is light speed travel possible

July 3, 2018

Astronomy at the Speed of Light

Future space probes traveling at relativistic velocities would offer a unique vantage point for studying the universe

By Bing Zhang & The Conversation US

The binary stars of Alpha Centauri, our nearest neighboring star system, as seen by the Hubble Space Telescope. What would a ‘relativistic camera’ see while traveling at nearly light speed toward these nearby stars?

ESA and NASA

The following essay is reprinted with permission from The Conversation , an online publication covering the latest research.

Astronomers strive to observe the universe via ever more advanced techniques. Whenever researchers invent a new method, unprecedented information is collected and people’s understanding of the cosmos deepens.

An ambitious program to blast cameras far beyond the solar system was announced in April 2016 by internet investor and science philanthropist Yuri Milner, late physicist Stephen Hawking and Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg. Called “ Breakthrough Starshot ,” the idea is to send a bunch of tiny nano-spacecraft to the sun’s closest stellar neighbor, the three-star Alpha Centauri system. Traveling at around 20 percent the speed of light—so as fast as 100 million miles per hour—the craft and their tiny cameras would aim for the smallest but closest star in the system, Proxima Centari, and its planet Proxima b, 4.26 light-years from Earth.

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing . By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Breakthrough Starshot aims to establish proof of concept for a ‘nanocraft’ driven by a light beam.

The Breakthrough Starshot team’s goal will rely on a number of as-yet unproven technologies. The plan is to use light sails to get these spacecraft further and faster than anything that’s come before—lasers on Earth will push the tiny ships via their super-thin and reflective sails. I have another idea that could piggyback on this technology as the project is gearing up: Researchers could get valuable data from these mobile observatories, even directly test Einstein’s theory of special relativity, long before they get anywhere close to Alpha Centauri.

Technical challenges abound

Achieving Breakthrough Starshot’s goal is by no means an easy task. The project relies on continuing technological development on three independent fronts.

First, researchers will need to dramatically decrease the size and weight of microelectronic components to make a camera. Each nanocraft is planned to be no more than  a few grams in total  – and that will have to include not just the camera, but also other payloads including power supply and communication equipment.

Another challenge will be to build thin, ultra-light and highly reflective materials to serve as the “sail” for the camera. One possibility is to have  a single-layer graphene sail—just a molecule thick, only 0.345 nanometer .

The Breakthrough Starshot team will benefit from the rising power and falling cost of laser beams. Lasers with  100-Gigawatt power  are needed to accelerate the cameras from the ground. Just as wind fills a sailboat’s sails and pushes it forward, the photons from a high-energy laser beam can propel an ultralight reflective sail forward as they bounce back.

With the projected technology development rate, it will likely be at least two more decades before scientists can launch a camera traveling with a speed a significant fraction of the speed of light.

Even if such a camera could be built and accelerated, several more challenges must be overcome in order to fulfill the dream of reaching the Alpha Centauri system. Can researchers aim the cameras correctly so they reach the stellar system? Can the camera even survive the near 20-year journey without being damaged? And if it beats the odds and the trip goes well, will it be possible to transmit the data—say, images—back to Earth over such a huge distance?

Introducing ‘relativistic astronomy’

My collaborator Kunyang Li, a graduate student at Georgia Institute of Technology, and I  see potential in all these technologies  even before they’re perfected and ready to head out for Alpha Centauri.

When a camera travels in space at close to the speed of light—what could be called “relativistic speed”—Einstein’s special theory of relativity plays a role in how the images taken by the camera will be modified. Einstein’s theory states that in different “rest frames” observers have different measures of the lengths of space and time. That is, space and time are relative. How differently the two observers measure things depends on how fast they’re moving with respect to each other. If the relative speed is close to the speed of light, their observations can differ significantly.

The Doppler effect explains how a source moving away from you will stretch the wavelengths of its light and look redder, while if it’s moving closer the wavelengths will shorten and look bluer. Credit:  Aleš Tošovský Wikimedia (CC BY-SA 4.0)

Special relativity also affects many other things physicists measure—for example, the frequency and intensity of light and also the size of an object’s appearance. In the rest frame of the camera, the entire universe is moving at a good fraction of the speed of light in the opposite direction of the camera’s own motion. To an imaginary person on board, thanks to the different spacetimes experienced by him and everyone back on Earth, the light from a star or galaxy would appear bluer, brighter and more compact, and the angular separation between two objects would look smaller.

Our idea is to take advantage of these features of special relativity to observe familiar objects in the relativistic camera’s different spacetime rest frame. This can provide a new mode to study astronomy—what we’re calling “relativistic astronomy.”

What could the camera capture?

So, a relativistic camera would naturally serve as a  spectrograph , allowing researchers to look at an intrinsically redder band of light. It would act as a lens, magnifying the amount of light it collects. And it would be a wide-field camera, letting astronomers observe more objects within the same field of view of the camera.

An example of redshift: On the right, absorption lines occur closer to the red end of the spectrum. Credit:  Georg Wiora Wikimedia (CC BY-SA 2.5)

Here’s one example of the kind of data we could gather using the relativistic camera. Due to the expansion of the universe, the light from the early universe is redder by the time it reaches Earth than when it started. Physicists call this effect redshifting: As the light travels, its wavelength stretches as it expands along with the universe. Red light has longer wavelengths than blue light. All this means that to see red-shifted light from the young universe, one must use the difficult-to-observe infrared wavelengths to collect it.

Enter the relativistic camera. To a camera moving at close to the speed of light, such redshifted light becomes bluer—that is, it’s now blueshifted. The effect of the camera’s motion counteracts the effect of the universe’s expansion. Now an astronomer could catch that light using the familiar visible light camera. The same Doppler boosting effect also allows the faint light from the early universe to be amplified, aiding detection. Observing the spectral features of distant objects can allow us to reveal the history of the early universe, especially  how the universe evolved after it became transparent  380,000 years after the Big Bang.

Another exciting aspect of relativistic astronomy is that humankind can directly test the principles of special relativity using macroscopic measurements for the first time. Comparing the observations collected on the relativistic camera and those collected from ground, astronomers could precisely test the fundamental predictions of Einstein’s relativity regarding change of frequency, flux and light travel direction in different rest frames.

Compared with the ultimate goals of the Starshot project, observing the universe using relativistic cameras should be easier. Astronomers wouldn’t need to worry about aiming the camera, since it could get interesting results when sent in any direction. The data transmission problem is somewhat alleviated since the distances wouldn’t be as great. Same with the technical difficulty of protecting the camera.

We propose that trying out relativistic cameras for astronomical observations could be a forerunner of the full Starshot project. And humankind will have a new astronomical “observatory” to study the universe in an unprecedented way. History suggests that opening a new window like this will unveil many previously undetected treasures.

This article was originally published on The Conversation . Read the original article .

What is the speed of light?

The speed of light is the speed limit of the universe. Or is it?

What is a light-year?

• Speed of light FAQs
• Special relativity
• Faster than light
• Slowing down light
• Faster-than-light travel

Bibliography

The speed of light traveling through a vacuum is exactly 299,792,458 meters (983,571,056 feet) per second. That's about 186,282 miles per second — a universal constant known in equations as "c," or light speed. 

According to physicist Albert Einstein 's theory of special relativity , on which much of modern physics is based, nothing in the universe can travel faster than light. The theory states that as matter approaches the speed of light, the matter's mass becomes infinite. That means the speed of light functions as a speed limit on the whole universe . The speed of light is so immutable that, according to the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology , it is used to define international standard measurements like the meter (and by extension, the mile, the foot and the inch). Through some crafty equations, it also helps define the kilogram and the temperature unit Kelvin .

But despite the speed of light's reputation as a universal constant, scientists and science fiction writers alike spend time contemplating faster-than-light travel. So far no one's been able to demonstrate a real warp drive, but that hasn't slowed our collective hurtle toward new stories, new inventions and new realms of physics.

Related: Special relativity holds up to a high-energy test

A l ight-year is the distance that light can travel in one year — about 6 trillion miles (10 trillion kilometers). It's one way that astronomers and physicists measure immense distances across our universe.

