 2006
• Oct 25, 2022

• Roads_to_tennis
• Apr 9, 2022

Put-in tours

Original tour agency in moscow and st petersburg..

Onboard a Soviet van!

Welcome to Russia!

We are Sergey and Simon, a Russian and a Frenchman, both  passionate about Moscow, Saint-Petersburg and classic cars. Together, we have created Put-in tours. Our goal is to help you experience Russian culture off the beaten path. Join us onboard our classic Soviet van and let’s get rolling!

In Moscow we offer you a city tour to discover most of the city in an original way as well as a night tour to admire the lights. Our pubcrawl is ideal to explore Moscow’s night-life and have fun. If you are craving to discover Russian culture, come impress your senses during our monastery diner or join our 100% Russian Banya Excursion . The latest will also bring you to Sergiyev Posad and it’s famous monastery!

For the most extreme travellers, our shooting tour will deliver your daily dose of adrenaline whereas our tank excursion will let you ride a real tank and shoot a bazooka.

We also offer help to receive your visa , safe and multilingual airport transfers , as well as organisation services for team-building events or bachelor parties .

All our excursions (but the monastery diner) happen onboard our Soviet military vans and can be covered by our  professionnal photographer or videographer.

In Saint Petersburg

We welcome you in Saint Petersburg onboard our Soviet van to discover the imperial city with our city tour and night tour .

Continue your discovery in style! The adrenaline lovers will like our shooting tour  which brings 3 Russian weapons to the tip of your trigger finger.

Follow us on Social Media...

Our partners

© Copyright 2021 - Put-in tours Designed by SD Marketing & Design

At Put-in tours, we put you in our classic Soviet vans to go explore Moscow, Saint Petersburg and Russian culture off the beaten path. Discover our Moscow city guided tour, visit Moscow by night, join our banya & Sergiyev Posad excursion, visit and dine in one of Moscow's oldest monastery or even Luzhniki stadium, before you party on our famous pubcrawl! Original and atypical tours : Shoot AK47 and a bazooka after riding on a tank with our tank & bazooka excursion ! Extreme tours: Fly a fighter jet in Moscow onboard a L-29 or L-39 aircraft!

© Copyright 2021 – Put-in tours

Design web: SD Marketing & Design

Home About us Videos Moscow Saint-Petersburg Contact Online booking Blog Disclaimer Privacy Policy

WhatsApp us

HEAD Graphene Touch Prestige Tour Racquet Review

It is high time for the head graphene touch prestige tour racquet review. I have play-tested this racquet for a few weeks and I was surprised to like it as much as a I did.

As I wrote in my first impressions version of this HEAD Graphene Touch Prestige Tour racquet review , the Austrian racquet company has not had an easy time with the racquetholics and tennis nerds since they introduced Graphene in their racquets. As most racquet lovers know, the HEAD IG series is seen by many as the last “true” HEAD racquets. Is this true or just exaggerated?

I understand where the racquet purists are coming from. The HEAD IG line of racquets was impressive and offered modern classics such as the HEAD IG Prestige MP and the HEAD IG Radical Pro as well as a nice HEAD IG Prestige Mid. It is simply tough to improve on these racquets. The Graphene was HEAD’s idea to take up the fight with stiffer racquets on the market and their main competitors Wilson and Babolat.

HEAD Graphene Touch Prestige Tour Racquet Review – The specs

Let us start by looking at the specs. I already wrote about this in my first impressions post, but a 99 sq inch head size and a 18×19 string pattern is not your typical racquet on the market. But I really think this works nice in this racquet. You get a nice, controlled response despite a bigger than average sweet spot. I think HEAD might be on to something here and if they can refine this model for the next iteration, it could be a truly great racquet.

The racquet is definitely more comfortable than your typical Graphene racquet. The stiffness rating of 65 RA strung feels high in my opinion. I would have guessed around 63, but since the head size is bigger than your average 95 sq inch you need to stiffen the racquet a bit. I was surprised that the racquet played well also in stock form, but as always for me, some lead at 3 and 9 helped to give it some extra power, plough-through and stability. It might play even better with a leather grip and lead at 12, that is up to personal preference of course.

