jbl tour one vs beats studio 3

Beats Studio3 Wireless

JBL Tour One

54 facts in comparison

Beats Studio3 Wireless vs JBL Tour One

Why is beats studio3 wireless better than jbl tour one.

• Can be used wirelessly ?

Why is JBL Tour One better than Beats Studio3 Wireless?

• 10 Hz lower low-frequency ? 10 Hz vs 20 Hz
• 20000 Hz higher high-frequency ? 40000 Hz vs 20000 Hz
• 10 hours longer battery life ? 50 hours vs 40 hours
• 1 newer Bluetooth version ? 5 vs 4
• 3 more microphone(s) ? 4 vs 1
• Has USB Type-C ?
• Has ambient sound mode ?
• Has a mute function ?

Which are the most popular comparisons?

Sony WH-1000XM5

Sony WH-XB910N

Beats Solo Pro

JBL Live 660 NC

Apple AirPods Max

JBL Tour One M2

Skullcandy Crusher Evo

Bose QuietComfort 45

Sony WH-CH720N

Beats Studio Pro

Bose QuietComfort SE

Sony WH-1000XM4

Beats Solo 3 Wireless

JBL Tune 760NC

Skullcandy Crusher ANC

Cheap alternatives

Shure Aonic 40

Anker Soundcore Life Q35

Wyze ANC Headphones

Philips TAH8506

Anker Soundcore Space One

Philips Fidelio L3

Anker Soundcore Space Q45

1More SonoFlow

Sony WH-1000XM2

User reviews

Overall rating.

Build quality

Sound quality

Value for money

Noise isolation

2 years ago

ANC is great, amazing headphones.

Overall, the headphones are quality. I love them. They work very well to serve my purposes, ANC is incredible and is honestly just great

Worth the Money

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Beats Studio3 Wireless)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (JBL Tour One)

Connectivity

Miscellaneous, which are the best headphones.

Bowers & Wilkins PX7 S2

Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones

Sony WH-1000XM3

Bowers & Wilkins Px8

Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H95

Shure Aonic 50 Gen 2

Bowers & Wilkins Px7 S2e

Sennheiser Momentum 4 Wireless

Bang & Olufsen Beoplay Portal

• Best Shows on Netflix
• Best Movies on Netflix
• F1 Live Stream
• Stranger Things Season 5
• Best New Movies
• Most Popular Movies on Netflix
• Best Shows on Disney+
• UFC Live Stream
• Best Movies on Disney+
• Audio / Video

Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?

JBL Tour One review: Noise-canceling cans for frequent callers

“A big battery and sweet call quality make these cans ideal for work or travel.”

• Effective ANC
• Good sound quality
• Excellent call quality
• Great battery life
• No sidetone for calls
• No aptX/aptX HD/LDAC codecs

Right now, Sony’s $350 WH-1000XM4 are the best noise-canceling headphones you can buy. We like them so much, they also top our lists of best wireless headphones and best headphones overall. Sony’s success hasn’t gone unnoticed by its competitors, which has led to several attempts to mimic the XM4, including JBL’s $300 Tour One.

• What’s in the box?

Comfort, controls, and connections

Sound quality, noise cancellation and transparency, call quality, battery life.

• Can a lower price and the Grammys save one of 2023’s most controversial products?
• JBL upgrades its 2024 wireless headphones with massive battery life
• Your next noise-canceling earbuds may use Navy sonar tech

The Tour One aren’t just a little like the XM4. From their size, weight, shape, and materials to their controls and features, it’s almost as if JBL used the XM4 as its blueprint for the Tour One and then figured out how to sell it for $50 less.

The question you’re probably asking yourself is, should I go ahead and buy the Tour One and save that $50, or did JBL cut too many features in its attempt to slide in under the XM4’s price? I think the Sony headphones are still the ones to buy, but JBL has still managed to make the Tour One worth your consideration thanks to a few things it does really well. Let’s get into it.

What’s in the box?

JBL still has a thing or two to learn about sustainable packaging. The Tour One box contains lots of foam padding and coated cardboard, making it tricky to recycle.

Open up the box and you’ll find the Tour One nestled in their own semi-hardshell, zippered carrying case. This is your first clue that JBL took its inspiration from Sony. Not only is the case almost exactly the same size and shape as the one Sony uses for both the WH-1000XM3 and XM4, but it also has the same mesh pocket sewn to one side, which can be used for small accessories or perhaps a credit card and ID if you took it to the gym.

Inside the case, the Tour One are folded into exactly the same position as the Sony cans and there’s a paper insert with a diagram to remind you how to insert the headphones so they fit, again, just like Sony does.

If you find Sony’s designs too conservative, the Tour One add just enough bling to avoid looking boring.

The similarities continue right down to the small compartment that houses the included accessories: A USB-A to USB-C charging cable, a 3.5mm to 2.5mm analog cable, and a double-prong flight adapter.

Unlike Sony, JBL’s charging cable is actually a usable length (40 inches versus Sony’s ludicrously short 9 inches). The USB-A side is reversible for guess-free usage — a nice touch.

Given how closely the Tour One resemble the WH-1000XM4, it’s hard to quibble with their overall design. It’s a compact shape that keeps the earcups and headband close to your head, so you don’t look like you just walked off the set of a Daft Punk video.

The earcups smoothly pivot, fold, and articulate themselves to match the shape of your head. The headband is well-padded and the sliders move with a precise “notchiness” that is both easy to adjust and secure once adjusted.

The Tour One are still very light and very comfortable.

JBL has graced the Tour One with a slightly satin finish on the plastics and added some black chrome accents that give the cans a decidedly premium look. If you find Sony’s designs too conservative, the Tour One add just enough bling to avoid looking boring.

Controls-wise, JBL actually improves on Sony’s design. JBL keeps things simple by ditching Sony’s swipe gestures for a combination of simple taps on the right earcup for playback control and a dedicated set of buttons for volume.  A combo power/Bluetooth pairing switch on the right earcup and a single multifunction button on the left earcup round out the Tour One’s controls.

Though not quite as light as the WH-1000XM4 (9.45 ounces vs. 8.95 ounces), the Tour One are still very light and very comfortable. There’s generous padding on the ear cushions and headband, and I was able to wear them for three hours continuously without any fatigue, even while wearing glasses. One thing that did start to bother me toward the end of that time was the depth of the earcups. My ears stick out quite a bit — maybe a little more than average — and their outer edges make contact with the inside lining. Eventually, that pressure point needed some relief.

If your ears are like mine, both the Sony WH-1000XM4 and Bose Noise Cancelling Headphones 700 offer deeper earcups.

The fold-flat hinges on the Tour One are great for when you want to wear them around your neck, and they fold the right way, meaning that the earcups point down, with the ear cushions against your collar bones. Sony does this too, but Bose makes the peculiar decision to rest the far-less cushy headband sliders against your clavicles.

Despite their comfy fit, the Tour One have a greater tendency to shift around on your head than either the Bose or the Sony. It’s not a deal-breaker by any means, but if you want a set of full-size cans for the gym as well as the office or airplane cabin, you should keep this in mind.

The Tour One’s controls are very easy to use. The single, double-, and triple-tap touches on the right earcup register every time (as long as you tap in the center) and I like having a power switch that instantly powers the headphones on. The Bose 700 power on instantly as well, but the Sony XM4s require more patience, with a press-and-hold gesture on the power button.

Using the JBL Headphones app provides some control customizations. Both the multifunction button as well as the tap-and-hold gesture on the touch panel can be set to control the active noise cancellation (ANC)/TalkThru modes or to trigger your voice assistant.

Bluetooth connectivity is excellent.

The auto-pause option works really well. Pulling the earcups away from your head instantly halts the tunes, then resumes them just as quickly when they are snapped back into place. You can disable the feature in the Headphones app if you want.