Light travels from the moon to our eyes in about 1 second, which means the moon is about 1 light-second away. Sunlight takes about 8 minutes to reach our eyes, so the sun is about 8 light minutes away. Light from Alpha Centauri , which is the nearest star system to our own, requires roughly 4.3 years to get here, so Alpha Centauri is 4.3 light-years away.

"To obtain an idea of the size of a light-year, take the circumference of the Earth (24,900 miles), lay it out in a straight line, multiply the length of the line by 7.5 (the corresponding distance is one light-second), then place 31.6 million similar lines end to end," NASA's Glenn Research Center says on its website . "The resulting distance is almost 6 trillion (6,000,000,000,000) miles!"

Stars and other objects beyond our solar system lie anywhere from a few light-years to a few billion light-years away. And everything astronomers "see" in the distant universe is literally history. When astronomers study objects that are far away, they are seeing light that shows the objects as they existed at the time that light left them. 

This principle allows astronomers to see the universe as it looked after the Big Bang , which took place about 13.8 billion years ago. Objects that are 10 billion light-years away from us appear to astronomers as they looked 10 billion years ago — relatively soon after the beginning of the universe — rather than how they appear today.

Related: Why the universe is all history

Speed of light FAQs answered by an expert

We asked Rob Zellem, exoplanet-hunter and staff scientist at NASA's Jet Propulsion Lab, a few frequently asked questions about the speed of light. 

Dr. Rob Zellem is a staff scientist at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, a federally funded research and development center operated by the California Institute of Technology. Rob is the project lead for Exoplanet Watch, a citizen science project to observe exoplanets, planets outside of our own solar system, with small telescopes. He is also the Science Calibration lead for the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope's Coronagraph Instrument, which will directly image exoplanets. 

What is faster than the speed of light?

Nothing! Light is a "universal speed limit" and, according to Einstein's theory of relativity, is the fastest speed in the universe: 300,000 kilometers per second (186,000 miles per second). 

Is the speed of light constant?

The speed of light is a universal constant in a vacuum, like the vacuum of space. However, light *can* slow down slightly when it passes through an absorbing medium, like water (225,000 kilometers per second = 140,000 miles per second) or glass (200,000 kilometers per second = 124,000 miles per second). 

Who discovered the speed of light?

One of the first measurements of the speed of light was by Rømer in 1676 by observing the moons of Jupiter . The speed of light was first measured to high precision in 1879 by the Michelson-Morley Experiment. 

How do we know the speed of light?

Rømer was able to measure the speed of light by observing eclipses of Jupiter's moon Io. When Jupiter was closer to Earth, Rømer noted that eclipses of Io occurred slightly earlier than when Jupiter was farther away. Rømer attributed this effect due the time it takes for light to travel over the longer distance when Jupiter was farther from the Earth. 

How did we learn the speed of light?

As early as the 5th century BC, Greek philosophers like Empedocles and Aristotle disagreed on the nature of light speed. Empedocles proposed that light, whatever it was made of, must travel and therefore, must have a rate of travel. Aristotle wrote a rebuttal of Empedocles' view in his own treatise, On Sense and the Sensible , arguing that light, unlike sound and smell, must be instantaneous. Aristotle was wrong, of course, but it would take hundreds of years for anyone to prove it. 

In the mid 1600s, the Italian astronomer Galileo Galilei stood two people on hills less than a mile apart. Each person held a shielded lantern. One uncovered his lantern; when the other person saw the flash, he uncovered his too. But Galileo's experimental distance wasn't far enough for his participants to record the speed of light. He could only conclude that light traveled at least 10 times faster than sound.

In the 1670s, Danish astronomer Ole Rømer tried to create a reliable timetable for sailors at sea, and according to NASA , accidentally came up with a new best estimate for the speed of light. To create an astronomical clock, he recorded the precise timing of the eclipses of Jupiter's moon , Io, from Earth . Over time, Rømer observed that Io's eclipses often differed from his calculations. He noticed that the eclipses appeared to lag the most when Jupiter and Earth were moving away from one another, showed up ahead of time when the planets were approaching and occurred on schedule when the planets were at their closest or farthest points. This observation demonstrated what we today know as the Doppler effect, the change in frequency of light or sound emitted by a moving object that in the astronomical world manifests as the so-called redshift , the shift towards "redder", longer wavelengths in objects speeding away from us. In a leap of intuition, Rømer determined that light was taking measurable time to travel from Io to Earth. 

Rømer used his observations to estimate the speed of light. Since the size of the solar system and Earth's orbit wasn't yet accurately known, argued a 1998 paper in the American Journal of Physics , he was a bit off. But at last, scientists had a number to work with. Rømer's calculation put the speed of light at about 124,000 miles per second (200,000 km/s).

In 1728, English physicist James Bradley based a new set of calculations on the change in the apparent position of stars caused by Earth's travels around the sun. He estimated the speed of light at 185,000 miles per second (301,000 km/s) — accurate to within about 1% of the real value, according to the American Physical Society .

Two new attempts in the mid-1800s brought the problem back to Earth. French physicist Hippolyte Fizeau set a beam of light on a rapidly rotating toothed wheel, with a mirror set up 5 miles (8 km) away to reflect it back to its source. Varying the speed of the wheel allowed Fizeau to calculate how long it took for the light to travel out of the hole, to the adjacent mirror, and back through the gap. Another French physicist, Leon Foucault, used a rotating mirror rather than a wheel to perform essentially the same experiment. The two independent methods each came within about 1,000 miles per second (1,609 km/s) of the speed of light.

Another scientist who tackled the speed of light mystery was Poland-born Albert A. Michelson, who grew up in California during the state's gold rush period, and honed his interest in physics while attending the U.S. Naval Academy, according to the University of Virginia . In 1879, he attempted to replicate Foucault's method of determining the speed of light, but Michelson increased the distance between mirrors and used extremely high-quality mirrors and lenses. Michelson's result of 186,355 miles per second (299,910 km/s) was accepted as the most accurate measurement of the speed of light for 40 years, until Michelson re-measured it himself. In his second round of experiments, Michelson flashed lights between two mountain tops with carefully measured distances to get a more precise estimate. And in his third attempt just before his death in 1931, according to the Smithsonian's Air and Space magazine, he built a mile-long depressurized tube of corrugated steel pipe. The pipe simulated a near-vacuum that would remove any effect of air on light speed for an even finer measurement, which in the end was just slightly lower than the accepted value of the speed of light today. 

Michelson also studied the nature of light itself, wrote astrophysicist Ethan Siegal in the Forbes science blog, Starts With a Bang . The best minds in physics at the time of Michelson's experiments were divided: Was light a wave or a particle? 

Michelson, along with his colleague Edward Morley, worked under the assumption that light moved as a wave, just like sound. And just as sound needs particles to move, Michelson and Morley and other physicists of the time reasoned, light must have some kind of medium to move through. This invisible, undetectable stuff was called the "luminiferous aether" (also known as "ether"). 

Though Michelson and Morley built a sophisticated interferometer (a very basic version of the instrument used today in LIGO facilities), Michelson could not find evidence of any kind of luminiferous aether whatsoever. Light, he determined, can and does travel through a vacuum.

"The experiment — and Michelson's body of work — was so revolutionary that he became the only person in history to have won a Nobel Prize for a very precise non-discovery of anything," Siegal wrote. "The experiment itself may have been a complete failure, but what we learned from it was a greater boon to humanity and our understanding of the universe than any success would have been!"

Special relativity and the speed of light

Einstein's theory of special relativity unified energy, matter and the speed of light in a famous equation: E = mc^2. The equation describes the relationship between mass and energy — small amounts of mass (m) contain, or are made up of, an inherently enormous amount of energy (E). (That's what makes nuclear bombs so powerful: They're converting mass into blasts of energy.) Because energy is equal to mass times the speed of light squared, the speed of light serves as a conversion factor, explaining exactly how much energy must be within matter. And because the speed of light is such a huge number, even small amounts of mass must equate to vast quantities of energy.

In order to accurately describe the universe, Einstein's elegant equation requires the speed of light to be an immutable constant. Einstein asserted that light moved through a vacuum, not any kind of luminiferous aether, and in such a way that it moved at the same speed no matter the speed of the observer. 