Unstrung specs Head size: 99 sq inches Length: 27 sq inches Weight: 305 grams Balance:  7 pts HL Stiffness: 65 RA Beam width: 21,5 mm

HEAD Graphene Touch Prestige Tour Racquet Review: Performance

I tried the racquet both with multifilament and poly strings and found the multi a bit too powerful and a thick poly a bit too low-powered. That is why I would recommend either a thin gauge (softer) poly, a hybrid string setup or a poly at a lower tension. If you can get the string bed to play plush, yet controlled, you are in for a nice ride.

I really enjoyed playing with the HEAD Graphene Touch Prestige Tour. It might not be a racquet I switch to (but after some customization, I definitely could), but it ignites some hope in me for other and future HEAD Prestige racquets from HEAD.

HEAD Graphene Touch Prestige Tour Racquet Review: First ratings

Below is my video review of the HEAD Graphene Touch Prestige Tour:

For a second opinion on the HEAD Graphene Touch Prestige Tour, check out this blog.

Are you curious about the HEAD Graphene Touch Prestige Tour? If not, why? Let me know in the comments below.

Do you like Tennisnerd? Do not miss a word or video by stalking us on social media. Every like and follow is appreciated! YouTube Instagram Twitter Facebook Page Amazon Influencer

Buy tennis gear

EU Racquet Depot Pro Direct Tennis

USA Tennis Express Do It Tennis Amazon.com

Racquet buying guides

Here is a great racquet buying guide to get you started. What tennis racquet should I buy? Top tennis racquets to buy right now The Gear of the Year 2017 The Gear of the Year 2016 Tennis racquets for juniors Tennis racquets for kids

Popular posts

What the ATP pros play Questions about pro stock tennis racquets Is a pro stock racquet better than a retail one? Do professional players change racquets? Racquet Commitment Issues

Jonas has been known as "tennis nerd" mainly for his obsessing about racquets and gear. Plays this beautiful sport almost every day.

Watching grass court tennis live

Will zverev be the next world number one, you may also like, wilson blade 98 16/19 v9 review, babolat pure strike 100 16/20 review, head boom pro 2024 review, dunlop cx 200 review, dunlop cx 400 tour review, wilson blade 98 18/20 v9 review, diadem nova v3 review, the most popular racquet on the wta tour, diadem nova v3 racquets, head speed pro 2024 review.

How would you compare this to the old and new pure strikes 18×20?

Hi, I think the Prestige Tour is more arm-friendly and has a bigger sweet spot, but less power. So if you want more control and comfort, I’d go with the Prestige Tour. I like the new Pure Strike too with some lead tape at 3 and 9 and a leather grip, but it can be a little harsh on the arm. Cheers / J

Can you compare prestige tour and blade cv? Which do you prefer? Thanks

Hi, I think the Graphene Touch Prestige Tour is a bit more responsive. I usually like Blades, but the CV version felt too muted and I felt disconnected to the ball.

Hi, How would you compare this to the Head Graphene Touch Speed Pro? I have a similar game level to yours, with a one hand backhand.

Leave a Comment

• The Tennisnerd Guide to Gear
• Recommended Racquets
• Recommended Strings
• Recommended Bags
• Racquet Consultation
• Racquet Reviews
• The best tennis racquets for spin and control
• Racquets and strings for beginners and lower-level intermediates
• Arm Friendly Tennis Racquets
• The Best Spin Racquets
• The Best Racquets for Intermediate Players?
• The Best Advanced Player Racquets
• The Best Power Racquets
• Pro Stock Racquets
• Pro Player String Tensions
• String Reviews
• Stringing machines
• Arm-friendly Strings
• Top Ten Tennis Strings Right Now
• The lowest string tension on tour?
• What is the difference between multifilament and poly strings?
• My Top 3 Spin Strings
• My Top 3 Control Strings
• Tennis balls
• Shoe Reviews
• Tennis Tools
• Podcasts and Interviews
• Betting Blog
• Monte-Carlo Masters Betting
• Best Tennis Betting Sites
• How to Bet on Tennis
• Live Betting Tennis
• Tennis Betting Odds Explained
• Betting Tips and Strategies
• Promotions and Bonuses
• ATP Masters 1000
• Betting Predictions
• Travel Blog
• Buying Tennis Tickets
• Tennis Academies in Europe
• Tennis coaching with Intuitive Tennis
• Coaching app
• ATP Rankings
• WTA Rankings
• Pickleball Blog
• Accessories
• College Tennis
• Contributors
• What People Say
• Advertising
• Tennis Friends
• In the Press