Bluetooth connectivity is excellent. Though not considered a class 1 Bluetooth device like the Beats Studio 3 headphones , I was still able to leave my phone at my desk and walk all the way to my garage (about 60 feet, one story, and several walls in terms of distance) and the signal stayed strong. You can also connect the Tour One to two Bluetooth devices simultaneously, though on one occasion this created a static sound that was resolved by disconnecting my phone and reconnecting it.

Out of the box, the Tour One have a relatively neutral EQ. There’s nice definition across frequencies, and excellent clarity in the upper midranges and highs. Bass response is snappy and not overbearing. You can tell that JBL has tuned these cans to be as genre-agnostic as possible, which stands in contrast to headphones that lean toward the low-end.

When compared to the Sony XM4, the Tour One don’t exhibit as much warmth or as wide a soundstage, but the difference isn’t huge. Curiously, just like JBL’s other flagship wireless cans, the Club One , the Tour One aren’t equipped with any high-quality Bluetooth codecs like aptX, aptX HD, or LDAC. So despite being capable of reproducing frequencies from 20Hz to 40kHz (and thus being considered hi-res audio compatible), you’ll never come close to experiencing this when using the headphones wirelessly. The XM4 give you LDAC, which won’t do much for iPhone owners, but will provide better sound quality for those with Android phones.

Listening via Bluetooth lets you appreciate the song’s bones, but going wired lets you hear its soul.

And that’s a shame because when you plug the Tour One into a digital-to-analog converter (DAC) with the included analog cable, they deliver much better depth and resonance.

One of my favorite test tracks is Billie Eilish’s Bad Guy . Not only does it have incredibly deep bass, but it also layers Eilish’s whispery voice on top, creating a torture chamber for audio devices. It’s also a deceptively complex recording. Listening via Bluetooth lets you appreciate the song’s bones, but going wired lets you hear its soul. Suddenly, Eilish isn’t just whispering her way through the lyrics, she’s whispering directly into your ears — it’s a goosebumps-inducing ASMR-level experience .

I don’t want to dump on the wireless performance too much as it’s actually very good, and I really like the fact you can access EQ presets and manual EQ adjustments within the app. Doing so can radically alter the Tour One’s sound signature, so if you’re not a fan of the so-called flat EQ, you don’t have to put up with it.

The Tour One does a decent job of canceling external sounds, but its performance can be a bit uneven. Unlike the Sony XM4 and Bose 700, the Tour One seems to struggle to create a nice, even cancellation effect. I have a fan under my desk that produces both consistent sound and consistent wind. JBL’s ANC blocks it well enough but it can’t quite decide which of the fan’s frequencies to block, so you can actually hear it hunting around and the result can be a bit unpleasant.

This mostly happens when you use JBL’s True Adaptive ANC mode, which attempts to respond to your listening conditions in real time. Turning that feature off helped a lot. In fairness, my desk fan situation is a bit of an anomaly — I wasn’t aware of the problem at all at other times — but both the Sony XM4 and Bose 700 handled it flawlessly, with the Bose being easily the best of the three.

The Silent Now mode is handy for when you just want quiet: It activates ANC but keeps Bluetooth communication turned off, saving the battery for when you need it.

In short, I’ve never tested a set of wireless headphones with better call quality than the Tour One.

JBL gives you two distinct transparency modes to choose from, and both have their advantages. For better general awareness of your surroundings, you can pick Ambient Aware — which lets in a lot of external sounds without altering your music. Or, if you need to actually speak to someone, you can engage TalkThru mode, which is just like Ambient Aware, but it also drops the volume of your audio to the point where it’s barely detectable.

Strangely, you can flip back and forth between full ANC mode and TalkThru by double-clicking the multifunction button, but if you want to switch between ANC and Ambient Aware, you’re forced to switch between three modes: ANC >,  Ambient Aware >, Ambient Aware off  > ANC .

So far, most of the JBL Tour One’s qualities put them more or less where you’d expect in comparing them to the Sony WH-1000XM4 and Bose Noise Cancelling Headphones 700. But one area where the Tour One blow these other headphones away is their call quality.

I was able to walk down a very busy street, with varying kinds of traffic noise including loud buses and some construction machinery, and yet when you listen to the recording I made, you’d swear I was sitting in a quiet park by myself — that’s how little external noise was picked up by the Tour One’s mics.

Not only is your voice uninterrupted by these competing sounds, but it sounds really good too. The Tour One capture and preserve your voice’s deeper tones, the ones that give it depth and resonance, which stands in sharp contrast to most other headphones and earbuds.

The only caveat here is that JBL has dedicated all of the Tour One’s mics to canceling noise and optimizing voice quality, which means there’s no sidetone, and no way to stay in Ambient Aware mode or TalkThru mode while on a call. So while your callers will love the way you sound, you won’t be able to hear your own voice as clearly.

JBL claims you’ll get 50 hours of battery life from the Tour One if you disable ANC, and about half that amount if you keep it on. I did not run them for a full charge/discharge cycle, but after about 10 hours of playing music at 50% volume with ANC on, the JBL Headphones app gave me a battery reading of 55% which seems pretty close to JBL’s claims.

These are great numbers. Better than Sony, better than Bose, and even a tiny bit better than the Marshall Monitor ANC II , our previous best premium cans for battery life.

It takes two hours to charge them fully from empty, but you can get three hours of play time from a 10-minute quick charge.

JBL’s Tour series which includes the Tour One headphones and the Tour Pro+ true wireless earbuds , are one of the few on the market that offer hands-free access to your choice of Google Assistant or Amazon Alexa.

Once you pick your assistant, you can say “Hey Google,” or “Alexa” and then ask for whatever you need — including controlling playback, call answer, and volume. Using this option frees up one of the Multifunction button’s gestures, giving you more control over other headphone functions.

I only tested Amazon’s Alexa, but it worked flawlessly. JBL hasn’t indicated if using hands-free access reduces battery life (and I wasn’t able to determine if it does), but it’s highly likely that it will.

You also get JBL’s My Alarm feature, which lets you select from a variety of soothing sounds, combined with a customizable sleep timer.

For those who want a premium set of noise-canceling headphones, the JBL Tour One offer an excellent (and cheaper) alternative to Sony and Bose, with very few sacrifices made for their more affordable price. And they’re killer for phone calls.

Is there a better alternative?

Yes, overall, the Sony WH-1000XM4 are still a better set of noise-canceling headphones, beating the Tour One in sound quality, ANC, comfort, and wireless hi-res audio. But unless you can find them on sale, they’re a good bit more expensive than the JBL Tour One. If you don’t mind the trade-offs, I see no reason not to buy the Tour One instead of the Sonys.

How long will they last?

From what I can tell, the build quality and materials on the Tour One are both excellent, and I suspect they will fare about the same as models from Sony and Bose in terms of longevity. They may even have an edge thanks to their bigger battery life, as batteries are usually the first part to degrade in a set of wireless headphones.

JBL backs the Tour One with a one-year warranty.

Should you buy them?

Yes. They’re a solid option for those looking for comfortable noise-canceling headphones with good sound quality, great battery life, and excellent call quality

Editors' Recommendations

• Best wireless earbuds for 2024: Sony, Bose, Soundcore, and more
• The 11 best noise-canceling headphones for 2024
• JBL’s $200 Live 3 earbuds get the Tour Pro 2’s touchscreen charging case
• Best noise-canceling earbuds for 2023: from Sony, Soundcore, Jabra, and more
• What is ANC and how do noise-cancelling headphones work?
• Entertainment
• Headphone Reviews
• Product Reviews

Marshall's second-gen Motif ANC wireless earbuds -- appropriately called the Marshall Motif II ANC -- look exactly like the first-gen Motif, but under the hood are some welcome enhancements like better battery life, better active noise cancellation (ANC) performance, and support for Bluetooth LE Audio. The price, on the other hand, remains the same: you can buy them staring August 29 for $199 on Marshall's website. The company expects them to ship on September 12.

