srixon q star tour 2 vs 3

Srixon Q Star vs Q Star Tour: Head-to-Head Golf Ball Comparison

Finding the best golf balls is no easy feat. Even with a good brand, an abundance of models makes getting to the point a tough task. For Srixon, two options jump out. The Q Star and Q Star Tour.

They might share a similar name but there are very real differences between the Srixon Q Star vs Q Star Tour. Each provide a boost to distance, control, and overall performance, but only when used by the right type of golfer. Affordable and durable too. But used by a golfer with the wrong swing type, the benefits are greatly diminished. It will be evident in your scores.

So what type is right for me? Keep reading for our expert golf ball comparison and recommendation.

Overview of Srixon Golf Balls

While not among the big 3 brands on the Tour, they boast an impressive lineup that began in the early 2000s with Jim Furyk and Ernie Els. Today’s Srixon golfers include Brooks Koepka, Keegan Bradley, Hideki Matsuyama, and Inbee Park.

Comparing the Srixon Q Star vs Q Star Tour is tough because you cannot decidedly say one is better than the other. They are each among the best golf balls in terms of quality, value, and performance.

Every brand pays significant amounts of attention to their tour level balls and beginner balls. Tour players attract attention and notoriety. Beginners lose balls left and right making the best repeat customers you could ask for.

Srixon is one of the few that live in the middle, spreading their efforts equally so that the golfer shooting 90 is not forgotten. As a result, they have become one of the elite brands for intermediate golfers.

Design and Construction – and How it Affects Performance

No golf ball comparison is complete without a look at how design and technology affect performance.

One of the biggest challenges for high and mid-handicap golfers is improving their launch angle which leads to increased carry and total distance. The Q Star features a fastlayer core which sets out to solve this. With lower compression than previous models, hitting your irons higher is made easy. This also goes a long way in attacking greens and having the ball come to rest shortly after landing. Because of the increased angle of descent, you can focus less on stopping the ball and more about direction and distance.

Golfers playing Q Star Tour get a different benefit from the core. A varied design of the fastlayer core, this version focuses on distance through speed. By increasing firmness as the core moves outward, your ball speed is greater with the same swing speed than it would be with a Q Star.

Q Star uses ionomer. Q Star Tour uses urethane. Ionomer is much thicker. Pretty standard for two and three-piece balls. Both balls also utilize the same Speed Dimple pattern designed to fight through wind and keep your ball in the air longer. But how do the different cover materials affect performance?

Despite each option having the Srixon Spin Skin, the cover materials make them play differently.

The ionomer cover of Q Star does not offer much in terms of spin but makes up for it with an abundance of control. A reduction of spin for a lesser skilled golfer means minimizing side spin—your slices and hooks. It will not help you hit the ball in the direction you want, but the shots you hit will be straight. As for direction, that is something only you can control.

For more skilled golfers, side spin is not always a bad thing. This is what enables you to hit purposeful cuts and draws. The urethane cover of Q Star Tour’s helps the process along. The expectation is that since more skilled golfers are using these balls, this is a positive. As a result, golfers are able to work the Q Star Tour into tighter spaces with more precision.

Suitability for Different Golfers

Intermediate golfers are the best fit for Srixon Q Star. Engineered for slower and mid-speed swings, this ball was built to amplify that specific type of golfer. Swinging harder than the ball is designed for leads to missing shots both ways and unpredictability. Lean into who the ball is meant for and stay under control.

The Q Star is a great option for beginners as well. However, there are more affordable options if you’re still losing a handful of balls per round. For those switching to the Q Star from $1 balls, it will likely be the first time you notice a difference in performance based on the ball you’re hitting.

The Q Star Tour does not have as broad of a group that should be playing it. This ball is intended for advanced players only. These are the golfers who hit draws and cuts—on purpose. Aided by an extremely thin cover, a low-handicap golfer will be able to manipulate its flight and operate with a high level of precision on all shots.

An easy way to think about Q Star vs Q Star Tour is what type of shafts you have on your irons. Regular shafts? Q Star every time. Stiff shafts? You’ll be able to get the most out of the Q Star Tour. This is of course assuming you are fitted to the right material shaft. (Go with the option for slower swing speeds if you’re on the edge.)

Durability and Longevity 

In a one-to-one Srixon Q Star vs Q Star tour, the Q Star is more durable because of its thicker cover and materials used in construction.

When it comes to the Q Star, damage is far more likely because of the players using them. 

 If you’re taking nice smooth 75 mph swings, you have nothing to worry about. Start dialing up the speed, and you get yourself into a trickier spot. If club contact damage starts to become a regular thing, that’s when you need to change balls.

Golfers with too strong of swings can scuff the Q Star solely by making contact. It won’t take trees or cart paths to cause the damage, just a very hard swing. However, this is the case with all golf balls designed for slower swings.

Someone who avoids trees and pavement all day can expect to play an entire round with the Q Star Tour without trouble. On the other hand, any contact with those course features we try so desperately to avoid will leave a mark. The type of mark that makes you swap balls on the next tee.

The best golf balls for durability will be ones that match your game. Make a selection that aligns with your skills, and you will have no issues using the same ball for full rounds. This is the case whether you’re using Srixon or anything else.

Price Comparison

Following the trend of these Srixon golf balls sharing a similar name, and not much else, prices vary too.

A dozen Srixon Q Star runs a few dollars under $30, with slightly different prices based on where you shop and the time of year. Q Star Tour’s will cost a bit more, with a box of those running around $35.

The price difference of about $.50 per ball might not seem significant, but over the course of a golf season will add up.

Compared to the entire Srixon golf ball lineup, the Q Star series falls in the middle. They are less expensive than their tour model balls, the Z Star series. And they are more affordable than the beginner-geared Soft Feel line.

Looking at the balls other top companies offer for intermediate golfers; Srixon offers a reasonable price and matches the quality of competitors.

Pros and Cons 

Let’s look at some key points and what makes the Q Star vs Q Star Tour what they are.

Srixon Q Star

• Design helps you elevate the ball.
• Spin levels promote straighter shots.
• Can withstand one or two dustups with branches or pavement.
• Less control around the greens.

Srixon Q Star Tour

• Top choice for golfers with moderate to slightly above average swing speed.
• Easy to shape shots with driver and irons. 
• Unpredictable shot shapes will be amplified.
• Damaged easily after making contact with anything but club or grass.

Final Recommendation

At the end of the day, there is not much overlap between users of these two Srixon golf balls.

The Q Star is a great option for the average golfer. It’s two-piece construction, ionomer cover, and mid-level compression make it so. You’ll be able to hit the ball further than with a three piece and control it better than with a urethane cover. All this together means finding more fairways and hitting shorter clubs into greens. The tangible result? Fewer double and triple bogeys. If high, straight shots are what you’re looking for, you’re a Q Star golfer.

Q Star Tour golfers are a little different. You swing a little harder, demand more on your approach and wedge shots, and your natural ball flight does not need improvement. This is the group of players who can work the ball left and right a bit, but not on every shot. It’s also the group who can confidently land a shot on the green without fear of it running off. And don’t forget affordability. When it comes to golf balls for this tier of golfers, paying $4/piece is standard. Not with the Q Star Tour.

Henry Foster

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.

Top Categories

• Training Aids
• Accessories

Site Navigation

Useful links.

• Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2024 Skilled Golf

Srixon Q-Star vs. Q-Star Tour: Which Golf Ball is Better?

Golf balls are just as crucial as your golf drivers are. Now when it comes to golf balls, there are many variants available; out of them, Srixon is a popular name. Their two most popular balls are Q star, and Q start tour. So you might wonder what is the difference between Srixon q star vs q star tour

Even though there are many differences between these two balls, the main difference is their design. The Srixon Q star has a two-piece layer design, whereas the Q star tour has a three piece layer design. 

Thus, if you are confused about which ball you need to buy, our guide is here to help you. Today we will discuss everything you need to know about these balls. 

Overview Of Srixon Q Star golf ball

The Q-Star is a mid-range golf ball designed with mid-handicappers in mind. It provides some advantages of the Z-Star and the Soft Feel ball.

Additionally, it has a softer outer cover, similar to all Srixon balls, and a FastLayer Core that provides excellent feel and speed.

Overview Of Srixon Q star Tour golf ball

The Q Star Tour is probably one of the best balls by Srixon; it’s an upgrade from the regular Q Start model.

It has many of the same features as Q Start but provides a much higher swing speed for mid handicappers.

This golf ball gives you the distance and greenside spin you have to beat the competition due to its low compression that is precisely adjusted for moderate swing speeds.

Srixon Q Star Vs Q star tour: Comparison Table

Now we will compare and list down all the basic differences between Q star and Star tour ball in our comparison table below. So, please read carefully to understand all the differences between them.

What Are The Differences Between Srixon Q star vs. Q star tour?

There are many different criteria you need to think about before selecting a golf ball, and the differences below will help you select the perfect ball. 

Construction layer

The first difference we will talk about is the construction design of these two balls. In general, a manufacturer may produce higher spin separation by adding more layers to a ball.

In comparison to iron or wedge, this results in a driver’s performance being more tailored. 

The golf ball with a two-piece Spin Skin structure is the Srixon Q Star. It features an outside covering and an inside core.

Whereas, the Q Star tour gets the upper hand here as it is composed of a 3-piece urethane structure.

Therefore, the Q Star Tour will give you more spin, and these high spin rates offer superb greenside control.

When we compare the feel of each of these balls, you will notice the Q Star has a soft feel, but on the other hand, the Q Star Tour has a softer feel to it.

For golfers who need a great feel and flexible reaction around the green, Srixon created the Q Star golf ball.

The Q Star Tour, however, offers a softer feel that makes it excellent for putting and striking greens.

Soft golf balls can create more spin than hard golf balls, which allows good golfers to modify strokes more easily.

As a result, the Q Star Tour will give you more spin, and if you have a sluggish swing speed, the launch will also be somewhat higher.

The Spin of a golf ball is one of the most important criteria while selecting your ball. There are different criteria of spin; the Q Star tour has a higher wedge spin than the Q Star with a low driver spin and a higher greenside spin.

However, the Q star falls behind here as it has a high wedge spin but is lower than Q Star Tour. It also has a lower greenside spin than Q Star Tour. 

Both balls have identical driver spin characteristics. Both of them cause minimal driver spin; however, there are variances closer to the green. The normal Q-Star doesn’t spin off the wedge as much.

So, the overall spin rate is a bit higher for Q Star Tour. It is primarily due to the three-layer construction of this ball which plays a role in this high spin rate.

Swing Speed

Balls play a massive role in the overall swing speed. The Q Star Tour has a higher swing speed between 90-105 mph compared to the 75+ mph swing speed of the Q Star ball. 

Therefore, Q Star Tour gives you the range and greenside spin you need to gain a sustainable competitive advantage thanks to its low compression that is precisely optimized for moderate swing speeds.

On the other hand, the Q Star provides golfers with a swing speed of about 75 mph with considerable distance and trajectory accuracy for complete shot control.

However, because of its length, which offers greater distance than the Q-Star, the Q-Star Tour would function best at quicker swing rates.