Please wait while you are redirected to the right page...

JavaScript seems to be disabled in your browser. For the best experience on our site, be sure to turn on Javascript in your browser.

Choose your location

• Austria Deutsch
• Belgium Français
• Bulgaria English
• Croatia English
• Cyprus English
• Czech Republic Čeština
• Denmark English
• Estonia English
• Finland English
• France Français
• Germany Deutsch
• Greece English
• Hungary English
• Ireland English
• Italy Italiano
• Latvia English
• Liechtenstein Deutsch
• Lithuania English
• Luxembourg Français
• Malta English
• Monaco Français
• Netherlands Nederlands
• Norway English
• Poland Polski
• Portugal English
• Romania English
• Slovakia English
• Slovenia English
• Spain Spanish
• Sweden English
• Switzerland Deutsch | Français | Italiano

North America

• Canada English | Français
• United States English

Rest of the world

• Australia English
• International English
• Japan Japanese

HEAD Prestige MP Tennis Racquet

Description.

The upgraded PRESTIGE MP TENNIS RACQUET is made for aggressive players seeking precision and control.

• Free Delivery on orders over £ 150.
• Delivery time 7 to 10 business days.
• Free returns on all orders.

Product Information

Stringing instructions.

Technologies

Auxetic Auxetic constructions show a unique deformation compared to non-Auxetic constructions. Due to their internal properties, Auxetic constructions widen when a “pull” force is applied and contract when squeezed. The bigger the applied force, the bigger the Auxetic reaction.

Elongated Shaft Elongated shaft for classic flex and feel appreciated on Tour since 1987

Box Beam The box beam cross-section stabilizes the frame for maximum control.

Full Cap Full cap for signature impact feel and unmistakable sound.

Delivery & Returns

Shipping fees

Shipping fees: 4,99 £ Free shipping: from an order value of 150 £

Shipping Time

All orders are sent twice a week from Austria via GLS. 

30 DAY RETURN

We want to be sure you are 100% satisfied with your purchase on HEAD.com. Therefore, if for any reason you are unhappy with your purchase, you may return it to us in its original condition within 30 days of the date of receipt for a full refund of the product. Please contact Customer Service by email ( [email protected] ) to receive a return slip.

We are happy to offer a refund on all HEAD items providing they are returned within 30 days, they have not been used and are in saleable condition. All tags must be attached and intact. The right of revocation does not apply to personalized products as skis and bindings which have been mounted and adjusted in accordance with your specifications. Moreover, the right of revocation does not apply on items which have been sealed due to hygiene reasons if the seal has been broken or damaged.

If you wish to return two separate orders, please do so by using the individual return labels.

We are not able to offer exchanges on our products, if you would like a different size, please return your item for a refund and repurchase the new size.

Please note that we do not deliver to Gibraltar and British Channel Islands because of special regulations.

• Regent Seven Seas Cruises

Best of Moscow by high speed train

By shuguley , February 15, 2014 in Regent Seven Seas Cruises

Recommended Posts

Sure would appreciate someone who has taken "Best of Moscow by high speed train" from St. Petersburg could please share their impressions of this shore excursion. From the description this sounds like a very long day.

Wondering how the 4 hour train trip was in terms of accommodations, etc. Also what time did you leave the ship and what time at night did you return? Were both legs of the trip on the high speed rail (I read that slower trains also travel the same tracks)?