Marshall has a talent for understatement. Its press release for the Marshall Motif II ANC talks about the improved battery life twice -- the new earbuds now get six hours of ANC playtime on a charge and a total of 30 hours with the case (versus 4.5 and 20 on the first-gen) -- but never mentions that the new Motif now have Bluetooth Multipoint for connecting two devices simultaneously.

While most of the attention these days is on true wireless earbuds, it's easy to forget that some folks much prefer the older neckband style for its simple convenience and longer battery life. Beyerdynamic clearly hasn't forgotten. Despite launching its first true wireless earbuds in 2022 -- the Free Byrd -- the company is continuing to develop its original Blue Byrd neckband-style buds with the introduction of the second-gen Blue Byrd ANC ($149).

As the name suggests, the new earbuds have active noise cancellation (ANC), a feature that remains fairly rare in the neckband earbuds category. You can buy them now from Beyerdynamic or Amazon.

Sony has announced its latest wireless earbuds, and they bring the cost of the company's excellent active noise cancellation (ANC) technology to a new low price. At $120, the WF-C700N are a step up from the entry-level $100 WF-C500, which lack ANC, yet they're considerably more affordable than the $200 Sony LinkBuds S or the $279 WF-1000XM4, the company's only other ANC models.

The WF-C700N can be preordered immediately in one of four colors (black, white, lavender, and sage green), with an expected delivery date of April 17 to April 18.

• Bestsellers
• New Arrivals

OneAdaptr OneWorld100

• Click & Grow

Your cart is empty

A Side-by-Side Comparison: Beats Studio Pro vs JBL Tour One M2

By Elisabeth Christ Published March 2024

For a while, the Beats Studio Pro and JBL Tour One M2 have been standing as notable audio tool providers, each bringing their unique strengths to the table. In this comparison article, we'll be taking a closer look at these top-tier options. Whether you're an audiophile or simply someone who enjoys quality sound, read on to discover which headphones come out on top.

On our list

#1 price & design, #2 features & audio quality, #3 battery life, #4 connectivity, #5 potential drawbacks, #1 price & design.

JBL Tour One M2

Priced at $349.99 , the Beats Studio Pro offers a sleek design reminiscent of its predecessor, the Studio3, but with added comfort thanks to its UltraPlush ear cushions. Plus, its ultra-compact case makes it easy to take on-the-go. You have four stylish colour options to choose from: Groovy Chocolate, Navy, Sandstone, and Matte Black. On the other side, the JBL Tour One M2 presents a more affordable option with a chic stylish finish that resembles the smooth texture of an eggshell and memory foam padding for comfort. With capacitive touch controls and metal hinges, it strikes the perfect balance between style and practicality. Both headphones are available in black or silver to suit your elegant taste.

#2 Features & Audio Quality

Beats Studio Pro

Whether you're looking for superior noise-cancelling capabilities or immersive spatial audio, both the Beats Studio Pro and JBL Tour One M2 have something to offer. The Beats Studio Pro features 40mm drivers with near-zero distortion at high volumes and head-tracking for a truly immersive experience. Plus, its six-array mic ensures crystal-clear calls and "Hi Siri" compatibility for added convenience. Meanwhile, the JBL Tour One M2 offers adjustable noise-cancelling and Ambient Aware modes through the JBL Headphones app, allowing for personalized sound signatures and a custom EQ curve.

#3 Battery Life

When it comes to battery life, the JBL Tour One M2 outshines the Beats Studio Pro. With up to 50 hours of playback with ANC off and 30 hours with it on, plus a quick charge feature that provides 5 hours of playback with just 10 minutes of charging, the JBL Tour One M2 will keep you jamming for longer. While the Beats Studio Pro offers a respectable 24 hours of battery life with ANC activated, it falls slightly behind its competition.

Stay connected and in control with the advanced Bluetooth 5.3 technology found in both the Beats Studio Pro and JBL Tour One M2 headphones. While the Beats support AAC and SBC codecs, the JBL adds multipoint connectivity and Google Fast Pair compatibility for added convenience. And when it comes to charging and wired sources, the Beats use USB-C and a 3.5mm input while the JBL includes a USB-A-to-USB-C cable and flight adapter, working seamlessly with Alexa and Google Assistant for easy voice commands.

Talking about comfort and durability, both the Beats Studio Pro and JBL Tour One M2 have their strengths and weaknesses. The Beats' plastic exterior and stiff band may detract from its premium feel, with buttons that require a bit of force to press and a lack of multipoint connectivity. On the other hand, the JBL Tour One M2 offers a snug fit but with a flimsy power button that may cause some frustration. Additionally, some users have reported heat being trapped in the ear cups, which could pose comfort issues during extended use.

✓ Cushion with  engineered  leather ✓ Class 1 Bluetooth 5.3 ✓ Spatial Audio support ✓ 40 mm driver

✓ Bluetooth 5.3 LE technology ✓ Up to 50 hours battery life ✓ Adjustable noise-cancelling and Ambient Aware ✓ 40 mm dynamic drivers

Final Thoughts

JBL Tour One M2 vs Beats Studio Pro

In conclusion, both the Beats Studio Pro and JBL Tour One M2 are excellent options for anyone looking for high-quality headphones. If you prioritize audio quality and head-tracking features, then the Beats Studio Pro is the way to go. However, if you're more concerned about comfort and battery life, then the JBL Tour One M2 might be better for you. At the end of the day, your decision will come down to your personal preferences and needs. Consider what features matter most to you when it comes to headphones and make an informed decision based on that.

Don't miss out on tech

Subscribe to our newsletter to stay up to date on the latest tech trends and guides on the best gadgets around.

Recommended reading

Sennheiser Momentum 4 vs Sennheiser Accentum: In-Depth Analysis

Sennheiser Momentum 4 vs Bose QuietComfort Ultra: Which Pair of Headphones Offers the Best Value?

Sennheiser Momentum 4 vs Sony WH-1000XM5: A Battle of Noise-Cancelling Headphones

Connecting you to the world's greatest innovations..

Delivering Happiness

Over  900+  5-star reviews.

Free shipping

For all orders over $200.

Official Warranty

For all products on Synced.sg

Local Tech Support

We're here for all your tech needs.

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

All products featured are independently chosen by us. However, SoundGuys may receive a commission on orders placed through its retail links. See our ethics statement.

Beats Studio Pro vs Beats Studio 3 Wireless

It’s been several years since the Beats Studio 3 Wireless was released, and now the Apple subsidiary has released the Studio 3 Wireless successor, the Beats Studio Pro. Are the new Beats headphones worth the upgrade? Let’s take a listen in this Beats Studio Pro vs Beats Studio 3 showdown.

Editor’s note: this article was published on February 20. 2024, to adjust formatting to our current style and ensure the timeliness of the information within.

What’s it like to use the Beats Studio Pro compared to the Beats Studio 3 Wireless?

The Beats Studio Pro succeeds the Beats Studio 3 Wireless , and it’s not surprising that they are very similar. However, you could be easily forgiven for mistaking one for the other. Really, the main outward sign that you’re using the newer model is the upgrade from a micro-USB to a USB-C port. It definitely made me do a double-take the first time I saw the new headphones.

It is hard to find any headphones out there that are as similar to their predecessors as the Beats Studio Pro. Of course, that’s not really a good or bad thing, just an issue to be aware of. If you were reading this article because you liked the Beats Studio 3 Wireless and wanted to see if the new headphones are worth it, then this may be all you need to hear. However, if you didn’t like the older headphones because they were uncomfortable, that hasn’t changed.

The newer headphones are 10 grams heavier, still aren’t water resistant , and sport the same plastic exterior design. We don’t recommend either set of headphones for working out. They might work okay for you — it’s just that moisture is a pernicious thing and can cause unexpected problems with unprotected products.

The biggest difference between the two pairs of headphones is the updated dynamic drivers and internal circuitry of the newer model, which makes the audio quality and ANC much better than the Beats Studio 3 Wireless. This also means you can use the headphones in more contexts with the USB connection.