The last difference we will discuss is the flight of these golf balls. Both Q Star and Q Star Tour have relatively low ball flights.

However, in comparison, because of the low spin of the Q star, the flight will be higher than the Q Star Tour and will be in the mid-high range.

While still being lower than the Q Star, the Q Star Tour’s flight is in the middle of the range.

This ball will have a slightly lower ball flight, but you wouldn’t immediately notice it as it will be of minimal difference.

Srixon Q Star Vs. Q star tour: Which Golf ball To choose?

Srixon Q Star and Srixon Q Star Tour have somewhat similar performances in many criteria. Thus, finding one direct winner can be somewhat difficult, and it mostly depends on your style of play.

The Srixon Q Star Tour golf ball is meant for advanced mid handicapped players with a higher swing speed who have no problem spending a few extra bucks.

This improves the ball’s ability to hold the greens and provides you with improved stroke control. 

On the other hand, the Srixon Q Star is meant for beginner to mid level or mid handicapped players who have a lower swing speed. This is also an excellent choice for players who have a lower budget.

By now you already know the differences between Q Star and Q Star Tour. However, you might have some questions wandering around your head after reading so far. To clear all these confusions make sure to read our Faqs section below.

Do Srixon Q Star and Q Star both have the same swing speed?

No, the swing speed of the Q Star tour is higher, which is between 95-105 mph, compared to the lower swing speed of Q Star, which is around 75+ mph. So, players who have a high swing speed will have a better result playing with the Q Star Tour ball.

Which is softer between Q Star and Q Star Tour?

Both Q Star and Q Star Tour balls are soft; however, the Q Star Tour is softer compared to the Q Star. Because they can generate more spin than harder golf balls, the Q Star Tour allows expert players to modify their strokes more easily.

Is Q Star and Q Star Tour both beginner friendly golf balls?

Yes, for beginner golfers, both Q Star and Q Star Tour are perfect for playing. However, as Q Star Tour is more expensive and has higher swing speeds, beginners should feel more comfortable while playing with the regular Q Star because of its low price and lower swing speed.

• Read Also: Titleist Velocity vs Pro V1: Which Golf Ball to Choose?
• Read Also: Titleist Pro V1x vs. Pro V1x Left Dash: Comparing Golf Balls
• Read Also: Srixon Z Star vs Titleist Pro V1 | Which Golf Ball is Better?
• Read Also: Srixon Z Star vs. Z Star XV: Which Golf Ball to Choose?
• Read Also: Callaway Supersoft vs Bridgestone E6: Comparing Golf Balls
• Read Also: Callaway Supersoft vs. Supersoft Max: Comparing Golf Balls

Meet Jalal, a passionate golf writer and the driving force behind Golfertroop.com, your go-to destination for all things golfing! Whether you’re a seasoned golfing veteran or a beginner taking your first swing, Jalal is here to assist you in making the most out of your golfing experience.

Similar Posts

Are Ping Eye 2 Irons Still Good? [Explained]

Ping Eye 2 irons have been around since the late ’80s and have been used by many professional golfers around the world. Though these irons…

Where are Snell Golf Balls Made? Unveiling the Truth

Snell Golf is a name that has gained popularity in a very short period of time for making top-notch golf balls. They even appeared in…

Apple Watch For Golf Vs Garmin: Which One to Choose?

A golf watch is a wearable device designed to help golfers improve their game by providing helpful information and tracking performance metrics. These watches typically…

Signs You Need A Stiffer Shaft! Are Stiffer Shaft Really Helpful

If you feel like your shots are not getting sufficient power or maybe the ball is getting too much loft are all signs that you…

Who Makes Tour Edge Golf Clubs? [Behind the Brand]

Tour Edge is famous in the market for providing high-quality golf clubs according to the player’s interests. Tour Edge has carved out its name as…

Are Tour Edge Golf Clubs Good? Exploring the Quality & Performance

Tour Edge is famous in the market for providing high-quality golf clubs according to the player’s interests. This company has undoubtedly created its own name…

Masters Tournament

Augusta National Golf Club

A HISTORY OF EVERY HOLE AT AUGUSTA

EVERY HOLE AT AUGUSTA

Srixon Q-Star Tour, Divide golf balls: What you need to know

WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW: Srixon’s fifth generation of its Q-Star Tour has a reformulated core to give moderate swing speed players more distance. A flexible coating of urethane on top of the softer urethane cover from the 2022 model improves the cover’s engagement with the grooves of irons and wedges for additional grab, leading to more control around the greens.

AVAILABILITY/PRICING: The new Srixon Q-Star Tour and Q-Star Tour Divide are available immediately at $40 per dozen in both white and yellow for Q-Star Tour and Blue, Orange and Red for Divide.

3 Cool Things

1. Need for speed. Moderate swing-speed players need all the help they can get. While the previous generation of the Q-Star Tour focused more on greenside spin, this iteration keeps those attributes but provides a distance boost with a reformulated core

This generation’s core has a slightly higher compression rating than its predecessor to promote better ball speed off the tee, while also reducing long-game sidespin because hitting it straighter also adds to distance.

The “FastLayer” core starts out soft in the center and then gradually increases in firmness as you move to the core’s outer edges, in effect acting like hundreds and hundreds of separate layers. That produces a benefit for moderate swing speed players off the tee and with other full swing shots because the low compression core helps launch shots higher and with less spin, compared to most multilayer urethane-covered balls that are typically played on the pro tours.

“The new Q-Star Tour is a high-caliber option for players wanting to hit the ball farther, see more spin around the greens and have more control across the course,” said Brian Schielke, GM for Srixon. “With an updated FastLayer Core, they can generate more ball speeds and distance without compromising feel.”

2. Cover it up. The cover utilizes the same 338 dimple pattern and features an extra, more flexible coating of urethane on top of the urethane cover to improve the cover’s engagement with the grooves of irons and wedges for increased spin—a technology the company refers to as SeRM which stands for “Slide-Ring Material.”

The dimples are designed in a manner to reduce drag and enhance lift—an aerodynamically preferable condition. The lower drag allows the ball to move through the air with less resistance, making it less susceptible to the wind. The higher lift allows the ball to stay in the air longer, helping boost distance.

3. A 50-50 proposition. Srixon also is debuting its second iteration of the Q-Star Divide, a bi-colored ball reminiscent of the Ping ball of some 50 years ago where one half is one color and the other half another.

Although one might think that would be dizzying, for those needing help with alignment on the greens or perhaps want to get a better feel for what their chip and pitch shots are doing, it’s a viable alternative without having to sacrifice the performance benefits of the Q-Star Tour.

More from Golf Digest

Trending now.

Best Srixon Golf Balls: 2024 On-Course Comparison

By: Jon Webber

Updated: January 8, 2024

We review what we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission. Learn More

Srixon golf balls aren’t seen as much on TV as some of the others, but that doesn’t mean they aren’t as good. They actually make some of my favorite models, and in this post, we’ll be comparing each model and talking about which is the best for you.

Which golf ball are you interested in?

• Z-Star Diamond
• Q-Star Tour
• Best Srixon Ball For Low Handicappers
• Best Srixon Ball For Mid Handicappers
• Best Srixon Ball For High Handicappers

Which ball you decide to play does make a big difference, it can hurt distance and increase your hook/slice. It all comes down to what your skill level is and what you need your ball to do. We’ll jump into everything you need to know, but if you just want a quick comparison, check out the table below.

Share your experience. Have you used any of these balls? If so, let me know your thoughts of them in the comments below .

Srixon Golf Ball Comparison

Alternatively, if you want to know about different brands instead, you can read our guides on the best Callaway golf balls or the best Bridgestone golf balls .

Do Golf Balls Really Make A Difference?

The majority of golfers out there (myself included) just tee up whatever ball they found in the woods the round before. I always just thought all balls were pretty much the same, but that isn’t even close to being true.

Each type of ball is designed differently and is made for different golfers . Different balls have different layers , have different compression ratings , spin at different speeds , and require different swing speeds.

If you’re a high handicapper , you probably have an average swing speed (or slightly less). With an average swing speed, you won’t be able to fully compress a high compression ball.

You’ll lose distance, your ball won’t go as high as you’d want, and you might get big hooks and slices. You need a ball that’s built for your swing.

If you’re a low handicapper , you probably have a faster than average swing speed. A low compression ball might compress too much, which can lead to less distance, shots that are too high, and shots that are hard to control.

Average golfers need distance and forgiveness . The most important thing is to play a ball that will help you find the fairway. You don’t need a ball that spins a lot. See how backspin and sidespin affect a golf ball .

Low handicappers have better control over the ball, so they don’t need as much forgiveness. They’re able to spin the ball more with their wedges, and that’s why they need a higher spinning ball .

Know Your Swing Speed

One of the easiest ways to better understand what ball you should be playing is by looking at your swing speed. Generally, faster swing speeds require a higher compression golf ball. The opposite is true for slower swing speeds.

• Best golf balls for high swing speeds
• Best golf balls for slow swing speeds

If you match the compression rating with your swing speed, you’ll get optimal distance and spin rates. Those are both important if you want to improve scores.

So, how do you figure out your swing speed?

The best way to figure it out is by testing it on a launch monitor. If you go to Topgolf or a local golf shop, you should be able to figure it out. Another way is by looking at your driver’s distance.

It’s not a perfect solution, but it should give you a better idea. Once you know that, you then need to decide which Srixon ball you’d like to play. In most cases, the Z-Star series is for fast swing speeds, the Soft Feel series are for slower swing speeds, and the Q-Star series is somewhere in the middle.

Srixon Z-Star

• Handicap : Low
• Feel : Softer
• Compression : 90
• Flight : Mid
• Driver Spin : Low
• Wedge Spin : Highest

The standard Z-Star ball is made up of 3 pieces and is designed for low handicaps. If you’re a more skilled golfer with a faster than average swing speed, this could be for you.

What is the compression of the Z-Star? The Z-Star has a compression rating of 90, which makes it ideal for better golfers with a swing speed between 90-100 MPH.

Compared to the other two options, this ball feels the softest . Part of the reason is the softer outer shell, but the other reason is that the compression rating is 10 fewer. You can see the difference between soft and hard golf balls here.

Since the compression rating is a bit less, the required swing speed is also less. At these swing speeds, you’ll get the most distance, the ball will feel really solid, and your spin rates should be right.

Another difference between the other two balls is that this one has the lowest ball flight . It’s not by a lot, but it should give you a bit more rollout, which will help you get a few extra yards.

The spin rates with the driver are also on the lower side, which should help you get straighter golf shots. Straighter shots mean more distance, which is always a good thing.

The final difference is that this ball has the most greenside spin . I don’t know if you can quickly stop the ball on the green, but if you can’t (and want to), this might be the way to go.

Who plays Srixon Z-Star: Keegan Bradley, Inbee Park.

Similar to: Titleist Pro V1, Callaway Chrome Soft.

Srixon Z-Star XV

• Handicap: Low
• Compression: 102
• Flight: Mid-High
• Driver Spin: Low
• Wedge Spin: High

The Z-Star XV is Srixon’s most used ball on tour and takes what the standard Z-Star offers and adds an extra layer (4 piece), which increases the compression rating compared to the standard Z-Star. This means that you’ll need a slightly faster swing speed to benefit.