My wife and I are considering this excursion. We thought that if we are making all the effort to go to Russia then how could we pass up going to Moscow, walking in Red Square, seeing St. Basil, etc.

Link to comment

Share on other sites.

If you are considering this on the 2015 June Baltic cruise on Voyager; my suggestion is don't. There is so much to do in St. Petersburg and although a train is one of my favorite ways to travel the time would be far better spent in St. P.

Thanks for the advice. Yes, this would be on the Voyager during the 2015 season but not yet sure exactly which cruise.

We did the Moscow excursion "on a different luxury line", but from your brief description it sounds very much like the same trip, so I will operate on that assumption. It is a VERY long day! We left the ship at 5:30 AM and returned at 12:30 AM. The highspeed train trip is comfortable, and while they call it "Business Class" it does not compare well to the equivalent class on say Rail Europe. When we did it in 2011, we did have highspeed both ways, and the trip back seemed much longer as the adrenaline and excitement had worn off!:D

Moscow itself is not that terribly different from any other big city in the world, but this Cold War kid never thought he would ever stand in Red Square, never mind walk the grounds of The Kremlin, or tour The Kremlin Palace, or see (but not visit) Lenin's Tomb, or visit The Armoury. But he did, and he loved every minute of it! Yes, it is a long day, and you barely scratch a scratch on the surface, but it is worth it. There is a tremendous amount to see in St. Petersburg, but every Baltic cruise goes to St. Petersburg, so you can go back if you choose to. Not every cruiseline offers you the chance to see Moscow.

I have not personally done this tour, but our last time in St Petersburg, the private guide that we hired for a day was leading the regent tour to Moscow on the high speed train the next day. He said it was way better than the previous alternative, which was flying to Moscow and back. He said that you actually got to Moscow faster because you didn't have to deal with airline checkin etc. it did seem like a very long day to me, and there is so much to see and do in st. Petersburg that I didn't consider doing it.

countflorida

We toured to Moscow from St. Petersburg via the hi-speed SAPSAN train last September, from a Baltic cruise on the Oceania Marina. You need to have a two-night, three day port call in St. Petersburg to take this tour because the tour typically leaves the ship around 5:00 - 5:30 AM and doesn't return until after midnight the next day. We didn't take the ship's tour; we made private arrangements with TravelAllRussia for three days of touring, the first and third days in St. Petersburg and the second day the tour to Moscow by train. Our cost for the private tour for three days was about the same as what the ship charged for the excursion to Moscow alone. There are a number of private tour agencies that operate in St. Petersburg and offer the Moscow train tours; we would strongly recommend them over the ship's tours.

All three days had private guides with car and driver. The second day, the driver picked us up at the ship and took us to the train, but we were alone on the train, and met in Moscow by the guide on the station platform. After our tour and dinner, we were brought back to the train and after the return train trip met by the driver and taken back to the ship. Because you are alone on the train you must have your own Russian visas.

If this is your first visit to St. Petersburg, I would agree there is much more to see there. We found Moscow somewhat a disappointment, particularly Red Square. The Kremlin and the cathedral in Red Square were also worth seeing. But the best thing we saw was the Moscow subway! I worked for the Washington Metro system back in the 1980s as it grew from 40 to 80 miles and although I was in the computer area, I learned a lot about the challenges of running a subway system. We used the Moscow system to get across the city from where we had dinner to the train station, and I was amazed at the cleanliness', speed of operation, the short headways maintained, and the courtesy of everyone involved. A very impressive experience!

We had been to St. Petersburg before, and so had the time to take a day and go to Moscow. Also, I really like trains, and the SAPSAN is a German train set running on Russian rails. Seats are like first class domestic air, spacious but not too plush or comfortable, but with enough room. Not too much recline, and almost 8 hours on the train in two shots is a lot for an old man. They come through and sell drinks, candy, etc. but the sellers don't speak English and no one around us helped, so we had just poor coffee once coming, and brought stuff with us for the trip back. Not too much to see from the train either, particularly on the return when it is night the whole way.