How do you control the Beats Studio Pro and Beats Studio 3 Wireless?

Controls on both the Beats Studio Pro and Beats Studio 3 Wireless are largely the same, as they primarily make use of clicky buttons hidden within the casing of the ear cup. This means that their shortcomings are shared, too. The clicky buttons can be a bit loud when you’re wearing the headphones, so you might find this annoying. The main difference is how you switch the EQ presets on the Beats Studio Pro, which aren’t available on the Beats Studio 3 Wireless because they’re exclusive to the USB audio feature.

Beats Studio Pro controls:

With no USB audio, controlling the Beats Studio 3 Wireless is a bit simpler, as the power button only controls pairing mode and power.

Beats Studio 3 Wireless controls:

Should you use the apps of either beats studio pro or beats studio 3 wireless.

Considering that both products use the same software, this recommendation is easy: do it. If you have an iOS device, the operating system will handle all of the necessary functions the app would normally provide. If you have an Android phone , the app provides both the Beats Studio Pro and Beats Studio 3 Wireless with firmware updates, allows you to tweak the power button function (slightly), and other features like changing the device name.

Though most headphone apps tend to collect lots of user data , it doesn’t seem like there’s a ton of that going on with the Android app, at least. Of course, if you enable the Find My feature for the Beats Studio Pro, you’ll be sharing location data. Similarly, using voice assistants requires you to share audio and other data by default. Be sure you know what you’re good with beforehand because it can be a little scary when you think about it too hard.

How do the Beats Studio Pro and Beats Studio 3 Wireless connect?

One of the few ways these headphones differ significantly is the connection methods . Though both have a 3.5mm headphone jack on the right earcup, the Beats Studio 3 Wireless only has Bluetooth 4.0 and no wired digital input. The Beats Studio Pro, on the other hand, uses Bluetooth 5.3 and has USB-C digital audio input (allowing lossless, digital playback) on the left ear cup.

Though both headphones support SBC and AAC , the newer version of Bluetooth should pay dividends in future compatibility with updated standards and features. Additionally, this version of Bluetooth should support LE audio , so it’s conceivable that a future update may use this capability.

Is battery life better on the Beats Studio Pro or Beats Studio 3 Wireless?

While we don’t have standardized testing to stack these headphones against each other, anecdotally, in real-world use, the battery life is better on the Beats Studio Pro than the Beats Studio 3 Wireless. However, as Adam Molina (who reviewed the Studio 3) and I have different listening habits, that should not be taken as gospel. New headphones offer improved power efficiency (Bluetooth tends to get better about this from version to version), so even if the power cells vary in size, you’ll get more out of less with the newer product.

Does the Beats Studio Pro have better active noise canceling than the Beats Studio 3 Wireless?

As expected, the Beats Studio Pro has better ANC than the Beats Studio 3 Wireless. It’s not really a fair comparison, given the years between release dates, but it is worth noting that this is one of the few straight upgrades to be had with the newer headphones. In large part, it seems like the Beats Studio Pro is able to isolate better (undoubtedly helped by the strong clamping force) than the Beats Studio 3 Wireless, making the whole task a fair bit easier for the newer cans.

That’s not to say that the Beats Studio 3 Wireless aren’t decent — on the contrary, the ANC is one of the better things about these headphones — but it’s been a long time since these headphones were released!

This is a noticeable upgrade, however, and the benefits here — namely the much-improved noise reduction in the sub-1kHz region — will allow you to listen to your music at a lower volume  when you’re out and about, meaning you are more likely to avoid accidentally giving yourself noise-induced hearing loss.

How does the Beats Studio Pro sound quality compare to the Beats Studio 3 Wireless?

The Beats Studio Pro sounds better than the Beats Studio 3 Wireless, and it’s not a particularly close contest. Not only are the older headphones laden with poor tuning choices, but the newer Beats Studio Pro has a slew of improvements in this area, including USB-C connectivity (allowing lossless digital audio) that simply make this a one-sided beatdown.

Beats has made great strides in its audio products since the Beats Studio 3 Wireless was released, and nowhere is it more apparent than the Beats Studio Pro. The newer headphones have fixed all of the weird issues found on the older ones, especially the performance in the mids and bass. The older headphones also had a comparatively lower emphasis on highs , making the bass appear louder. The opposite is true for the Beats Studio Pro: highs are now more prominent, and bass is about where it should be.

A notable plus with the Beats Studio Pro is that you’re not limited to Bluetooth or wired listening via an analog connection. The USB-C port on the bottom of the left ear cup gives the job of decoding audio to the headphones rather than your source device’s digital-to-analog convertor (DAC). This means you can enjoy lossless audio without the compression of lossy Bluetooth connections or unnecessary conversions between digital and analog.

There seems to be the misconception that lossless audio is automatically better than what you’d get from a lower-tier streaming service. Still, the truth is that it comes with several tradeoffs for marginal benefit. Now that Bluetooth has come so far, you won’t notice a massive difference in fidelity while you’re in a noisy environment like a train or bus. Even at home, when it’s reasonably quiet, you might have a hard time picking out the difference between compressed media and lossless.

Beats Studio Pro vs Beats Studio 3 Wireless: Microphone quality

You’ll notice right away that the microphones of the Beats Studio Pro are a lot less sensitive (quieter) than those of the Beats Studio 3 Wireless. Depending on the application, though, your phone can automatically apply gain to the signal to fix any volume issues.

Beats Studio Pro microphone demo (Ideal conditions):

Beats studio 3 wireless microphone demo (ideal conditions):, beats studio pro microphone demo (street conditions):, beats studio 3 wireless microphone demo (street conditions):, which microphone sounds best to you, beats studio pro vs beats studio 3 wireless: price and availability.

Given that the Beats Studio 3 Wireless is so old and probably on its way out, it might be time to forget they exist. However, they’re still worth taking a flyer on at a sale price. They’re already about half the cost of the Beats Studio Pro (currently selling for $149.99 at Best Buy ), so any further discounts would mean their shortcomings will be that much easier to tolerate. However, that does mean that you will be missing out on the advanced features of the Beats Studio Pro, and they definitely will feel ancient pretty quickly with the micro-USB charging port.

The Beats Studio Pro is still sitting at its release price of $349.99 at Amazon and will be slowly replacing the Beats Studio 3 Wireless on shelves in big box electronics stores as stock of the latter product dwindles. As Beats is one of the most popular brands of headphones out there, there is absolutely zero reason to believe that it will disappear from the market any time soon.

Should you get the Beats Studio Pro or Beats Studio 3 Wireless?

Neither of these headphones will top anyone’s list for the best noise canceling headphones out there, but the Beats Studio Pro is a much better bet for the long term than the Beats Studio 3 Wireless. Not only do they sound better and have more effective ANC, but they also have a modern connector that’s still in use with smartphones and other mobile tech today. At this point, there’s really no reason outside of cost to pick up the older headphones, but even that isn’t very wise because you’re only delaying the need for an upgrade by spending the money on the older headphones.

Of course, we’re pretty cool on the Beats Studio Pro to begin with because they’re best matched with smaller ears and heads. So you might want to shop around if you find that your headphones are a little on the small side for you. However, if you know you want either the Beats Studio 3 Wireless or the Beats Studio Pro: get the Beats Studio Pro.

Frequently asked questions

No. Neither set of headphones are waterproof, nor do they bear an ingress protection rating that would indicate this.

Despite the tighter fit being able to keep each set of headphones on your noggin during periods of heavy movement, we don’t recommend these headphones for working out.

The Beats Studio Pro supports head-tracked spatial audio, though you’ll need an iOS device to use it.

Yes, they do.

Yes, but for the PS5, you might want to use the wired connection, and for the Xbox, you’ll likely use the adapter or the headphone jack on the controller.

JBL vs Beats Headphones: Which Brand is Right for You?