RELATED : 3 vs 4 Piece Golf Balls

What is the compression of the Z-Star XV? The Z-Star XV has a compression rating of 102, which makes it ideal for better golfers with a swing speed above 100 MPH.

Adding the extra layer will help reduce the amount of driver spin as your swing speed increases. This should help with straighter shots and more fairways found.

Just like with all Z-Star models, the outer shell is made from a softer urethane material . It’s not quite as soft as the standard Z-Star, but it’s on the softer side. Most people prefer that, but it doesn’t really impact the performance.

One of the differences between the Z-Star and Z-Star XV is that the XV will fly a little bit higher . This should give you a bit more distance as well if you swing the club fast enough (100+ MPH).

When it comes to spin rates, both Z-Star models produce low driver spin, which will help hit straight shots. The difference comes from greenside spin , since the XV spins a bit less. It’s still a high spinning ball, but it’s not quite as much.

Who plays Srixon Z-Star XV: Shane Lowry, Graeme McDowell, Hideki Matsuyama.

Similar to: Titleist Pro V1x, Callaway Chrome Soft X.

Srixon Z-Star Diamond

• Driver Spin: Mid
• Wedge Spin: Higher

The Z-Star Diamond is the latest golf ball in this series and is very similar to the XV. The main difference is that it’s designed for tour players like Brooks Koepka.

One of the differences between the XV and Diamond is that this ball has one less layer . Having one less layer should give you a bit more spin with the driver, which has its pros and cons.

The overall feel of the ball is exactly the same as the XV and so are the ball flight and the compression rating. This means you’ll need an above-average swing speed to see the full benefits.

What is the compression of the Srixon Z-Star Diamond? The Diamond has a compression rating of 102, which is the same as the XV. This makes the Diamond ideal for golfers with a swing speed above 100 MPH.

There are really only two differences between the Diamond and the XV. The first is that this ball will spin more off the tee . This could better help you control the height and shape of the ball.

That being said, if you occasionally hook or slice the ball, it could make that worse.

The second difference is that this ball has a bit more greenside spin . It’s not as much as the standard Z-Star but it’s more than the XV.

Who plays Srixon Z-Star Diamond: Brooks Koepka.

Similar to: Titleist Pro V1x, Bridgestone Tour B XS.

Srixon Q-Star

Handicap: Mid Layers: 2 Feel: Soft Compression: 72 Flight: Mid-High Driver Spin: Low Wedge Spin: Mid

The Q-Star is a middle-of-the-range golf ball that is built for mid-handicappers . It sits between the Soft Feel and Z-Star and offers some of the benefits of each ball.

The standard Q-Star is built with 2 layers and has a lower compression rating compared to the Z-Star, which means it’s good for slightly slower swing speeds.

What is the compression of the Srixon Q-Star? The Q-Star has a compression rating of 72, which makes it perfect for mid-handicap golfers with a swing speed between 75-95 MPH.

Just like with all Srixon balls, the Q-Star has a softer outer cover, which I think most people like. That being said, it’s not quite as soft feeling as the Q-Star Tour. The Q-Star has an Ionomer cover while the Tour has a urethane cover.

The second difference between these balls is that this one will fly a little bit higher . It’s not by much, but it should be enough to give people with slower swing speeds a bit more distance.

When it comes to driver spin , both balls are exactly the same. They both produce low driver spin, but the differences come closer to the green. The standard Q-Star doesn’t spin quite as much off the wedge.

In my opinion, most people won’t be able to tell much of a difference between the standard Q-Star and the Tour. They fly pretty similarly off the tee and it’s only a slight difference around the greens.

Who should use: A “higher” mid handicapper who wants to save a bit of money and can’t yet put spin on their wedges.

Similar to : Bridgestone e12 Contact, Callaway ERC Soft & Titleist Tour Soft

Srixon Q-Star Tour

Handicap: Mid Layers: 3 Feel: Softer Compression: 72 Flight: Mid Driver Spin: Low Wedge Spin: Mid

The Q-Star Tour is pretty similar to the standard Q-Star, but I think it’s a better choice for “better” mid handicappers with a slightly faster swing speed .

The first difference is that the Tour has one extra layer (3 piece). The cover on the Tour is urethane, which makes it feel a little softer and spin more around the green.

RELATED : 2 vs 3 Piece Golf Balls

The compression rating is exactly the same, which makes it ideal for golfers with the same swing speeds. Slower swing speeds should go with the Soft Feel ball. For faster speeds, the Z-Star might be better.

What’s the compression of the Srixon Q-Star Tour? The Tour has a compression rating of 72, which is the same as the standard Q-Star. This makes the ball ideal for golfers with a swing speed between 75-95 MPH.

The ball flight will also be a bit lower with this ball. It’s not something you’d clearly notice, but it could give you a few extra yards if you have a faster swing speed.

The spin rates are exactly the same off the tee but the Tour will bite the green a bit better . If you can’t spin the ball, you won’t notice a difference. If you can spin the ball, this could be a better choice.

The reason this ball will bite the greens more is because of the urethane cover . It’s what higher-end balls have and is why this ball is a bit more expensive.

Who should use: A “better” mid handicap who has a faster swing speed (85-95 MPH) and can actually put spin on their wedge shots.

Similar to : Taylormade Tour Response & Callaway Chrome Soft

Srixon Soft Feel

Handicap: High Layers: 2 Feel: Softest Compression: 70 Flight: Mid-High Driver Spin: Low Wedge Spin: Low

These balls were my favorite for quite a while and are ideal for beginners, high handicaps, or anyone who doesn’t want to spend a fortune on golf balls.

They’re made of 2 pieces and are the softest golf balls from Srixon. The compression rating is also the lowest, which makes them designed for slower swing speeds.

What is the compression of the Srixon Soft Feel? Both the Soft Feel and Soft Feel Lady have a compression of 70, which makes them ideal for golfers with a swing speed less than 85 MPH.

Having a lower compression rating will help you get more distance with a slower swing speed. If you use a ball with a higher compression rating, it’ll probably go low and with not much distance. You can see our high vs low compression golf ball test here.

The biggest benefit of this ball is that it produces very little driver spin. Most beginners and high handicaps slice the ball off the planet. That’s caused by sidespin.

Playing this ball won’t fix that, but it should reduce that spin more than any of the others. Straighter shots will lead to more distance and more fairways found.

The reason I don’t play these balls anymore is that they don’t spin much around the green. This won’t matter for average golfers because they probably can’t put spin on any ball.

What’ll happen is that you’ll land the ball on the green and it’ll just roll out. If you want your ball to bite quickly on the green, you’ll need a higher-end ball. That’s why I prefer the Q-Star (I’m a mid-handicap though).

If you’re a female golfer, you might want to consider the Soft Feel Lady . It’s pretty much the same but it’ll launch the ball slightly higher, which could give you a bit more distance.

Who should use: A beginner, high handicapper, or mid-handicap who doesn’t want to spend a lot on balls.

Similar to : Titleist TruFeel, Wilson Duo Soft+ & Callaway Supersoft

What Srixon Ball Should You Use?

If you’re a fan of Srixon golf balls but don’t know which one to use, there are a few things you need to look at. The most important thing is what your current skill level is and how much you want to pay.

A golfer just getting started should definitely not use the same ball as someone shooting in the 70s. These golfers need their balls to do different things and that’s why Srixon makes different models.

As your ball starts to offer more features, the price will also increase. Beginners and high handicaps shouldn’t spend a whole lot of money on balls because they’ll lose a bunch. Once you get better, you can pay for better performance.

Other things to consider are your swing speed, shot height, spin rates, and feel. We’ll jump into everything you need to know, but generally, they make balls that fit into three different categories: low, mid, and high handicap.

Our Testing Process : We test products for several weeks or months before writing our reviews so we can help you find the right product.  Learn more here .

Best Srixon Golf Ball For Low Handicappers

The best Srixon golf ball for most low handicaps is the standard Z-Star . Both the Z-Star XV and Z-Star Diamond are alternative choices, but these balls have a higher compression rating and are suited for faster than average swing speeds.

The reason these balls are suited for better players ( shooting in the 70s ) is that the compression rating is higher and they spin more. Since this is the case, they’ll be quite a bit more expensive than the others.

A higher compression rating will give you the most distance when your swing speed gets high enough. Anything above 90 MPH with the driver is when you might want to look at these balls.

A higher spin rate will help you control the ball better around the course. More spin lets you control the shape and trajectory of your shot and will also help you stop the ball quickly on the green.

You might be able to use these balls as a mid handicapper with a fast swing speed, but I don’t think you’d see enough benefit to justify the higher price.

For me (a mid handicapper), I prefer the Q-Star balls . I’m not good enough to get the difference between these balls and the Q-Star balls. I’ll save my money for now and stick with the cheaper balls.

The choice of what model you should add to your bag will depend on the feel of the ball and how much it spins. I think the majority of recreational players would prefer the standard Z-Star. Let’s quickly touch on the key differences.

Srixon Z-Star : This ball is the softest option with the highest spin rates. It’s built for golfers with swing speeds of at least 90 MPH and is going to fit the majority of recreational golfers.

Srixon Z-Star XV : This ball is firmer and will spin less than the standard Z-Star. It’s built for golfers with swing speeds of at least 100 MPH and will have a lower ball flight.

Srixon Z-Star Diamond : This ball is firmer than the standard Z-Star and will spin more than the XV. It’s somewhere between the other two balls. The compression rating is the same as the XV and the spin rates are similar to the Z-Star. The idea is more distance with more spin.

Best Srixon Golf Ball For Mid Handicappers

The best Srixon ball for mid-handicappers is the Srixon Q-Star Tour . This ball offers better performance compared to the Srixon Soft Feel, but it won’t cost as much as a tour-level ball.

The Q-Star series is Srixon’s mid-tier ball that offers better performance at a cheaper price. It essentially sits between the Soft Feel and Z-Star and is a great mid handicapper golf ball .

The reason these balls are suited for mid-handicaps is that the spin rates are higher than the Soft Feel. The Soft Feel is a perfect ball for some, but as you start getting better (shooting in the 80s), you probably want a bit more spin.

More spin will help you control the ball better. You probably want to start working on your short game spin; having the ball land on the green, bounce once or twice, and then stop.

High handicaps won’t be able to do this and that’s why there’s no point in spending the extra money. Plus, they’ll lose quite a few balls per round.

On the other hand, low handicaps will probably want more spin. The reason I wouldn’t recommend the Z-Star for a mid-handicap is that they won’t benefit from the increased spin. You won’t be able to stop the ball any quicker and it can actually make your hook or slice worse.

The Q-Star is a good mix of performance and value. You’ll have the choice between the standard Q-Star and Q-Star Tour, but I think Srixon is leaning more towards the tour (I would too).

Srixon Q-Star vs Q-Star Tour: Both Q-Star balls perform very similarly off the tee in terms of distance and ball flight. The main difference comes from the slightly softer feel and increased short game spin of the Q-Star Tour.