If you decide to go, take a private tour and avoid the overly expensive ship's tour. I'm glad we did it, but wouldn't bother to repeat the tour; we've seen Moscow.

Thanks so much to all of you for the thorough and thought insight. Yhe information you have provided is most helpful.

countflorida: Your detailed post is very helpful. We are not quite ready for a Baltic cruise but should do so within a year. Time enough to do our pre travel research, bookings and visa gathering.:) Thank you!

Emperor Norton

Sure would appreciate someone who has taken "Best of Moscow by high speed train" from St. Petersburg could please share their impressions of this shore excursion. From the description this sounds like a very long day.   Wondering how the 4 hour train trip was in terms of accommodations, etc. Also what time did you leave the ship and what time at night did you return? Were both legs of the trip on the high speed rail (I read that slower trains also travel the same tracks)?   My wife and I are considering this excursion. We thought that if we are making all the effort to go to Russia then how could we pass up going to Moscow, walking in Red Square, seeing St. Basil, etc.

I did this on Seabourn. IMO DONT. Take Aeroflop (er Aeroflot). The train has non folding seats where you are literally knee to knee with your fellow passenger (facing each other). Further they don't believe in air conditioning. It's also the worlds slowed bullet train. I think I would have found more enjoyment wandering around the St. Petersburg and Moscow airports.

Countflorida,

This is a little off topic,, however we had planned a river cruise in Russia but decided we would rather stay on land and have booked about two weeks with Travel-All-Russia using the private guide and driver. I'm curious as to how you found them as a tour company.

The guides they provided were fine. We had a different guide each of the days in St. Petersburg, but both were flexible, pleasant, knowledgeable and spoke English very well, as did the guide in Moscow, incidentally. She was a bit aloof, distant, not too friendly, but otherwise fine. In fact, she was the one who suggested taking the Metro, which unexpectedly became one of the highlights of the Moscow excursion. If I have a complaint with AllTravelRussia, it is with their plan and its execution (more later).

I had requested emphasis on World War II (in Russia, the Great Patriotic War) sites and info. In scheduling us, they weren't careful about dates and a couple of the sites we wanted to see were scheduled on the third day, after we'd been to Moscow. But both sites were closed that day of the week, and that info was readily available, right on web sites describing them. Also, the included meals (lunches in St. Pete, dinner in Moscow) were not what we asked for: light meals with some choices, so we could avoid things we didn't like and choose things we did like. My request was ignored; we were given full Russian meals with a fixed menu, no choice. On the first day, a fish dish was the entre, but I am allergic to fish. Fortunately, I had the e-mail I'd sent with me and showed it to the guide, and she was able to change my entre to chicken, which was very good actually. But we didn't want a 3-4 course lunches or dinner (in Moscow). We had the guide drop the lunch the third day, although we never got any credit or refund. But, particularly in contrast to the ship's tours, the prices were so reasonable we didn't worry too much about it.

The people who were on the ship's tour to Moscow saw us boarding the same train for which they were forced to queue up and wait on the way back, and asked us what we had done. I was candid and open so they were not happy when I explained what we had arranged and particularly what it had cost. Also, when we returned to the ship, we found they had laid on a late supper for those who had gone to Moscow, so up we went and had something. Well, it turns out the late supper was supposed to be just for those on the ship's tour, but we and others on 'independent' tours, there were a dozen or more of us, crashed the party, actually got there first, and they didn't realize it until the larger group arrived and there weren't enough tables/places set. By that time, the 'independents' had all gotten served and were eating; what could they do?

A couple from the larger group sat down with us and asked us about our tour, and they were the ones I told about our arrangement and its cost. They turned to others who’d been with them and announced the details, loudly enough so the whole room heard, which started a lot of bitching and complaining. I gathered they weren't very happy with the ship's tour to begin with, and this was the straw that broke the camel's back. We finished up and beat it out of there, but overheard later that one of the excursion staff came to check on something and ran into a real mess. I caught a cold on the trip, which forced me to bed the second day following in Tallinn, so by the time we reappeared we heard about the contretemps' but apparently no one recalled who started it, thankfully.