Think of it like this: Observers sitting on a train could look at a train moving along a parallel track and think of its relative movement to themselves as zero. But observers moving nearly the speed of light would still perceive light as moving away from them at more than 670 million mph. (That's because moving really, really fast is one of the only confirmed methods of time travel — time actually slows down for those observers, who will age slower and perceive fewer moments than an observer moving slowly.)

In other words, Einstein proposed that the speed of light doesn't vary with the time or place that you measure it, or how fast you yourself are moving. 

Therefore, objects with mass cannot ever reach the speed of light. If an object ever did reach the speed of light, its mass would become infinite. And as a result, the energy required to move the object would also become infinite: an impossibility.

That means if we base our understanding of physics on special relativity (which most modern physicists do), the speed of light is the immutable speed limit of our universe — the fastest that anything can travel. 

What goes faster than the speed of light?

Although the speed of light is often referred to as the universe's speed limit, the universe actually expands even faster. The universe expands at a little more than 42 miles (68 kilometers) per second for each megaparsec of distance from the observer, wrote astrophysicist Paul Sutter in a previous article for Space.com . (A megaparsec is 3.26 million light-years — a really long way.) 

In other words, a galaxy 1 megaparsec away appears to be traveling away from the Milky Way at a speed of 42 miles per second (68 km/s), while a galaxy two megaparsecs away recedes at nearly 86 miles per second (136 km/s), and so on. 

"At some point, at some obscene distance, the speed tips over the scales and exceeds the speed of light, all from the natural, regular expansion of space," Sutter explained. "It seems like it should be illegal, doesn't it?"

Special relativity provides an absolute speed limit within the universe, according to Sutter, but Einstein's 1915 theory regarding general relativity allows different behavior when the physics you're examining are no longer "local."

"A galaxy on the far side of the universe? That's the domain of general relativity, and general relativity says: Who cares! That galaxy can have any speed it wants, as long as it stays way far away, and not up next to your face," Sutter wrote. "Special relativity doesn't care about the speed — superluminal or otherwise — of a distant galaxy. And neither should you."

Does light ever slow down?

Light in a vacuum is generally held to travel at an absolute speed, but light traveling through any material can be slowed down. The amount that a material slows down light is called its refractive index. Light bends when coming into contact with particles, which results in a decrease in speed.

For example, light traveling through Earth's atmosphere moves almost as fast as light in a vacuum, slowing down by just three ten-thousandths of the speed of light. But light passing through a diamond slows to less than half its typical speed, PBS NOVA reported. Even so, it travels through the gem at over 277 million mph (almost 124,000 km/s) — enough to make a difference, but still incredibly fast.

Light can be trapped — and even stopped — inside ultra-cold clouds of atoms, according to a 2001 study published in the journal Nature . More recently, a 2018 study published in the journal Physical Review Letters proposed a new way to stop light in its tracks at "exceptional points," or places where two separate light emissions intersect and merge into one.

Researchers have also tried to slow down light even when it's traveling through a vacuum. A team of Scottish scientists successfully slowed down a single photon, or particle of light, even as it moved through a vacuum, as described in their 2015 study published in the journal Science . In their measurements, the difference between the slowed photon and a "regular" photon was just a few millionths of a meter, but it demonstrated that light in a vacuum can be slower than the official speed of light. 

Can we travel faster than light?

— Spaceship could fly faster than light

— Here's what the speed of light looks like in slow motion

— Why is the speed of light the way it is?

Science fiction loves the idea of "warp speed." Faster-than-light travel makes countless sci-fi franchises possible, condensing the vast expanses of space and letting characters pop back and forth between star systems with ease. 

But while faster-than-light travel isn't guaranteed impossible, we'd need to harness some pretty exotic physics to make it work. Luckily for sci-fi enthusiasts and theoretical physicists alike, there are lots of avenues to explore.

All we have to do is figure out how to not move ourselves — since special relativity would ensure we'd be long destroyed before we reached high enough speed — but instead, move the space around us. Easy, right? 

One proposed idea involves a spaceship that could fold a space-time bubble around itself. Sounds great, both in theory and in fiction.

"If Captain Kirk were constrained to move at the speed of our fastest rockets, it would take him a hundred thousand years just to get to the next star system," said Seth Shostak, an astronomer at the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) Institute in Mountain View, California, in a 2010 interview with Space.com's sister site LiveScience . "So science fiction has long postulated a way to beat the speed of light barrier so the story can move a little more quickly."

Without faster-than-light travel, any "Star Trek" (or "Star War," for that matter) would be impossible. If humanity is ever to reach the farthest — and constantly expanding — corners of our universe, it will be up to future physicists to boldly go where no one has gone before.

Additional resources

For more on the speed of light, check out this fun tool from Academo that lets you visualize how fast light can travel from any place on Earth to any other. If you’re more interested in other important numbers, get familiar with the universal constants that define standard systems of measurement around the world with the National Institute of Standards and Technology . And if you’d like more on the history of the speed of light, check out the book " Lightspeed: The Ghostly Aether and the Race to Measure the Speed of Light " (Oxford, 2019) by John C. H. Spence.

Aristotle. “On Sense and the Sensible.” The Internet Classics Archive, 350AD. http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/sense.2.2.html .

D’Alto, Nick. “The Pipeline That Measured the Speed of Light.” Smithsonian Magazine, January 2017. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/air-space-magazine/18_fm2017-oo-180961669/ .

Fowler, Michael. “Speed of Light.” Modern Physics. University of Virginia. Accessed January 13, 2022. https://galileo.phys.virginia.edu/classes/252/spedlite.html#Albert%20Abraham%20Michelson .

Giovannini, Daniel, Jacquiline Romero, Václav Potoček, Gergely Ferenczi, Fiona Speirits, Stephen M. Barnett, Daniele Faccio, and Miles J. Padgett. “Spatially Structured Photons That Travel in Free Space Slower than the Speed of Light.” Science, February 20, 2015. https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.aaa3035 .

Goldzak, Tamar, Alexei A. Mailybaev, and Nimrod Moiseyev. “Light Stops at Exceptional Points.” Physical Review Letters 120, no. 1 (January 3, 2018): 013901. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.013901 . 

Hazen, Robert. “What Makes Diamond Sparkle?” PBS NOVA, January 31, 2000. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/article/diamond-science/ . 

“How Long Is a Light-Year?” Glenn Learning Technologies Project, May 13, 2021. https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/Numbers/Math/Mathematical_Thinking/how_long_is_a_light_year.htm . 

American Physical Society News. “July 1849: Fizeau Publishes Results of Speed of Light Experiment,” July 2010. http://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/201007/physicshistory.cfm . 

Liu, Chien, Zachary Dutton, Cyrus H. Behroozi, and Lene Vestergaard Hau. “Observation of Coherent Optical Information Storage in an Atomic Medium Using Halted Light Pulses.” Nature 409, no. 6819 (January 2001): 490–93. https://doi.org/10.1038/35054017 . 

NIST. “Meet the Constants.” October 12, 2018. https://www.nist.gov/si-redefinition/meet-constants . 

Ouellette, Jennifer. “A Brief History of the Speed of Light.” PBS NOVA, February 27, 2015. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/article/brief-history-speed-light/ . 

Shea, James H. “Ole Ro/Mer, the Speed of Light, the Apparent Period of Io, the Doppler Effect, and the Dynamics of Earth and Jupiter.” American Journal of Physics 66, no. 7 (July 1, 1998): 561–69. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.19020 . 

Siegel, Ethan. “The Failed Experiment That Changed The World.” Forbes, April 21, 2017. https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2017/04/21/the-failed-experiment-that-changed-the-world/ . 

Stern, David. “Rømer and the Speed of Light,” October 17, 2016. https://pwg.gsfc.nasa.gov/stargaze/Sun4Adop1.htm . 

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: [email protected].

Get the Space.com Newsletter

Breaking space news, the latest updates on rocket launches, skywatching events and more!

Vicky Stein is a science writer based in California. She has a bachelor's degree in ecology and evolutionary biology from Dartmouth College and a graduate certificate in science writing from the University of California, Santa Cruz (2018). Afterwards, she worked as a news assistant for PBS NewsHour, and now works as a freelancer covering anything from asteroids to zebras. Follow her most recent work (and most recent pictures of nudibranchs) on Twitter. 