Best Srixon Golf Ball For High Handicappers

The best Srixon ball for beginners, seniors, and high handicappers is the Srixon Soft Feel . These balls are built to provide the most forgiveness and increased distance for golfers with slower swing speeds.

These balls are Srixon’s entry-level model, but just because that’s the case doesn’t mean they aren’t as good as the others. All it means is that they’re for a different type of golfer. They’re a great golf ball for average golfers , which is anyone who shoots above 90 .

When you’re first getting started, you’re going to lose a lot of balls. That’s why one of the most important factors to look for is the price. These balls are much cheaper than any of the other models.

For high handicaps , one of the best ways to lower scores is to hit more fairways and greens in regulation. The Soft Feel ball has the lowest amount of spin, which will help hit straighter shots.

The downside is that it also means you won’t get much spin around the greens. That being said, beginners and high handicaps won’t be able to spin any type of ball anyway.

For senior golfers , one of the things you might struggle with is a decreasing swing speed. You might not swing the club as fast as you used to, which means you probably don’t hit the ball as high or as far as before.

The Soft Feel ball is designed to fly high and fly far for golfers with slower swing speeds . This also makes them a good choice for lady golfers .

Even as a mid handicap with a moderate swing speed, I still really like these balls. Golf is so much easier when you’re hitting your second shot from the fairway. The only downside is the short game spin.

Srixon Soft Feel vs Soft Feel Lady: The only difference is that the Lady will fly a little bit higher. Both balls have the same amount of layers, the same compression rating, and the same amount of wedge spin.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which Srixon ball is most like Pro V1? The ball that is closest to the Pro V1 is the Srixon Z-Star. Both balls have 3 layers, have the same compression rating, and produce high greenside spin.

Which Srixon golf ball is the softest? The softest ball by Srixon is their Soft Feel model. This ball is designed for distance and forgiveness, which makes it ideal for high handicap golfers.

Articles Up Next:

• Do Low Spin Golf Balls Go Further?
• The Highest And Lowest Spinning Golf Balls
• Best Low Spin Golf Balls

What To Do Next:

Enter Our Gear Giveaway : Like free golf stuff? A few times per year, we pick a few of our viewers and send them some gifts. Click here to learn more.

Deals & Discounts : We’ve worked with brands to offer discounts to our readers. See our deals and discounts page to see our current promotions.

Write For Us : Calling all hackers, whackers, and golf enthusiasts. Out Of Bounds Golf is looking for writers. If you’d like to get paid to write about golf, click here for more info.

Hey, I'm Jon. I started Out Of Bounds Golf to share my findings after testing golf gear for the past 10+ years. My goal is to make the game a little easier to understand, whether that's with finding the right product or answering common questions. I currently live in the Pacific Northwest.

Get plugged in…

Test & Review the New Srixon Q STAR Tour

More in bag chatter:.

Test the New Srixon Q STAR Tour Golf Balls

Are you interested in trying the new Srixon Q STAR Tour golf balls and letting the world know what you think of them?  This is your chance.

We will be choosing eight golfers to receive both of Srixon’s newest golf balls.  Here’s how you can be one of them.

How to Enter

Step 1: Post a comment below with your name, location, handicap, and your current golf ball of choice.

Step 2: On Tuesday, April 18, we will contact eight golfers via email to get your shipping address.

Step 3: Test the Srixon Q STAR Tour balls against your current gamers.

Step 4: Fill out a questionnaire about how the Q STAR Tour performed.  Your answers will be shared on PluggedInGolf.com.

REMEMBER: If your entry does not include your name, location, handicap, and ball of choice, you will not be eligible.  Also, make sure you use your real email address when posting the comment so that we can contact you.

Recent Posts

• Mitsubishi Diamana Putter Shaft Review - April 9, 2024
• Golf Pride Reverse Taper Putter Grip Review - April 9, 2024
• TaylorMade Qi10 Tour Rescue Hybrid Review - April 8, 2024

86 Comments

Q Star Tour review describes the type of golf ball that is compatible with my swing and falls within my price range.

My name is Bob Forberg and I’m from Michigan. I am currently a 5 handicap and am a avid golfer. My current balls of choice are the Bridgestone RXS, Srixon Z star and the Volvik VIBE. I would love to try out the new Q Star Tour as the original Q star did not quite have enough spin around the greens for me. I love Srixon and would hope this ball fits the bill as I do like the price range!!

David silk Edinburgh Scotland 14.9 Wilson staff DX3 Urethane

James Nugent, New York, NY. 15.9 HCP. I play the Srixon Q Star

I like the super white look of the ball , have tries occasionally when I have found a new one but have played Pro V 1X for several years but could be persuaded to switch if ball is better

Interested in testing Q Star Tour ball to compare w/ Pro V

Handicap = 9 Vero Beach, FL Bridgestone B330-RXS

Andy Greenwald, 11, Titleist Pro V1X or Callaway Supersoft (depends on weather)

Sugar Land, TX

Current ball: Srixon Z-star (2015)

I usually play with Callaway’s Chrome Soft ball but I have also played with Srixon’s Z Star ball. I haven’t played with the Q Star or the Q Star Tour ball. I would like to test the Q Star Tour ball vs. Chrome Soft.

Steve Doylestown (Bucks County) PA Callaway SuperSoft GHIN Handicap 8.2

Ken New Jersey 5 Bridgestone E6 Soft

St. Cloud, MN Handicap index- 6.5 Current ball- Bridgestone B330-S

I would like to test the Q star tour. My current ball Wilson Duo Urethane. Ed Fiedler, Spring Hill, Florida. Handicap is 13

Tim Rhode Island Handicap – 9 Nike RZN Platinum

Joey Worley, Tri-County golf course Teague texas, 13, Pro-V1X

My index is 13.6. I currently use Chrome Soft. I winter in Tucson and home is East Amherst, NY

Yes, I’d love to test out the new Q Star Tour ball. Charles Bartholomew Massachusetts 12 Titleist

Charsleton, South Carolina, 4.6 handicap, ProV1 X (Pre – 2017, as it appears the 2017 V1 & V1x are opposite from before).

BRIAN TAYLOR 3524 S BERYL AVE TUCSON AZ 85735 HCP 7 TITLEIST PRO V1

Handicap – 14 Location – Troy, IL Current ball – bridgestone e6 soft

I am 70 years old and play to 4.9 handicap index. I play at a private club. For years I played Prov1’s and recently switched to Snell MTB ball. They are both good balls that do different things. The Snell flies a little farther but does not spin around the greens that well. The Pro V spins great but is not as durable as it should for the price. I am looking for a better overall ball that cover spin rate of the the full shots and around the greens. I am still an average 270 yards driver of the tee ball so distance is not my major concern.

13 handicap Sunny Florida Q Star Tour Callaway Soft.

I have been playing the Srixon (yellow) soft feel golf ball around eight years. If I change to a different ball I would like to try another Srixon golf ball. Thanks John Wilson.

Located in NW Ohio. Golf season is here! Currently gaming Costco K-sig n Callaway Chrome Soft.

(Forgot handicap in last post…ugh) NW Ohio Handicap 8.8 Gaming Costco Ksigs n Callaway Chrome Soft currently. Thx!

John Sweat Warner Robins, GA, Handicap: 18 Ball: Supersoft or B330RX

I live in Oakmont, PA and I am a 10 handicap. My current ball is the Srixon Z Star.

Greg Crowder, I currently am playing the Callaway Chrome Soft. Changed recently from the Srixon Soft Feel. My current Handicap Index is 17.7. Summer 2016 ended at 12.7. Live in White Rock BC. Play 52 weeks a year. Winter play pushes our Handicaps up. I manage a Golf Group of 24 golfers. We play every Saturday and have a few local travel rounds to North Washington State. We also do a 4 day 6 round event at Desert Canyon in Orondo, WA. My wife and I spend a couple weeks in Palm Springs and Las Vegas every year. I play every day when we are there.

Name: Ryan Location: Los Altos, CA Handicap: 17 Ball of choice: Snell My Tour Ball

Co. Kerry – Ireland. Hcp 8. Titleist PROV1

Pick me for the Srixon tour ball testing. My name is Mark Ecklund, I golf in Moorhead MN and I have a 1.2 handicap index. My current ball of choice is the Titleist Pro V1.

Jack California 10.3 GHIN Snell MTB This ball fits my swing speed of 87 mph with the driver. Would enjoy the chance to give them as go!

your name, location, handicap, and ball of choice, you will not be eligible

My name is Mike, I’m sixty years young with a 12 handicap & currently use Bridgestone’s e-6. Playing two or three rounds a week I would love to put the new Srixon Q Star Tour Balls too the test. Living here in Downers Grove, just twenty miles west of downtown Chicago we’re just a short drive from several dozen top notch courses of every stripe where I can put the Q-STAR through most every conceivable challenge.

Thanks for the opportunity, Michael J Henkle A.K.A. 1GolfJones

I am new to golf (~9 months) and do not know how to pick a golf ball. I have found one that I do not like, but that is about all I know. I have enjoyed playing with Srixon balls and have never been disappointed in the ball (just with myself) and would love to post a review of them I am still so bad, that I do not even have a handicap yet.

Tim R Rhode Island Nike RZN Tour Platinum Handicap – 9

Jake Jamison Chico, CA Srixon z star Handicap index – 12.2

Bret Van Riessen Sioux Center, Iowa Callaway Chrome soft Current GHIN is 0.2

Thanks for the opportunity!

Mike Cunningham Connecticut 16.3 HDCP Currently using Taylormade TP5

Looking for pro v1 type that fits my budget and swing John Crow Louisville,KY 40220 Pro V1

Srixon Q Star Dennis O. 17.7 Handicap Minnesota

Post a comment below with your name, location, handicap, and your current golf ball of choice.

Nave El-Modigi Ann Arbor, MI Bridgestone B-330 RXS Handicap – 9

Mark Matz Arlington Heights,IL HDCP: 20 Current ball: B330RXSn

Dan C Alabama Titleist NXT & Trusoft HC – 13

Nave El-Modigi Ann Arbor, MI 9 Bridgestone B-330 RXS

David Ball Atlanta, GA 20.2 Volvik Vibe

Would love to try these balls Lyle Bennewies Waterloo, Ontario, Canada 20 HC Callaway Chrome Soft

Dan C Alabama Titleist NXT & DT Trusoft HC- 13

My name is Tom Coffey and I live in Windsor, Ontario Canada. My handicap is 14 and I currently play the project A from taylormade. I will put the Srixon Q STAR to the test . Thanks

Currently playing a taylormade tour preferred and am always looking for an extra edge. I am not fully versed in which ball I should be playing with so would love to know if I am missing a trick when it comes to ball selection.

6 handicap, Cape Town, South Africa

My name is Rick TALLEY, and I live in Granite City, Illinois (about 15 minutes from downtown St. Louis, Mo). I have a 6 handicap and currently play the new Bridgestone e6 Soft; which replaced the Wilson Duo. I’ve tried just about every ball on the market, and if it weren’t for price, I would be playing Snell’s MTB or the new Taylormade Tpx. Thanks for your consideration.