Because of what happened to us, I would probably not use AllTravelRussia if I were to go again, or if I did, I would be sure to get confirmation of every detail of the tour. They do have good reviews generally, and we were certainly helped by their visa department and liked the guides and drivers. Their weakness, I say now with full 20:20 hindsight, is that once the sales person who plans the tour, sells it to you and collects your money, he (or she) transfers the plan to their Russia office for implementation; there is no follow-up to make sure it gets done right. And that is where our problems arose; we paid for a custom tour but got a standard package with a few destinations switched, and no one checked them out, even to see when they were open the day we were scheduled to go. If you check every detail that’s important to you, it should be OK, but that’s a hell of a way to have to do business, in my opinion.

Thank you for the 20/20 hindsight observation on your Russian tour operator, and better priced than the ship's excursion cost.

Thanks very much for the feedback.

We had the same experience as you so far as price. We originally booked a Viking Cruise but, hearing some things about the river cruises that made us unhappy, looked into other options. T-A-R cost the same or less than a cruise and had us in hotels for 11 days. We opted for the private tour. They have three tour levels, based on hotels. We originally opted for the four star as it did not cost much more than the three star hotels. Finally we decided to throw it all in and upgraded to five star. In Moscow we will be at the newly opened Kempinsky which is two blocks from Red Square. In St. Petersburg it is the Grand Hotel Europe, one of the most vaunted luxury hotels in Russia. Location is important for us as the tours use up only part of the day so being in the center of everything for our independent touring is important. As with many other cities, the less you pay, the farther out of the center of town you are.

We have been working with our salesman in D.C. and he seems to get back to us with the changes we want. He recently returned from Russia so is up on everything. When I asked they said they paid the full TA commission if I wanted so I got my usual TA on board so he is watching our back and giving us that extra level of comfort. He also set up our air, which I know pays him little or nothing, and got us business class for much less than T-A-R wanted for economy, though it took working for a while with a consolidator. He's happy to get his 10 percent on this trip without having booked it. He also took care of the trip insurance. We've been doing a lot of research on the CC sister site Trip Advisor and will write a report there. We will, I guess, become a source of info for CC members after having spent 5 days in Moscow and 6 in SP.

• 4 months later...

scubacruiserx2

Anybody considering a day trip to Moscow from St. Petersburg on the Sapsan may want to look at our travelogue filled with pictures.

http://boards.cruisecritic.com/showthread.php?t=1927687

Very informative. Thanks dor sharing. Jeff

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in

• Welcome to Cruise Critic
• ANNOUNCEMENT: Set Sail Beyond the Ordinary with Oceania Cruises
• ANNOUNCEMENT: The Widest View in the Whole Wide World
• New Cruisers
• Cruise Lines “A – O”
• Cruise Lines “P – Z”
• River Cruising
• Cruise Critic News & Features
• Digital Photography & Cruise Technology
• Special Interest Cruising
• Cruise Discussion Topics
• UK Cruising
• Australia & New Zealand Cruisers
• Canadian Cruisers
• North American Homeports
• Ports of Call
• Cruise Conversations

Announcements

• New to Cruise Critic? Join our Community!

Write Your Own Amazing Review !

Click this gorgeous photo by member SUPERstar777 to share your review!

Features & News

LauraS · Started 1 hour ago

LauraS · Started Thursday at 10:20 PM

LauraS · Started Wednesday at 07:36 PM

LauraS · Started Wednesday at 12:53 AM

LauraS · Started Tuesday at 07:17 PM

• Existing user? Sign in OR Create an Account
• Find Your Roll Call
• Meet & Mingle
• Community Help Center
• All Activity
• Member Photo Albums
• Meet & Mingle Photos
• Favorite Cruise Memories
• Cruise Food Photos
• Cruise Ship Photos
• Ports of Call Photos
• Towel Animal Photos
• Amazing, Funny & Totally Awesome Cruise Photos
• Write a Review
• Live Cruise Reports
• Member Cruise Reviews
• Create New...