Satellites watch as 4th global coral bleaching event unfolds (image)

Happy Earth Day 2024! NASA picks 6 new airborne missions to study our changing planet

Sneak peek: Browncoats grab victory in Boom! Studios' upcoming 'Firefly: 'Verses' comic (exclusive)

Most Popular

• 2 SpaceX launching 23 Starlink satellites from Florida this evening
• 3 NASA's mission to an ice-covered moon will contain a message between water worlds
• 4 Watch SpaceX Dragon cargo capsule depart the ISS today
• 5 Russia vetoes UN resolution against nuclear weapons in space

NASA's Guide to Near-light-speed Travel

• Released Friday, August 14, 2020
• Produced by:
• Chris Smith
• Written by:
• Visualizations by:
• Krystofer Kim
• Scientific consulting by:
• Ryan DeRosa
• and Scott Noble

So, you've just put the finishing touches on upgrades to your spaceship, and now it can fly at almost the speed of light. We're not quite sure how you pulled it off, but congratulations! Before you fly off on your next vacation, however, watch this handy video to learn more about near-light-speed safety considerations, travel times, and distances between some popular destinations around the universe. You can also download shorter clips from the video and printable postcards to send to your friends.

Near-light-speed Travel GuideThis handy video will help acquaint you with the quirks of near-light-speed travel, expected travel times, and the distances to some popular (at least, we think so) destinations!Credit: NASA's Goddard Space Flight CenterMusic: "The Tiptoe Strut" from Universal Production MusicComplete transcript available.

• traveler_near_light_speed_HQ_1080.mp4 (1920x1080) [385.7 MB]
• traveler_near_light_speed_HQ_1080.webm (1920x1080) [20.4 MB]
• traveler_near_light_speed_HQ_4K.mp4 (3840x2160) [1.4 GB]
• traveler_near_light_speed_LQ_4K.mp4 (3840x2160) [190.8 MB]
• traveler_near_light_speed_prores.mov (3840x2160) [8.4 GB]
• traveler_near_light_speed.en_US.srt [4.5 KB]
• traveler_near_light_speed.en_US.vtt [4.3 KB]
• traveler_near_light_speed_still.jpg (3840x2160) [4.6 MB]
• traveler_near_light_speed_still_print.jpg (1024x576) [378.3 KB]
• traveler_near_light_speed_still_searchweb.png (320x180) [83.4 KB]
• traveler_near_light_speed_still_web.png (320x180) [83.4 KB]
• traveler_near_light_speed_still_thm.png (80x40) [6.3 KB]

Complete transcript available.

Near Light Speed 101: Effects of Near-light-speed TravelTravel at near the speed of light offers a few quirks you should be aware of, from time and space weirdness to protecting yourself from dangerous cosmic particles. This video covers some of the important ones!Credit: NASA's Goddard Space Flight CenterMusic: "Dinner With the Vicar" from Universal Production MusicComplete transcript available.

• traveler_near_light_speed_segment_effects_HQ_1080.mp4 (1920x1080) [117.3 MB]
• traveler_near_light_speed_segment_effects_HQ_1080.webm (1920x1080) [7.2 MB]
• traveler_near_light_speed_segment_effects_HQ_4K.mp4 (3840x2160) [500.7 MB]
• traveler_near_light_speed_segment_effects_LQ_4K.mp4 (3840x2160) [66.1 MB]
• traveler_near_light_speed_segment_effects_prores.mov (3840x2160) [2.8 GB]
• traveler_near_light_speed_segment_effects.en_US.srt [1.6 KB]
• traveler_near_light_speed_segment_effects.en_US.vtt [1.6 KB]
• traveler_near_light_speed_segment_effects_still.jpg (3840x2160) [3.0 MB]
• traveler_near_light_speed_segment_effects_still_print.jpg (1024x576) [285.5 KB]
• traveler_near_light_speed_segment_effects_still_searchweb.png (320x180) [68.7 KB]
• traveler_near_light_speed_segment_effects_still_web.png (320x180) [68.7 KB]
• traveler_near_light_speed_segment_effects_still_thm.png (80x40) [6.7 KB]

Near Light Speed 101: Near-light-speed Travel TimesEven if you've figured out how to travel at almost the speed of light, the universe is still a huge place! Watch this video to learn more about how long it takes to cruise around the cosmos.Credit: NASA's Goddard Space Flight CenterMusic: "Dinner With the Vicar" from Universal Production MusicComplete transcript available.

• traveler_near_light_speed_segment_travel_times_HQ_1080.mp4 (1920x1080) [126.3 MB]
• traveler_near_light_speed_segment_travel_times_HQ_1080.webm (1920x1080) [8.0 MB]
• traveler_near_light_speed_segment_travel_times_HQ_4K.mp4 (3840x2160) [554.3 MB]
• traveler_near_light_speed_segment_travel_times_LQ_4K.mp4 (3840x2160) [74.8 MB]
• traveler_near_light_speed_segment_travel_times_prores.mov (3840x2160) [3.1 GB]
• traveler_near_light_speed_segment_travel_times.en_US.srt [1.7 KB]
• traveler_near_light_speed_segment_travel_times.en_US.vtt [1.6 KB]
• traveler_near_light_speed_segment_travel_times_still.jpg (3840x2160) [2.2 MB]
• traveler_near_light_speed_segment_travel_times_still_print.jpg (1024x576) [227.3 KB]
• traveler_near_light_speed_segment_travel_times_still_searchweb.png (320x180) [60.6 KB]
• traveler_near_light_speed_segment_travel_times_still_web.png (320x180) [60.6 KB]
• traveler_near_light_speed_segment_travel_times_still_thm.png (80x40) [6.0 KB]
• near_light_speed_postcard.png (3148x2225) [1.6 MB]
• near_light_speed_postcard_print.jpg (1024x723) [175.0 KB]
• near_light_speed_postcard_searchweb.png (180x320) [67.8 KB]
• near_light_speed_postcard_web.png (320x226) [79.0 KB]
• near_light_speed_postcard_thm.png (80x40) [6.5 KB]

*compared to friends that stayed behind.

• solar_system_postcard.png (3148x2225) [1.7 MB]
• solar_system_postcard_print.jpg (1024x723) [150.0 KB]
• solar_system_postcard_searchweb.png (320x180) [67.7 KB]
• solar_system_postcard_web.png (320x226) [74.9 KB]
• solar_system_postcard_thm.png (80x40) [6.7 KB]

Visit sunny Glerbax-29, home of eight unique, beautiful planets! The locals call it the solar system.

• Andromeda_postcard.png (3148x2225) [1.5 MB]
• Andromeda_postcard_print.jpg (1024x723) [138.2 KB]
• Andromeda_postcard_searchweb.png (320x180) [62.9 KB]
• Andromeda_postcard_web.png (320x226) [72.9 KB]
• Andromeda_postcard_thm.png (80x40) [6.1 KB]

A vacation to Andromeda, our nearest spiral neighbor galaxy, is a long, long, long, long, long trip, but it's worth it! And this postcard will prove it to your friends.

• Astrophysics

Please give credit for this item to: NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center

• Chris Smith  (USRA)
• Krystofer Kim  (USRA)
• Ryan DeRosa  (NASA/GSFC)
• Scott Noble  (NASA/GSFC)

Release date

This page was originally published on Friday, August 14, 2020. This page was last updated on Wednesday, May 3, 2023 at 1:44 PM EDT.

• Narrated Movies

Snap It! An Eclipse Photo Adventure (Trailer)

Nasa’s guide to visiting a gamma-ray burst, nasa's field guide to black holes, nasa's guide to black hole safety, you may also like..., no results., an error occurred. please reload this page and try again..

• Search Please fill out this field.
• Manage Your Subscription
• Give a Gift Subscription
• Sweepstakes
• Space Travel + Astronomy

Here's What Actually Happens When You Travel at the Speed of Light, According to NASA

NASA created a fun video to answer all of our burning questions about near-light-speed travel.

Ever wish you could travel at the speed of light to your favorite destinations ? Once you see the reality of that speed, you may rethink everything.