Dillon Black London, Ontario, Canada Current Ball – ProV1x Handicap – 4

Brentwood, TN Handicap 12 Callaway Chrome Soft

Name – Allan K Location – North Jersey Handicap – 13 Ball of choice – Snell MTB

Allan K North Jersey 13 Snell MTB

I’m in Dartmouth, MA, playing off a 22.5. My current ball of choice is the W/S Duo Spin.

Anthony Tran Location. Bismarck,ND Handicap. 29 Current Ball Taylormade Project A

Tyler Belle, Missouri Handicap: 12 Callaway Chrome Soft

Great opportunity Jack O’Neal California 10.3 GHIN Snell MTB / 2016 B330 RX

Charlie Pevcevicius Mississauga, Ontario Handicap 19.3 Titleist Pro V1 & V1X

I PRESENTLY USE SRIXON Q STAR GOLF BALL, SINCE CHANGING FROM CALLAWAY SOFT FEEL FOR AN INCREASE OF AT LEAST 30 YARD’S, NOT BAD FOR A 71 YEAR OLD

I currently play the zstar Iv I like the ball it performs well and is a great value but doesn’t seem as soft as the prov

Handicap is 5.0, current ball is Chrome Soft. Fort Smith, AR

I am playing Taylormade TP5X and it is great, it would be hard for any ball to bear the TP5X but I will give an honest appraisal. My HC is 13.9. I live in Elkin,NC 28621 I play at the Forrest Pines GC.

Edwin Banks HCP 9 Berkshire Ball of choice – Wilson FG Tour Would love to try the new Srixon Q ball and will fully compare it against others I’ve used in 30+ years of golfing

Mark Johnson 7 Titleist Pro V1

76 yrs. 11 hdcp Srixon Q Star Have been thinking of buying the Q Star Tour to compare to the original. I want a ball that holds well in the short game and feels relatively soft on the putter face.

John Reedy age 69 handicap 13.7 currently play Bridgestone b330rxs Compare to current ball.

Dave Seward Orlando, Fl. 7 handicap Ball of choice TP5x

Manja Nijeveen, The Netherlands 15.5 hcp Pinnacle gold

Irvine, CA 6.3 Bridgestone e6 / B330RX

16-Handicap

Currently playing Wilson Staff Duo Spin Previous Callaway Chrome Age 68 Short Hitter Climate: Minnesota

Handicap 6 Peterborough, Cambridgeshire Z Star and Pro V1

Bonjour Handicap 16.8 je joue les titleist nxt tour, je suis en France, région ile de france. Je cherche ma prochaine balle après avoir essayé Bridgestone E7, E6, dunlop NZV9-V3, Callaway superhot, et bien d’autres… Cordialement.

22 hcp – always use SRIXON balls sorted depending on course and weather conditions but mostly AD333

Name: Jason Norris Location: North Carolina Handicap: 9 Ball: Snell MTB

Already lots of high marks for this ball from various sources! Jack O’Neal California 10.3 GHIN Snell MTB / 2016 B330 RX

Brad Schut Grand Rapids , Mi Handicap 9.7 Nike RZN Black/ Bridgestone B330S

Ed Ahlstrand Florida 14 GHIN TM project (a)

Bennebroek, Netherlands Handicap: 19 Wilson DX2 soft

I would like to try the Q Star tour.

Handicap – 28.5 Tiltilest Pro v 1 Callawy soft Recently retired and playing at least 5 days a week. I only have about 40 games under my belt but i have already dropped 15 strokes a game averaging 105. My short game is the worst part and any help would be great!

Andrew Marks Mentor, Ohio Handicap – 9.8 I currently game a mix of chrome soft, nxt tour s, and super soft in the colder months. Used to play trispeed tours but wanted to look for something softer so I’ve switched to the 3 above.

Hie! I’m a10 handicap player,I play with (C.supersoft and W s Duo )I play three game a week at different golf course in Quebec some green are hard some soft.But every year I’m in Ft.lauderdale for 5 month.I Think that I’m a good candidat To try the New Q star Tour but only the Q Star because my swing speed is not over 100 mph.I’m ready to send you my comment (English and French) as you.

Vista, CA Hcp: 9.7 TaylorMade TP5

Pick me! Pick me! [seriously, pick me…I golf 2xweek, practice 3xweek, and am a total gearhead. My lousy handicap is due to poor approach shots. Got hcp down to 21; now working it back down]. Name: Jonathan Compton Location: Albuquerque, NM (recent transplant from The Villages, FL, where golf is king), Moving to Tuscon in April. Handicap: 24, Ball of choice: Snell MTB-Black

Leave a Comment Cancel

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Address

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Mitsubishi Diamana Putter Shaft Review
• Golf Pride Reverse Taper Putter Grip Review
• Golf News – April 8, 2024
• TaylorMade Qi10 Tour Rescue Hybrid Review
• 2024 Valero Texas Open Recap

Contact Us Advertise Subscribe

Advertise on this site.

Plugged In Golf

Do You Like Free Golf Gear?

Sign up for our weekly newsletter and not only will you get the latest reviews, instruction, and more delivered directly to your inbox, you’ll also be entered into regular giveaways for golf clubs and more.

TaylorMade Tour Response vs Srixon Q-Star Tour

Our verdict on the TaylorMade Tour Response vs Srixon Q-Star Tour golf balls

• Sign up to Golf Monthly Newsletter Newsletter

Ball Flight

Which ball should you choose.

The Tour Response offers premium-like performance without the price tag. It is great for those who have a faster-than-average swing speed and want good control around the greens too.

• Great all-round feel
• Distance off the tee
• More affordable price
• Slightly quicker swing speed needed

With a short game feel and control to rival many premium models, the Srixon Q-Star Tour is a hugely impressive performer in the increasingly competitive mid-priced golf ball category.

• Impressive short game spin
• Delivers good height and distance
• Soft feel off the putter
• Price is near tour level balls

In this review, we compare the TaylorMade Tour Response golf ball with the Srixon Q-Star Tour, to see which of these mid-range balls delivers the best performance for golfers on a budget.

TaylorMade consumer surveys found that many golfers play expensive premium balls that aren’t suited to their actual playing ability and wanted to tempt golfers to look beyond market leading tour balls.

The result was the TaylorMade Tour Response. Srixon is also targeting the same golf demographic with its Q-Star Tour ball, its softest ball delivering tour level performance. 

Both balls are made with urethane covers, the gold standard material used to cover most of the best golf balls and both have an overall compression around the 70-72 mark, significantly lower than market-leading balls like the Titleist Pro V1 and Pro V1x .

We tested both on the golf course and on a launch monitor to see how they compared.

The TaylorMade Tour Response looks like an expensive premium ball. Its 322 dimples form a clean uniform pattern and it has a quality soft and tacky feel in the hand.

The numbers on the Tour Response are deep red and its branded alignment arrow shows the ball name as well as making it easy to line up drives and putts.

Get the Golf Monthly Newsletter

Subscribe to the Golf Monthly newsletter to stay up to date with all the latest tour news, equipment news, reviews, head-to-heads and buyer’s guides from our team of experienced experts.

Srixon’s Q-Star Tour ball looks and feels like its top-end Z-STAR ball but has a black number instead of red. The black alignment arrow on the side is a nice touch combining the ball name and a handy aiming guide off the tee and on the greens. As a urethane covered ball, it also has a nice sticky feel in the hand.

The TaylorMade Tour Response felt firmer than the Srixon Q-Star Tour, especially off the putter face and wedges, and with finesse shots around the green.

Srixon uses SpinSkin with SeRM, a form of flexible coating which it says digs deep into wedge and iron grooves for increased friction and maximum spin. In short game testing, both balls performed well, offer plenty of stop and a predictable reaction on landing. On pure feel and feedback, I enjoyed chipping and pitching the Srixon ball more.

It seemed softer and more responsive, especially when I didn’t quite middle it.

With centre strikes and good shots, the Tour Response reacts well, with plenty of spring and energy, but mishit shots felt dull and a little lifeless. Sometimes, the ball felt heavy and dense off the face.

The Srixon Q-Star Tour felt superior around the greens, generating more spin, especially on short to mid-range low flighted pitches. On higher softer shots, like lobs and greenside pitches, both balls performed about the same.

• Read our full TaylorMade Tour Response Ball review

The flight and spin profiles of the TaylorMade Tour Response and Srixon Q-Star Tour are similar. Both balls are pitched as mid-high launch and low spin and this pattern had merit during on-course and launch monitor testing.

For two balls with high launch low-spin characteristics and a softer compression core, you’d expect similar results. With mid to long irons, I got similar flight profiles but more stability in the flight with the Tour Response.

Both balls stopped quickly on approach shots into greens but the Tour Response flies a lot like the best TaylorMade golf balls with less spin and a straighter flight that doesn’t deviate.

The Q-Star Tour ball flew higher for me and was marginally less accurate in terms of dispersion on the launch monitor.

It was hard to separate the balls in terms of distance control in a round of mid-iron testing. Both were as long as tour balls I’ve played and averaged over 170 yards with 7-iron in testing – further than my stock yardage of 169 – recorded on a gapping test with a Pro V1x using a Foresight GC2 launch monitor.

In driver testing, TaylorMade Tour Response was a clear favourite for me.

It launched high and flew with a stable consistent flight. The spin rate was a touch high at just below 3000rpm, but it didn’t prevent the ball getting out there. On course, in a stiff breeze, it flew with a nice rainbow flight and seemed to cut through wind well.

The Srixon Q-Star Tour launched and flew higher but felt spinny on the course and testing it on the launch monitor, I just couldn’t get the distance I was achieving with the Tour Response.

Both balls performed well around the green, the Srixon Q-Star Tour edging it slightly because of its combination its softer feel and grippier cover on chips and pitches.

Launch monitor testing showed that the Q-Star Tour span more with my wedges than the TaylorMade Tour Response but that the TaylorMade ball held a tighter dispersion and was generally more consistent in peak flight.

The TaylorMade Tour Response ball feels like a softer and cheaper version of the brand’s elite TP5 and TP5 X balls with its only downside being a firm, dull feel on off-centre strikes.

Srixon’s Q-Star Tour excels around the green and held its own in long game testing but didn’t click for me off the tee.

Considering the price point, I would rate both balls comfortably in the best mid-price golf balls category delivering tour-like performance, soft feel and ample distance. It’s likely that moderate to slower swingers will experience better distance gains by switching to a softer lower compression ball with a thinner faster cover.

Choose the TaylorMade Tour Response if... - You want a value-for-money three piece golf ball that performs close to premium equivalents - You want higher launch, consistent distance and stable flight in the long game - You prefer a firmer feel on short shots - Value durability over time

Choose the Srixon Q-Star Tour if… - You like a soft feeling high spinning ball around the greens - Want to flight it higher with your irons and driver - You are already accurate with your iron play but need short game improvements

Matthew Moore fell in love with golf hitting an old 3-iron around his school playing field imagining rugby posts were flags and long jump pits as bunkers.

He earned golf scholarships to the University of St Andrews and Emory University, Atlanta, U.S.A and dreamed of playing professionally before training as a journalist.