If you’re a music lover or an audiophile, you understand the importance of having high-quality headphones. In today’s wireless world, JBL and Beats are two prominent names that come to mind when it comes to top-notch audio accessories. Both brands have their own unique features and styles that cater to different preferences.

Which is the Winner in the JBL vs Beats headphones comparison ? JBL provides better value and well-balanced sound at more reasonable prices. Beats are fashionable and provide extra bass emphasis but cost more. It depends on how you prioritize sound quality or style when choosing.

In this comparison battle, the Head Phones Baba team will provide you with a complete guide about JBL and Beats headphones and will discuss which is the better option for you. So don’t miss this comparison battle!

Page Contents

JBL vs. Beats Headphones: The Ultimate Showdown for 2023

When it comes to top headphone brands, JBL and Beats are two of the biggest names in the game. Both companies make high-quality headphones packed with features, but which brand reigns supreme? This guide compares JBL vs. Beats headphones to help you decide which is best for your needs and budget.

1. JBL Headphones vs. Beats Sound Quality

One of the most important factors when choosing headphones is sound quality. You want crisp highs, punchy lows, and clear mids so you can hear every detail in your music.

JBL headphones are known for their excellent sound with precise bass and detailed highs. Even affordable models like the JBL Tune 500BT provide impressive audio with powerful bass. Higher-end JBL headphones wireless like the Club Series feature optimized drivers and tuning technology for superior sound.

Beats headphones also deliver vibrant, bass-heavy audio, though some audiophiles argue they overly boost bass at the expense of mids. However, newer Beats models like the Powerbeats Pro have improved sound across frequencies. And Beats’ signature bass-heavy profile appeals to many users.

Winner: For the most natural, well-balanced sound, JBL may have a slight edge. But Beats fans of pulsating bass.

2. JBL vs. Beats Noise Cancelling Headphones

Noise-canceling technology is essential for blocking out ambient noise so you can focus entirely on your music. Both JBL and Beats offer headphones with active noise cancellation ( ANC ).

JBL noise canceling headphones like the LIVE 650BTNC provide effective noise reduction using dual microphone technology. The LIVE 500BT and higher models have adjustable ambient awareness and talk-thru modes so you can let in sound when needed.

Do you know? Tozo NC9 vs NC9 Plus: Which One Is Right for You?

Beats Studio3 headphones feature Apple’s W1 chip for Class 1 wireless connectivity and pure ANC to block external noise. The Solo Pro goes a step further with two listening modes: Active Noise Cancelling and Transparency mode to amplify surrounding sounds.

Winner: For the most advanced noise cancellation, Beats may have a slight edge. But JBL’s ANC abilities are quite impressive, especially for the price.

3. Comfort and Design

You want headphones you can wear comfortably for hours, whether at home or on the go. JBL and Beats both make stylish, ergonomically designed headphones using high-quality materials.

JBL headphones tend to be extremely comfortable thanks to plush, breathable ear cushions that mold to your ears. Even budget models have well-padded headbands that avoid clamping. The pricier JBL Club Series features luxurious leather and soft ear cups.

Cool metallic accents and sleek lines define the Beats aesthetic. Padding on the headband and ear cups is ample and supple. However, some users find the ear cups slightly shallow and prone to heat buildup during extended wear. But convenience features like auto play/pause and instant pairing provide a smooth listening experience.

Winner: For long-wearing comfort, JBL may have a small advantage. But aesthetics are a personal choice between the two fashionable brands.

4. Bluetooth Connectivity

Bluetooth wireless headphones free you to roam while listening. JBL and Beats both excel in wireless connectivity.

Most JBL headphones use the latest Bluetooth 5.0 for strong, skip-free audio within range. Budget models like the JBL Tune 500BT have up to 40 hours of battery life per charge. And JBL’s ambient-aware technology lets you hear your surroundings and chat without removing your headphones.

Thanks to Apple’s proprietary tech, Beats headphones seamlessly sync with Apple devices. The W1 chip enables Class 1 Bluetooth and extended range. Battery life reaches an impressive 40 hours on the Powerbeats Pro. The Fast Fuel feature provides 1.5 hours of playtime from a 5-minute charge.

Winner: For Android users, JBL may connect more smoothly. But Apple devotees get a flawless experience with Beats.

When choosing the best headphones for your needs, price always plays a role. In general, JBL headphones cost less than comparable Beats models.

Affordable JBL models like the Tune 500BT cost around $50. Mid-tier headphones like the LIVE 650BTNC run $100-150. And the premium Club Series costs around $200-350.

Beats headphones range under $1000 for entry-level models to $400 for the top noise-canceling and wireless options. The Powerbeats Pro retails for $250. Solo3 headphones cost $300, while Studio3 is priced at $350.

Winner: Across the lineup, JBL provides better value at lower price points compared to Beats. But premium options from both brands ultimately deliver quality relative to the price.

JBL headphones vs. Beats Which Is Better?

For budget buyers or Android users, JBL is hard to beat. You get impressive sound, comfort, and connectivity at affordable prices.

But hardcore Apple fans may prefer Beats for seamless integration, bass-forward sound, and stylish aesthetic. The choice ultimately comes down to your budget, music tastes, and device ecosystem.

Whichever you choose, you can be confident that both JBL and Beats deliver a high-quality listening experience on par with their premium brand reputations. It just depends on whether your preferences lean more toward JBL’s balanced sound or the pumping bass of Beats.

In the battle of JBL vs. Beats headphones , JBL emerges as the winner for most users. With its affordable prices, excellent comfort, battery life, and well-balanced sound quality across the frequency range, JBL simply provides better overall value compared to Beats. Beats headphones certainly have appeal, especially for Apple fans who prioritize seamless device connectivity, bass-heavy sound, and fashionable style.

With impressive technology like adjustable ambient aware modes and Bluetooth 5.0 syncing, JBL headphones deliver a complete package of quality and performance. So when considering the key factors of price, sound, comfort, and connectivity, JBL headphones outshine Beats to become the champion.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Which is better JBL or Beats wireless headphones?

JBL wireless headphones are generally better than Beats. JBL provides more balanced, clear sound quality, better comfort and durability, and more affordable pricing overall.

However, Beats may have slightly better noise cancellation and a stylish design that some prefer. In short, for sound purity, comfort, and value, JBL wireless headphones are the better choice for most buyers.

Are Beats better than JBL for sound quality?

Overall, audiophiles tend to prefer JBL for its more balanced, crisp sound signature vs. the extra bass emphasis from Beats. However, sound quality preference is subjective.

Which brand is more durable?

JBL headphones tend to be built more sturdily and last longer, though Beats’ durability has improved in recent years. JBL likely has an advantage in long-term durability.

Which headphones are more comfortable?

JBL headphones usually have softer earcups and adjustable headbands that make them more comfortable for longer listening sessions. Beats headphones can feel too tight on some heads.

Which brand has a longer battery life?

Battery life depends on the specific headphone model, but JBL and Beats are fairly comparable, with most models providing 15-22 hours of listening time per charge.

Which brand should I choose?

JBL for better value and balanced sound, or Beats for style, extra bass, and prestige. Consider sound, comfort, price, and aesthetic preferences when deciding.

Recent Comparison

• Sony Wf-1000xm4 Vs Bose Quietcomfort Earbuds 2
• Beats Fit Pro Vs Bose Sport Earbuds: Which One To Buy
• Airpods Max Vs Beats Studio 3: Which One To Buy

Anneq Aish Choudhary is a passionate writer with a keen interest in headphones and music. With years of experience in writing about technology, Anneq has a deep understanding of the latest trends and innovations in the headphone industry. Anneq’s articles provide valuable insights into the best headphones on the market.