"There are some important things you should probably know about approaching the speed of light," NASA's video, Guide to Near-light-speed Travel , explains. "First, a lot of weird things can happen, like time and space getting all bent out of shape."

According to the video, if you're traveling at nearly the speed of light, the clock inside your rocket would show it takes less time to travel to your destination than it would on Earth. But, since the clocks at home would be moving at a standard rate you'd return home to everyone else being quite a bit older.

"Also, because you're going so fast, what would otherwise be just a few hydrogen atoms that you'd run into quickly becomes a lot of dangerous particles. So you should probably have shields that keep them from frying your ship and also you."

Finally, the video tackles the fact that even if you were moving at the speed of light, the "universe is also a very big place, so you might be in for some surprises." For example, your rocket's clock will say it takes about nine months to get from Earth to the edge of the solar system. An Earth clock would say it took about a year and a half. Fortunately, NASA astronauts have a slew of tips for avoiding jet lag along the way.

"If you want to get to farther out vacation spots," the video explains, "you'll probably need more than a few extra snacks. A trip to the Andromeda Galaxy, our nearest large neighbor galaxy, can take over one million years. And a trip to the farthest known galaxy where it currently sits might take over 15 billion years, which is more vacation time than I think I'll ever have."

The video doesn't explain how your rocket will travel at the speed of light. Our technology just isn't there yet, but maybe the aliens will share that tech with us soon. Until then, you can track the first crew launch of Artemis II , a rocket that will fly around the moon in 2024 before making its first lunar landing in 2025.

Can anything travel faster than the speed of light?

Does it matter if it's in a vacuum?

In 1676, by studying the motion of Jupiter's moon Io, Danish astronomer Ole Rømer calculated that light travels at a finite speed. Two years later, building on data gathered by Rømer, Dutch mathematician and scientist Christiaan Huygens became the first person to attempt to determine the actual speed of light, according to the American Museum of Natural History in New York City. Huygens came up with a figure of 131,000 miles per second (211,000 kilometers per second), a number that isn't accurate by today's standards — we now know that the speed of light in the "vacuum" of empty space is about 186,282 miles per second (299,792 km per second) — but his assessment showcased that light travels at an incredible speed.

According to Albert Einstein 's theory of special relativity , light travels so fast that, in a vacuum, nothing in the universe is capable of moving faster. 

"We cannot move through the vacuum of space faster than the speed of light," confirmed Jason Cassibry, an associate professor of aerospace engineering at the Propulsion Research Center, University of Alabama in Huntsville.

Question answered, right? Maybe not. When light is not in a vacuum, does the rule still apply?

Related: How many atoms are in the observable universe?

"Technically, the statement 'nothing can travel faster than the speed of light' isn't quite correct by itself," at least in a non-vacuum setting, Claudia de Rham, a theoretical physicist at Imperial College London, told Live Science in an email. But there are certain caveats to consider, she said. Light exhibits both particle-like and wave-like characteristics, and can therefore be regarded as both a particle (a photon ) and a wave. This is known as wave-particle duality.

If we look at light as a wave, then there are "multiple reasons" why certain waves can travel faster than white (or colorless) light in a medium, de Rham said. One such reason, she said, is that "as light travels through a medium — for instance, glass or water droplets — the different frequencies or colors of light travel at different speeds." The most obvious visual example of this occurs in rainbows, which typically have the long, faster red wavelengths at the top and the short, slower violet wavelengths at the bottom, according to a post by the University of Wisconsin-Madison . 

Sign up for the Live Science daily newsletter now

Get the world’s most fascinating discoveries delivered straight to your inbox.

When light travels through a vacuum, however, the same is not true. "All light is a type of electromagnetic wave, and they all have the same speed in a vacuum (3 x 10^8 meters per second). This means both radio waves and gamma rays have the same speed," Rhett Allain, a physics professor at Southeastern Louisiana University, told Live Science in an email.

So, according to de Rham, the only thing capable of traveling faster than the speed of light is, somewhat paradoxically, light itself, though only when not in the vacuum of space. Of note, regardless of the medium, light will never exceed its maximum speed of 186,282 miles per second.

Universal look

According to Cassibry, however, there is something else to consider when discussing things moving faster than the speed of light.

"There are parts of the universe that are expanding away from us faster than the speed of light, because space-time is expanding," he said. For example, the Hubble Space Telescope recently spotted 12.9 billion year-old light from a distant star known as Earendel. But, because the universe is expanding at every point, Earendel is moving away from Earth and has been since its formation, so the galaxy is now 28 billion light years away from Earth.

In this case, space-time is expanding, but the material in space-time is still traveling within the bounds of light speed.

Related: Why is space a vacuum?

So, it's clear that nothing travels faster than light that we know of, but is there any situation where it might be possible? Einstein's theory of special relativity, and his subsequent theory of general relativity, is "built under the principle that the notions of space and time are relative," de Rham said. But what does this mean? "If someone [were] able to travel faster than light and carry information with them, their notion of time would be twisted as compared to ours," de Rham said. "There could be situations where the future could affect our past, and then the whole structure of reality would stop making sense."

This would indicate that it would probably not be desirable to make a human travel faster than the speed of light. But could it ever be possible? Will there ever be a time when we are capable of creating craft that could propel materials — and ultimately humans — through space at a pace that outstrips light speed? "Theorists have proposed various types of warp bubbles that could enable faster-than-light travel," Cassibry said.

But is de Rham convinced?

"We can imagine being able to communicate at the speed of light with systems outside our solar system ," de Rham said. "But sending actual physical humans at the speed of light is simply impossible, because we cannot accelerate ourselves to such speed.

"Even in a very idealistic situation where we imagine we could keep accelerating ourselves at a constant rate — ignoring how we could even reach a technology that could keep accelerating us continuously — we would never actually reach the speed of light," she added. "We could get close, but never quite reach it."

Related: How long is a galactic year?

This is a point confirmed by Cassibry. "Neglecting relativity, if you were to accelerate with a rate of 1G [Earth gravity], it would take you a year to reach the speed of light. However, you would never really reach that velocity because as you start to approach lightspeed, your mass energy increases, approaching infinite. "One of the few known possible 'cheat codes' for this limitation is to expand and contract spacetime, thereby pulling your destination closer to you. There seems to be no fundamental limit on the rate at which spacetime can expand or contract, meaning we might be able to get around this velocity limit someday."

— What would happen if the speed of light were much lower?

— What if the speed of sound were as fast as the speed of light?

— How does the rubber pencil illusion work?

Allain is similarly confident that going faster than light is far from likely, but, like Cassibry, noted that if humans want to explore distant planets, it may not actually be necessary to reach such speeds. "The only way we could understand going faster than light would be to use some type of wormhole in space," Allain said. "This wouldn't actually make us go faster than light, but instead give us a shortcut to some other location in space."

Cassibry, however, is unsure if wormholes will ever be a realistic option.

"Wormholes are theorized to be possible based on a special solution to Einstein's field equations," he said. "Basically, wormholes, if possible, would give you a shortcut from one destination to another. I have no idea if it's possible to construct one, or how we would even go about doing it." Originally published on Live Science.

Joe Phelan is a journalist based in London. His work has appeared in VICE, National Geographic, World Soccer and The Blizzard, and has been a guest on Times Radio. He is drawn to the weird, wonderful and under examined, as well as anything related to life in the Arctic Circle. He holds a bachelor's degree in journalism from the University of Chester. 

Hundreds of black 'spiders' spotted in mysterious 'Inca City' on Mars in new satellite photos

Scientists find one of the oldest stars in the universe in a galaxy right next to ours

Eclipse from space: Paths of 2024 and 2017 eclipses collide over US in new satellite image

Most Popular

• 2 James Webb telescope confirms there is something seriously wrong with our understanding of the universe
• 3 George Washington's stash of centuries-old cherries found hidden under Mount Vernon floor
• 4 Scientists find one of the oldest stars in the universe in a galaxy right next to ours
• 5 DNA analysis spanning 9 generations of people reveals marriage practices of mysterious warrior culture
• 2 Tweak to Schrödinger's cat equation could unite Einstein's relativity and quantum mechanics, study hints
• 3 Lavish 2,200-year-old tomb unearthed in China may be that of ancient king
• 4 New UTI vaccine wards off infection for years, early studies suggest
• 5 Claude 3 Opus has stunned AI researchers with its intellect and 'self-awareness' — does this mean it can think for itself?