He has worked at Golf Monthly and CNN Sports as well as covering golf news, features, products and travel as a freelance writer and TV presenter for newspapers, magazines and corporate clients. Matthew has interviewed Ryder Cup Captains, Major Champions and legends of the game and rates sharing a glass of rioja and a bowl of nuts with Miguel Angel Jimenez as his favourite moment. Matthew plays off 1, has won five club championships and aced the first hole of Augusta National’s Par-3 course in 2002.

TaylorMade’s Tour Response tested against its sister ball – TaylorMade Soft Response

By Matthew Moore Published 25 November 21

Which ball came out on top in a head-to-head between TaylorMade’s tour performance golf balls?

By Matthew Moore Last updated 8 September 22

TaylorMade’s Tour Response ball tested against its sibling rival – TaylorMade Project (a)

By Matthew Moore Last updated 21 July 22

LIV Golf Miami champion Dean Burmester refused to say that he deserved to be in the Masters field despite admitting he's playing some of the best golf of his career

By Elliott Heath Published 8 April 24

The five-time Green Jacket winner was pictured at Augusta National, as he makes his first start since February

By Matt Cradock Published 7 April 24

• Contact Future's experts
• Terms and conditions
• Privacy policy
• Accessibility statement
• Cookies policy
• Advertise with us

Golf Monthly is part of Future plc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site . © Future Publishing Limited Quay House, The Ambury, Bath BA1 1UA. All rights reserved. England and Wales company registration number 2008885.

Srixon launches fourth-generation Q-Star Tour golf ball

Srixon Golf has today introduced the fourth-generation of its Q-Star Tour golf ball.

The new ball is designed to fit moderate swing speed players that seek the distance and spin of a tour-caliber ball, and speaking on the latest addition, Brian Schielke, General Manager at Srixon, said

“The new and improved Q-Star Tour continues to deliver tour-caliber performance with a softer feel compared to our other tour-level offerings. This ball provides the distance all golfers need with the greenside spin and control to attack the toughest of pins.”

The Q-Star Tour features a FastLayer Core designed to provide maximum distance and soft feel due to a gradual transition from soft inner core to firm outer edge.

Srixon’s Spin Skin with SeRM coating also increases friction on every strike, with the added friction and bite seeking to offer more spin and more control on approach shots and shots around the green. Per Srixon, during robotic testing commissioned by the company, the new Q-Star Tour delivered almost 400RPM more spin than a few close competitors.

In addition, a new, longer side stamp is designed to better help align putts, while a 338 Speed Dimple pattern seeks to offer a penetrating ball flight with the optimal dimple design increasing lift and reducing drag to maximize distance.

Specs, Availability & Price

• Price: $34.99 per dozen
• U.S. Retail Launch Date: January 26, 2022
• Color Offerings: Pure White, Tour Yellow

Coolest thing for sale in the GolfWRX Classifieds (1/26/22): Vega VM-02 Kyoei Forged irons

Srixon ZX7 vs Mizuno Pro 223 irons – GolfWRXers discuss

Gianni is the Managing Editor at GolfWRX. He can be contacted at [email protected] .

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed .

You may like

Whats in the bag, michael s. kim witb 2024 (april).

• Michael S. Kim what’s in the bag accurate as of the Valero Texas Open.

Driver: Titleist TSR3 (10 degrees, B1 SureFit setting) Shaft: Graphite Design Tour AD DI 8 X

3-wood: Ping G430 Max (15 degrees) Shaft: Graphite Design Tour AD UB 8 TX

Check out more in-hand photos of Michael Kim’s clubs here.

Irons: Titleist T200 (3, 4), Titleist T100 (5-PW) Shafts: Graphite Design Tour AD IZ 95 X (3), Nippon N.S. Pro Modus3 Tour 120 S

Wedges: Titleist Vokey Design SM9 (52-12F), SM10 (56-14F), WedgeWorks Proto (60-L) Shafts: True Temper Dynamic Gold Tour Issue S300

Putter: L.A.B. Link.1 Grip: SuperStroke Zenergy Tour 1.0P 17

Grips: Golf Pride MCC

Ball: Titleist Pro V1x

Check out more in-hand photos of Michael Kim’s clubs here. 

TaylorMade BRNR Mini Driver Copper: Leveraging 90s nostalgia

TaylorMade is leaning in even further to the retro vibes with the 2024 edition of its BRNR Mini Driver.

Patterned after the Carlsbad-based company’s iconic late 1990s Burner driver design, the 2024 BRNR Mini features similar copper styling and a retro version of the TaylorMade logo.

Featuring the same technology as its 2023 BRNR Mini Driver, the 2024 edition continues to play the hits that saw the unique club land in the bag of tour pros, such as Tommy Fleetwood and Jake Knapp.

• Check out details on the technology in our 2023 BRNR launch story.
• See more in-hand photos and read what GolfWRXers are saying in the forums. 

Why play a mini driver?

In general, TaylorMade finds two types of golfers gravitate toward a mini driver. In the first case, it’s an addition to a standard driver: Players looking for a “fairway finder” driver without giving up too much distance that can also be hit off the deck. Second, TaylorMade recommends giving a mini a go to golfers who struggle to hit 460 cc drivers, particularly choppers. It’s a better alternative than a 3-wood off the tee.

Tommy Fleetwood’s endorsement of playing a mini driver

“For me, if I HAD to hit a fairway, I’m more comfortable hitting a driver than a 3-wood. I would tee the driver down, and I would hit a little cut, or a neck-y cut in the fairway. The 3-wood isn’t for that. The 3-wood, generally, is a pretty hot club that I’ll hit from 270 or 280 in the fairway on a par 5. You get some courses where a 3-wood is not always necessary. [With the BRNR] you put a normal swing on it, and I’m more comfortable hitting it straight. It’s a replacement for a 3-wood, basically.”

Pricing, specs, availability

TaylorMade’s new BRNR Mini Driver Copper clubs will sell for $449.99 in 11.5 (RH/LH) and 13.5 (RH) degree options, and they will be available for custom orders.

Coolest thing for sale in the GolfWRX Classifieds (4/5/24): I think I ‘Blacked Out’ trying to love these irons

At GolfWRX, we are a community of like-minded individuals that all experience and express our enjoyment of the game in many ways.

It’s that sense of community that drives day-to-day interactions in the forums on topics that range from best driver to what marker you use to mark your ball. It even allows us to share another thing we all love – buying and selling equipment.

Currently, in our GolfWRX buy/sell/trade (BST) forum, there is a listing for a set of blacked out P770 irons

From the seller: (@hammertime1515): “Just one single iron set up for grabs today. Got these right before they quote selling them at the end of February. Only played 3 full rounds with them and a couple short range sessions. 7 iron shows the most wear and 8 iron has a sandy mark on the toe (ball striking out of winter wasn’t the strong suit) Just not right for me no matter how much I wanted them to be. Price is shipped and OBO……

P770 Black Out irons. 4-PW. —New Tour Velvet Align Midsize Grips —1/2” over TM standard —2 degrees upright —Standard Lofts —Dynamic Gold 105 X100 shafts —PW has never been hit, most of them have been hit sparingly. Tried to capture the wear on the 7 iron and the toe mark on the 8 iron the best I could. Soles have virtually no scratching from use and no bag chatter. -If more pics are needed just ask ——PRICE: $1000 OBO” & Shipped

To check out the full listing in our BST forum, head through the link: Blacked out P770 irons

This is the most impressive current listing from the GolfWRX BST, and if you are curious about the rules to participate in the BST Forum you can check them out here:  GolfWRX BST Rules

Tour pro calls Anthony Kim a ‘f*****g idiot’ following Instagram comeback post

John Daly stuns fans into silence with brutal opening tee shot on PGA Tour Champions

Things got heated at the Houston Open between Tony Finau and Alejandro Tosti. Here’s why

Anthony Kim WITB 2024 (February)

This Rory McIlroy post-round ‘The Match’ moment is going viral…but all is likely not what it seems

Scottie Scheffler WITB 2024 (March)

Photos from the 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational

Anthony Kim’s speculated LIV Golf sign-on fee may surprise you

The total sum that Sergio Garcia needs to pay in fines if he wants to return to DP World Tour revealed

Report: Tiger Woods has ‘eliminated sex’ in preparation for the 2024 Masters

Michael S. Kim what’s in the bag accurate as of the Valero Texas Open. Driver: Titleist TSR3 (10 degrees, B1...

Kevin Chappell WITB 2024 (April)

Kevin Chappell what’s in the bag accurate as of the Valero Texas Open. More photos from the event here. Driver:...

Raul Pereda WITB 2024 (April)

Raul Pereda what’s in the bag accurate as of the Texas Children’s Houston Open. More photos from the event here....

Rickie Fowler WITB 2024 (April)

Rickie Fowler what’s in the bag accurate as of the Valero Texas Open. More photos from the event here. Driver: Cobra...

2-time major champ announces shock retirement from the sport at age of 33

Edoardo Molinari reveals the latest PGA Tour golfer to turn down ‘good offer’ from LIV Golf

Charlie Woods finds it tough going on American Junior Golf Association debut

Scottie Scheffler had an interesting response when asked how he ‘quiets the noise’ following Players victory

Addiction, spinal fusion, and scam artists – Everything Anthony Kim revealed in candid interview with David Feherty

Srixon Soft Feel vs Q-Star: Which One Performs Better?

Whether you are just starting in the game of golf or have played it for a few years, there is always a chance you might wonder what the differences are between the Srixon Soft Feel vs the Q-Star.

They are both popular golf balls that are very similar in their design. But some differences will make it difficult for you to decide which one to get.

In this article, we will look at these differences and help you make an informed decision.

Introducing the Srixon Soft Feel and Q-Star

Srixon soft feel golf balls:.

The Soft Feel is engineered to be Srixon’s softest golf ball. With a premium undertone and a soft feel unlike any other.

It offers exceptional distance off the tee, with low spin and high launch performance providing great height.

From the tee, the Srixon Soft Feel strengths start to show.

Especially for slower swingers, the compression on these balls create a noticeable yardage boost.

The balls have a high launch and are fairly accurate.

Due to the 338 Speed Dimple Pattern and overall design of the soft feel, these balls have little side spin and drag.

If your tee game is lacking, giving the Srixon Soft Feel Golf Balls may be worth it for the yardage and launch height.

One downside of the Srixon Soft Feel Golf Balls is the lack of spin. However, since the Soft Feel is distance balls, this is a very minor drawback.

Unfortunately, these balls are also quite expensive. Nonetheless, they blow away their counterparts in many ways.

Srixon Q-Star Golf Balls:

Meanwhile, the Q-Star Tour Divide is designed to be 50/50 matte-based, offering tour-level performance with its unique design.

The feel of this ball can be described as super-soft. Off the putter, the sound seems like a soft ”tock”.

Around the green, this ball invokes the feeling of touch. Off a driver or iron, the feel becomes firmer.

The FastLayer Core of this ball is relatively soft on the inside and becomes firmer on the outside.

This type of core allows the ball to have a remarkably high launch and low spin.

The cover material of this ball is Spin Skin with Slide Ring Material.

The main material of the cover is high-quality urethane and SeRM is just an additional coating that attaches to the cover and makes the urethane molecules more flexible, thus increasing spin and durability.