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Reviews TV REVIEWS   v1.11 HEADPHONES REVIEWS   v1.6 MONITOR REVIEWS   v1.2 SOUNDBAR REVIEWS   v1.3 MOUSE REVIEWS   v1.5 KEYBOARD REVIEWS   v1.3.1 PRINTER REVIEWS   v1.2 VACUUM REVIEWS   v1.2 PROJECTOR REVIEWS   v0.8 TOASTER REVIEWS   v1.0 BLENDER REVIEWS   v1.0 KEYBOARD SWITCH REVIEWS   v1.0 SPEAKER REVIEWS   v0.8 CAMERA REVIEWS   v0.12.1 LAPTOP REVIEWS   v0.8.2
• In Progress
• Newsletters

JBL Live Pro 2 vs Beats Studio Buds: which affordable noise-cancelling earbuds are best?

We put these top-performing, mid-range true wireless earbuds head-to-head

Battery life: 10 hours (buds); 30 hours (case) Driver: 11mm dynamic Weight: 4.8g (buds); 48g (case) The JBL Live Pro 2 true wireless earbuds punch above their weight in the most important ways. Noise cancellation is excellent and is perfect for busy, noisy environments and commuting. Sound is good, EQ customization is great and although call quality could be better, most people won’t notice it unless they make a lot of them regularly.

• Fantastic noise cancellation
• Powerful, bassy audio
• Good companion app
• On-ear controls a bit limited
• Not audiophile sound
• Calls can be muffled

Battery life: 8 hours (buds); 16 hours (case) Driver: 8.2mm dynamic Weight: 5.1g (buds); 48g (case)

The Beats Studio Buds are the best-sounding earbuds Beats has ever made at this kind of price. They’re comfortable to wear, they sound great, and there's effective ANC. They come with some smart features for both iOS and Android too, including some that the JBLs can't match, such as Find My support on both platforms. The JBLs have the edge on ANC quality and sound, though.

• Good sound quality
• Stylish and small
• Great smart features
• ANC is only okay
• Battery life is weaker
• Poor call quality

Many of the top tech companies have true wireless earbuds that represent the best of the best in audio technology. But let’s not overlook the buds that fill out the more affordable parts of our best true wireless earbuds list – high performers with a mid-range price tag.

Two of our favorite wireless buds that are firmly in this high-quality audio and mid-range price category are from affordable audio tech brand JBL and Apple -owned headphones brand Beats. So which is the best: the JBL Live Pro 2 vs Beats Studio Buds ?

We've thoroughly reviewed them both, so in this guide we’ll put these two noise-cancelling earbuds head-to-head to find out how they compare in terms of sound quality, battery life and comfort. Be sure to take a look at our best wireless earbuds and best noise-cancelling earbuds guides for more suggestions. Otherwise read on to find out which is right for you, the JBL Live Pro 2 vs Beats Studio Buds.

JBL Live Pro 2 vs Beats Studio Buds: Price and availability

The Beats Studio Buds were released in June 2021 and the JBL Live Pro 2 were released a whole year later in June 2022. At the time of their respective releases, both earbuds cost the same: $149.99 / £129.99 / AU$199.95, which makes them excellent to compare in terms of specs, features and sound.

Because the Beats Studio Buds have been around much longer, you're likely to find them permanently discounted from several third party retailers, and with big discounts during sales events. 

So there’s not much in it here between these two true wireless earbuds in terms of price. But are they both good value more generally? The short answer is yes. They may not be able to compete with the best of the best true wireless earbuds on the market, but if you don’t want to spend more than $150/£150, then they’re some of the best options available. In fact, unless you want high-end sound and features, you’d be more than satisfied with the levels of noise cancellation, sound quality and comfort offered by both buds. 

JBL Live Pro 2 vs Beats Studio Buds: Design

The JBL Live Pro 2 earbuds have the stem-like true wireless earbud design we’ve been seeing from a lot of brands over the past few years – like the AirPods Pro 2 and LG Tone Free T90Q . We like that the JBL Live Pro 2’s stems are fairly understated, although they do have a shiny finish that stands out in brightly lit environments. 

In contrast, the Beats Studio Buds sit almost flush with your ear – although the ‘b’ Beats logo does set them apart from other, similar earbuds. Neither is necessarily better design-wise, but the one you go for will be down to personal preference – do you like the AirPods-esque stems or would you prefer something more compact? 

Comfort-wise, we got on well with both pairs of buds when we reviewed them. The JBL Live Pro 2 earbuds come with small, medium and large silicone eartips so you can get a perfect fit. Similarly, in our Beats Studio Buds review we called them “supremely comfortable”. 

The JBL Live Pro 2 have an IPX5 rating, which means they’re resistant to water splashes and a light water stream and perfect for a sweaty workout. The Beats Studio Buds have an IPX4 rating, which makes them a little less water resistant, but should still be good for light exercise – just don’t accidentally take them into the shower.

JBL Live Pro 2 vs Beats Studio Buds: Features

In our JBL Live Pro 2 review we highly rated the JBL app, which is easy to navigate and filled with user-friendly features – but not too much to be overwhelming. We also like the gesture control on these buds, which makes use of the capacitive touch panel in the stem and can be customized. 

In comparison, the Beats Studio Buds have a clickable button on the buds, which controls playback. This might be more reliable than some touch controls, but it means you don’t get onboard volume controls here. 

The JBL Live Pro 2 earbuds offer multipoint pairing, which is great news if you use lots of devices throughout the day. The Beats Studio Buds don’t, but they do work with both Apple and Android phones very easily. This is good news for Android users, as there’s a dedicated Beats app that we enjoyed using, as well as support for some cool features, like Find My in iOS and Find My Device in Android. But Apple users won’t get multipoint pairing with other Apple devices and hands-free Siri – you’ll need Apple buds like the AirPods 3 for that. 

It might sound like a small point, but we didn’t like that the Beats Studio Buds don’t have automatic ear detection. So if you take them out, music won’t pause. The JBL Live Pro 2 do have this feature, which if you’re removing your buds a lot throughout the day makes a real difference. 

JBL Live Pro 2 vs Beats Studio Buds: Sound quality

When we reviewed the Beats Studio Buds we paired them with an iPhone 11 Pro and turned on Apple Music, which supports Spatial Audio with Dolby Atmos and Lossless Audio. We couldn’t get the full effect of Lossless Audio with the Beats Studio Buds (Bluetooth compression ruins the lossless nature of the music), but we used them to play songs with Spatial Audio, which sounded great. These buds have a lively sound quality, which elevates the high and low ends of a mix, resulting in toe-tapping, head-bobbing music that’s engaging for long periods of time. 

The sound quality on offer from the JBL Live Pro 2 is also impressive for the price. There’s a good balance across the whole range and a fairly broad soundstage right out of the box too – especially when the volume is pumped up high. They handle bass remarkably well and vocals are, for the most part, clear. There was some richness of detail here, but not on par with the best-in-class buds, like the Apple AirPods Pro 2 .

JBL Live Pro 2 vs Beats Studio Buds: Noise cancelling

The JBL Live Pro 2 earbuds are great for noise-cancelling. They’re some of the best noise cancelling earbuds for under £150/$150 and to get a significantly better experience, you’d have to pay well over £200/$200 for something like the Bose QuietComfort Earbuds 2 . We loved how ANC adjusts based on your environment, making them ideal for a range of scenarios. 

In comparison, we found that the noise-cancellation in the Beats Studio Buds performs moderately well. We can imagine them being solid office companions, keeping out the roar of office conversation to a minimum, but probably not silencing the sounds of planes or trains. Although they do adapt to your environment like the JBLs do with two distinct listening modes.

We found the call quality of both buds to be lacking. The JBL Live Pro 2 and Beats Studio Buds are good enough if you’re taking a call indoors but when they’re competing with traffic, wind and general background noise it can be tricky to hear and, according to the people we were chatting to, it was challenging to be heard as well. 

JBL Live Pro 2 vs Beats Studio Buds: Battery life

The JBL Live Pro 2 boast 10 hours of battery life in the buds but there’s an additional 30 in the Live Pro 2's case, giving you 40 hours in total. This about the most you can get from any of the best wireless earbuds .