This Trick Flips Space and Time

By Meddling With Spacetime Dimensions, We Could Finally Reach Warp Speed

New research shows that the “superluminal observer” needs three separate time dimensions for a warp-speed math trick that would please even Galileo.

✅ Quick Facts:

• In new research, the lead scientist explains why just one space and one time aren’t enough for this scenario.
• Symmetry is a physics concept that goes all the way back to Galileo’s time.

The secret to faster-than-light physics could be to double down on the number of dimensions. Specifically, the solution may lie in three dimensions of time , with just one representing space. The math is deep and complicated, but the ideas may be within our grasp after all. And there’s one math trick at superspeeds that may just “flip” your lid.

The key idea at play is that of a “superluminal observer,” according to research published in December 2022 in the journal Classical and Quantum Gravity. “Superluminal” means faster than light, from super - meaning “more” or “most,” and - luminal like, well, Lumière from Beauty and the Beast, and the lumens that power your home movie projector. The superluminal observer is a hypothetical thing that is looking at the universe while traveling faster than light. It’s you in your Star Trek warp-speed shuttle.

Superluminal observers are cool because, in a way, they marry together two very different sides of physics: general relativity and quantum mechanics . General relativity is the work embodied by Albert Einstein, which governs how spacetime functions as bodies move around the universe at subluminal, or slower than light, speeds. Quantum mechanics explains how subatomic particles behave, or don’t behave, in very strange ways on the smallest of scales.

The research team—led by theoretical physicist Andrzej Dragan of the University of Warsaw and the National University of Singapore—has theorized that many parts of quantum physics, like indeterminism and superposition , can be explained if you take general relativity and apply its principles to the superluminal observer. In other words, how messy does spacetime get if we take our shuttle up to warp speed? Is everything suddenly in multiple places at once?

Dragan’s new work indicates that it’s at least a possibility. Perhaps more interestingly, the way general relativity becomes quantum phenomena at speeds greater than light doesn’t seem to introduce any causal paradoxes. In earlier work , published in the New Journal of Physics in March 2020, Dragan and his coauthor studied “just” one space dimension and one time dimension, known as 1+1. In the new paper, the researchers upped the ante to include one space dimension and three time dimensions, or 1+3.

When Time and Space Flip Math

Why do we need three time dimensions? To understand, we have to talk about some math. “[D]espite our common perception, time and space are strikingly similar according to relativity, and mathematically the only difference between them is the minus sign somewhere in the equations,” Dragan explains to Popular Mechanics in an email. That’s a small difference in complicated math, but think of the algebra example of the difference of two squares: x² - 16, for example, is the result of (x - 4)(x + 4). With one flipped sign, the middle term in the polynomial falls away.

But when the observer is going faster than the speed of light, the difference in signs also changes. That’s because time and space must flip in the math. “The time of the superluminal observer becomes space of the subluminal one, and their space becomes time,” Dragan says. In other words, the regular, non-light-speed observer’s space and time turn into the time and space, relatively, of the faster-than-light observer. “So their corresponding signs have to interchange.”

In a 1+1 scenario, that means the two dimensions are the same, making it redundant. If 50 = 50, does it matter which 50 is which? (In logic, we call this a tautology.) That means that if we want to truly study space and time as different things, we have to add a second “set” of two dimensions: space and time 1, together, represent space; while time 2 and time 3, together, represent time . It’s not quite the difference of two squares, but we have two balanced sets of dimensions.

The Symmetry in Physics

There’s another interesting aspect to this research, because Dragan’s team wants to show that even at superluminal speeds, physics shows symmetry.

“The idea of symmetry in physics can be traced back to Galileo,” Dragan says. “He noticed that no matter what velocity we move at, as long as that velocity is constant, our physics remains the same. A parrot flying in a moving ship experiences the same dynamical laws as at ‘rest’ on Earth.”

✅ Galileo Galilei was an influential Italian scientist who lived during the 16th and 17th centuries. As an elderly man, he received a life sentence for going public with his belief that Earth orbited the sun!

But our conceptions of physics are limited by the long-running (and reasonable!) belief that nothing can travel faster than light, Dragan explains. That means the superluminal observer, by definition, exists as a kind of exception into which we must work to extend the idea of symmetry. Does it make sense that a superluminal observer would still be subject to symmetry? Is the parrot traveling faster than light still the same as the parrot in the ship or on Earth?

“We argued that this additional limiting assumption isn’t necessary,” Dragan says. He believes symmetry may extend into faster-than-light speeds, and our parrot friend would be just as affected by the same laws of physics while traveling in the warp-speed shuttle.

Toward a Grand Unified Theory

So, this paper isn’t about traveling at warp speed, but instead an analysis of physics to show how we can bring two very different physics branches together. Why is that, itself, so important?

“The idea of more than one time dimension has been considered by others over the years, so that particular premise is not novel,” Harold “Sonny” White, a onetime NASA physicist and the founder of the Limitless Space Institute (LSI), a group that funds and promotes far-out space travel and physics research, tells Popular Mechanics . “But the mathematical framework developed by the authors in this published paper is unique. It would seem the authors’ perceived benefit from the effort is that it establishes a mathematical basis for why we need a field theoretical framework.”

What is a field theoretical framework? It’s the big picture of physics that can bring everything together. “[I]f we envision the standard models of physics as a Venn diagram, there would be two circles side-by-side that touch at a single tangent point,” White explains. “The idea of a grand unified field theory might be envisioned as a larger circle that encircles both the smaller circles.”

By showing their work, these researchers have pointed out a really specific way in which one big basket of physics—rather than two baskets that we aren’t sure how to carry at the same time—would make more sense in practical and mathematical terms.

Okay, sure, you may be thinking: all this superluminal jabberwocky is interesting. But warp speed itself is science fiction, right? (At least for now: White’s LSI funds education that may eventually lead us elsewhere.) The superluminal observer is just a thought exercise ... right?

Dragan isn’t so sure. “The last remaining question is whether superluminal objects are only a mathematical possibility, or they actually exist in reality,” he concludes. “We believe the latter to be that case, and that is the purpose of our further research.”

That means our warp-speed shuttle, once the most far-out thing science fiction writers could even imagine, could embody an elegant theory that brings together two very different kinds of physics. Indeed, objects in the superluminal mirror may be closer than they appear.

Caroline Delbert is a writer, avid reader, and contributing editor at Pop Mech. She's also an enthusiast of just about everything. Her favorite topics include nuclear energy, cosmology, math of everyday things, and the philosophy of it all. 

.css-cuqpxl:before{padding-right:0.3125rem;content:'//';display:inline;} Pop Mech Pro: Space .css-xtujxj:before{padding-left:0.3125rem;content:'//';display:inline;}

How a Lunar Supercollider Could Upend Physics

The History of Pi

The Strange Origin of the Hollow Moon Conspiracy

What Do Alien Space Probes Look Like?

How NASA’s Next Super Telescope Could Find Aliens

Will Mars Astronauts Need Sunscreen?

Sunquakes May Be the Key to Nuclear Fusion

7 Solid Reasons to Actually Believe in Aliens

The 7 Greatest Cosmic Threats to Life on Earth

Your Guide to Every Stargazing Event in 2024

This Is the Coldest Place in the Universe

Have we made an object that could travel 1% the speed of light?

University Distinguished Professor of Astronomy, University of Arizona

Disclosure statement

Chris Impey receives funding from the National Science Foundation and the Hearst Foundation.

University of Arizona provides funding as a member of The Conversation US.

View all partners

Curious Kids is a series for children of all ages. If you have a question you’d like an expert to answer, send it to [email protected] .

Have we made an object that could travel at at least 1% the speed of light? – Anadi, age 14, Jammu and Kashmir, India

Light is fast . In fact, it is the fastest thing that exists, and a law of the universe is that nothing can move faster than light. Light travels at 186,000 miles per second (300,000 kilometers per second) and can go from the Earth to the Moon in just over a second. Light can streak from Los Angeles to New York in less than the blink of an eye.