Verdict on the Soft Feel & Q-Star

Both are sure to help you improve your game on the course. Giving you more spin for lower scores!

Srixon Soft Feel vs Q-Star: Which One is Better?

Comparing Performance

The Srixon Soft Feel and Q-Star Tour golf balls offer two distinct levels of performance for different types of players.

• The Soft Feel is designed for players with a lower handicap and comprises a 2-piece construction with an ionomer cover. It has a compression rating of 60 and provides easy compression, low driver spin, and improved accuracy on full shots.
• The Q-Star Tour is designed for high handicappers and features a 3-piece construction with a urethane cover. It has a higher compression rating of 72, providing more distance off the tee while also offering enhanced greenside spin thanks to its Spinskin Coating.

Both models have thin covers that produce extra greenside spin, making them great choices for both casual golfers and serious players alike.

Distance & Spin

When it comes to comparing the Srixon Soft Feel and Q-Star golf balls for distance and spin, the Q-Star offers a slight edge.

The Q-Star has a compression of 72, making it softer than the Srixon Soft Feel’s 60 compressions.

This softness provides a better feel on contact and more spin-off of your clubface, resulting in increased overall distance.

Additionally, the Q-Star’s cover is 20% softer than the Z-Star model. This makes it possible to further increase spin rates and enhance the feel.

On the other hand, while not as long off the tee as the Q-Star Tour, Srixon Soft Feel balls are still excellent for mid-handicappers who want an all-around performance ball that won’t break their budget.

Srixon offers a variety of golf balls designed to suit different playing styles.

The Soft Feel and Q-Star Tour are two popular models that offer superior performance and feel.

The Soft Feel is the softest ball Srixon makes, featuring low spin and high launch for maximum distance.

It’s ideal for players with low to moderate swing speeds.

On the other hand, the Q-Star Tour is a mid-tier ball that sits between the Soft Feel and Z-Star in terms of performance.

It provides an excellent feel without sacrificing its power, making it perfect for high handicappers who need extra control on their shots.

Both balls offer excellent feel and performance, so it’s up to you to decide which one best suits your game!

When it comes to durability, both models have been designed to last, with the Soft Feel being slightly more resilient due to its firmer construction.

However, the Q-Star Tour’s soft core provides greater control and spin rates which can be beneficial on short shots around the green.

Ultimately, both balls provide good longevity and performance so choosing between them depends on personal preference and playing style.

Visual Appeal

When comparing the visual appeal of Srixon Soft Feel and Q-Star, it’s clear that the Q-Star has a more premium look to it.

Its sleek, modern design stands out from the classic look of the Srixon Soft Feel.

The Q-Star also has a softer feel than its predecessor, making it a great choice for those looking for a high-end golf ball with an extra layer of comfort.

Both balls are excellent options for any golfer looking for a reliable and visually appealing ball.

Final Thoughts: Which Ball is Right for You?

The Srixon Soft Feel and Q-Star golf balls offer players two solid choices in terms of performance, feel, and spin.

• The Soft Feel is best for senior players who are looking for a low compression ball with a soft feel to maximize their distance.
• The Q-Star Tour is best suited for high handicappers and offers great spin control on the greens, thanks to its thinner urethane cover.

Both balls have Spin Skin technology to help increase the amount of spin generated by wedges and irons.

In conclusion, both of these golf balls provide excellent performance features that are sure to improve your game.

Related Posts:

• KBS Tour vs C Taper Shafts: Comparison
• Is Golfpass Worth It?
• TruGolf Mini Simulator Review
• Vokey SM8 vs. SM9 Wedges: Are There Any Differences?
• Miura vs Mizuno Clubs: Which Is Better?

Want to Get Better at Golf?

Get "ben hogan's five lessons" and join thousands of others improving their golf skills..

Learn the Fundamentals: Stance and Posture > Golf Grip > The Swing.

This book has LOADS of positive reviews. THOUSANDS OF REVIEWS. A MILLION COPY SOLD. CHEAP!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Regent Seven Seas Cruises

Best of Moscow by high speed train

By shuguley , February 15, 2014 in Regent Seven Seas Cruises

Recommended Posts

Sure would appreciate someone who has taken "Best of Moscow by high speed train" from St. Petersburg could please share their impressions of this shore excursion. From the description this sounds like a very long day.

Wondering how the 4 hour train trip was in terms of accommodations, etc. Also what time did you leave the ship and what time at night did you return? Were both legs of the trip on the high speed rail (I read that slower trains also travel the same tracks)?

My wife and I are considering this excursion. We thought that if we are making all the effort to go to Russia then how could we pass up going to Moscow, walking in Red Square, seeing St. Basil, etc.

Link to comment

Share on other sites.

If you are considering this on the 2015 June Baltic cruise on Voyager; my suggestion is don't. There is so much to do in St. Petersburg and although a train is one of my favorite ways to travel the time would be far better spent in St. P.

Thanks for the advice. Yes, this would be on the Voyager during the 2015 season but not yet sure exactly which cruise.

We did the Moscow excursion "on a different luxury line", but from your brief description it sounds very much like the same trip, so I will operate on that assumption. It is a VERY long day! We left the ship at 5:30 AM and returned at 12:30 AM. The highspeed train trip is comfortable, and while they call it "Business Class" it does not compare well to the equivalent class on say Rail Europe. When we did it in 2011, we did have highspeed both ways, and the trip back seemed much longer as the adrenaline and excitement had worn off!:D

Moscow itself is not that terribly different from any other big city in the world, but this Cold War kid never thought he would ever stand in Red Square, never mind walk the grounds of The Kremlin, or tour The Kremlin Palace, or see (but not visit) Lenin's Tomb, or visit The Armoury. But he did, and he loved every minute of it! Yes, it is a long day, and you barely scratch a scratch on the surface, but it is worth it. There is a tremendous amount to see in St. Petersburg, but every Baltic cruise goes to St. Petersburg, so you can go back if you choose to. Not every cruiseline offers you the chance to see Moscow.

I have not personally done this tour, but our last time in St Petersburg, the private guide that we hired for a day was leading the regent tour to Moscow on the high speed train the next day. He said it was way better than the previous alternative, which was flying to Moscow and back. He said that you actually got to Moscow faster because you didn't have to deal with airline checkin etc. it did seem like a very long day to me, and there is so much to see and do in st. Petersburg that I didn't consider doing it.

countflorida

We toured to Moscow from St. Petersburg via the hi-speed SAPSAN train last September, from a Baltic cruise on the Oceania Marina. You need to have a two-night, three day port call in St. Petersburg to take this tour because the tour typically leaves the ship around 5:00 - 5:30 AM and doesn't return until after midnight the next day. We didn't take the ship's tour; we made private arrangements with TravelAllRussia for three days of touring, the first and third days in St. Petersburg and the second day the tour to Moscow by train. Our cost for the private tour for three days was about the same as what the ship charged for the excursion to Moscow alone. There are a number of private tour agencies that operate in St. Petersburg and offer the Moscow train tours; we would strongly recommend them over the ship's tours.

All three days had private guides with car and driver. The second day, the driver picked us up at the ship and took us to the train, but we were alone on the train, and met in Moscow by the guide on the station platform. After our tour and dinner, we were brought back to the train and after the return train trip met by the driver and taken back to the ship. Because you are alone on the train you must have your own Russian visas.

If this is your first visit to St. Petersburg, I would agree there is much more to see there. We found Moscow somewhat a disappointment, particularly Red Square. The Kremlin and the cathedral in Red Square were also worth seeing. But the best thing we saw was the Moscow subway! I worked for the Washington Metro system back in the 1980s as it grew from 40 to 80 miles and although I was in the computer area, I learned a lot about the challenges of running a subway system. We used the Moscow system to get across the city from where we had dinner to the train station, and I was amazed at the cleanliness', speed of operation, the short headways maintained, and the courtesy of everyone involved. A very impressive experience!

We had been to St. Petersburg before, and so had the time to take a day and go to Moscow. Also, I really like trains, and the SAPSAN is a German train set running on Russian rails. Seats are like first class domestic air, spacious but not too plush or comfortable, but with enough room. Not too much recline, and almost 8 hours on the train in two shots is a lot for an old man. They come through and sell drinks, candy, etc. but the sellers don't speak English and no one around us helped, so we had just poor coffee once coming, and brought stuff with us for the trip back. Not too much to see from the train either, particularly on the return when it is night the whole way.

If you decide to go, take a private tour and avoid the overly expensive ship's tour. I'm glad we did it, but wouldn't bother to repeat the tour; we've seen Moscow.

Thanks so much to all of you for the thorough and thought insight. Yhe information you have provided is most helpful.

countflorida: Your detailed post is very helpful. We are not quite ready for a Baltic cruise but should do so within a year. Time enough to do our pre travel research, bookings and visa gathering.:) Thank you!

Emperor Norton

Sure would appreciate someone who has taken "Best of Moscow by high speed train" from St. Petersburg could please share their impressions of this shore excursion. From the description this sounds like a very long day.   Wondering how the 4 hour train trip was in terms of accommodations, etc. Also what time did you leave the ship and what time at night did you return? Were both legs of the trip on the high speed rail (I read that slower trains also travel the same tracks)?   My wife and I are considering this excursion. We thought that if we are making all the effort to go to Russia then how could we pass up going to Moscow, walking in Red Square, seeing St. Basil, etc.

I did this on Seabourn. IMO DONT. Take Aeroflop (er Aeroflot). The train has non folding seats where you are literally knee to knee with your fellow passenger (facing each other). Further they don't believe in air conditioning. It's also the worlds slowed bullet train. I think I would have found more enjoyment wandering around the St. Petersburg and Moscow airports.

Countflorida,

This is a little off topic,, however we had planned a river cruise in Russia but decided we would rather stay on land and have booked about two weeks with Travel-All-Russia using the private guide and driver. I'm curious as to how you found them as a tour company.

The guides they provided were fine. We had a different guide each of the days in St. Petersburg, but both were flexible, pleasant, knowledgeable and spoke English very well, as did the guide in Moscow, incidentally. She was a bit aloof, distant, not too friendly, but otherwise fine. In fact, she was the one who suggested taking the Metro, which unexpectedly became one of the highlights of the Moscow excursion. If I have a complaint with AllTravelRussia, it is with their plan and its execution (more later).

I had requested emphasis on World War II (in Russia, the Great Patriotic War) sites and info. In scheduling us, they weren't careful about dates and a couple of the sites we wanted to see were scheduled on the third day, after we'd been to Moscow. But both sites were closed that day of the week, and that info was readily available, right on web sites describing them. Also, the included meals (lunches in St. Pete, dinner in Moscow) were not what we asked for: light meals with some choices, so we could avoid things we didn't like and choose things we did like. My request was ignored; we were given full Russian meals with a fixed menu, no choice. On the first day, a fish dish was the entre, but I am allergic to fish. Fortunately, I had the e-mail I'd sent with me and showed it to the guide, and she was able to change my entre to chicken, which was very good actually. But we didn't want a 3-4 course lunches or dinner (in Moscow). We had the guide drop the lunch the third day, although we never got any credit or refund. But, particularly in contrast to the ship's tours, the prices were so reasonable we didn't worry too much about it.