In contrast, you can get 8 hours from the Beats Studio Buds and 24 hours of playback with the case. So the JBL Live Pro 2 do outperform the Beats buds significantly in that regard, although the Beats aren't bad at all.

JBL Live Pro 2 vs Beats Studio Buds: Conclusion

The JBL Live Pro 2 vs Beats Studio Buds are two excellent pairs of true wireless earbuds and give higher-priced buds a run for their money. If you want good sound quality, top comfort and decent ANC they both deliver, but there are some areas in which one set of buds excels over the other. 

For example, if battery life is important to you because you need all-day listening and don’t like having to pause your music to charge, then the JBL Live Pro 2 outperform the Beats Studio Buds. In terms of design, it’s largely down to personal preference and whether you love or loathe the stem-like look of the JBL Live Pro 2. 

Some people really enjoy the sound of Beats devices, and we liked listening to the Beats Studio Buds, even though the JBL Live Pro 2 also offer great audio there’s a fun and lively quality to the Beats. However, audio purists might want to look elsewhere – you’ll need a higher-end pair of buds with a higher price tag for better sound. 

If we had to choose we’d probably go with the JBL Live Pro 2, they’re newer, some of the specs are slightly better, the noise cancellation is more effective, and we liked the stem design with the high shine finish. But given they’re the same price, you can’t go wrong with either pair of mid-range earbuds.

Get daily insight, inspiration and deals in your inbox

Get the hottest deals available in your inbox plus news, reviews, opinion, analysis and more from the TechRadar team.

Becca is a contributor to TechRadar, a freelance journalist and author. She’s been writing about consumer tech and popular science for more than ten years, covering all kinds of topics, including why robots have eyes and whether we’ll experience the overview effect one day. She’s particularly interested in VR/AR, wearables, digital health, space tech and chatting to experts and academics about the future. She’s contributed to TechRadar, T3, Wired, New Scientist, The Guardian, Inverse and many more. Her first book, Screen Time, came out in January 2021 with Bonnier Books. She loves science-fiction, brutalist architecture, and spending too much time floating through space in virtual reality. 

The best earbuds for small ears 2024, all tested by a petite-eared audio expert

Nothing teases imminent Ear (3) earbuds launch – in possibly the weirdest way yet

4 fun horror movies leaving Netflix in April 2024 you don't want to miss

Most Popular

By Allisa James March 04, 2024

By James Rogerson March 01, 2024

By Paul Hatton February 29, 2024

By Dashiell Wood February 23, 2024

By Rob Dwiar February 23, 2024

By Ruth Jones February 22, 2024

By Jon Mundy February 20, 2024

By Ruth Hamilton February 19, 2024

By Jon Mundy February 19, 2024

By Becca Caddy February 18, 2024

By Jon Mundy February 16, 2024

• 2 Obscure Chinese tablet maker quietly unveiled a tablet with a sought-after feature no other tablet vendor dare launch — a 4K display that not even Apple, Google or Samsung can match
• 3 256TB SSDs could land before 2026 with a surprisingly low price — but will most likely use a controversial and popular trick borrowed from tape technology
• 4 Own an LG OLED TV from 2022? You’re about to get a great free upgrade
• 5 PC gaming handhelds should "feel like an Xbox" says Microsoft's Phil Spencer, but he's wrong – they could be something even better
• 2 The big Apple lawsuit explained: why Apple's getting sued and what it means for the iPhone
• 3 Microsoft has a potentially genius idea to make ray tracing work better even with lower-end GPUs
• 4 Gear up for the AI gaming revolution with AORUS 16X and GIGABYTE G6X
• 5 macOS isn’t perfect – but every day with Windows 11 makes me want to use my MacBook full-time

Jbl Live 660Nc Vs. Beats Studio3 Wireless Review

Beats Studio3 Wireless

Reasons why you might like the Beats Studio3 Wireless

Overall Score 6 Represents average audio ecosystem compatibility score.

• Weight of 260 g

Has Active Noise Cancellation (Anc)

• Battery Life of 40 hours

Can Be Used Wirelessly

Has ambient sound mode.

JBL Live 660NC

Reasons why you might like the JBL Live 660NC

Overall Score 5.8 Represents average audio ecosystem compatibility score.

• Weight of 265 g
• Battery Life of 50 hours

Jbl Live 660Nc Vs. Beats Studio3 Wireless Review In Summary

Jbl live 660nc vs. beats studio3 wireless review in detail.

JBL Live 660NC have a weight of 265g, these weigh below 320g, which we consider as the highest average a headphone should weigh for comfort during long use. We consider a lower weight better for the reason that lighter devices are more comfortable to carry. The Beats Studio3 Wireless , at 260g are lighter than the JBL Live 660NC by -5g

Has A Detachable Cable

Detachable cables are cables that have connectors on both ends. One end goes into your headphone earpieces, while the other end is inserted into a source device. Some new headphones, and not just the expensive ones, are coming with detachable cables, JBL Live 660NC are one of those. With a detachable cable, Beats Studio3 Wireless too can use alternative cables and if the cable is pulled, it will pop out instead of breaking.

Can Be Folded

JBL Live 660NC are foldable, which makes them more portable. Foldable headphones are easier to transport and take up less storage space. The Beats Studio3 Wireless too can fold up, foldable headphones can reduce their size by 60% to 70% when folded.

Has A Tangle Free Cable

Twisted headphone cables can be a great source of annoyance and inconvenience, JBL Live 660NC 's cable is designed to minimize tangling. Constant twisting of the cables can also lead to bends in the copper wires, affecting sound quality, or rendering your headphones defective.

Cable Length

A long cable ensures more freedom of movement, but remember that every cable based on the conducting material used has a certain amount of parasitic resistance, inductance, and capacitance. How much depends on the length and construction. JBL Live 660NC comes with a 1.2meters cable.

Has An Over-The-Ear Foam

Over-ear headphones have larger earpads that fit around your entire ear JBL Live 660NC have a comfortable full-size form with earcups that fully enclose your ears. This design is loved for its increased sound isolation and the fact that it won't leak sound to your neighbors. Beats Studio3 Wireless with this design offer potential for maximum bass and loudness levels.

Has Stereo Speakers

JBL Live 660NC have stereo speakers, what this means is that JBL Live 660NC 's speakers deliver sound from independent channels on both left and right sides, creating a richer sound and a better listening experience. The Beats Studio3 Wireless also have stereo speakers

Sound Quality

Active noise cancellation uses more advanced technology to reduce unwanted ambient sounds. How it works, it detects and analyzes the sound pattern outside and inside the earbud and then generates a mirror signal to cancel it out. In simple terms, it's like taking +1 outside (noise from your surrounding) and adding -1 inside (counter sound within the device) to make zero hence "diluting" the noise. JBL Live 660NC allow you to listen at lower volume levels, causing less ear fatigue as you don't have to crank up the volume to overcome background noise. Beats Studio3 Wireless too have active noise cancellation making both devices ideal for plane rides and morning commutes. Each may work with different noise cancellation modes, pick the setting, mode, or noise cancellation type that you prefer for commute or that enhances your relaxation time.

Has Passive Noise Reduction

Passive Noise Cancellation uses well-designed ear cups to seal out unwanted noise. This is used for both in-ear earphones and over-ear headphones where the headphone itself will keep surrounding noise out. The JBL Live 660NC sits tightly in place, creating an acoustic seal that reduces background noise and prevents your music from leaking out. Both of these devices have passive noise reduction which means that also the Beats Studio3 Wireless isolates you from ambient noise instead of actively using technology to cancel it out.