While 1% of anything doesn’t sound like much, with light, that’s still really fast – close to 7 million miles per hour! At 1% the speed of light, it would take a little over a second to get from Los Angeles to New York. This is more than 10,000 times faster than a commercial jet.

The fastest things ever made

Bullets can go 2,600 mph (4,200 kmh), more than three times the speed of sound. The fastest aircraft is NASA’s X3 jet plane , with a top speed of 7,000 mph (11,200 kph). That sounds impressive, but it’s still only 0.001% the speed of light.

The fastest human-made objects are spacecraft. They use rockets to break free of the Earth’s gravity, which takes a speed of 25,000 mph (40,000 kmh). The spacecraft that is traveling the fastest is NASA’s Parker Solar Probe . After it launched from Earth in 2018, it skimmed the Sun’s scorching atmosphere and used the Sun’s gravity to reach 330,000 mph (535,000 kmh). That’s blindingly fast – yet only 0.05% of the speed of light.

Why even 1% of light speed is hard

What’s holding humanity back from reaching 1% of the speed of light? In a word, energy. Any object that’s moving has energy due to its motion. Physicists call this kinetic energy. To go faster, you need to increase kinetic energy. The problem is that it takes a lot of kinetic energy to increase speed. To make something go twice as fast takes four times the energy. Making something go three times as fast requires nine times the energy, and so on.

For example, to get a teenager who weighs 110 pounds (50 kilograms) to 1% of the speed of light would cost 200 trillion Joules (a measurement of energy). That’s roughly the same amount of energy that 2 million people in the U.S. use in a day.

How fast can we go?

It’s possible to get something to 1% the speed of light, but it would just take an enormous amount of energy. Could humans make something go even faster?

Yes! But engineers need to figure out new ways to make things move in space. All rockets, even the sleek new rockets used by SpaceX and Blue Origins, burn rocket fuel that isn’t very different from gasoline in a car. The problem is that burning fuel is very inefficient.

Other methods for pushing a spacecraft involve using electric or magnetic forces . Nuclear fusion , the process that powers the Sun, is also much more efficient than chemical fuel.

Scientists are researching many other ways to go fast – even warp drives , the faster-than-light travel popularized by Star Trek.

One promising way to get something moving very fast is to use a solar sail. These are large, thin sheets of plastic attached to a spacecraft and designed so that sunlight can push on them, like wind in a normal sail. A few spacecraft have used solar sails to show that they work, and scientists think that a solar sail could propel spacecraft to 10% of the speed of light .

One day, when humanity is not limited to a tiny fraction of the speed of light, we might travel to the stars .

Hello, curious kids! Do you have a question you’d like an expert to answer? Ask an adult to send your question to [email protected] . Please tell us your name, age and the city where you live.

And since curiosity has no age limit – adults, let us know what you’re wondering, too. We won’t be able to answer every question, but we will do our best.

• Solar system
• Speed of light
• Curious Kids
• Curious Kids US
• Parker Solar Probe

Executive Dean, Faculty of Health

Regional Engagement Officer - Shepparton

Lecturer/Senior Lecturer, Earth System Science (School of Science)

Sydney Horizon Educators (Identified)

Deputy Social Media Producer

What is a light-year?

Light-year is the distance light travels in one year. Light zips through interstellar space at 186,000 miles (300,000 kilometers) per second and 5.88 trillion miles (9.46 trillion kilometers) per year.

We use light-time to measure the vast distances of space.

It’s the distance that light travels in a specific period of time. Also: LIGHT IS FAST, nothing travels faster than light.

How far can light travel in one minute? 11,160,000 miles. It takes 43.2 minutes for sunlight to reach Jupiter, about 484 million miles away. Light is fast, but the distances are vast . In an hour, light can travel 671 million miles.

Earth is about eight light minutes from the Sun. A trip at light-speed to the very edge of our solar system – the farthest reaches of the Oort Cloud, a collection of dormant comets way, way out there – would take about 1.87 years. Keep going to Proxima Centauri, our nearest neighboring star, and plan on arriving in 4.25 years at light speed.

When we talk about the enormity of the cosmos, it’s easy to toss out big numbers – but far more difficult to wrap our minds around just how large, how far, and how numerous celestial bodies really are.

To get a better sense, for instance, of the true distances to exoplanets – planets around other stars – we might start with the theater in which we find them, the Milky Way galaxy.

Our galaxy is a gravitationally bound collection of stars, swirling in a spiral through space. Based on the deepest images obtained so far, it’s one of about 2 trillion galaxies in the observable universe. Groups of them are bound into clusters of galaxies, and these into superclusters; the superclusters are arranged in immense sheets stretching across the universe, interspersed with dark voids and lending the whole a kind of spiderweb structure. Our galaxy probably contains 100 to 400 billion stars, and is about 100,000 light-years across. That sounds huge, and it is, at least until we start comparing it to other galaxies. Our neighboring Andromeda galaxy, for example, is some 220,000 light-years wide. Another galaxy, IC 1101, spans as much as 4 million light-years.

Based on observations by NASA’s Kepler Space Telescope, we can confidently predict that every star you see in the sky probably hosts at least one planet. Realistically, we’re most likely talking about multi-planet systems rather than just single planets. In our galaxy of hundreds of billions of stars, this pushes the number of planets potentially into the trillions. Confirmed exoplanet detections (made by Kepler and other telescopes, both in space and on the ground) now come to more than 4,000 – and that’s from looking at only tiny slices of our galaxy. Many of these are small, rocky worlds that might be at the right temperature for liquid water to pool on their surfaces.

The nearest-known exoplanet is a small, probably rocky planet orbiting Proxima Centauri – the next star over from Earth. A little more than four light-years away, or 24 trillion miles. If an airline offered a flight there by jet, it would take 5 million years. Not much is known about this world; its close orbit and the periodic flaring of its star lower its chances of being habitable.

The TRAPPIST-1 system is seven planets, all roughly in Earth’s size range, orbiting a red dwarf star about 40 light-years away. They are very likely rocky, with four in the “habitable zone” – the orbital distance allowing potential liquid water on the surface. And computer modeling shows some have a good chance of being watery – or icy – worlds. In the next few years, we might learn whether they have atmospheres or oceans, or even signs of habitability.

One of the most distant exoplanets known to us in the Milky Way is Kepler-443 b. Traveling at light speed, it would take 3,000 years to get there. Or 28 billion years, going 60 mph.

Discover More Topics From NASA

Search for Life

Black Holes

Is Time Travel Possible?

We all travel in time! We travel one year in time between birthdays, for example. And we are all traveling in time at approximately the same speed: 1 second per second.

We typically experience time at one second per second. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech

NASA's space telescopes also give us a way to look back in time. Telescopes help us see stars and galaxies that are very far away . It takes a long time for the light from faraway galaxies to reach us. So, when we look into the sky with a telescope, we are seeing what those stars and galaxies looked like a very long time ago.

However, when we think of the phrase "time travel," we are usually thinking of traveling faster than 1 second per second. That kind of time travel sounds like something you'd only see in movies or science fiction books. Could it be real? Science says yes!

This image from the Hubble Space Telescope shows galaxies that are very far away as they existed a very long time ago. Credit: NASA, ESA and R. Thompson (Univ. Arizona)

How do we know that time travel is possible?

More than 100 years ago, a famous scientist named Albert Einstein came up with an idea about how time works. He called it relativity. This theory says that time and space are linked together. Einstein also said our universe has a speed limit: nothing can travel faster than the speed of light (186,000 miles per second).

Einstein's theory of relativity says that space and time are linked together. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech

What does this mean for time travel? Well, according to this theory, the faster you travel, the slower you experience time. Scientists have done some experiments to show that this is true.

For example, there was an experiment that used two clocks set to the exact same time. One clock stayed on Earth, while the other flew in an airplane (going in the same direction Earth rotates).

After the airplane flew around the world, scientists compared the two clocks. The clock on the fast-moving airplane was slightly behind the clock on the ground. So, the clock on the airplane was traveling slightly slower in time than 1 second per second.

Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech

Can we use time travel in everyday life?

We can't use a time machine to travel hundreds of years into the past or future. That kind of time travel only happens in books and movies. But the math of time travel does affect the things we use every day.

For example, we use GPS satellites to help us figure out how to get to new places. (Check out our video about how GPS satellites work .) NASA scientists also use a high-accuracy version of GPS to keep track of where satellites are in space. But did you know that GPS relies on time-travel calculations to help you get around town?

GPS satellites orbit around Earth very quickly at about 8,700 miles (14,000 kilometers) per hour. This slows down GPS satellite clocks by a small fraction of a second (similar to the airplane example above).

GPS satellites orbit around Earth at about 8,700 miles (14,000 kilometers) per hour. Credit: GPS.gov

However, the satellites are also orbiting Earth about 12,550 miles (20,200 km) above the surface. This actually speeds up GPS satellite clocks by a slighter larger fraction of a second.

Here's how: Einstein's theory also says that gravity curves space and time, causing the passage of time to slow down. High up where the satellites orbit, Earth's gravity is much weaker. This causes the clocks on GPS satellites to run faster than clocks on the ground.

The combined result is that the clocks on GPS satellites experience time at a rate slightly faster than 1 second per second. Luckily, scientists can use math to correct these differences in time.

If scientists didn't correct the GPS clocks, there would be big problems. GPS satellites wouldn't be able to correctly calculate their position or yours. The errors would add up to a few miles each day, which is a big deal. GPS maps might think your home is nowhere near where it actually is!

In Summary:

Yes, time travel is indeed a real thing. But it's not quite what you've probably seen in the movies. Under certain conditions, it is possible to experience time passing at a different rate than 1 second per second. And there are important reasons why we need to understand this real-world form of time travel.

If you liked this, you may like:

Monthly STEM periodical run by IMSA students

Breaking the speed limit: is faster-than-light travel possible.

Traveling faster than light – or as scientists call it, FTL – has long been a staple of science fiction; but according to Einstein’s theory of relativity, it’s an impossible task. However, new research proposes several methods through which FTL travel might be possible . While these ideas are exciting, there are significant hurdles to overcome. Let’s delve deeper into this fascinating concept and explore the challenges that lie ahead in making FTL travel a reality!

What is Faster-Than-Light Travel?

Imagine stretching a rubber sheet flat. That sheet represents the fabric of spacetime, according to Einstein’s theory of relativity. Everything in the universe, from tiny particles to massive stars, are like marbles sitting on this sheet, some much larger than others. Each marble causes the sheet of spacetime to curve and bend (Skruse, 2). Most propositions for FTL travel propose a way to manipulate this spacetime fabric itself, creating a kind of warp or shortcut that would allow a spacecraft to travel faster than the speed of light, which is currently considered the cosmic speed limit. In essence, FTL wouldn’t be about the spacecraft pushing itself to faster speeds than light, which is considered impossible, but rather about warping spacetime around it to create a faster path or a shortcut.

The Warp Drive Theory

So how could one actually do this? One theory involves folding and unfolding the rubber sheet in a specific way. (Figure 1) The marble on the sheet, representing a spaceship, wouldn’t move very quickly on its own, but by riding the folds and unfolds of the sheet, (Baron, 1) it could travel vast distances very quickly. However, at the moment, we have no method to actually bend spacetime, so this idea still remains a theory.

This concept is a simplified version of “warp drive” but there also exist other contenders for FTL travel. Other theories explore ideas like utilizing negative energy or manipulating phenomena like wormholes, which are shortcuts through spacetime that could connect distant points in the universe. (Lewis, 3)

Visualization of Warp Drive

Source: Omspace Rocket and Exploration

Negative Energy: Fuel for FTL Dreams or Nightmares?

Another intriguing idea involves negative energy, a hypothetical form of energy with properties opposite to our regular understanding. This is a scenario where energy isn’t just used up, but can somehow be formed – that’s the basic principle behind negative energy.

Theorists propose that negative energy could be used to create a repulsive force, counteracting the attractive nature of gravity. This, in turn, could potentially be harnessed to manipulate spacetime and create a warp bubble (Landis, 2) for FTL travel. However, there are significant challenges associated with negative energy. First and foremost, negative energy remains purely theoretical. No experiment or observation has ever confirmed its existence. Although we can theorize about its properties, there’s no concrete evidence to work with. Also, even if we could somehow generate negative energy, theories suggest it might be incredibly unstable. Negative energy might have a natural tendency to cancel out positive energy, making it difficult to control and potentially leading to catastrophic consequences if let out of control.

Despite these challenges, the allure of negative energy as a key to FTL travel persists. Scientists continue to explore theoretical models and search for any hints of its existence in the universe. For now, though, it remains a fascinating but highly speculative concept.

Wormholes: Cosmic Tunnels or Celestial Traps?

While manipulating spacetime with exotic energy sources is mind-bending, another theoretical pathway to FTL travel involves cosmic shortcuts known as wormholes. Going back to the metaphor of the universe as a vast sheet of fabric, a wormhole would be represented as a hidden tunnel piercing through it. These hypothetical tunnels wouldn’t require immense energy manipulation, but rather make use of the natural curvature of spacetime to connect two distant points. (Figure 2) Through wormholes, galaxies millions of light-years away could be within reach. However, there are several significant hurdles to consider.

First of all, theorists suggest wormholes might be inherently unstable. Like a tunnel made of wet sand, it would likely collapse on itself before anything could travel through. Similarly, a naturally occurring wormhole might be too short-lived or constantly fluctuating in size, making it incredibly dangerous to navigate. (Bambi, 5) Secondly, even if a stable wormhole existed, some theories suggest it might require a form of exotic matter with negative energy properties to keep it from collapsing. As discussed earlier, negative energy is purely hypothetical and incredibly difficult to control, making the creation or stabilization of a wormhole highly improbable with our current understanding of physics. And finally, other theories propose that wormholes might only be traversable in one direction. (Stojkovic, 1) Imagine a cosmic drain, allowing travel into another region of space but not back out. This one-way trip scenario would be a major drawback for interstellar exploration.

Despite these challenges, the possibility of wormholes continues to intrigue scientists and science fiction writers alike. Future discoveries about the nature of gravity and exotic forms of matter might shed light on the existence and stability of wormholes. For now, they remain a fascinating but still theoretical concept on the roadmap to FTL travel.

Bending Spacetime to Form a Wormhole

Source: Physics Stack Exchange

Chasing the Stars: Can We Ever Achieve FTL?

FTL travel, once relegated to the realm of science fiction, is now a concept being seriously explored by physicists. While immense challenges lie ahead, the potential rewards are equally immense. Traveling beyond the constraints of light speed would open up the vast expanse of the cosmos, allowing us to explore distant galaxies, potentially encounter new forms of life, and revolutionize our understanding of the universe.

The road to FTL travel will undoubtedly be long and arduous. It will require breakthroughs in our understanding of physics, the development of new technologies, and perhaps even the discovery of entirely new physical phenomena. However, the human spirit of exploration thrives on challenges. By continuing to push the boundaries of knowledge and explore these fascinating concepts, we inch closer to the day when humanity can truly touch the stars. The journey itself, filled with discovery and innovation, may be just as rewarding as the ultimate destination.

References and Sources

Skuse, Benjamin. (2021, March 24). Spacecraft in a “warp bubble” could travel faster than light, claims physicist. Physics World. 

Finazzi, S., Liberati, S., & Barceló, C. (2009, July 14). Semiclassical instability of dynamical warp drives. arXiv.org.

McMonigal, B., Lewis, G. F., & O’Byrne, P. (2012, February 26). The Alcubierre Warp Drive: On the matter of matter. arXiv.org.

Alcubierre, M. (2000, September 5). The Warp Drive: Hyper-fast travel within general relativity. arXiv.org.

Landis, Geoffrey. (2012, November 12). Negative Mass in Contemporary Physics, and its Application to Propulsion. National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

Bambi, Cosimo. (2021, May 8). Astrophysical Wormholes. arXiv.org.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Disable these demo widgets by adding your own widgets or from `Customizer > Layout Options > Miscellaneous > Disable demo widgets`.