The people who were on the ship's tour to Moscow saw us boarding the same train for which they were forced to queue up and wait on the way back, and asked us what we had done. I was candid and open so they were not happy when I explained what we had arranged and particularly what it had cost. Also, when we returned to the ship, we found they had laid on a late supper for those who had gone to Moscow, so up we went and had something. Well, it turns out the late supper was supposed to be just for those on the ship's tour, but we and others on 'independent' tours, there were a dozen or more of us, crashed the party, actually got there first, and they didn't realize it until the larger group arrived and there weren't enough tables/places set. By that time, the 'independents' had all gotten served and were eating; what could they do?

A couple from the larger group sat down with us and asked us about our tour, and they were the ones I told about our arrangement and its cost. They turned to others who’d been with them and announced the details, loudly enough so the whole room heard, which started a lot of bitching and complaining. I gathered they weren't very happy with the ship's tour to begin with, and this was the straw that broke the camel's back. We finished up and beat it out of there, but overheard later that one of the excursion staff came to check on something and ran into a real mess. I caught a cold on the trip, which forced me to bed the second day following in Tallinn, so by the time we reappeared we heard about the contretemps' but apparently no one recalled who started it, thankfully.

Because of what happened to us, I would probably not use AllTravelRussia if I were to go again, or if I did, I would be sure to get confirmation of every detail of the tour. They do have good reviews generally, and we were certainly helped by their visa department and liked the guides and drivers. Their weakness, I say now with full 20:20 hindsight, is that once the sales person who plans the tour, sells it to you and collects your money, he (or she) transfers the plan to their Russia office for implementation; there is no follow-up to make sure it gets done right. And that is where our problems arose; we paid for a custom tour but got a standard package with a few destinations switched, and no one checked them out, even to see when they were open the day we were scheduled to go. If you check every detail that’s important to you, it should be OK, but that’s a hell of a way to have to do business, in my opinion.

Thank you for the 20/20 hindsight observation on your Russian tour operator, and better priced than the ship's excursion cost.

Thanks very much for the feedback.

We had the same experience as you so far as price. We originally booked a Viking Cruise but, hearing some things about the river cruises that made us unhappy, looked into other options. T-A-R cost the same or less than a cruise and had us in hotels for 11 days. We opted for the private tour. They have three tour levels, based on hotels. We originally opted for the four star as it did not cost much more than the three star hotels. Finally we decided to throw it all in and upgraded to five star. In Moscow we will be at the newly opened Kempinsky which is two blocks from Red Square. In St. Petersburg it is the Grand Hotel Europe, one of the most vaunted luxury hotels in Russia. Location is important for us as the tours use up only part of the day so being in the center of everything for our independent touring is important. As with many other cities, the less you pay, the farther out of the center of town you are.

We have been working with our salesman in D.C. and he seems to get back to us with the changes we want. He recently returned from Russia so is up on everything. When I asked they said they paid the full TA commission if I wanted so I got my usual TA on board so he is watching our back and giving us that extra level of comfort. He also set up our air, which I know pays him little or nothing, and got us business class for much less than T-A-R wanted for economy, though it took working for a while with a consolidator. He's happy to get his 10 percent on this trip without having booked it. He also took care of the trip insurance. We've been doing a lot of research on the CC sister site Trip Advisor and will write a report there. We will, I guess, become a source of info for CC members after having spent 5 days in Moscow and 6 in SP.

• 4 months later...

scubacruiserx2

Anybody considering a day trip to Moscow from St. Petersburg on the Sapsan may want to look at our travelogue filled with pictures.

http://boards.cruisecritic.com/showthread.php?t=1927687

Very informative. Thanks dor sharing. Jeff

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in

• Welcome to Cruise Critic
• ANNOUNCEMENT: Set Sail Beyond the Ordinary with Oceania Cruises
• New Cruisers
• Cruise Lines “A – O”
• Cruise Lines “P – Z”
• River Cruising
• Cruise Critic News & Features
• Digital Photography & Cruise Technology
• Special Interest Cruising
• Cruise Discussion Topics
• UK Cruising
• Australia & New Zealand Cruisers
• Canadian Cruisers
• North American Homeports
• Ports of Call
• Cruise Conversations

Announcements

• New to Cruise Critic? Join our Community!

Write Your Own Amazing Review !

Click this gorgeous photo by member SUPERstar777 to share your review!

Features & News

LauraS · Started 12 hours ago

LauraS · Started 13 hours ago

LauraS · Started Thursday at 07:37 PM

LauraS · Started Thursday at 04:48 PM

LauraS · Started Thursday at 04:19 PM

• Existing user? Sign in OR Create an Account
• Find Your Roll Call
• Meet & Mingle
• Community Help Center
• All Activity
• Member Photo Albums
• Meet & Mingle Photos
• Favorite Cruise Memories
• Cruise Food Photos
• Cruise Ship Photos
• Ports of Call Photos
• Towel Animal Photos
• Amazing, Funny & Totally Awesome Cruise Photos
• Write a Review
• Live Cruise Reports
• Member Cruise Reviews
• Create New...

• Fairway Woods
• Golf Wedges
• Golf Technology
• Golf Gloves

Golf Apparel

• Golf Accessories
• We Tried It
• Head-to-Head
• True Golf Fit
• Our Toolkit

Srixon Q-Star Tour Golf Balls: What’s New?

• BY Connor Lindeman
• Jan 11th 2024
• Read all comments

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

Today, Srixon announces the fifth iteration of the popular Q-STAR TOUR golf ball. As per usual, the new Q-STAR TOUR will be available in Pure White and Tour Yellow as well as a host of Q-STAR TOUR DIVIDE colorways.

Let’s walk through the new Q-STAR TOUR lineup and what’s new for 2024.

Q-STAR TOUR: Five Things To Know

• Retail for $39.99
• Pure White and Tour Yellow ( Q-STAR TOUR ), Blue, Orange and Red ( Q-STAR TOUR DIVIDE )
• Urethane Cover
• SpinSkin Technology
• Three-piece construction

What’s New with Q?

You’re probably wondering why the 2024 Q-STAR TOUR golf ball seems largely the same as its predecessor. Of course, appearance is only the tip of the iceberg.

The real difference lies within.

I’ll spare you the Shrek quote I wanted to use about peeling an onion (or ogre) layer by layer and instead give it to you straight: The core of the Q-STAR TOUR lineup of golf balls has been reformulated.

How? The new FastLayer core has been firmed up a bit. The hope is that this change will promote faster ball speeds without compromising the soft feel that so many already love about the Q-STAR TOUR lineup.

“Players can work the ball tee to green with confidence,” said Brian Schielke, General Manager at Srixon. “And with an updated FastLayer Core, they can generate more ball speeds and distance without compromising feel.”

Combine the firmer core with a new, softer cover and you’ve got yourself a potential winner (or spinner). And, yes, Srixon’s SpinSkin coating is still around to ensure you’ve got maximum stopping power when you need it.

If recent years are any indication of performance, it’s worth noting that the Q-STAR TOUR has been on an upward trend in our Ball Lab . You’ll be the first to know how the 2024 Q-STAR TOUR fares when put through our gauges and gizmos galore.

The Great Divide

The same changes and tweaks made to the Q-STAR TOUR ball will be found on the new second generation of Q-STAR TOUR DIVIDE golf balls. You’ll remember when Srixon introduced the bold lineup a few years ago? (How could you forget?) The same 50/50 matte cover you know (and I love) is back for Round 2.

“The new Q-STAR TOUR DIVIDE helps golfers align more accurately on the putting greens and see the way the ball spins on pitch and chip shots for more visual feedback,” said Schielke. “It’s a great way to see the game.”

I must say the Orange/Yellow color combo looks much better on the Q-STAR TOUR DIVIDE than a traffic cone. Just saying.

In any case, the new reformulated FastLayer Core, softer cover and SpinSkin coating are all there, despite the colorful matte finish.

Available Now

The revamped Srixon Q-STAR TOUR and Q-STAR TOUR DIVIDE golf balls are available now at Srixon.

Apr 4, 2024

The perfect one-day itinerary for first-time masters patrons.

Shhh! PUMA Drops New Collection with Quiet Golf

Radmor Is Leading the Charge for a More Sustainable Golf Apparel Industry

• about the author
• latest posts

Connor Lindeman

Connor is MyGolfSpy's resident sneakerhead who believes that golf is more enjoyable with a fresh pair of kicks. When he isn't scrolling Twitter to find his next golf shoe purchase, you can find him at the piano or trying a new dessert place with his wife. #Lefty

Email Address

3 months ago

What is the compression of the 2024 Q star tour ball?

2 months ago

According to Srixon’s website it is 74. The prior model was 72. It will be interesting when tested by MGS as often it seems their numbers are a bit lower.

I really like Divide balls, but orange, blue, red just isn’t my jam. Prefer the Z Star Divide series. Frankly I think the white/yellow is easier to see and certainly easier on the eye

1 month ago

I felt the same way about the blue Divide…then I bought a sleeve Monday morning and played 27 holes with them. Actually playing with the Blue/Yellow, it grew on me. I thought the ball performed well, the blue actually made it easier to find at times (not a lot of blue in the woods) and the divide really does help with putting. I ordered a box that night and I’m going to give them a few more rounds.

Why are the divide in a matte finish unlike the normal Q Star tours?

Didn’t you guys say that’s a bad thing performance wise?

While I actually do like the divide colors, I was never a fan of the “spin skin” matte look and feel. The new Tour is designed for those with a slower swing speed (75-95mph) and I have to say, the all yellow finish is more appealing to me. Hopefully we can get a chance to test these out.

Leave A Reply

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail

Sign me up for the newsletter

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed .

Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

Home Page › Our tours › Moscow tours

• Our Service
• Our Photo Album

Moscow tours

We take part in bbc series of documentaries "world's busiest cities"(moscow).

Buy Tickets to the Bolshoi Theatre

Other special offers...

Interpreting and assistance at exhibitions and conferences, our garage ( vehicles+drivers), where to stay in moscow, what and where to eat in moscow, visa support, learning and discovery, our partners (trips to st.petersburg).

Copyright 2015 - Moscow Navigator

• Preplanned tours
• Daytrips out of Moscow
• Themed tours
• Customized tours
• St. Petersburg

Monino aviation museum tour

The Central Airforce Museum in Monino, some 32km from Moscow is extremely popular among aircraft enthusiasts. Pre-soviet and Soviet planes, helicopters and jets are on display here. The tour price includes cost of transportation by car. You will be picked up from your hotel and taken back by car.

What to see in the museum:

ANT-2 - the first all-metal Russian aircraft

On ANT-25 several record-breaking flights were performed. Among them - a 60 hour non-stop flight from Moscow to Portland, Oregon in the United States.

The first ever supersonic passenger aircraft Tu-144

A unique, all-titanium reconnaissance jet-bomber the Sukhoi T-4

Tour duration : 5-6 hours Tour cost: 250 USD for 1-2 people, 280 USD for 3-5 people. Car/minivan service is included

This tour does not have a discounted price in winter

Additional expenses: museum entrance fee (150 RUB per person) 

Send us a request!