Lowest Frequency

Low-frequency response measures if and how well a particular audio component reproduces low audible frequencies and if it makes any changes to the signal while at it. JBL Live 660NC 's lowest frequency is at 16Hz, the lower the low-frequency response, the stronger and juicier the bass. Beats Studio3 Wireless 's lowest frequency is at 20Hz, this means that Beats Studio3 Wireless got a juicier bass than the JBL Live 660NC

Highest Frequency

High frequency response measures if and how well an audio device reproduces high audible frequencies and if it changes to the signal on the way through. JBL Live 660NC 's highest frequency is at 20,000Hz, the higher the high-frequency response, the clearer and crispier the treble. Beats Studio3 Wireless 's highest frequency is at 20,000Hz, this means that both devices produce equal treble

Sound Pressure Level

Sound pressure is the average variation in atmospheric pressure caused by the sound, the sound level .i.e how loud something is can be perceived differently by different people so we need to have a way of getting an objective measurement of sound level expressed in numerical terms. The sound pressure level, SPL, is the pressure level of a sound, measured in decibels, dB, JBL Live 660NC 's measurement is 97dB/mW. Devices with a higher sound pressure level are generally louder when supplied with any given audio source. Beats Studio3 Wireless 's sound pressure level measurement is 114dB/mW.

Driver Unit Size

The driver unit is the component that produces sound in the device, its size dictates the loudness of the headphone. JBL Live 660NC driver unit is 40mm in diameter, bigger drivers are more powerful and can produce better bass. Beats Studio3 Wireless driver unit is 40mm in diameter, making both devices similar in how loud their sound gets , many people have a misconception that driver units of a bigger size automatically produce better sound quality. However, large drivers usually have difficulty reproducing high frequencies so yes, larger drivers are capable of generating louder sound, but this does not mean that they produce better sound.

Defined as the device's resistance to the electromagnetic current, as electricity flows through a wire, it faces electrical resistance that counters the flow of current. The resistance of a conductor is measured in ohms. JBL Live 660NC 's impedance is 32Ohms, the lower the impedance, the easier it is to get higher volume and requires less power. Beats Studio3 Wireless 's impedance is 32Ohms. The impedance of earbuds is the electrical resistance of the driver unit present on the inside.

Battery Life

If your headphones play wirelessly, cancel ambient noise, or enhance your listening experience with active features, their battery life will reduce over time. The device's battery life is given by the manufacturer, with longer battery life, you get to use it for longer and have to charge the device less often. JBL Live 660NC 's battery life is 50 hours Beats Studio3 Wireless 's battery life is 40 hours. Each time you recharge your headphones, they get a little less listening time. The effect is barely noticeable at first. But over a few years, you may find that your device, no longer plays for long like it used to.

Charge Time

It takes 2 hours to fully charge the JBL Live 660NC 's battery. It is recommended to fully charge the battery before using the headphones for the first time or when they have been unused for extended periods. Beats Studio3 Wireless takes 2 hours to fully charge the battery

Has A Battery Level Indicator

JBL Live 660NC have a battery level indicator, an indicator shows you when the device has a low battery. The battery indicator lights show the charging status of your headphones. Beats Studio3 Wireless too have a battery level indicator, charging indicators allow you to determine the charging state of your headphones, whether fully charged, or the battery is running low.

Has A Rechargeable Battery

A rechargeable battery is a type of electrical battery that can be charged, discharged into a load, and recharged many times, as opposed to a disposable or primary battery, which is supplied fully charged and discarded after use. JBL Live 660NC 's battery can be recharged and used over again. The Beats Studio3 Wireless too have a rechargeable battery.

Connectivity

JBL Live 660NC can be used wirelessly, wireless devices allow you more freedom of movement not restricted by a cable. The Beats Studio3 Wireless also can be used wirelessly

Bluetooth Version

Bluetooth is a wireless technology standard that allows data transfers between devices placed in close proximity, using short-wavelength, ultra-high frequency radio waves. JBL Live 660NC has a v5 Beats Studio3 Wireless has a Bluetooth version of v4. Newer versions provide faster data transfers.

Has Usb Type-C

JBL Live 660NC support USB TYPE-C, an industry-standard connector for transmitting both data and power on a single cable. The USB-C plug is now part and parcel of most current laptops, phones, and tablets, it features reversible plug orientation and cable direction.

Has Bluetooth Aptx

Beats Studio3 Wireless support APTX, a codec used for transmitting audio wirelessly with Bluetooth. It is developed by Qualcomm and supports 16-bit audio at a bit rate of 384kbps.

JBL Live 660NC support AAC, a codec that is used for Bluetooth audio. It supports 24-bit audio at 250kbps. Because it uses psychoacoustic modeling, it can provide better results than other codecs at a similar bit rate. The Beats Studio3 Wireless support AAC as well. Designed to be the successor of the MP3 format, AAC generally achieves higher sound quality than MP3 encoders at the same bit rate.

Maximum Bluetooth Range

Bluetooth is a short-range wireless technology standard that is used for exchanging data between fixed and mobile devices over short distances. The JBL Live 660NC can connect at a 10meters distance via Bluetooth or infrared to another device. The Beats Studio3 Wireless can connect at a 10meters distance via Bluetooth

Has A 3.5Mm Male Connector

Being an industry standard audio plug, a standard 3.5mm male connector is suitable for use with all MP3 players and computer sound cards. This means that it is commonly used in stereo headphones to your phone or connecting your phone to an external amplifier, sound bars, your car radio, etc. Beats Studio3 Wireless has this connector giving it a wider range of connectivity with most of the sound devices out there. All plugs have at least a tip and sleeve with the number of rings that stand as a differentiating factor.

Number Of Microphones

Beats Studio3 Wireless have only 4 microphones, more microphones result in better sound quality and enable the device to filter out background noise.

Has A Noise-Canceling Microphone

JBL Live 660NC use a noise-canceling type of microphone, these microphones are designed to filter out background noise from the desired sound. Especially useful in noisy environments. The Beats Studio3 Wireless too use a noise-canceling type of microphone.

JBL Live 660NC support ambient sound mode, which uses microphones to pass through ambient noises so that they can still be heard. It’s useful when you want to listen to music but also be aware of what’s happening around you, for example when you’re having a jog but would still want to be able to hear traffic. The Beats Studio3 Wireless support ambient sound mode as well allowing you to hear the ambient sound even while wearing them.

Has In/On-Ear Detection

Beats Studio3 Wireless support in/on-ear detection, the sensors in the device can detect when they are removed from your ears so that the music is paused, saving battery life and improving your listening experience while at it.

Has A Mute Function

JBL Live 660NC have a mute function, they have an option to mute/unmute a conversation directly from the device. The mute function means that you unilaterally turn off the microphone, but you can still hear the other party's voice. The Beats Studio3 Wireless too have a mute function.

Multipoint Count

JBL Live 660NC support multipoint, which allows you to link to more Bluetooth devices and switch between them. For example, you can easily switch calls from one device to another without having to manually disconnect and reconnect. The Beats Studio3 Wireless support multipoint count. Bluetooth multipoint would come in handy because you can be on one call without missing notifications coming from another device.

Control Panel Placed On A Device

There is a control panel on the JBL Live 660NC body, so you can easily access the volume control or remote without having to interact with a cable or another device it's connected to. The Beats Studio3 Wireless too have a control panel on them.

Can Be Used As A Headset

JBL Live 660NC can be used as a headset. A headset is one headphone or pair with a built-in microphone. Headsets can be used for apps that require communication i.e. Zoom, Google Meet, Skype, games with voice chat, mobile phones, etc. Beats Studio3 Wireless can be used as a headset. since they have a built-in microphone

Warranty Period

The period of time that warrant free repair and adjustment services in case of a malfunction occurring under normal use that has followed instruction manuals. When covered under the manufacturer’s warranty it is possible to get a replacement in the case of a malfunction. JBL Live 660NC have a warranty period of 1 years The Beats Studio3 Wireless have a warranty period of 1years.

Travel Bag Is Included

Carrying headphones without a case, or putting them in bags without a casing can easily put them at risk of getting damaged. The JBL Live 660NC come with their own special case or pouch, which is useful for safe transportation. Beats Studio3 Wireless too have a travel bag or case included.

Related Reviews